Sex Roles

pp 1–11 | Cite as

What We Know and Where We Go from here: A Review of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Youth Hookup Literature

Feminist Forum Review Article

Abstract

In this paper, we acknowledge and critique the absence of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) experiences in the recent proliferation of scholarship on “hooking up” among youth (aged 16 to 24). Although previous research has documented that LGB youth hookup at high rates (up to three-quarters of LGB youth), and oftentimes more than heterosexuals, the most basic aspects of hookups (e.g., motivations, experiences, and outcomes) have not been comprehensively explored. This is pertinent because young adulthood, in particular, is a time when young people explore their sexuality. Most scholarship on hooking up has focused on White heterosexual college students, mostly due to sampling constraints and impediments, and so we are left with a critical gap in our knowledge about LGB youth—a population that is typically at higher risk for sexual, mental, and emotional health issues. We begin by reviewing the literature on hooking up among heterosexual young adults as organized by four themes: hookup definitions/frequencies, contexts, motivations, and outcomes. We do this to explicitly highlight and contrast what little is known about LGB youth hookups. We then provide a research agenda that projects how future researchers can advance this area of scholarship and begin to fill its gaps, while considering the hookup experiences of diverse LGB youth.

Keywords

Hookup culture LGB hookups Casual sex MSM Sexual initiation 

References

  1. Abara, W., Annang, L., Spencer, S. M., Fairchild, A. J., & Billings, D. (2014). Understanding internet sex-seeking behaviour and sexual risk among young men who have sex with men: Evidences from a cross-sectional study. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 90(8), 596–601. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2014-051545.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2009). Orgasm in college hook ups and relationships. In B. Risman (Ed.), Families as they really are (pp. 362–377). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  3. Barrett, D. C., & Pollack, L. M. (2005). Whose gay community? Social class, sexual self-expression, and gay community involvement. The Sociological Quarterly, 46(3), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2005.00021.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrios, R. J., & Lundquist, J. H. (2012). Boys just want to have fun? Masculinity, sexual behaviors, and romantic intentions of gay and straight males in college. Journal of LGBT Youth, 9(4), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2012.716749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauermeister, J. A., Leslie-Santana, M., Johns, M. M., Pingel, E., & Eisenberg, A. (2011). Mr. right and Mr. right now: Romantic and casual partner-seeking online among young men who have sex with men. AIDS and Behavior, 15(2), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-010-9834-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumle, A. K., & Compton, D. L. R. (2011). Legislating the family: The effect of state family laws on the presence of children in same-sex households. Law & Policy, 33(1), 82–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2010.00329.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumle, A. K., & Compton, D. L. R. (2014). Identity versus identification: How LGBTQ parents identify their children on census surveys. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(1), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baumle, A. K., & Poston Jr., D. L. (2009). Same-sex partners: The social demography of sexual orientation. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  9. Blackwell, C., Birnholtz, J., & Abbott, C. (2014). Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New Media & Society, 17(7), 1117–1136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814521595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bostwick, W. B., Boyd, C. J., Hughes, T. L., & McCabe, S. E. (2010). Dimensions of sexual orientation and the prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 100(3), 468–475. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2008.152942.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Bostwick, W. B., Boyd, C. J., Hughes, T. L., West, B. T., & McCabe, S. E. (2014). Discrimination and mental health among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults in the United States. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 84(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0098851.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Bradshaw, C., Kahn, A. S., & Saville, B. K. (2010). To hook up or date: Which gender benefits? Sex Roles, 62(9–10), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9765-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carrillo, H., & Hoffman, A. (2016). From MSM to heteroflexibilities: Non-exclusive straight male identities and their implications for HIV prevention and health promotion. Global Public Health, 11(7–8), 923–936. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2015.1134272.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chow, E. P., Cornelisse, V. J., Read, T. R., Hocking, J. S., Walker, S., Chen, M. Y., … Fairley, C. K. (2016). Risk practices in the era of smartphone apps for meeting partners: A cross-sectional study among men who have sex with men in Melbourne, Australia. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 30(4), 151–154. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2015.0344.
  16. Claxton, S. E., & van Dulmen, M. H. (2013). Casual sexual relationships and experiences in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1(2), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696813487181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cooper, M. L., Shapiro, C. M., & Powers, A. M. (1998). Motivations for sex and risky sexual behavior among adolescents and young adults: A functional perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1528–1558. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1528.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Corrigan, P., & Matthews, A. (2003). Stigma and disclosure: Implications for coming out of the closet. Journal of Mental Health, 12(3), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963823031000118221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DeHaan, S., Kuper, L. E., Magee, J. C., Bigelow, L., & Mustanski, B. S. (2013). The interplay between online and offline explorations of identity, relationships, and sex: A mixed-methods study with LGBT youth. Journal of Sex Research, 50(5), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.661489.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Diamond, L. M. (2005). From the heart or the gut? Sexual-minority women’s experiences of desire for same-sex and other-sex partners. Feminism & Psychology, 15(1), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353505049697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eaton, A. A., Rose, S. M., Interligi, C., Fernandez, K., & McHugh, M. (2016). Gender and ethnicity in dating, hanging out, and hooking up: Sexual scripts among Hispanic and white young adults. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(7), 788–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1065954.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. England, P., Shafer, E. F., & Fogerty, A. C. K. (2008). Hooking up and forming relationships on today’s college campuses. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The gendered society reader (3rd ed., pp. 531–593). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Engler, K., Frigault, L. R., Léobon, A., & Lévy, J. J. (2007). The sexual superhighway revisited: A qualitative analysis of gay men's perceived repercussions of connecting in cyberspace. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 18(2), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1300/J041v18n02_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Epstein, M., Calzo, J. P., Smiler, A. P., & Ward, L. M. (2009). “Anything from making out to having sex”: Men's Negotiations of hooking up and friends with benefits scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 46(5), 414–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490902775801.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Everett, B. G., Schnarrs, P. W., Rosario, M., Garofalo, R., & Mustanski, B. (2014). Sexual orientation disparities in sexually transmitted infection risk behaviors and risk determinants among sexually active adolescent males: Results from a school-based sample. American Journal of Public Health, 104(6), 1107–1112. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301759.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual hookups among first-semester female college students. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 36, 346–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2010.488118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fielder, R. L., Walsh, J. L., Carey, K. B., & Carey, M. P. (2014). Sexual hookups and adverse health outcomes: A longitudinal study of first-year college women. Journal of Sex Research, 51(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.848255.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Fine, M., & McClelland, S. (2006). Sexuality education and desire: Still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review, 76(3), 297-338. 10.17763/Haer.76.3.w5042g23122n6703.
  29. Garcia, J. R., Reiber, C., Massey, S. G., & Merriwether, A. M. (2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology, 16(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027911.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Garofalo, R., Kuhns, L. M., Hidalgo, M., Gayles, T., Kwon, S., Muldoon, A. L., … Mustanski, B. (2014). Impact of religiosity on the sexual risk behaviors of young men who have sex with men. Journal of Sex Research, 52(5), 590–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.910290.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Gates, G. J. (2017). LGBT data collection amid social and demographic shifts of the US LGBT community. American Journal of Public Health, 102(8), 1220–1222. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Glenn, N., & Marquardt, E. (2001). Hooking up, hanging out, and hoping for Mr. Right: College women on dating and men today. Institute for American Values Report to the Independent Women’s Forum. New York, NY: Institute for American Values.Google Scholar
  33. Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., Harper, M. S., & Dickson, J. W. (2003). Dating and sexual relationship trajectories and adolescent functioning. Adolescent and Family Health, 3(3), 103–112.Google Scholar
  34. Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43(3), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552324.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Grov, C., Breslow, A. S., Newcomb, M. E., Rosenberger, J. G., & Bauermeister, J. A. (2014). Gay and bisexual men's use of the internet: Research from the 1990s through 2013. Journal of Sex Research, 51(4), 390–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.871626.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Hawkins, B., & Watson, R. J. (2017). LGBT cyberspaces: A need for a holistic investigation. Children’s Geographies, 15(1), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2016.1216877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heldman, C., & Wade, L. (2010). Hook-up culture: Setting a new research agenda. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 7(4), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-010-0024-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hirshfield, S., Grov, C., Parsons, J. T., Anderson, I., & Chiasson, M. A. (2015). Social media use and HIV transmission risk behavior among ethnically diverse HIV-positive gay men: Results of an online study in three US states. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(7), 1969–1978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0513-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Jaspal, R. (2015). Gay men’s construction and management of identity on Grindr. Sexuality & Culture. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-016-9389-3.
  40. Johns, M. M., Pingel, E., Eisenberg, A., Santana, M. L., & Bauermeister, J. (2012). Butch tops and femme bottoms? Sexual positioning, sexual decision making, and gender roles among young gay men. American Journal of Men's Health, 6(6), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988312455214.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Josiam, B. M., Hobson, J. P., Dietrich, U. C., & Smeaton, G. (1998). An analysis of the sexual, alcohol and drug related behavioural patterns of students on spring break. Tourism Management, 19(6), 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00052-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kalish, R., & Kimmel, M. (2011). Hooking up: Hot hetero sex or the new numb normative? Australian Feminist Studies, 26, 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2011.546333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kelly, C. (2012). Sexism in practice: Feminist ethics evaluating the hookup culture. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, 28(2), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.2979/jfemistudreli.28.2.27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kenney, S. R., Thadani, V., Ghaidarov, T., & LaBrie, J. W. (2013). First-year college women's motivations for hooking up: A mixed-methods examination of normative peer perceptions and personal hookup participation. International Journal of Sexual Health, 25(3), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2013.786010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Kreager, D. A., Staff, J., Gauthier, R., Lefkowitz, E. S., & Feinberg, M. E. (2016). The double standard at sexual debut: Gender, sexual behavior and adolescent peer acceptance. Sex Roles, 75(7–8), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0618-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Kubicek, K., Beyer, W. J., Weiss, G., Iverson, E., & Kipke, M. D. (2010). In the dark: Young men’s stories of sexual initiation in the absence of relevant sexual health information. Health Education & Behavior, 37(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198109339993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kuperberg, A., & Padgett, J. E. (2014). Dating and hooking up in college: Meeting contexts, sex, and variation by gender, partner's gender, and class standing. Journal of Sex Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.901284.
  48. Kuperberg, A., & Padgett, J. E. (2016a). The role of culture in explaining college students’ selection into hookups, dates, and long-term romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(8), 1070–1096. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515616876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kuperberg, A., & Padgett, J. E. (2016b). Partner meeting contexts and risky behavior in college students’ other-sex and same-sex hookups. The Journal of Sex Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1124378.
  50. Lehmiller, J. J., & Ioerger, M. (2014). Social networking smartphone applications and sexual health outcomes among men who have sex with men. PloS One, 9(1), e86603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Lewis, M. A., Granato, H., Blayney, J. A., Lostutter, T. W., & Kilmer, J. R. (2012). Predictors of hooking up sexual behavior and emotional reactions among U.S. college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(5), 1219–1229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9817-2.
  52. Maticka-Tyndale, E., Herold, E. S., & Mewhinney, D. (1998). Casual sex on spring break: Intentions and behaviors of Canadian students. Journal of Sex Research, 35(3), 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Morgan, E. M. (2013). Contemporary issues in sexual orientation and identity development in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696812469187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Murchison, G. R., Boyd, M. A., & Pachankis, J. E. (2017). Minority stress and the risk of unwanted sexual experiences in LGBQ undergraduates. Sex Roles, 77(3–4), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0710-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mustanski, B., Lyons, T., & Garcia, S. C. (2011). Internet use and sexual health of young men who have sex with men: A mixed-methods study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(2), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9596-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Newcomb, M. E., & Mustanski, B. (2013). Racial differences in same-race partnering and the effects of sexual partnership characteristics on HIV risk in MSM: A prospective sexual diary study. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 62(3), 329–333. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0b013e31827e5f8c.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(2), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9652-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of ‘casual’ sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 639–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407502195006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). "Hookups": Characteristics and correlates of college students' spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490009552023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Paul, E. L., Wenzel, A., & Harvey, J. (2009). Hookups: A facilitator or a barrier to relationship initiation and intimacy development? In S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 375–390). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  61. Persson, T. J., & Pfaus, J. G. (2015). Bisexuality and mental health: Future research directions. Journal of Bisexuality, 15(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2014.994694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pingel, E. S., Bauermeister, J. A., Johns, M. M., Eisenberg, A., & Leslie-Santana, M. (2013). “A safe way to explore”: Reframing risk on the internet amidst young gay men’s search for identity. Journal of Adolescent Research, 28(4), 453–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558412470985.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Prestage, G., Van de Ven, P., Grulich, A., Kippax, S., McInnes, D., & Hendry, O. (2001). Gay men’s casual sex encounters: Discussing HIV and using condoms. AIDS Care, 13, 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120120043928.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Reiber, C., & Garcia, J. R. (2010). Hooking up: Gender differences, evolution, and pluralistic ignorance. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 390–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491000800307.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Reid, J. A., Webber, G. R., & Elliott, S. (2015). “It's like being in church and being on a field trip:” The date versus party situation in college students' accounts of hooking up. Symbolic Interaction, 38(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rice, E., Holloway, I., Winetrobe, H., Rhoades, H., Barman-Adhikari, A., Gibbs, J., … Dunlap, S. (2012). Sex risk among young men who have sex with men who use Grindr, a smartphone geosocial networking application. Journal of AIDS & Clinical Research, S4(005), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6113.S4-005.
  67. Rudman, L. A., Glick, P., Marquardt, T., & Fetterolf, J. C. (2016). When women are urged to have casual sex more than men are: Perceived risk moderates the sexual advice double standard. Sex Roles. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0723-x.
  68. Rupp, L. J., Taylor, V., Regev-Messalem, S., Fogarty, A. C., & England, P. (2014). Queer women in the hookup scene: Beyond the closet? Gender & Society, 28(2), 212–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243213510782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Savin-Williams, R. C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). Sexual identity trajectories among sexual-minority youths: Gender comparisons. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29(6), 607–627.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Schneider, M. E., & Katz, J. (2017). Adult attachment and heterosexual college women’s hookup behaviors: Mediating effects of sexual motives. Sex Roles, 77, 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0726-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Seage, G. R., Mayer, K. H., Lenderking, W. R., Wold, C., Gross, M., Goldstein, R., … & Holmberg, S. (1997). HIV and hepatitis B infection and risk behavior in young gay and bisexual men. Public Health Reports, 112(2), 158–167.Google Scholar
  72. Sewell, K. K., & Strassberg, D. S. (2015). How do heterosexual undergraduate students define having sex? A new approach to an old question. Journal of Sex Research, 52(5), 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.888389.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Silva, T. (2017). Bud-sex: Constructing normative masculinity among rural straight men that have sex with men. Gender & Society, 31(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243216679934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Snapp, S., Lento, R., Ryu, E., & Rosen, K. S. (2014). Why do they hook up? Attachment style and motives of college students. Personal Relationships, 21(3), 468–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Snapp, S., Ryu, E., & Kerr, J. (2015). The upside to hooking up: College students’ positive hookup experiences. International Journal of Sexual Health, 27(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2014.939247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Spell, S. A. (2017). Not just black and white: How race/ethnicity and gender intersect in hookup culture. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 3(2), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649216658296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stepp, L. S. (2007). Unhooked: How young women pursue sex, delay love and lose at both. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
  78. Stinson, R. D. (2010). Hooking up in young adulthood: A review of factors influencing the sexual behavior of college students. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 24(2), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/87568220903558596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sumter, S. R., Vandenbosch, L., & Ligtenberg, L. (2017). Love me tinder: Untangling emerging adults’ motivations for using the dating application tinder. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Uecker, J. E., Pearce, L. D., & Andercheck, B. (2015). The four U’s: Latent classes of hookup motivations among college students. Social Currents, 2(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329496515579761.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. van den Boom, W., Stolte, I., Sandfort, T., & Davidovich, U. (2012). Serosorting and sexual risk behaviour according to different casual partnership types among MSM: The study of one-night stands and sex buddies. AIDS Care, 24, 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2011.603285.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Veale, J., Watson, R. J., Adjei, J., & Saewyc, E. (2016). Prevalence of pregnancy involvement among Canadian transgender youth and its relation to mental health, sexual health, and gender identity. International Journal of Transgenderism, 17(3–4), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2016.1216345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Vrangalova, Z. (2014). Hooking up and psychological well-being in college students: Short-term prospective links across different hookup definitions. Journal of Sex Research, 52(5), 485–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.910745.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Wade, L. (2017). American hookup: The new culture of sex on campus. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  85. Ward, J. (2008). Dude-sex: White masculinities and authentic heterosexuality among dudes who have sex with dudes. Sexualities, 11(4), 414–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460708091742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ward, J. (2015). Not gay: Sex between straight white men. New York, NY: NYU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Westbrook, L., & Saperstein, A. (2015). New categories are not enough: Rethinking the measurement of sex and gender in social surveys. Gender & Society, 29(4), 534–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243215584758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Winetrobe, H., Rice, E., Bauermeister, J., Petering, R., & Holloway, I. W. (2014). Associations of unprotected anal intercourse with Grindr-met partners among Grindr-using young men who have sex with men in Los Angeles. AIDS Care, 26(10), 1303–1308. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2014.911811.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. World Values Survey 1981–2014. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp. Accessed 20 March 2016.
  90. Worth, H., Reid, A., & McMillan, K. (2002). Somewhere over the rainbow: Love, trust and monogamy in gay relationships. Journal of Sociology, 38(3), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/144078302128756642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wright, M. O. D., Norton, D. L., & Matusek, J. A. (2010). Predicting verbal coercion following sexual refusal during a hookup: Diverging gender patterns. Sex Roles, 62(9–10), 647–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9763-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Yost, M. R., & McCarthy, L. (2012). Girls gone wild? Heterosexual women’s same-sex encounters at college parties. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311414818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Zaikman, Y., Marks, M. J., Young, T. M., & Zeiber, J. A. (2016). Gender role violations and the sexual double standard. Journal of Homosexuality, 63(12), 1608–1629. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2016.1158007l.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human Development and Family StudiesUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyCalifornia State University of Monterey BayMarinaUSA
  3. 3.Department of SociologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations