Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 76, Issue 3–4, pp 202–217 | Cite as

Sport = Male… But Not All Sports: Investigating the Gender Stereotypes of Sport Activities at the Explicit and Implicit Levels

  • Mélissa PlazaEmail author
  • Julie Boiché
  • Lionel Brunel
  • François Ruchaud
Original Article

Abstract

The main objectives of the present studies were to update the explicit gender stereotypes linked to sport activities and examine whether they are associated with gender, age, personal practice, and general feminization rates of participation (Study 1, N = 690), as well as to investigate the potential effects of implicit gender sport stereotypes on the categorization of gendered names (Study 2, N = 53) and on perceptions of feminine, neutral, and masculine silhouettes (Study 3, N = 42). Study 1 indicated that explicit gender stereotypes are still attached to sport activities, with little variations according to personal characteristics but with a strong association with actual feminization rates. In Study 2, which focused on implicit stereotypes, we observed a slower identification of male names when participants were primed with feminine sport activities. In Study 3, neutral silhouettes were more frequently categorized as women following a feminine sport, but as men following a masculine sport. Our research suggests that sport activities are still gendered, both at the explicit and implicit levels, which may lead individuals to adjust their own participation even outside their consciousness.

Keywords

Gender stereotypes Implicit stereotypes Semantic priming Perceptual priming Sport 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This publication was generously facilitated by Jan Yoder, the Editor in chief of Sex Roles, and we are grateful for that. Also, we would like to thank the two reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript.

Supplementary material

11199_2016_650_MOESM1_ESM.docx (47 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 47 kb)

References

  1. Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1995). Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 181–198. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.181.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Banaji, M. R., & Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00346.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511996481.017.Google Scholar
  4. Birnbaum, M. H. (2001). Introduction to behavioral research on the internet. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Blair, I. V., & Banaji, M. R. (1996). Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1142–1163. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouchard, C., Blair, S. N., & Haskell, W. L. (2012). Physical activity and health. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  7. Brook-Gunn, J. (1989). Pubertal processes and the early adolescent transition. In W. Damon (Ed.), Child development today and tomorrow (pp. 155–176). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Castelli, L., Macrae, C. N., Zogmaister, C., & Arcuri, L. (2004). A tale of two primes: Contextual limits on stereotype activation. Social Cognition, 22, 233–247. doi: 10.1521/soco.22.2.233.35462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chalabaev, A., Sarrazin, P., Fontayne, P., Boiché, J., & Clément-Guillotin, C. (2013). The influence of gender stereotypes and gender roles on participation and performance in sport and exercise: Review and future directions. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14, 136–144. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical environments impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045–1060. doi: 10.1037/a0016239.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Collier, K. L., Bos, H. M., Merry, M. S., & Sandfort, T. G. (2013). Gender, ethnicity, religiosity, and same-gender sexual attraction and the acceptance of same-gender sexuality and gender non-conformity. Gender Roles, 68, 724–737. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0135-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Csizma, K. A., Wittig, A. F., & Schurr, K. T. (1988). Sport stereotypes and gender. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 10, 62–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Damian-Gaillard, B., Montañola, S., & Olivesi, A. (2014). L’assignation de genre dans les medias. Attentes, perturbations, reconfigurations [The assignation of gender in the Medias. Expectations, disruptions, reconfigurations]. Res Publica: Presse Universitaire de Rennes.Google Scholar
  14. Davisse, A., & Louveau, G. (1993). Sports, école, société: La part des femmes [Sports, school, society: The women’s part]. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 103, 115–117.Google Scholar
  15. De Beuckelaer, A., & Lievens, F. (2009). Measurement equivalence of paper-and-pencil and online organizational surveys: A large scale examination in 16 countries. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58, 336–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec’H, G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Le Bihan, D. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597–600. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00350.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Department of Economic and Social Affairs of United Nations. (2007). Femmes en l’an 2000 et au-delà [Women in 2000 year and beyond]. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/public/Women_and_Sport_French-web.pdf.
  18. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Draine, S. C., & Greenwald, A. G. (1998). Replicable unconscious semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 286–303. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.127.3.286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–74). New York, NY: Academic.Google Scholar
  22. Fontayne, P., Sarrazin, P., & Famose, J. P. (2002). Effet du genre sur le choix et le rejet des activités physiques et sportives en Éducation Physique et Sportive: une approche additive et différentielle du modèle de l’androgynie. [Effect of gender on choice and rejection of sports and physical activities in physical education and sports: An additive and differential approach of the androgyny model]. Movement & Sport Sciences, 45, 45–56.Google Scholar
  23. Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2004). Parental influences on youth involvement in sports. In M. R. Weiss (Ed.), Developmental sport and exercise psychology: A lifespan perspective (pp. 145–164). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.Google Scholar
  24. Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2011). A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. Psychological Review, 118, 247–279. doi: 10.1037/a0022327.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. French Interdepartmental Committee of Women’s Rights. (2012). Une troisième génération des droits des femmes: vers une société de l’égalité réelle [A third generation of women’s rights: Toward a society of real equality]. Retrieved from http://femmes.gouv.fr/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/CI-DDF-RELEVE-V7.pdf.
  26. French Ministry of Sports. (2013). Les chiffres clés de la féminisation du sport en France [The key numbers of sport feminization in France]. Retrieved from http://www.sports.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/ccfs_2012-2013_06062014.pdf.
  27. French Ministry of Women’s Rights. (2015). Vers l’égalité réelle entre les femmes et les hommes - Chiffres Clés – L’essentielle édition 2015 [Toward a real equality between women and men – Key numbers – The essential edition 2015]. Retrieved from http://femmes.gouv.fr/publications/egalite-entre-les-femmes-et-les-hommes/vers-legalite-reelle-entre-les-femmes-et-les-hommes-chiffres-cles-lessentiel-edition-2015/.
  28. French Sports National Olympic Committee. (2012). Charte d’éthique et de déontologie du sport Français [Charter of ethics and conduct of the French sport]. Retrieved from http://franceolympique.com/files/File/publications/Charte%20ethique%20et%20de%20deontologie%20du%20sport%20adoptee%20par%20AG%20CNOSF%202012.05.10.pdf.
  29. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3–25. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.109.1.3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gupta, V. K., Turban, D. B., & Bhawe, N. M. (2008). The effect of stereotype activation on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1053–1061. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1053.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hardin, M., & Greer, J. D. (2009). The influence of gender-role socialization, Media use and sports participation on perception of gender-appropriate sports. Journal of Sport Behavior, 32, 207–226.Google Scholar
  33. Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369–1385. doi: 10.1177/0146167205275613.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hundhammer, T., & Mussweiler, T. (2012). How gender puts you in gendered shoes: Sexuality-priming leads to gender-based self-perception and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 176–193. doi: 10.1037/a0028121.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson, K. L., & Tassinary, L. G. (2005). Perceiving gender directly and indirectly: Meaning in motion and morphology. Psychological Science, 16, 890–897. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01633.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson, K. L., Iida, M., & Tassinary, L. G. (2012). Person (mis)perception: Functionally biased gender categorization of bodies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 4982–4989. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2060.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R. B. (2006). The Single Category-Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 16–32. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kawakami, K., Dion, K. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1999). Implicit stereotyping and prejudice and the primed Stroop task. Swiss Journal of Psychology / Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 58, 241–250. doi: 10.1024//1421-0185.58.4.241.Google Scholar
  39. Koivula, N. (1995). Ratings of gender appropriateness of sports participation: Effects of gender-based schematic processing. Gender Roles, 33, 543–557. doi: 10.1007/bf01544679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lane, K. A., Kang, J., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). Implicit social cognition and law. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 427–451. doi: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lemm, K. M., Dabady, M., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Gender picture priming: It works with denotative and connotative primes. Social Cognition, 23, 218–241. doi: 10.1521/soco.2005.23.3.218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lentillon, V. (2009). Les stéréotypes sexués relatifs à la pratique des activités physiques et sportives chez les adolescent(e)s Français et leurs conséquences discriminatoires [The gender stereotypes related to the practice of sport and physical activities among French adolescents and their discriminatory consequences]. Bulletin de Psychologie, 62, 15–28. doi: 10.3917/BUPSY.499.0015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leyens, J. P., Yzerbyt, V., & Schadron, G. (1994). Stereotypes and social cognition. Bruxelles: Mardaga. doi: 10.2307/2077497.Google Scholar
  44. Lim, S. S., Vos, T., Flaxman, A. D., Danaei, G., Shibuya, K., Adair-Rohani, H., & Aryee, M. (2012). A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet, 380, 2224–2260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1995). Homogeneity of gender groups in memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 193–217. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1995.1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Louveau, C. (2004). Sexuation du travail sportif et construction sociale de la féminité [Sexuation of sporting work and social construction of feminity]. Cahiers du genre, 36, 163–183. doi: 10.3917/cdge.036.0163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Matteo, S. (1986). The effect of gender and gender-schematic processing on sport participation. Gender Roles, 15, 417–432. doi: 10.1007/bf00287981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Matteo, S. (1988). The effect of gender-schematic processing on decisions about gender-inappropriate sport behavior. Gender Roles, 18, 41–58. doi: 10.1007/bf00288016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Messner, M. A. (2002). Taking the field: Women, men, and sports. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  50. Messner, M. (2011). Gender ideologies, youth sports, and the production of soft essentialism. Sociology of Sport Journal, 28, 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Metheny, E. (1965). Connotations of movement in sport and dance. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.Google Scholar
  52. Müller, F., & Rothermund, K. (2014). What does it take to activate stereotypes? Simple primes don’t seem enough a replication of stereotype activation (Banaji & Hardin, 1996; Blair & Banaji, 1996). Social Psychology, 45, 187–193. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. National Institute of Health and Medical Research. (2008). Activité physique: contextes et effets sur la santé. [Physical activity: Contexts and effects on health.] Retrieved from http://www.ipubli.inserm.fr/handle/10608/80.
  54. Ndobo, A. (2013). Discourse and attitudes on occupational aspirations and the issue of gender equality: What are the effects of perceived gender asymmetry and prescribed gender role? European Review of Applied Psychology, 63, 231–241. doi: 10.1016/j.erap.2013.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 101–115. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Hansen, J. J., Devos, T., Lindner, N. M., Ranganath, K. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 36–88. doi: 10.1080/10463280701489053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Riemer, B. A., & Visio, M. E. (2003). Gender-typing of sports: An investigation of Metheny’s classification. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 193–204. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2003.10609081.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Ross, S. R., & Shinew, K. J. (2008). Perspectives of women college athletes on sport and gender. Gender Roles, 58, 40–57. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9275-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rudman, L. A., & Pheelan, J. E. (2010). The effect of priming gender roles on women’s implicit gender beliefs and career aspirations. Social Psychology, 41, 192–202. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Steele, J. R., & Ambady, N. (2006). Math is hard! The effect of gender priming on women’s attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 428–436. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Stromquist, N. P. (2004). Inequality as a way of life: Education and social class in Latin America. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 12, 95–119. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. United Nation Statement. (2013). Secretary-General’s message to the World Health Assembly. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/sg/STATEMENTS/index.asp?nid=6826.
  64. Van-Tuyckom, C., & Scheerder, J. (2010). Sport for all? Insight into stratification and compensation mechanisms of sporting activity in the 27 European Union member states. Sport, Education and Society, 15, 495–512. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2010.514746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Webb, T. L., Sheeran, P., & Pepper, J. (2012). Gaining control over responses to implicit attitude tests: Implementation intentions engender fast responses on attitude‐incongruent trials. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 13–32. doi: 10.1348/014466610x532192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Wheeler, S. C., & Petty, R. E. (2001). The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: A review of possible mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 797–826. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.127.6.797.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mélissa Plaza
    • 1
    Email author
  • Julie Boiché
    • 1
  • Lionel Brunel
    • 1
  • François Ruchaud
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory Epsylon “Dynamics of Human Abilities and Health Behavior” (EA 4556)University of MontpellierMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations