Sex Roles

pp 1–13 | Cite as

The Bromance: Undergraduate Male Friendships and the Expansion of Contemporary Homosocial Boundaries

Original Article

Abstract

The present study provides the first known qualitative examination of heterosexual undergraduate men’s conceptualization and experiences of the bromance, outside research on cinematic representations. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with 30 undergraduate men enrolled in one of four undergraduate sport-degree programs at one university in the United Kingdom, we find these heterosexual men to be less reliant on traditional homosocial boundaries, which have previously limited male same-sex friendships. Contrary to the repressive homosociality of the 1980s and 1990s, these men embrace a significantly more inclusive, tactile, and emotionally diverse approach to their homosocial relationships. All participants provided comparable definitions of what a bromance is and how it operates, all had at least one bromantic friend, and all suggested that bromances had more to offer than a standard friendship. Participants described a bromance as being more emotionally intimate, physically demonstrative, and based upon unrivalled trust and cohesion compared to their other friendships. Participants used their experiences with romances and familial relations as a reference point for considering the conditions of a bromance. Results support the view that declining homophobia and its internalization has had significantly positive implications for male expression and intimacy. Conclusions are made about the bromance’s potential to improve men’s mental health and social well-being because participants indicate these relationships provide a space for emotional disclosure and the discussion of potentially traumatic and sensitive issues.

Keywords

Bromance Homosocial Homohysteria Masculinity Men Stoicism Suicide 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest to report.

Research Involving Human Subjects

This research included qualitative interviews with human subjects. As highlighted in the article, “The ethical procedures of the British Sociological Association have been followed. This includes participants’ right to view transcripts, the right to withdraw from the study, making anonymous the participants’ names and the name of their university. Participants were provided with an information sheet with the investigators’ contact information, aims of the study, consent forms and indication that there was no penalty for not participating.”

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Winchester, Research Ethics Committee.

Supplementary material

11199_2017_768_MOESM1_ESM.docx (14 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 14 kb)

References

  1. Adams, A. (2011). Josh wears pink cleats: Inclusive masculinity on the soccer field. Journal of Homosexuality, 58(5), 579–596. doi:10.1080/00918369.2011.563654.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. (2005). In the game: Gay athletes and the cult of masculinity. New York: University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, E. (2009). Inclusive masculinity: The changing nature of masculinities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, E. (2010). Sport, theory and social problems: A critical introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, E. (2014). 21st century jocks: Sporting men and contemporary heterosexuality. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, E., Adams, A., & Rivers, I. (2012b). I kiss them because I love them: The emergence of heterosexual men kissing in British institutes of education. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 41(2), 421–430. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9678-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson, E., & McCormack, M. (2015). Cuddling and spooning heteromasculinity and homosocial tactility among student-athletes. Men and Masculinities, 18(2), 214–230. doi:10.1177/1097184X14523433.
  8. Anderson, E., McCormack, M., & Lee, H. (2012a). Male team sport hazing initiations in a culture of decreasing homohysteria. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27(4), 427–448. doi:10.1177/0743558411412957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arnett, J. (2004). A longer road to adulthood. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Askew, S., & Ross, C. (1988). Boys don't cry: Boys and sexism in education. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Baker, P., & Hotek, D. (2011). Grappling with gender: Exploring masculinity and gender in the bodies, performances, and emotions of scholastic wrestlers. Journal of Feminist Scholarship, 1, 1–15. Retrieved from http://www.jfsonline.org/issue1/pdfs/jfs_issueFINAL.pdf#page=53.
  12. Bank, B, & Hansford, S. (2000). Gender and friendship: Why are men's best same-sex friendships less intimate and supportive? Personal Relationships, 7(1), 63–78. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00004.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beasley, C. (2008). Rethinking hegemonic masculinity in a globalizing world. Men and Masculinities, 11(1), 86–103. doi:10.1177/1097184X08315102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bogle, K. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bowman, J. (2008). Gender role orientation and relational closeness: Self-disclosive behavior in same-sex male friendships. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 16, 316–330. doi:10.3149/jms.1603.316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Boyle, K., & Berridge, S. (2012). I love you, man: Gendered narratives of friendship in contemporary Hollywood comedies. Feminist Media Studies, 14(3), 353–368. doi:10.1080/14680777.2012.740494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Branfman, J., Stiritz, S., and Anderson, E. (2017). Relaxing the straight-male anus: Decreasing homohysteria around anal eroticism. Sexualities. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1363460716678560.
  18. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bush, A., Anderson, A., & Carr, S. (2012). The declining existence of men's homophobia in British sport. Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education, 6(1), 107–120. doi:10.1179/ssa.2012.6.1.107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cancian, F. (1986). The feminization of love. Signs, 11(4), 692–709. doi:10.1086/494272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Channon, A., & Matthews, C. (2015). It is what it is: Masculinity, homosexuality, and inclusive discourse in mixed martial arts. Journal of Homosexuality, 62(7), 936–956. doi:10.1080/00918369.2015.1008280.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen, E. J. (2011). Caught in a bad bromance. Texas Journal of Women and Law, 21(2), 241–267. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tjwl21anddiv=12andg_sent=1andcollection=journals.
  23. Cleary, A. (2012). Suicidal action, emotional expression, and the performance of masculinities. Social Science and Medicine, 74(4), 498–505. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Collins, W., & Repinski, D. (1994). Relationships during adolescence: Continuity and change in interpersonal perspective. In R. Montemayor, G. Adams, & T. Gullotta (Eds.), Personal relationships during adolescence (pp. 7–36). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Collins, W., & Sroufe, L. (1999). Capacity for intimate relationships. In W. Furman, B. Brown, & C. Feiring (Eds.), The development of romantic relationships in adolescence (pp. 125–147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Connell, R. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Courtenay, W. H. (2000). Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: A theory of gender and health. Social Science and Medicine, 50(10), 1385–1401. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00390-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Davies, N. (2014). I love you hombre. In M. DeAngelis (Ed.), Reading the bromance: Homosocial relationships in film and television (pp. 109–138). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  29. DeAngelis, M. (2014). Reading the bromance: Homosocial relationships in film and television. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Deitcher, D. (2001). Dear friends: American photographs of men together, 1840–1918. New York: Harry N Abrams Inc..Google Scholar
  31. Denscombe, M. (2002). Ground rules for good research. Leicester: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Dermott, E. (2008). Intimate fatherhood: A sociological analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Diamond, L., Savin-Williams, R., & Dube, E. (1999). Intimate peer relations among lesbian, gay and bisexual adolescence. In W. Furman, B. Brown, & C. Feiring (Eds.), The development of romantic relationships in adolescence (pp. 175–210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Emsliea, C., Ridge, D., Ziebland, S., & Hunt, K. (2007). Exploring men’s and women’s experiences of depression and engagement with health professionals: More similarities than differences? A qualitative interview study. BioMed Central Family Practice, 8(43). doi:10.1186/1471-2296-8-43.
  35. Fehr, B. (1996). Friendship processes. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Flood, M. (2008). Men, sex, and homosociality: How bonds between men shape their sexual relations with women. Men and Masculinities, 10(3), 339–359. doi:10.1177/1097184X06287761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Floyd, K., Hess, J. A., Miczo, L. A., Halone, K. K., Mikkelson, A. C., & Tusing, K. J. (2005). Human affection exchange: VIII. Further evidence of the benefits of expressed affection. Communication Quarterly, 53(3), 285–303. doi:10.1080/01463370500101071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Foucault, M. (1984). The Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  39. Freud, S. (1905). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  40. Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  41. Hagestad, G., & Call, V. (2007). Pathways to childlessness a life course perspective. Journal of Family Issues, 28(10), 1338–1361. doi:10.1177/0192513X07303836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hammarén, N., & Johansson, T. (2014). Homosociality in between power and intimacy. SAGE Open, 4(1), 1–11. doi:10.1177/2158244013518057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hansen-Miller, D., & Gill, R. (2011). Lad flicks: Discursive reconstructions of masculinity in popular film. In H. Radner & E. Pullar (Eds.), Feminism at the movies: Understanding gender in contemporary popular cinema (pp. 36–50). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Herek, G. (1988). Heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. Journal of Sex Research, 25(4), 451–477. doi:10.1080/00224498809551476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hilber, C., & Vermeulen, W. (2016). The impact of supply constraints on house prices in England. The Economic Journal, 126(591), 358–405. doi:10.1111/ecoj.12213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Howard, H. (2012). A confederacy of bachelors. New York Times. Retrieved from https://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/08/05/nyregion/four-men-sharing-rent-and-friendship-for-18-years.html.
  47. Hruschka, D. (2010). Friendship: Development, ecology, and evolution of a relationship (Vol. 5). Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hutchinson, S., Marsiglio, W., & Cohan, M. (2002). Interviewing young men about sex and procreation: Methodological issues. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 42–60. doi:10.1177/1049732302012001004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Ibson, J. (2002). Picturing men: A century of male relationships in everyday American photography. Illinois: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  50. Joffe, H. (2012). Thematic analysis. In D. Harper & A. Thompson (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: An introduction for students and practitioners (pp. 209–224). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. Jourard, S. (1971). The transparent self. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  52. Kerrick, M. R., & Henry, R. L. (2017). “Totally in love”: Evidence of a master narrative for how new mothers should feel about their babies. Sex Roles, 76(1–2), 1–16. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0666-2.
  53. Kimmel, M. (1994). Manhood in America. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  54. Kimmel, M. (2004). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. In P. Rothenberg (Ed.), Race, class, and gender in the United States: An integrated study (pp. 81–93). New York: Worth.Google Scholar
  55. Kobak, R., Rosenthal, N., Zajac, K., & Madsen, S. (2007). Adolescent attachment hierarchies and the search for an adult pair-bond. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, Fall, (117), 57–72. doi:10.1002/cd.194.
  56. Komarovsky, M. (1974). Patterns of self-disclosure of male undergraduates. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 36(4), 677–686. doi:10.2307/350349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kozloski, M. (2010). Homosexual moral acceptance and social tolerance: Are the effects of education changing? Journal of Homosexuality, 57(10), 1370–1383. doi:10.1080/00918369.2010.517083.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Kring, A., & Gordon, A. (1998). Sex differences in emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 686–703. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.686.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Lewis, R. (1978). Emotional intimacy among men. Journal of Social Research, 34(1), 108–121. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1978.tb02543.x.Google Scholar
  60. Lipman-Blumen, J. (1976). Toward a homosocial theory of sex roles: An explanation of the sex segregation of social institutions. Signs, 1(3), 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Luttrell, W. (2012). Making boys' careworlds visible. Thymos: Journal of Boyhood Studies, 6(2), 186–202. doi:10.3149/thy.0601.186.Google Scholar
  62. Magrath, R., Anderson, E., & Roberts, S. (2015). On the door-step of equality: Attitudes toward gay athletes among academy-level footballers. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 50(7), 804–821. doi:10.1177/1012690213495747.
  63. McCormack, M. (2011). Hierarchy without hegemony: Locating boys in an inclusive school setting. Sociological Perspectives, 54(1), 83–101. doi:10.1525/sop.2011.54.1.83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McCormack, M. (2012). The declining significance of homophobia: How teenage boys are redefining masculinity and heterosexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McCormack, M., & Anderson, E. (2014). The influence of declining homophobia on men’s gender in the United States: An argument for the study of homohysteria. Sex Roles, 71(3–4), 109–120. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0358-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mehta, C., & Strough, J. (2009). Sex segregation in friendships and normative contexts across the life span. Developmental Review, 29(3), 201–220. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2009.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Miller, N. (1995). Out of the past: Gay and lesbian history from 1869 to the present. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  68. Morin, S., & Garfinkle, E. (1978). Male homophobia. Journal of Social Issues, 34(1), 29–47. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1978.tb02539.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Morman, M. T., & Floyd, K. (2006). Good fathering: Father and son perceptions of what it means to be a good father. Fathering, 4(2), 113–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Morris, M., & Anderson, E. (2015). Charlie is so cool like: Authenticity, popularity and inclusive masculinity on YouTube. Sociology, 49(6), 1200–1217. doi:10.1177/0038038514562852.
  71. Murray, A., & White, A. (2015). Twelve not so angry men: Inclusive masculinities in Australian contact sports. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1012690215609786.
  72. Murray, A., White, A., Scoats, R., & Anderson, E. (2016). Constructing masculinities in the National Rugby League's footy show. Sociological Research Online, 21(3), 11. doi:10.5153/sro.4044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Nardi, P. (1999). Gay men's friendships: Invincible communities. Illinois: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  74. Office for National Statistics. (2012). Marriages in England and Wales, provisional 2012. Retrieved from http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171778_366530.pdf.
  75. Olstad, K. (1975). Brave new men: A basis for discussion. In J. Petras (Ed.), Sex. male/gender. Masculine. Port Washington: AlfredGoogle Scholar
  76. Parks, M., & Floyd, K. (1996). Meanings for closeness and intimacy in friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13(1), 85–107. doi:10.1177/0265407596131005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Peterson, G., & Anderson, E. (2012). The performance of softer masculinities on the university dance floor. The Journal of Men's Studies, 20(1), 3–15. doi:10.3149/jms.2001.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pollack, W. (1999). Real boys: Rescuing our sons from the myths of boyhood. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  79. Poplawski, P. (1989). Psychological and qualitative dimensions of friendship among men: An examination of intimacy, sex-role, loneliness, control and the friendship experience (unpublished dissertation). Philadelphia: Temple University.Google Scholar
  80. Rotundo, A. (1989). Romantic friendship: Male intimacy and middle-class youth in the northern United States, 1800–1900. Journal of Social History, 23(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Savin-Williams, R. (2005). The new gay teenager. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Scoats, R. (2015). Inclusive masculinity and Facebook photographs among early emerging adults at a British university. Journal of Adolescent Research, 1-23. doi: 10.1177/0743558415607059.
  83. Scoats, R., Joseph, L., & Anderson, E. (2017). “I don’t mind watching him cum”: Heterosexual men, male-male-female threesomes, and the erosion of the one-time rule of homosexuality. Sexualities. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1363460716678562.Google Scholar
  84. Scourfield, J. (2005). Suicidal masculinities. Sociological Research Online, 10(2). Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/2/scourfield.html.
  85. Sedgwick, E. K. (1985). Between men: English literature and male homosocial desire. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Seiden, A., & Bart, P. (1975). Woman to woman: Is sisterhood powerful? In N. Glazer-Malbin (Ed.), Old family/new family (pp. 189–228). New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  87. Sherrod, D. (1987). The bonds of men: Problems and possibilities in close male relationships. In H. Bord (Ed.), The making of masculinities: The new men's studies (pp. 212–239). Boston: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  88. Thompson, L. (2015). Reading the bromance: Homosocial relationships in film and television. Journal of Gender Studies, 24(3), 368–370. doi:10.1080/09589236.2015.1005976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Thurnell-Read, T. (2012). What happens on tour: The premarital stag tour, homosocial bonding, and male friendship. Men and Masculinities, 15(3), 249–270. doi:10.1177/1097184X12448465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tripp, C. (2005). The intimate world of Abraham Lincoln. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  91. Van Duijn, M., Evelien, A., Zeggelink, P., Huisman, M., Stokman, F., & Wasseur, F. (2003). Evolution of sociology freshmen into a friendship network. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 27(2–3), 153–191. doi:10.1080/00222500305889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Vrangalova, Z., & Savin-Williams, R. (2012). Mostly heterosexual and mostly gay/lesbian: Evidence for new sexual orientation identities. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(1), 85–101. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9921-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Walker, K. (1994). Men, women, and friendship: What they say, what they do. Gender and Society, 8(2), 246–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Ward, J. (2015). Not gay: Sex between straight White men. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Way, N. (2011). Deep secrets: Boys’ friendships and the crisis of connection. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Way, N. (2013). Boys' friendships during adolescence: Intimacy, desire, and loss. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(2), 201–213. doi:10.1111/jora.12047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Weeks, J. (2007). The world we have won: The remaking of erotic and intimate life. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  98. Weeks, J., Holland, J., & Waites, M. (2003). Sexualities and society: A reader. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  99. White, A., & Hobson, M. (2015). Teachers' stories: Physical education teachers' constructions and experiences of masculinity within secondary school physical education. Sport, Education and Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13573322.2015.1112779.
  100. White, A., & Robinson, S. (2016). Boys, inclusive masculinities and injury: Some research perspectives. Boyhood Studies, 9(2), 73–91. doi:10.3167/bhs.2016.09206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Williams, D. G. (1985). Gender, masculinity-femininity, and emotional intimacy in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 12(5–6), 587–600. doi:10.1007/BF00288179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wright, P. (1982). Men's friendships, women's friendships and the alleged inferiority of the latter. Sex Roles, 8(1), 1–20. doi:10.1007/BF00287670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Zorn, T., & Gregory, K. (2005). Learning the ropes together: Assimilation and friendship development among first-year male medical students. Health Communication, 17(3), 211–231. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc1703.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sport and Exercise, Faculty of Business, Law and SportUniversity of WinchesterWinchesterUK

Personalised recommendations