Sex Roles

, Volume 78, Issue 11–12, pp 715–730 | Cite as

What Are Men Doing while Women Perform Extra Unpaid Labor? Leisure and Specialization at the Transitions to Parenthood

  • Claire M. Kamp DushEmail author
  • Jill E. Yavorsky
  • Sarah J. Schoppe-Sullivan
Original Article


Marriage has significantly changed since Becker proposed his specialization model yet some scholars maintain that specialization characterizes modern couples. Specialization occurs when one partner, traditionally the man, concentrates on market work while the other partner, traditionally the woman, focuses on nonmarket work such as housework or childcare. Using innovative time diary data from primarily highly-educated, White, dual-earner U.S. couples, we examine how couples manage their time in market and household work and leisure across a momentous, gendered life course turning point—the transition to parenthood. We find little evidence of specialization, but stronger evidence of nonspecialization where both partners concurrently engaged in market work or leisure. Yet gender still mattered. Men enjoyed more leisure time, particularly on nonworkdays, whereas their partners performed more nonmarket work. Our study is the first known to uncover exactly what men were doing while women performed additional minutes of housework and childcare. On nonworkdays, fathers engaged in leisure 47% and 35% of the time during which mothers performed childcare and routine housework, respectively. Mothers engaged in leisure only about 16% to 19% of the time that fathers performed childcare and routine housework. In sum, although our study challenges economic theories of specialization by suggesting that nonspecialization is the norm for new parents’ time among highly-educated, dual-earner couples, persistent gender inequalities continue to characterize family work and leisure time.


Specialization Division of labor Transition to parenthood Gender gap Gender equality Housework Leisure 



The New Parents Project was funded by the National Science Foundation (CAREER 0746548, Schoppe-Sullivan), the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD; 1K01HD056238, Kamp Dush), with support from The Ohio State University’s Initiative in Population Research (NICHD; R24 HD058484, 1 R21 HD047943-01) and Department of Human Development and Family Science. The contents of this paper are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent official views of NICHD, NSF, or The Ohio State University. We thank the families and research assistants who made the New Parents Project possible.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The authors of this manuscript, Claire M. Kamp Dush, Jill E. Yavorsky, and Sarah J. Schoppe-Sullivan, assert that principles of ethical and professional conduct have been followed.

This study was funded by the National Science Foundation (CAREER 0746548, Schoppe-Sullivan), the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD; 1K01HD056238, Kamp Dush), with support from The Ohio State University’s Initiative in Population Research (NICHD; R24 HD058484, 1 R21 HD047943–01) and the Department of Human Development and Family Science.

The contents of this paper are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent official views of NICHD, NSF, or The Ohio State University.

There are no financial, or non-financial, conflicts of interest associated with this study.

This study was approved by The Ohio State University Institutional Review Board (Study ID: 2007B0228). Informed consent was obtained from the human subjects involved with this research.


  1. Allison, P. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models (Vol. 160). Thousand Okas: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alon, S., & Haberfeld, Y. (2007). Labor force attachment and the evolving wage gap between white, black, and Hispanic young women. Work and Occupations, 34(4), 369–398. Scholar
  3. Anxo, D., Mencarini, L., Pailhé, A., Solaz, A., Tanturri, M. L., & Flood, L. (2011). Gender differences in time use over the life course in France, Italy, Sweden, and the U.S. Feminist Economics, 17(3), 159–195. Scholar
  4. Armstrong, K., & Edwards, H. (2003). The effects of exercise and social support on mothers reporting depressive symptoms: A pilot randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 12(2), 130–138. Scholar
  5. Baker, M. J., & Jacobsen, J. P. (2007). Marriage, specialization, and the gender division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(4), 763–793. Scholar
  6. Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Berk, S. F. (1985). The gender factory: The apportionment of work in American households. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bianchi, S. M. (2000). Maternal employment and time with children: Dramatic change or surprising continuity? Demography, 37(4), 401–414. Scholar
  9. Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79(1), 191–228. Scholar
  10. Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. A. (2006). Changing rhythms of American family life. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Bianchi, S. M., Sayer, L. C., Milkie, M. A., & Robinson, J. P. (2012). Housework: Who did, does or will do it, and how much does it matter? Social Forces, 91(1), 55–63. Scholar
  12. Bittman, M., & Wajcman, J. (2000). The rush hour: The character of leisure time and gender equity. Social Forces, 79(1), 165–189. Scholar
  13. Bittman, M., England, P., Sayer, L., Folbre, N., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 186–214. Scholar
  14. Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2013). Female labor supply: Why is the United States falling behind? The American Economic Review, 103(3), 251–256. Scholar
  15. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2007). American Time Use Survey Activity Lexicon. Retrieved from
  16. Claffey, S. T., & Mickelson, K. D. (2009). Division of household labor and distress: The role of perceived fairness for employed mothers. Sex Roles, 60(11), 819–831. Scholar
  17. Clawson, D., & Gerstel, N. (2014). Unequal time: Gender, class, and family in employment schedules. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. Scholar
  19. Connelly, R., & Kimmel, J. (2009). Spousal influences on parents’ non-market time choices. Review of Economics of the Household, 7(4), 361–394. Scholar
  20. Corrigall, E. A., & Konrad, A. M. (2007). Gender role attitudes and careers: A longitudinal study. Sex Roles, 56(11–12), 847–855. Scholar
  21. Cunningham, M. (2008). Changing attitudes toward the male breadwinner, female homemaker family model: Influences of women's employment and education over the lifecourse. Social Forces, 87(1), 299–323. Scholar
  22. Diprete, T. A., & Buchmann, C. (2013). The rise of women: The growing gender gap in education and what it means for American schools. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. Donnelly, K., Twenge, J. M., Clark, M. A., Shaikh, S. K., Beiler-May, A., & Carter, N. T. (2015). Attitudes toward women’s work and family roles in the United States, 1976–2013. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 41–54. Scholar
  24. England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society, 24(2), 149–166. Scholar
  25. England, P., Budig, M., & Folbre, N. (2002). Wages of virtue: The relative pay of care work. Social Problems, 49, 455–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frisco, M. L., & Williams, K. (2003). Perceived housework equity, marital happiness, and divorce in dual-earner households. Journal of Family Issues, 24(1), 51–73. Scholar
  27. Gerson, K. (2010). The unfinished revolution: How a new generation is reshaping family, work, and gender in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gjerdingen, D. K., & Center, B. A. (2005). First-time parents' postpartum changes in employment, childcare, and housework responsibilities. Social Science Research, 34(1), 103–116. Scholar
  29. Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hudson, D. B., Elek, S. M., & Fleck, M. O. (2001). First-time mothers' and fathers' transition to parenthood: Infant care self-efficacy, parenting satisfaction, and infant sex. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 24(1), 31–43. Scholar
  31. Johnson, D. (2005). Two-wave panel analysis: Comparing statistical methods for studying the effects of transitions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4), 1061–1075. Scholar
  32. Kalleberg, A. L. (2013). Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  33. Katz, E. (1997). The intra-household economics of voice and exit. Feminist Economics, 3(3), 25–46. Scholar
  34. Kotila, L. E., & Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J. (2015). Integrating sociological and psychological perspectives on coparenting. Sociology Compass, 9(8), 731–744. Scholar
  35. Kotila, L. E., Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J., & Kamp Dush, C. M. (2013). Time in parenting activities in dual-earner families at the transition to parenthood. Family Relations, 62(5), 795–807. Scholar
  36. Larson-Meyer, D. E. (2002). Effect of postpartum exercise on mothers and their offspring: A review of the literature. Obesity Research, 10(8), 841–853. Scholar
  37. Lee, Y.-S., & Waite, L. J. (2005). Husbands’ and wives’ time spent on housework: A comparison of measures. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(2), 328–336. Scholar
  38. Lundberg, S. (2005). The division of labor by new parents: Does child gender matter? (ID 826445). Retrieved from
  39. Manning, W. D., Brown, S. L., & Payne, K. K. (2014). Two decades of stability and change in age at first union formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(2), 247–260. Scholar
  40. Mattingly, M. J., & Bianchi, S. M. (2003). Gender differences in the quantity and quality of free time: The U.S. experience. Social Forces, 81(3), 999–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maume, D. J. (2015). Can men make time for family? Paid work, care work, work-family reconciliation policies, and gender equality. Social Currents, 3, 43–63. Scholar
  42. McGill, B. S. (2014). Navigating new norms of involved fatherhood: Employment, fathering attitudes, and father involvement. Journal of Family Issues, 35(8), 1089–1106. Scholar
  43. McQuillan, J., Greil, A. L., Shreffler, K. M., & Tichenor, V. (2008). The importance of motherhood among women in the contemporary United States. Gender & Society, 22(4), 477–496. Scholar
  44. Milkie, M. A., Bianchi, S. M., Mattingly, M. J., & Robinson, J. P. (2002). Gendered division of childrearing: Ideals, realities, and the relationship to parental well-being. Sex Roles, 47(1–2), 21–38. Scholar
  45. Milkie, M. A., Raley, S. B., & Bianchi, S. M. (2009). Taking on the second shift: Time allocations and time pressures of U.S. parents with preschoolers. Social Forces, 88(2), 487–517. Scholar
  46. Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7, 105–125. Scholar
  47. Nomaguchi, K. M., Milkie, M. A., & Bianchi, S. M. (2005). Time strains and psychological well-being. Journal of Family Issues, 26(6), 756–792. Scholar
  48. Offer, S. (2016). Free time and emotional well-being do dual-earner mothers and fathers differ? Gender & Society, 30(2), 213–239. Scholar
  49. Pedulla, D. S., & Thébaud, S. (2015). Can we finish the revolution? Gender, work-family ideals, and institutional constraint. American Sociological Review, 80(1), 116–139. Scholar
  50. Pollak, R. A. (2012). Allocating household time: Does efficiency imply specialization? Department of Economics. Washington University. St. Louis. Retrieved from
  51. Press, J. E., & Townsley, E. (1998). Wives' and husbands' housework reporting: Gender, class, and social desirability. Gender & Society, 12(2), 188–218. Scholar
  52. Reimers, C. W. (1985). Cultural differences in labor force participation among married women. The American Economic Review, 75(2), 251–255.Google Scholar
  53. Ridgeway, C., & Correll, S. (2006). Consensus and the creation of status beliefs. Social Forces, 85(1), 431–453. Scholar
  54. Robinson, J., & Godbey, G. (2010). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Sanchez, L., & Thomson, E. (1997). Becoming mothers and fathers parenthood, gender, and the division of labor. Gender & Society, 11(6), 747–772. Scholar
  56. Sayer, L. C. (2005). Gender, time and inequality: Trends in women's and men's paid work, unpaid work and free time. Social Forces, 84(1), 285–303. Scholar
  57. Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J., Altenburger, L. E., Lee, M. A., Bower, D. J., & Kamp Dush, C. M. (2015). Who are the gatekeepers? Predictors of maternal gatekeeping behavior. Parenting: Science and Practice, 15, 166–186. Scholar
  58. Schwartz, C. R., & Mare, R. D. (2005). Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography, 42(4), 621–646. Scholar
  59. Speakman, S., & Marchington, M. (1999). Ambivalent patriarchs: Shiftworkers, `breadwinners' and housework. Work, Employment & Society, 13(1), 83–105. Scholar
  60. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2007). Marriage and divorce: Changes and their driving forces. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Strazdins, L., & Broom, D. H. (2004). Acts of love (and work). Journal of Family Issues, 25(3), 356–378. Scholar
  62. Thébaud, S. (2010). Masculinity, bargaining, and breadwinning: Understanding men’s housework in the cultural context of paid work. Gender & Society, 24(3), 330–354. Scholar
  63. Waldfogel, J. (1998). Understanding the "family gap" in pay for women with children. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(1), 137–156. Scholar
  64. Wang, W., Parker, K., & Taylor, P. (2013). Breadwinner moms. Retrieved from
  65. Wegner, M., Helmich, I., Machado, S., Nardi, A. E., Arias-Carrion, O., & Budde, H. (2014). Effects of exercise on anxiety and depression disorders: Review of meta-analyses and neurobiological mechanisms. CNS & Neurological Disorders-Drug Targets, 13(6), 1002–1014.Google Scholar
  66. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151. Scholar
  67. Xie, Y., Raymo, J. M., Goyette, K., & Arland, T. (2003). Economic potential and entry into marriage and cohabitation. Demography, 40(2), 351–367. Scholar
  68. Yavorsky, J. E., Kamp Dush, C. M., & Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J. (2015). The production of inequality: The gender dvision of labor across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(3), 662–679. Scholar
  69. Yoshida, A. (2012). Dads who do diapers: Factors affecting care of young children by fathers. Journal of Family Issues, 33(4), 451–477. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claire M. Kamp Dush
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jill E. Yavorsky
    • 2
  • Sarah J. Schoppe-Sullivan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Human SciencesThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of North Carolina at CharlotteCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations