Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 79, Issue 9–10, pp 505–518 | Cite as

Changing Versus Protecting the Status Quo: Why Men and Women Engage in Different Types of Action on Behalf of Women

  • Helena R. M. Radke
  • Matthew J. Hornsey
  • Fiona Kate Barlow
Original Article
  • 377 Downloads

Abstract

We investigate women’s and men’s willingness to engage in action on behalf of women, and we identify two distinct categories of behavior: action that aims to challenge gender inequality (feminist action) and action that aims to protect women from violence (protective action). Three online studies were conducted. For each study, a U.S. community sample was recruited. In Study 1 (n = 602), women reported greater intentions to engage in feminist action than men did. Men, however, were just as willing as women to participate in protective action. In Study 2 (n = 726), we replicated these gender differences and found that protective action was positively predicted by benevolent sexism among men. In Study 3 (N = 582), we investigated why women reported greater intentions to engage in feminist action compared to men. We found that women were more aware of gender inequality, which was associated with identification as a feminist, and through this, intentions to engage in feminist action. Awareness of gender inequality also predicted intentions to engage in protective action among women. Men, however, were less aware of gender inequality, which was associated with the belief that feminist action leads to women having more rights than men do and subsequently greater willingness to participate in protective action. Our results can assist social policymakers and activists to develop appropriate campaigns for gender equality if their goal is to challenge, rather than protect women from, the status quo.

Keywords

Sexism Gender Feminism Collective action Feminist consciousness Zero-sum 

Notes

Funding

The third author (Fiona Kate Barlow) is funded by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT150100147).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interests

There are no financial or non-financial conflict of interests for this project.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was received from human participants for this project.

Supplementary material

11199_2017_884_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

References

  1. Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111–125.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, J. C., & Swim, J. K. (2011). Seeing the unseen: Attention to daily encounters with sexism as way to reduce sexist beliefs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 352, 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, J. C., Glick, P., Ilic, M., & Bohner, G. (2011). Damned if she does, damned if she doesn’t: Consequences of accepting versus confronting patronizing help for the female target and male actor. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 761–773.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64, 170–180.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014564.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cole, E. R., & Stewart, A. J. (1996). Meanings of political participation among black and white women: Political identity and social responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 130–140.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.130.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drury, B. J., & Kaiser, C. R. (2014). Allies against sexism: The role of men in confronting sexism. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 637–652.  https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duncan, L. E. (1999). Motivation for collective action: Group consciousness as mediator of personality, life experiences, and women’s rights activism. Political Psychology, 20, 611–635.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duncan, L. E. (2012). The psychology of collective action. In K. Deaux & M. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 781–803). New York: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398991.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duncan, L. E., & Stewart, A. J. (2007). Personal political salience: The role of personality in collective identity and action. Political Psychology, 28, 143–164.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00560.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203781906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). New York: Psychology Press.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.70.3.491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.56.2.109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Good, J. J., & Rudman, L. A. (2010). When female applicants meet sexist interviewers: The costs of being a target of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 62, 481–493.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9685-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gough, D. (2012, December 7). Gym and tonic: Women fight back. The age. Retrieved from http://www.theage.com.au.
  18. Gurin, P. (1985). Women's gender consciousness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 143–163.  https://doi.org/10.1086/268911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gurin, P., Miller, A. H., & Gurin, G. (1980). Stratum identification and consciousness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 30–47.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3033746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  21. Jackson, L. A., Fleury, R. E., & Lewandowski, D. A. (1996). Feminism: Definitions, support, and correlates of support among female and male college students. Sex Roles, 34, 687–693.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01551502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kehn, A., & Ruthig, J. C. (2013). Perceptions of gender discrimination across six decades: The moderating roles of gender and age. Sex Roles, 69, 289–296.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0303-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lallo, M. (2012, October 20). Thousands march to reclaim the night. The Age. Retrieved from http://www.theage.com.au.
  24. Mahalik, J. R., Locke, B. D., Ludlow, L. H., Diemer, M. A., Scott, R. P., Gottfried, M., … Freitas, G. (2003). Development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 4, 3–25.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nadler, A. (2002). Inter-group helping relations as power relations: Maintaining or challenging social dominance between groups through helping. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 487–502.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Jans, L. (2013). A single-item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity, and utility. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 597–617.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Radke, H. R. M., Hornsey, M. J., & Barlow, F. K. (2016). Barriers to women engaging in collective action to overcome sexism. American Psychologist, 71, 863–874.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ruthig, J. C., Kehn, A., Gamblin, B. W., Vanderzanden, K., & Jones, K. (2017). When women’s gains equal men’s losses: Predicting a zero-sum perspective of gender status. Sex Roles, 76, 17–26.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0651-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shnabel, N., Bar-Anan, Y., Kende, A., Bareket, O., & Lazar, Y. (2016). Help to perpetrate traditional gender roles: Benevolent sexism increases engagement in dependency-oriented cross-grender helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 55–75.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000037.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994–1003.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zucker, A. N. (2004). Disavowing social identities: What it means when women say, “I’m not a feminist, but...”. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 423–435.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00159.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zucker, A. N., & Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2010). Minding the gap between feminist identity and attitudes: The behavioral and ideological divide between feminists and non-labelers. Journal of Personality, 78, 1895–1924.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00673.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helena R. M. Radke
    • 1
  • Matthew J. Hornsey
    • 2
  • Fiona Kate Barlow
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for PsychologyUniversity of OsnabrückOsnabrückGermany
  2. 2.School of PsychologyUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations