Advertisement

Sex Roles

pp 1–18 | Cite as

Influence of Marriage on Women’s Participation in Medicine: The Case of Doctor Brides of Pakistan

  • Ayesha Masood
Original Article

Abstract

Despite the difficulties women in Pakistan face in their access to education, their numbers have been increasing consistently in medical colleges. However, most of the women medical graduates do not go on to practice medicine after graduation. One of the reasons suggested by Pakistani media and society for this increase in the number of women medical graduates is the desirability of women doctors in Pakistan’s marriage market. Based on an ethnographic study of Pakistani women doctors, I examine why women doctors are considered desirable as spouses and how this influences women’s access to medical education. I found that women doctors are valued as marital partners because of the status granted to them by their academic credentials, chaste educational experience, and potential to contribute to family income. Because of the value of medical education in marriage, parents are more willing to invest in their daughters’ education, facilitating women’s access to medical education. I also found that, as a way of bargaining with the patriarchy, women doctors accept the social norms of arranged marriage because it allows them access to professional education, economic opportunities, and a better bargaining position in the marriage market. Overall, I found that, unless underlying patriarchal norms are addressed, potentially empowering projects like women’s education will be co-opted by the existing structures of domination. I also discuss potential implications for changing marriage patterns and increasing representation of women in Pakistan’s medical workforce.

Keywords

Women in science Technology Engineering and mathematics Marriage and family measures Muslim women Gender gap 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research for the present paper was supported by grants from Wenner-Gren Foundation, Arizona State University and American Institute of Pakistan Studies.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Standards

The research for this paper involves human subjects. It complies with the ethical standards of research and was approved by Institutional review board at Arizona State University (ID: STUDY00003018).

Informed Consent

All participants were informed of potential risks involved with participating in the study and informed consent was obtained.

Conflict of Interest

The author has no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Abid, A. M. (2014, October 22). Female doctors becoming ‘Trophy’ wives: Is quota the right move? Dawn. Retrieved from http://www.dawn.com/news/1139639.
  2. Abu-Lughod, L. (1990). The romance of resistance: Tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women. American Ethnologist, 17(1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahearn, L. M. (1994). Consent and coercion: Changing marriage practices among Magars in Nepal (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  4. Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Invitations to love: Literacy, love letters, and social change in Nepal. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen, I. (2005). Women doctors and their careers: What now? British Medical Journal, 331(7516), 569–572.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7516.569.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Arif, S. (2011). Broken wings: Issues faced by female doctors in Pakistan regarding career development. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 1(3), 69-91. Retrieved from http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:1:y:2011:i:3:p:69-91.
  7. Arnold, D. (2000). The new Cambridge history of India: Science, technology and medicine in colonial India (Vol. 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Batliwala, S. (1994). The meaning of women’s empowerment: New concepts from action. In G. Sen, A. Germain, & L. C. Chen (Eds.), Population policies reconsidered: Health, empowerment, and rights (pp. 127–138). Boston: Harvard University, Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies.Google Scholar
  9. Bernard, H. R. (2006). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Bhopal, K. (1999). South asian women and arranged marriages in east London. In R. Barot, H. Bradley, & S. Fenton (Eds.), Ethnicity, gender and social change (pp. 117–134). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bhopal, K. (2000). South Asian women in east London: The impact of education. European Journal of Women's Studies, 7(1), 35–52.  https://doi.org/10.1177/135050680000700103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bhopal, K. (2011). ‘Education makes you have more say in the way your life goes’: Indian women and arranged marriages in the United Kingdom. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(3), 431–447.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2011.559342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bloch, F., Rao, V., & Desai, S. (2004). Wedding celebrations as conspicuous consumption signaling social status in rural India. Journal of Human Resources, 39(3), 675–695.  https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.XXXIX.3.675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Blossfeld, H. P. (2009). Educational assortative marriage in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 513–530.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Blossfeld, H. P., & Huinink, J. (1991). Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women's schooling and career affect the process of family formation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(1), 143–168.  https://doi.org/10.1086/229743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Blossfeld, H.-P., & Timm, A. (Eds.). (2003). Who marries whom? Educational systems as marriage markets in modern societies. European Studies of Population (Vol. 12). Boston: Kluwar Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Bourdieu, P. (2011). The forms of capital. In S. Imre & T. Kaposy (Eds.), Cultural theory: An anthology (pp. 81–93). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell (Original work published 1986).Google Scholar
  20. Buddeberg-Fischer, B., Klaghofer, R., Abel, T., & Buddeberg, C. (2006). Swiss residents' speciality choices–impact of gender, personality traits, career motivation and life goals. BMC Health Services Research, 6(1), 137.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-137.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Caldwell, J. C., Reddy, P. H., & Caldwell, P. (1983). The causes of marriage change in South India. Population Studies, 37(3), 343–361.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.1983.10408866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carter, A. T. (1973). A comparative analysis of systems of kinship and marriage in South Asia. Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 1973, 29-54.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3031719.
  23. Channel News Asia (2013, September 29). Pakistan: ‘Doctor Brides’ in huge demand [YouTube video]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbIvMUkbkgg.
  24. Charania, M. (2014). Feminism, sexuality and the rhetoric of westernization in Pakistan: Precarious citizenship. In L. Fernandes (Ed.), Handbook of gender in South Asia (pp. 318–332). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Chiappori, P., Iyigun, M., & Weiss, Y. (2006). Investment in schooling and the marriage market. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 2454. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-20080702262.
  26. Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1051–1057.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610377342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. DiMaggio, P., & Mohr, J. (1985). Cultural capital, educational attainment, and marital selection. American Journal of Sociology, 90(6), 1231–1261.  https://doi.org/10.1086/228209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. DiPrete, T. A., & Buchmann, C. (2006). Gender-specific trends in the value of education and the emerging gender gap in college completion. Demography, 43(1), 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2006.0003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Donnan, H. (1985). The rules and rhetoric of marriage negotiations among the Dhund Abbasi of northeast Pakistan. Ethnology, 24(3), 183–196.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3773609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Donner, H. (2005). “Children are capital, grandchildren are interest”: Changing educational strategies and parenting in Calcutta’s middle-class families. In J. Assayag & C. J. Fuller (Eds.), Globalizing India: Perspectives from below (pp. 119–139). London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  31. Dorsey, E. R., Jarjoura, D., & Rutecki, G. W. (2005). The influence of controllable lifestyle and sex on the specialty choices of graduating US medical students, 1996–2003. Academic Medicine, 80(9), 791–796.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Drury, D. (1993). The iron school master. Education, employment and the family in India. New Delhi: Hindustan Book Company.Google Scholar
  33. Dube, L. (1997). Women and kinship: Comparative perspectives on gender in south and south-east Asia. Tokyo: UNU Press.Google Scholar
  34. Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(4), 585–609.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01049.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., & Harold, R. D. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents’ socialization of gender differences. Journal of Social Issues, 46(2), 183–201.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb01929.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Elias, N. T., & Malik, A. A. (2009). Development of Naheed Anila Index for Mate Assessment (NAIMA). Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 8(1), 52–63.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15332690802626718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., Neuschatz, M., & Uzzi, B. (1992). Athena unbound: Barriers to women in academic science and engineering. Science and Public Policy, 19(3), 157–179.  https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/19.3.157.Google Scholar
  38. Fischer, M. D. (1991). Marriage and power: Tradition and transition in an urban Punjabi community. In H. Donnan & P. Werbner (Eds.), Economy and culture in Pakistan (pp. 97–123). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Forbes, G. H. (1994). Medical careers and health care for Indian women: Patterns of control. Women's History Review, 3(4), 515–530.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09612029400200067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Forbes, G. H. (1996). New Cambridge history of India: Women in modern India (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Forbes, G. H. (2005). Women in colonial India: Essays on politics, medicine, and historiography. India: Orient Blackswan.Google Scholar
  42. Fricke, T. E., Syed, S. H., & Smith, P. C. (1986). Rural Punjabi social organization and marriage timing strategies in Pakistan. Demography, 23(4), 489–508.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2061347.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Furstenberg, F. F. (2005). Banking on families: How families generate and distribute social capital. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4), 809–821.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00177.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ghimire, D. J., Axinn, W. G., Yabiku, S. T., & Thornton, A. (2006). Social change, premarital nonfamily experience, and spouse choice in an arranged marriage society. American Journal of Sociology, 111(4), 1181–1218.  https://doi.org/10.1086/498468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Goldstein, J. R., & Kenney, C. T. (2001). Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for US women. American Sociological Review, 66(4), 506-519. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3088920.
  46. Grown, C., Gupta, G. R., & Khan, Z. (2003). Promises to keep: Achieving gender equality and the empowerment of women. Background paper for the UN millennium project task force on education and gender equality. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women.Google Scholar
  47. Grünenfelder, J. (2013). Discourses of gender identities and gender roles in Pakistan: Women and non-domestic work in political representations. Women's Studies International Forum, 40, 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Henwood, F. (2010). WISE choices? Understanding occupational decision making in a climate of equal opportunity for women in science and technology. Gender and Education, 8(2), 199–214.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540259650038860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hodge, R. W., Siegel, P. M., & Rossi, P. H. (1964). Occupational prestige in the United States, 1925-63. American Journal of Sociology, 70(3), 286–302.  https://doi.org/10.1086/223840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Humayun, M. (2014, September 30). PMDC’s 50:50 quota – playing with our lives and our future [Blog post]. The Express Tribunes Blogs. Retrieved from http://blogs.tribune.com.pk/story/24256/pmdcs-5050-quota-playing-with-our-lives-and-our-future/.
  51. Jafarey, S., Mainali, R. M., & Montes-Rojas, G. (2014). The anticipation effect of marriage on female education: Theory and evidence from Nepal (Report No. 15/12). London: Department of Economics, City University London. Retrieved from http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/13875/.
  52. Jayaweera, S. (1997). Women, education and empowerment in Asia. Gender and Education, 9(4), 411–424.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540259721169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jeffery, R., & Basu, A. M. (1996). Girls' schooling, women's autonomy and fertility change in South Asia. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Junaidi, I. (2014, October 22). 50pc of female doctors never work after graduation. Dawn. Retrieved from http://www.dawn.com/news/1139557.
  55. Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender and Society, 2(3), 274–290.  https://doi.org/10.1177/089124388002003004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Khan, R. E. A., & Ali, K. (2005). Bargaining over sons and daughters’ schooling: Probit analysis of household behaviour in Pakistan. Working Paper, 01-05, Department of Economics, Bahawalpur, Islamia University. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/9315048.pdf.
  57. Khan, M. M., & Reza, H. (1998). Gender differences in nonfatal suicidal behavior in Pakistan: Significance of sociocultural factors. Suicide and Life-threatening Behavior, 28(1), 62–68.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1943-278X.1998.tb00626.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Khurshid, A. (2012). A transnational community of Pakistani Muslim women: Narratives of rights, honor, and wisdom in a women's education project. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 43(3), 235–252.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1492.2012.01176.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Khurshid, A. (2015). Islamic traditions of modernity gender, class, and Islam in a transnational Women’s education project. Gender and Society, 29(1), 98–121.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243214549193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lahiri, S., & Self, S. (2007). Gender bias in education: The role of inter-household externality, dowry and other social institutions. Review of Development Economics, 11(4), 591–606.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2007.00387.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Levy, R. I., & Hollan, D. W. (2015). Person-centered interviewing and observation. In H. Russell Bernard (Ed.), Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology (pp. 333–364). Lanham: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  62. Lukose, R. A. (2009). Liberalization’s children: Gender, youth, and consumer citizenship in globalizing India. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mare, R. D. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review, 56(1) 15-32. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095670.
  64. Marrow, J. (2013). Feminine power or feminine weakness? North Indian girls’ struggles with aspirations, agency, and psychosomatic illness. American Ethnologist, 40(2), 347–361.  https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Memon, G. R. (2007). Education in Pakistan: The key issues, problems and the new challenges. Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 3(1), 47–55.Google Scholar
  66. Mines, M. (1988). Conceptualizing the person: Hierarchical society and individual autonomy in India. American Anthropologist, 90(3), 568–579.  https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1988.90.3.02a00030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mines, M. (1994). Public faces, private lives: Community and individuality in South India. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nair, J. (1990). Uncovering the Zenana: Visions of Indian womanhood in Englishwomen's writings, 1813-1940. Journal of Women’s History, 2(1), 8–34.  https://doi.org/10.1353/jowh.2010.0263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pakistan Council of Research and Technology (2013). Pakistani women in science and technology. Pakistan Council of Research and Technology. Retrieved from http://www.pcst.org.pk/wst/.
  70. Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (PM&DC) (2017). Statistics. Pakistan Medical and Dental Council. Retrieved from http://www.pmdc.org.pk/Statistics/tabid/103/Default.aspx.
  71. Pande, R. (2015). ‘I arranged my own marriage’: Arranged marriages and post-colonial feminism. Gender, Place & Culture, 22(2), 172–187.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2013.855630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods: Integrating theory and practice. London: Sage Publishers.Google Scholar
  73. Psacharopoulos, G. (1994). Returns to investment in education: A global update. World Development, 22(9), 1325–1343.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90007-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Qian, Z. (1998). Changes in assortative mating: The impact of age and education, 1970–1890. Demography, 35(3), 279-292. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.2307%2F3004036?LI=true.
  75. Rafiq, H. M. W., Fatima, T., Sohail, M. M., Saleem, M., & Khan, M. A. (2013). Parental involvement and academic achievement: A study on secondary school students of Lahore, Pakistan. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(8), 209–223.Google Scholar
  76. Rose, E. (2004). Education and hypergamy in marriage markets. Seattle: University of Washington Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  77. Samari, G. (2017). Women’s agency and fertility: Recent evidence from Egypt. Population Research and Policy Review, 36(4), 561–582.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-017-9427-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Sathar, Z. A., & Mason, K. O. (1993). How female education affects reproductive behavior in urban Pakistan. Asian and Pacific Population Forum, 6(4), 93–103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Seymour, E. (1999). The role of socialization in shaping the career-related choices of undergraduate women in science, mathematics, and engineering majors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 869(1), 118–126.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08366.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Shah, A. M. (2012). The structure of Indian society: Then and now. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. Shaw, A. (2006). The arranged transnational cousin marriages of British Pakistanis: Critique, dissent and cultural continuity. Contemporary South Asia, 15(2), 209–220.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09584930600955317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Shaw, A., & Charsley, K. (2006). Rishtas: Adding emotion to strategy in understanding British Pakistani transnational marriages. Global Networks, 6(4), 405–421.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00152.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Shortell, S. M. (1974). Occupational prestige differences within the medical and allied health professions. Social Science & Medicine, 8(1), 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-7856(74)90003-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Smith, J. L., Kausar, R., & Holt-Lunstad, J. (2007). Stigma consciousness in the classroom: A comparison of Pakistani women’s motivation and well-being in science and non-science fields of study. Sex Roles, 57(1-2), 3–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9217-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stone, P. (2007). Opting out?: Why women really quit careers and head home. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  86. Sweeney, M. M. (2002). Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review, 67(1), 132-147. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3088937.
  87. Valian, V. (2005). Beyond gender schemas: Improving the advancement of women in academia. Hypatia, 20, 198–213.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2005.tb00495.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wardlow, H. (2006). Wayward women: Sexuality and agency in a New Guinea society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  89. Wiquar, A. (2014, November 8). The PMDC quota rule: A boon or a bane for Pakistan’s healthcare future? [Blog post]. Journal of Pioneering Medical Sciences Blog. Retrieved from http://blogs.jpmsonline.com/2014/11/08/the-pmdc-quota-rule-a-boon-or-a-bane-for-pakistans-healthcare-future/.
  90. Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2003). Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Zakaria, R. (2013, July 26). The doctor brides. Dawn. Retrieved from http://www.dawn.com/news/1032070.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Suleman Dawood School of BusinessLahore University of Management SciencesLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations