Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Hispanic College Men's Perceptions of Appropriate Strategies for Initiating Sexual Intercourse with Women

  • 535 Accesses

  • 3 Citations

Abstract

Research on heterosexual college students’ sexual activity finds that men are typically the initiators of sexual intercourse. However, few studies examining college students’ sexual experiences have focused on racial/ethnic minority populations. The present study uses sexual scripting frameworks and qualitative methods to provide an in-depth examination of the sexual initiation perceptions of 45 Hispanic college men who have sex with women. Two broad themes were uncovered: (a) men’s perceptions about when sexual intercourse should first be initiated and (b) the kinds of behaviors men saw as appropriate for initiating sexual intimacy. Hispanic college men reported that the status of the relationship and partners’ mutual desire most strongly influenced their decisions about when to initiate sex. Few men ascribed to a normative time frame for initiating sexual intercourse. The most commonly reported approach used to initiate sex was non-verbal communication, followed by indirect verbal communication, direct verbal communication, and waiting for the woman to initiate. Although machismo beliefs were acknowledged as part of men’s cultural reference for masculinity, they felt they were not central to their own sexual initiation experiences or beliefs. Our findings advance our knowledge of the processes contributing to college men’s personal desires and beliefs about engaging in sexual activity, which has important implications for developing effective campus-based efforts addressing the communication of sexual consent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 111–125. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111.

  2. Abreau, J. M., Goodyear, R. K., Campos, A., & Newcomb, M. D. (2000). Ethnic belonging and traditional masculinity ideology among African Americans, European Americans, and Latinos. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 1, 75–86. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.1.2.75.

  3. Ahrold, T., & Meston, C. (2010). Ethnic differences in sexual attitudes of U.S. college students: Gender, acculturation, and religiosity factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 190–202. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9406-1.

  4. Arciniega, G. M., Anderson, T. C., Tovar-Blank, Z. G., & Tracey, T. J. G. (2008). Toward a fuller conception of machismo: Development of a traditional machismo and Caballerismo scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 19–33. doi:10.1037/00220167.55.1.19.

  5. Aronson, E., Biegler, H., Bond, B., Clark, R., Drogos, K., Garcia, M., et al. (2007). Norms for teasing among college students. Communication Research Reports, 24, 169–176. doi:10.1080/08824090701304980.

  6. Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(5), 633–642. doi:10.1002/ejsp.270.

  7. Bartoli, A. M., & Clark, D. M. (2006). The dating game: Similarities and differences in dating scripts among college students. Sexuality and Culture, 10, 54–80. doi:10.1007/s12119-0061026-0.

  8. Bowleg, L. (2013). “Once you’ve blended the cake, you can’t take the parts back to the main ingredients”: Black gay and bisexual men’s descriptions and experiences of intersectionality. Sex Roles, 68(11–12), 754–767. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0152-4.

  9. Bowleg, L., Burkholder, G. J., Noar, S. M., Teti, M., Malebranche, D. J., & Tschann, J. M. (2015). Sexual scripts and sexual risk behaviors among black heterosexual men: Development of the sexual scripts scale. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(3), 639–654. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0193-y.

  10. Bradshaw, C., Kahn, A. S., & Saville, B. K. (2010). To hook up or date: Which gender benefits? Sex Roles, 62, 661–669. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9765-7.

  11. Chappell, B. (2014). California enacts ‘yes means yes’ law, defining sexual consent. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2014/09/29/352482932/california-enacts-yes-means-yes-law-defining-sexual-consent. Accessed 15 April 2016.

  12. Cole, E. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(3), 170–180. doi:10.1037/a0014564.

  13. Dantzker, M. L., & Eisenman, R. (2003). Sexual attitudes among Hispanic college students: Differences between males and females. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 11(1), 79–89. doi:10.1080/02673843.2003.9747919.

  14. Dworkin, S. L., & O’Sullivan, L. (2005). Actual versus desired initiation patterns among a sample of college men: Tapping disjunctures within traditional male sexual scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 42(2), 150–158. doi:10.1080/00224490509552268.

  15. Dworkin, S. L., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2007). “It’s less work for us and it shows us she has good taste”: Masculinity, sexual initiation, and contemporary sexual scripts. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The sexual self (pp. 105–121). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press. doi:10.1080/14681990801910869. 282.

  16. Eaton, A. A., & Matamala, A. (2014). The relationship between heteronormative beliefs and verbal sexual coercion in college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(7), 1443–1457. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0284-4.

  17. Eaton, A. A., & Rose, S. (2011). Has dating become more egalitarian? A 35-year review using sex roles. Sex Roles, 64(11–12), 843–862. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9957-9

  18. Eaton, A. A., & Rose, S. (2012). Scripts for actual first date and hanging-out encounters among young heterosexual Hispanic adults. Sex Roles, 67, 285–299. doi:10.1007/s11199-0120190-y.

  19. Eaton, A. A., Rose, S., Interligi, C., Fernandez, K., & McHugh, M. (2015). Gender and ethnicity in dating, hanging out, and hooking up: Sexual scripts among Hispanic and white young adults. Journal of Sex Research, 53, 788–804. doi:10.1080/00224499.2015.1065954.

  20. Edgar, T., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1993). Expectations for sexual interaction: A cognitive test of the sequencing of sexual communication behaviors. Health Communication, 5, 239–261. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc0504_1.

  21. Eisenman, R., & Dantzker, M. L. (2006). Gender and ethnic differences in sexual attitudes at a Hispanic-serving university. Journal of General Psychology, 133, 153–162. doi:10.3200/GENP.133.2.153-162.

  22. Eisenstadt, M. (2015). ‘Can I put my hand there?’: New York law changes the rules of the college hook-up. Retrieved from http://www.syracuse.com/state/index.ssf/2015/07/can_i_put_my_hand_there_new_york_law_changes_the_rules_of_the_college_hook-up.html. Accessed 11 April 2016.

  23. Estrada, F., & Arciniega, G. M. (2015). Positive masculinity among Latino men and the direct and indirect effects on well-being. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 43(3), 191–205. doi:10.1002/jmcd.12014.

  24. Farris, C., Treat, T. A., Viken, R. J., & McFall, R. M. (2008). Sexual coercion and the misperception of sexual intent. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 48–66. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2007.03.002.

  25. Few, A. L., Stephens, D. P., & Rouse-Arnett, M. (2003). Sister-to-sister talk: Transcending boundaries in qualitative research with black women. Family Relations, 52, 205–215. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2003.00205.x.

  26. Foubert, J. D., Garner, D. N., & Thaxter, P. J. (2006). An exploration of fraternity culture: Implications for programs to address alcohol-related sexual assault. College Student Journal, 40, 361–373.

  27. Fry, R., & Taylor, P. (2013). Hispanic high school graduates pass Whites in rate of college enrollment. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org/ 2013/05/09/hispanic-high-school-graduates-pass-whites-in-rate-of-college-enrollment/. Accessed 18 Mar 2016.

  28. Glass, J., & Owen, J. (2010). Latino fathers: The relationship among machismo, acculturation, ethnic identity, and paternal involvement. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 11, 251–261. doi:10.1037/a0021477.

  29. Glick, P., Sakalli-Ugurlu, N., Ferreira, M. C., & de Souza, M. A. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward wife abuse in Turkey and Brazil. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 292–297. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00068.

  30. Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (2004). Analysing qualitative data. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative methods for health research (pp. 173–200). London: Sage Publications.

  31. Gurman, T., & Borzekowski, D. L. (2004). Condom use among Latino college students. Journal of American College Health, 52(4), 169–178. doi:10.3200/JACH.52.4.169-178.

  32. Hall, J. A., Xing, C., & Brooks, S. (2015). Accurately detecting flirting: Error management theory, the traditional sexual script, and flirting base rate. Communication Research, 42, 939–958. doi:10.1177/0093650214534972.

  33. Helm, K. (2016). Hooking up: The psychology of sex and dating. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.

  34. Higgins, J. A., Trussell, J., Moore, N. B., & Davidson, J. K. (2010). Virginity lost, satisfaction gained? Physiological and psychological sexual satisfaction at heterosexual debut. Journal of Sex Research, 47(4), 384–394. doi:10.1080/00224491003774792.

  35. Hoban, M. T., & Ward, R. L. (2003). Building culturally competent college health programs. Journal of American College Health, 52, 137–141. doi:10.1080/07448480309595736.

  36. Humphreys, T. (2007). Perceptions of sexual consent: The impact of relationship history and gender. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 307–315. doi:10.1080/00224490701586706.

  37. Hurtado, A. & Gurin, P. (2004). Chicana/o identity in a changing U.S. society: ¿Quién soy? ¿Quiénes somos? Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.

  38. Hurtado, A., & Sinha, M. (2008). More than men: Latino feminist masculinities and intersectionality. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 337–349. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9405-7.

  39. Hurtado, A., & Sinha, M. (2016a). Beyond machismo: Intersectional Latino masculinities. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

  40. Hurtado, A., & Sinha, M. (2016b). Toward new masculinities: A Chicana feminist intersectional analysis of Latino’s definitions of manhood. In A. Hurtado & M. Sinha (Eds.), Beyond machismo: Intersectional Latino masculinities (pp. 54–77). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

  41. Jozkowski, K., & Peterson, Z. (2013). College students and sexual consent: Unique insights. The Journal of Sex Research, 50, 517–523. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.700739.

  42. Jozkowski, K. N., Peterson, Z. D., Sanders, S. A., Dennis, B., & Reece, M. (2014). Gender differences in heterosexual college students’ conceptualizations and indicators of sexual consent: Implications for contemporary sexual assault prevention education. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 904–916. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.792326.

  43. Krogstad, J. M. (2015). 5 facts about Latinos and education. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/05/26/5-facts-about-latinos-and-education/. Accessed 18 Mar 2016.

  44. La France, B. (2010). What verbal and nonverbal communication cues lead to sex?: An analysis of the traditional sexual script. Communication Quarterly, 58, 297–318. doi:10.1080/01463373.2010.503161.

  45. La France, B., Henningsen, D., Oates, A., & Shaw, C. (2009). Social-sexual interactions? Meta-analyses of sex differences in perceptions of flirtatiousness, seductiveness, and promiscuousness. Communication Monographs, 76, 263–285. doi:10.1080/03637750903074701.

  46. Laner, M. R., & Ventrone, N. A. (2000). Dating scripts revisited. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 488–500. doi:10.1177/019251300021004004.

  47. Leung, L. (2015). Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. Journal of Family Medicine & Primary Care, 4(3), 324–327. doi:10.4103/2249-4863.161306.

  48. Lindgren, K. P., Parkhill, M. R., George, W. H., & Hendershot, C. S. (2008). Gender differences in perceptions of sexual intent: A qualitative review and integration. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 423–439. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00456.x.

  49. Lindgren, K. P., Schacht, R. L., Pantalone, D. W., Blayney, J. A., & George, W. H. (2009). Sexual communication, sexual goals, and students’ transition to college: Implications for sexual assault, decision-making, and risky behaviors. Journal of College Student Development, 50(5), 491–503. doi:10.1353/csd.0.0095.

  50. Lu, A., & Wong, Y. J. (2014). Stressful experiences of masculinity among young U.S.-born and immigrant Latino American men. Culture, Society and Masculinities, 6(2), 111–128. doi:10.1177/0891243213479446.

  51. Marin, B. V. (2003). HIV prevention in the Hispanic community: Sex, culture, and empowerment. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 14(3), 186–192. doi:10.1177/1043659603014003005.

  52. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  53. Masser, B., Lee, K., & McKimmie, B. M. (2010). Bad woman, bad victim? Disentangling the effects of victim stereotypicality, gender stereotypicality and benevolent sexism on acquaintance rape victim blame. Sex Roles, 62(7–8), 494–504. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9648-y.

  54. Meston, C. M., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2007). Such a tease: Intentional sexual provocation within heterosexual interactions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 531–542. doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9167-7.

  55. Mirandé, A. (1997). Hombres y machos. Masculinity and Latino culture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. doi:10.1604/9780813331973.

  56. Oramas, L., Stephens, D. P., & Whiddon, M. (2015). The influence of parental conflict resolution strategies on Hispanic college women’s experiences with verbal aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0886260515 596333.

  57. Patrick, M. E., Maggs, J. L., & Abar, C. C. (2007). Reasons to have sex, personal goals, and sexual behavior during the transition to college. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 240–249. doi:10.1080/00224490701443759.

  58. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand. Oaks, CA: Sage.

  59. Sakaluk, J. K., Todd, L. M., Milhausen, R., & Lachowsky, N. J. (2014). Dominant heterosexual sexual scripts in emerging adulthood: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Sex Research, 51(5), 516–531. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.745473.

  60. Sanchez, D. T., Fetterolf, J. C., & Rudman, L. A. (2012). Eroticizing inequality in the United States: The consequences and determinants of traditional gender role adherence in intimate relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 168–183. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.653699.

  61. Schleicher, S. S., & Gilbert, L. A. (2005). Heterosexual dating discourses among college students: Is there still a double standard? Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 19(3), 7–23. doi:10.1300/J035v19n03_03.

  62. Shields, S. A. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 301–311. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9501-8.

  63. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1984). Sexual scripts. Society, 22, 52–60. doi:10.1007/BF02701260.

  64. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97–120. doi:10.1007/bf01542219.

  65. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1987). A sexual scripts approach. In J. H. Greer & W. T. O’Donohue (Eds.), Theories of human sexuality (pp. 363–383). New York: Plenum.

  66. Stephens, D. P., & Eaton, A. A. (2014). The influence of masculinity scripts on heterosexual Hispanic college men’s perceptions of female-initiated sexual coercion. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 15, 387–396. doi:10.1037/a0034639.

  67. Stephens, D. P., & Thomas, T. L. (2011). Hispanic women’s expectations of campus- based health clinics addressing sexual health concerns. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 6, 260–280. doi:10.1080/15546128.2011.601953.

  68. Stephenson, B., Clabaugh, S. E., Clark, R. A., Kosovski, M. C., Daar, R., Hefner, V., et al. (2007). Teasing among college men and women. Communication Studies, 58, 157–172.

  69. Sternberg, P. (2000). Challenging machismo: Promoting sexual and reproductive health with Nicaraguan men. Gender and Development, 8, 89–99. doi:10.1080/741923418.

  70. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511557842.

  71. Taylor, P., Lopez, M. H., Martinez, J. H., & Velasco, V. (2012). When labels don’t fit: Hispanics and their views of identity. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org/2012/04/04/when-labels-dont-fit-hispanics-and-their-views-of-identity/. Accessed 20 Mar 2016.

  72. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary. (2015). Fact sheet: The “It’s On Us” Campaign launches new PSA, marks one-year since launch of “It’s On Us” Campaign to end campus sexual assault [Press Release]. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/09/01/fact-sheet-its-us-campaign-launches-new-psa-marks-one-year-launch. Accessed 11 April 2016.

  73. Torres, J. B., Solberg, V. S., & Carlstrom, A. H. (2002). The myth of sameness among Latino men and their machismo. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 72(2), 163–181. doi:10.1037/0002-9432.72.2.163.

  74. Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15, 398–405. doi:10.1111/nhs.12048.

  75. Vannier, S. A., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2011). Communicating interest in sex: Verbal and non-verbal initiation of sexual activity in young adults’ romantic dating relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 961–969. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9663-7.

  76. Viki, G. T., Abrams, D., & Hutchison, P. (2003). The "true" romantic: Benevolent sexism and paternalistic chivalry. Sex Roles, 49(9–10), 533–537. doi:10.1023/A:1025888824749.

  77. Warner, L. R. (2008). A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 454–463. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9504-5.

  78. Warren, P., Swan, S., & Allen, C. T. (2015). Comprehension of sexual consent as a key factor in the perpetration of sexual aggression among college men. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 24, 897–913. doi:10.1080/10926771.2015.1070232.

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank undergraduate Research Assistants Sabrina Aguilar, Tatiana Bustos, Alexa Collazo, Katherine Fernandez, Lauren Hayes, Geysa Ortiz, and Gloria Selva for their work on this project.

Author information

Correspondence to Dionne P. Stephens.

Ethics declarations

I certify that I have complied with the APA ethical principles regarding research with human participants and/or care and use of animals in the conduct of the research presented in this manuscript. Further, this research was conducted after receiving approval from the Florida International University Institutional Review Board, and followed all protocols and requirements outlined in that application.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stephens, D.P., Eaton, A.A. & Boyd, B. Hispanic College Men's Perceptions of Appropriate Strategies for Initiating Sexual Intercourse with Women. Sex Roles 77, 239–253 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0709-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Hispanic
  • Sexuality
  • Masculinity
  • Sexual script
  • Consent