The Discrepancy Between How Women See Themselves and Feminists Predicts Identification with Feminism
Many women who accept the basic tenets of feminist ideology are reluctant to call themselves feminists, which is problematic because feminist self-identification is related to a variety of positive outcomes. The present research tests the idea that discrepancies between women’s self-view and feminist-view on the dimensions of competence and warmth are related to identification with feminism. This supposition is guided by the idea that a full understanding of why women have difficulty embracing feminism must take into account not only their view of feminists, but also whether women see themselves as different from feminists. Three online survey studies, which included 387, 288, and 116 adult U.S. women, demonstrate that perception of warmth identification with feminism was lower if women regard feminists as less warm than they see themselves. For perceptions of competence, the direction of this discrepancy was irrelevant: The more women see feminists as differently competent (i.e., higher or lower), the less they identify with feminists. Moreover, perceived discrepancy predicted identification with feminism even after controlling for women’s agreement with feminist values. Both endorsement of feminist values and perceived discrepancy are important in predicting identification with feminism and therefore practical interventions to maximize identification should target both of these components. For perceived discrepancy, interventions to reduce feminist-self discrepancies will likely be most effective if they target stereotypes of feminists as being cold.
KeywordsFeminism Self-concept Group identity Stereotyped attitudes Stereotype content model
Data and experiment files will be made publicly available on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/eavhc) upon manuscript acceptance. This research was supported by Project Implicit.
- Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
- Cuddy, A. J. (2009). Just because I'm nice, don't assume I'm dumb. Harvard Business Review, 87, 24.Google Scholar
- Devos, T., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Implicit self and identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 153–175). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371–389. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3<371::AID-EJSP932>3.0.CO;2-U.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Etaugh, C. (1975). Biographical predictors of college students’attitudes toward women. Journal of College Student Personnel, 16, 273–276.Google Scholar
- Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi: 10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1248.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fortune. (2010, April 22). Fortune 500 women CEOs. Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2010/fortune/1004/gallery.fortune500_women_ceos.fortune/index.html.
- Gawronski, B., Strack, F., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2009). Attitudes and cognitive consistency: The role of associative and propositional processes. In R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio, & P. Briñol (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 86–117). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Hampp, A. (2012, November 30). Katy Perry, Carly Rae Jepsen Speak About Success, Empowerment at Billboard Women in Music Ceremony. Billboard. Retrieved from http://www.billboard.com.
- Hogg, M. A. (2003). Social identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 462–479). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Hurt, M., Nelson, J., Turner, D., Haines, M., Ramsey, L., Erchull, M., & Liss, M. (2007). Feminism: What is it good for? Feminine norms and objectification as the link between feminist identity and clinically relevant outcomes. Sex Roles, 57, 355–363. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9272-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Judd, C. M., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V., & Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899–913. doi: 10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1999.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kite, M. E., Deaux, K., & Haines, E. (2008). Gender stereotypes. In F. L. Denmark & M. A. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories (2nd ed., pp. 205–236). Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
- Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
- League of European Research Universities. (2012, July). Women, research, and universities: Excellence without gender bias. Retrieved from www.leru.org.
- Lee, A. (2014). The story of a t-shirt. Retrieved from: http://www.fawcettsociety.org.uk/blog/story-t-shirt/.
- Lottes, I. L., & Kuriloff, P. J. (1992). The effects of gender, race, religion, and political orientation on the sex role attitudes of college freshmen. Adolescence, 27, 675–688. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1414577
- Nelson, J., Liss, M., Erchull, M., Hurt, M., Ramsey, L., Turner, D., … Haines, M. (2008). Identity in action: Predictors of feminist self-identification and collective action. Sex Roles, 58, 721–728. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9384-0.
- Ramsey, L. R., Haines, M. E., Hurt, M. M., Nelson, J. A., Turner, D. L., Liss, M., … Erchull, M. J. (2007). Thinking of others: Feminist identification and the perception of others’ beliefs. Sex Roles, 56, 611–616. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9205-5.
- Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1972). Who likes competent women? Competence, sex-role congruence of interests, and subjects' attitudes toward women as determinants of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2, 197–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1972.tb01272.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In S. Worchel & L. W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
- The Economist. (2014, March 8). The glass-ceiling index. London: The Economist Newspaper Limited.Google Scholar
- Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- United Nations. (2010). The world’s women 2010. Trends and statistics. Retrieved from http://www.unstats.un.org.
- United States Department of Labor. (2010). Quick stats on women workers. Retrieved from http://www.dol.gov/.
- Vinnicombe, S., & Sealy, R. (2013). The Female FTSE Board Report 2013. Retrieved from http://www.som.cranfield.ac.uk/som/p19617/Knowledge-Interchange/Management-Themes/Leadership/Cranfield-On-Leadership/The-Female-FTSE-Board-Report-2013.
- Vonk, R. (1996). Negativity and potency effects in impression formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 851–865. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199611)26:6<851::AID-EJSP790>3.0.CO;2-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar