Sexual Orientation and Leadership Suitability: How Being a Gay Man Affects Perceptions of Fit in Gender-Stereotyped Positions
The current set of studies examines perceptions of gay men’s fitness for leadership positions in the workplace. In two between-subjects experiments we examined the effect of a male employee’s sexuality on perceptions of his suitability for stereotypically feminine, masculine, and gender-neutral managerial positions, as well as potential mediators (perceptions of target agency and communion) and moderators (target out status) of these effects. In Study 1, 341 U.S. college student participants rated a gay male target as more communal and more suitable for feminine managerial positions than an otherwise identical heterosexual target, irrespective of his “out” status. Moreover, ratings of communion mediated the relationship between targets’ sexuality and suitability for feminine leadership. No differences between gay and heterosexual targets in targets’ agency or targets’ suitability for masculine or gender-neutral managerial positions were detected. Study 2 used a sample of 439 U.S. adults and an ambiguous target’s résumé to replicate and expand Study 1. This study provided participants with conflicting information on targets’ agency and communion, and it assessed the same dependent variables of targets’ agency, communion, and leadership suitability for various positions. Study 2 again found that ratings of communion significantly mediated the relationship between male targets’ sexuality and perceived suitability for feminine managerial roles. These findings extend previous research on perceptions of gay men in the workplace and have practical implications for being “out” at work.
KeywordsSexual orientation Leadership Discrimination Stereotypes Gay men
Compliance with Ethical Standards
There was no source of funding for the studies, and there are no conflicts of interest. All participants in the studies conducted by the authors were treated in compliance with the ethical standards of APA and they each provided their informed consent to participate. No part of this manuscript has been published in any other outlet as of yet.
- Abele, A. E., Uchronski, M., Suitner, C., & Wojciszke, B. (2008). Towards an operationalization of fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(7), 1202–1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Abele, A. E., Hauke, N., Peters, K., Louvet, E., Szymkow, A., & Duan, Y. (2016). Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: Agency with competence and assertiveness—Communion with warmth and morality. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1810. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Catalyst. (2017, August 18). Statistical overview of women in the workforce. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/statistical-overview-women-workforce.
- Devine, P. G., & Monteith, M. J. (1999). Automaticity and control in stereotyping. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 339–360). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Family Equality Council. (2017). Employment protection is a family issue!. Retrieved from https://www.familyequality.org/equal_family_blog/2013/11/07/1744/employment_protection_is_a_family_issue.
- Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1688.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freedom to Marry. (2015). Winning the freedom to marry nationwide: The inside story of a transformative campaign. Retrieved from http://www.freedomtomarry.org/pages/how-it-happened.
- Gallup. (2017). Gay and lesbian rights. Retrieved from http://news.gallup.com/poll/1651/gay-lesbian-rights.aspx.
- Heilman, M. E. (1995). Sex stereotypes and their effects in the workplace: What we know and what we don't know. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(6), 3–26.Google Scholar
- Heilman, M. E., & Parks-Stamm, E. J. (2007). Gender stereotypes in the workplace: Obstacles to women’s career progress. In S. J. Correll (Ed.), Social psychology of gender: Advances in group processes (Vol. 24, pp. 47–77). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Ltd., JAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6145(07)24003-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., & Martell, R. F. (1995). Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perceptions of managers? Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 10(6), 237–252.Google Scholar
- Human Rights Campaign. (2018). Corporate equality index 2018. Retrieved from https://assets2.hrc.org/files/assets/resources/CEI-2018-FullReport.pdf.
- Kimmel, M. (2008). Guyland: The perilous world where boys become men. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
- Kite, M. E., & Deaux, K. (1987). Gender belief systems: Homosexuality and the implicit inversion theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00776.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kite, M. E., & Whitley Jr., B. E. (2003). Do heterosexual women and men differ in their attitudes toward homosexuality? A conceptual and methodological analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Lammers, J., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S. (2009). Iron ladies, men of steel: The effects of gender stereotyping on the perception of male and female candidates are moderated by prototypicality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(2), 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Moss-Racusin, C., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(41), 16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Niedlich, C., Steffens, M. C., Krause, J., Settke, E., & Ebert, I. D. (2015). Ironic effects of sexual minority group membership: Are lesbians less susceptible to invoking negative female stereotypes than heterosexual women? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(8), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0412-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Northouse, P. G. (2016). Transformational leadership. In P. G. Northouse (Ed.), Leadership: Theory and practice (7th ed., pp. 161–194). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411–419.Google Scholar
- Pew. (2014). U.S. Hispanic and Asian populations growing, but for different reasons. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/06/26/u-s-hispanic-and-asian-populations-growing-but-for-different-reasons/.
- Rabelo, V. C., & Cortina, L. M. (2016). Intersectionality: Infusing IO psychology with feminist thought. In T. Roberts, N. Curtin, L. E. Duncan, & L. M. Cortina (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on building a better psychological science of gender (pp. 179–197). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ruggs, E. N., Hebl, M. R., Law, C., Cox, C. B., Roehling, M. V., Wiener, R. L., … Barron, L. (2013). Gone fishing: I–O psychologists' missed opportunities to understand marginalized employees' experiences with discrimination. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/iops.12007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez, D. T., Fetterolf, J. C., & Rudman, L. A. (2012). Eroticizing inequality in the united states: The consequences and determinants of traditional gender role adherence in intimate relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 49(2–3), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.653699.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Schyns, B., & Meindl, J. R. (2005). Implicit leadership theories: Essays and explorations. Leadership horizons. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Steffens, M. C., Niedlich, C., & Ehrke, F. (2016a). Discrimination at work on the basis of sexual orientation: Subjective experience, experimental evidence, and interventions. In T. Köllen (Ed.), Sexual orientation and transgender issues in organizations: Global perspectives on LGBT workforce diversity (pp. 367–388). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Steffens, M. C., Niedlich, C., Kachel, S. M., & Methner, N. (2016b). Impression formation of applicants differing in sexual orientation: An attempt to integrate theoretical models and a review of the empirical evidence. In F. Earley (Ed.), Sexual orientation: Perceptions, discrimination and acceptance (pp. 51–80). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
- Sweden. (2017). Working for a gay friendly Sweden. Retrieved from https://sweden.se/society/working-for-a-gay-and-equal-sweden/.
- Westgate, E. C., Riskind, R. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2015). Implicit preferences for straight people over lesbian women and gay men weakened from 2006 to 2013. Collabra Open Access Journal, 1(1), Art 1. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2U7DU.
- Wilder, D. A. (1981). Perceiving persons as a group: Categorization and intergroup relations. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 213–257). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Wilson, J. P., Remedios, J. D., & Rule, N. O. (2017). Interactive effects of obvious and ambiguous social categories on perceptions of leadership: When double-minority status may be beneficial. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(6), 888–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217702373.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar