The Gendered Culture of Scientific Competence: A Study of Scientist Characters in Doctor Who 1963–2013
The present study examines the relationship between gender and scientific competence in fictional representations of scientists in the British science fiction television program Doctor Who. Previous studies of fictional scientists have argued that women are often depicted as less scientifically capable than men, but these have largely taken a simple demographic approach or focused exclusively on female scientist characters. By examining both male and female scientists (n = 222) depicted over the first 50 years of Doctor Who, our study shows that, although male scientists significantly outnumbered female scientists in all but the most recent decade, both genders have consistently been depicted as equally competent in scientific matters. However, an in-depth analysis of several characters depicted as extremely scientifically non-credible found that their behavior, appearance, and relations were universally marked by more subtle violations of gender expectations. Incompetent male scientists were largely depicted as effeminate and lacking in masculinity. In addition, many incompetent male and all incompetent female scientists served regimes that were problematically effeminate, collectivist and pacifist, or male-rejecting and ruled by women. Although Doctor Who avoids overtly treating women and men unequally, strong codes of masculine capability and prowess nevertheless continue to influence representations of scientific competence, pointing to the continued pervasiveness of such associations within wider Western culture. Professionals working to encourage gender-inclusive practices in science should look to subtle discourses about the masculine culture of science in addition to institutional and structural impediments to participation for women and gender minorities.
KeywordsScience Gender equality Gender variance Masculinities Television Media images Popular culture Content analysis
Thanks to Emlyn Williams for statistical advice, and two anonymous peer reviewers for their useful suggestions.
- Anon (2008, December 1). ‘Doctor Who should be a woman’ say female scientists. The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/celebritynews/3538551/Doctor-Who-should-be-a-woman-say-female-scientists.html.
- Bacon, F. (1620). Author’s preface. In The new organon: Or true directions concerning the interpretation of nature. Available online at http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/bacon1620.pdf.
- Bell, S. (2009). Women in science in Australia: Maximising productivity, diversity and innovation. Australia: Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies.Google Scholar
- Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2011). Grounded theory: A practical guide. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Brown, H. C. (2016). The ladies of sci-fi: 5 reasons why we need a female doctor in Doctor Who. The Mary Sue. Retrieved from http://www.themarysue.com/the-ladies-of-sci-fi-5-reasons-why-we-need-a-female-doctor-in-doctor-who/.
- Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.”. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- De Swert, K. (2012). Calculating inter-coder reliability in media content analysis using Krippendorff’s Alpha. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Ellis, S., & Thomas, M. D. (Eds.). (2013). Queers dig time lords: A celebration of Doctor Who by the LGBTQ fans who love it. Des Moines: Mad Norwegian Press.Google Scholar
- Fiske, J. (1984). Popularity and ideology: A structuralist reading of Dr. Who. In W. D. Rowland Jr. & B. Watkins (Eds.), Interpreting television: Current research perspectives (pp. 165–198). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Haran, J., Chimba, M., Reid, G., & Kitzinger, J. (2008). Screening women in SET: How women in science, engineering and technology are represented in films and on television (Research report series for UKRC No.3). Bradford: UK Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering & Technology.Google Scholar
- Harmes, M. K. (2014). Doctor Who and the art of adaptation. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Haynes, R. D. (1994). From Faust to Strangelove: Representations of the scientist in western literature. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Kant, I. (1784). An answer to the question: “What is enlightenment?” Retrieved from https://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/documents/What_is_Enlightenment.pdf.
- Kitzinger, J., Haran, J., Chimba, M., & Boyce, T. (2008). Role models in the media: An exploration of the views and experiences of women in science, engineering and technology (Research report series for UKRC No.1). Bradford: UK Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering & Technology.Google Scholar
- Le Doeuff, M. (2003). The sex of knowing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Merrick, H. (2012). Challenging implicit gender bias in science: Positive representations of female scientists in fiction. Journal of Community Positive Practices, 4, 744–769.Google Scholar
- Meyers, D. (2004). Feminist perspectives on the self. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2004 edition). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2004/entries/feminism-self/.
- Nyder. (n.d.). The evolving guide to lesbian/gay/bisexual moments in Doctor Who. Retrieved from http://www.nyder.com/stuff/whosqueer.html.
- Orthia, L. A. (2010). Enlightenment was the choice: Doctor Who and the democratisation of science (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
- Orthia, L. A. (2013). Savages, science, stagism and the naturalized ascendancy of the Not-We in Doctor Who. In L. A. Orthia (Ed.), Doctor Who and race (pp. 269–287). Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
- Schiebinger, L. (1989). The mind has no sex? Women in the origins of modern science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Stanish, D., & Myles, L. M. (Eds.). (2012). Chicks unravel time: Women journey through every season of Doctor Who. Des Moines: Mad Norwegian Press.Google Scholar
- Théry, I. (2009). Gender: A question of personal identity or a mode of social relations? Paper presented at the Centre M. Bloch, EHESS, Berlin. Retrieved from http://www.pacific-dialogues.fr/pdf/4-IT_ConfBerlin_2009_def.pdf.
- Thomas, L. M., & O’Shea, T. (Eds.). (2010). Chicks dig time lords: A celebration of Doctor Who by the women who love it. Des Moines: Mad Norwegian Press.Google Scholar
- Thomson, R. G. (1997). Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American culture and literature. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Thornton, M. (2013). The mirage of merit: Reconstituting the ‘ideal academic.’ Australian Feminist Studies, 28, 127–143.Google Scholar
- Tulloch, J., & Jenkins, H. (1995). Science fiction audiences: Watching Doctor Who and Star Trek. London: Routledge.Google Scholar