The Power of Language: Gender, Status, and Agency in Performance Evaluations
- 828 Downloads
In the workplace, women often encounter gender stereotypes and biases that reinforce the existing gender hierarchy, may hinder women’s career aspirations and retention, and may limit their ability to be promoted—especially in traditionally male organizations. Long-standing and widely held (although often unconscious) beliefs about gender can reinforce women’s perceived lower status position relative to men’s. Because men are described/prescribed as agentic (often masculine) and women as communal (often feminine), women leaders are often evaluated as being status-incongruent. We explore the gendered assignment of leader attributes with particular attention to associations of agentic competence (deficiency for women) and agentic dominance (penalty for women). We examined peer evaluations of 4344 U.S. Naval Academy students who are assigned attributes from a predefined list. Although men and women received similar numbers of descriptive (positive) attributes, women received more proscriptive (negative) attributes than did men and these individual attributes were predominantly feminine. These findings offer evidence that women leaders’ status incongruity may be associated with perceived competence (agentic deficiency). A contribution of our analysis is theory testing using data from a real-life performance evaluation system. Additionally, our research contributes to our knowledge of gendered language and status characteristics in performance evaluations and can assist researchers and practitioners with developing interventions. Understanding the association of gender status beliefs with evaluation processes may facilitate changing workplace culture to be more gender-inclusive through less biased and stereotypical performance evaluations.
KeywordsGender and leadership Agentic and communal traits Stereotype content Performance appraisal Military
The authors would like to thank Alice Eagly, Carolyn Judge, Emerald Archer and the Sex Roles reviewers for their thoughtful comments. We would also like to thank Cathy McGuire for her invaluable research assistance with data management. The views of the authors are their own and do not purport to reflect the position of the U.S. Naval War College, the U.S. Naval Academy, the Department of the Navy, or the U.S. Department of Defense.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose for this research.
The research is based on a secondary data source from the U.S. Naval Academy and was approved by the U.S. Naval Academy Institutional Review Board (IRB).
Informed consent was not applicable as the data was collected from a secondary data source.
- Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2014). Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A dual perspective model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 195–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800284-1.00004-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Atkinson, R. E. (2015). Military professionals as guardians of the republic: The hidden promise of Huntington’s The Soldier and the State. Retrieved from https://works.bepress.com/robert_atkinson/24/. Accessed 12 Mar 2018.
- Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
- Barrett, F. J. (1996). The organizational construction of hegemonic masculinity: The case of the US navy. Gender, Work and Organization, 3(3), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.1996.tb00054.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Zelditch Jr., M. (1977). Status characteristics and interaction: An expectation states approach. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 479–508. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.06.080180.002403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J. Y., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A. T. (2016). Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? Debiasing word embeddings. Paper presented at the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Barcelona.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Correll, S., & Simard, C. (2016). Research: Vague feedback is holding women back. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/04/research-vague-feedback-is-holding-women-back. Accessed 7 Jun 2016.
- Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women's leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2066.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ebbert, J., & Hall, M.-B. (1993). Crossed currents: Navy women from WWI to Tailhook. Washington, DC: Brassey's.Google Scholar
- Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-35220.127.116.118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Francke, L. B. (1997). Ground zero: The gender wars in the military. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581.
- Morgan, M. J. (2004). Women in a man's world: Gender differences in leadership at the military academy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(12), 2482–2502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb01988.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moskos, C. (1993). From citizens' army to social laboratory. The Wilson Quarterly (1976-), 17(1), 83–94. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40258439. Accessed 12 Mar 2018.
- Parker, K., Horowitz, J. M., & Rohal, M. (2015). Women and leadership: Public says women are equally qualified, but barriers persist. Washington, DC. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2015/01/2015-01-14_women-and-leadership.pdf. Accessed 22 Mar 2018.
- Pellerin, C. (2015). Carter opens all military occupations, positions to women. https://www.defense.gov/News/Article/Article/632536/carter-opens-all-military-occupations-positions-to-women/. Accessed 1 Mar 2016.
- Rosen, S. (1992). The military as an internal labor market: Some allocation, productivity, and incentive problems. Social Science Quarterly, 73(2), 227–237.Google Scholar
- Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 1004–1010. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1684.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Segal, M. W., Smith, D. G., Segal, D. R., & Canuso, A. A. (2016). The role of leadership and peer behaviors in the performance and well-being of women in combat: Historical perspectives, unit integration, and family issues. Military Medicine, 181(1S), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Soares, R., Bartkiewicz, M. J., Mulligan-Ferry, L., Fendler, E., & Kun, E. W. C. (2013). Catalyst census: Fortune 500 women executive officers and top earners. http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/2013-catalyst-census-fortune-500-women-executive-officers-and-top-earners. Accessed 24 Mar 2018.
- Soyars, M. (2017). Firms' productivity rises as women become executives. Monthly Labor Review, 140, 1–2. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/month140&div=6&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals. Accessed 9 Jun 2017.
- U.S. Department of Defense. (2016). Population representation in the military services: Fiscal year 2015. Washington, DC: Department of Defense Printing.Google Scholar
- United States Naval Academy. (2016). Midshipmen aptitude for commissioning system. Annapolis, MD. https://www.usna.edu/Commandant/Directives/Instructions/1000-1999/COMDTMIDNINST-1600.2HMIDSHIPMEN-APTITUDE-FOR-COMMISSION-SYSTEM.pdf. Accessed 28 Jun 2017.
- Yee, L., Krivkovich, A., Kutcher, E., Epstein, B., Thomas, R., Finch, A., … Konar, E. (2016). Women in the workplace: 2016. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/women-in-the-workplace-2016. Accessed 24 Mar 2018.