Where are the Women in Wikipedia? Understanding the Different Psychological Experiences of Men and Women in Wikipedia
A comprehensive survey conducted in 2008 found that only 13 % of Wikipedia contributors are women. We proposed that masculine norms for behavior in Wikipedia, which may be further exacerbated by the disinhibiting nature of an online, anonymous environment, lead to different psychological experiences for women and men, which, in turn, explain gender differences in contribution behavior. We hypothesized that, among a sample of individuals who occasionally contribute to Wikipedia, women would report less confidence in their expertise, more discomfort with editing others’ work, and more negative responses to critical feedback compared to men, all of which are crucial aspects of contributing to Wikipedia. We also hypothesized that gender differences in these psychological experiences would explain women’s lower contribution rate compared to men in this sample. We analyzed data from a sample of 1,598 individuals in the United States who completed the English version of an international survey of Wikipedia users and readers conducted in 2008 and who reported being occasional contributors. Significant gender differences were found in confidence in expertise, discomfort with editing, and response to critical feedback. Women reported less confidence in their expertise, expressed greater discomfort with editing (which typically involves conflict) and reported more negative responses to critical feedback compared to men. Mediation analyses revealed that confidence in expertise and discomfort with editing partially mediated the gender difference in number of articles edited, the standard measure for contribution to Wikipedia. Implications for the gender gap in Wikipedia and in organizations more generally are discussed.
KeywordsGender differences in organizations Online organizations Gender stereotypes
- Ahlqvist, S., London, B., & Rosenthal, L. (2013). Unstable identity compatibility: How gender rejection sensitivity undermines the success of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields. Psychological Science, 24, 1644–1652. doi: 10.1177/0956797613476048.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor. (2013). Median weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers by detailed occupation and sex. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat39.pdf.
- Buriol, L. S., Castillo, C., Donato, D., Leonardi, S., & Millozzi, S. (2006). Temporal analysis of the Wikigraph. In Proceedings of Web Intelligence Conference (pp. 45–51). Hong Kong. doi: 10.1109/WI.2006.164.
- Burke, M. & Kraut, R. (2008, November). Mopping up: Modeling Wikipedia promotion decisions. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 27–36). San Diego: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1460563.1460571.
- Cassell, J. (2011, February 4). Edit wars behind the scene. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/02/02/where-are-the-women-in-wikipedia/a-culture-of-editing-wars.
- Catalyst. (2012). Statistical overview of women in the workplace. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/publication/219/statistical-overview-of-women-in-the-workplace.
- Cohen, N. (2011, January 30). Define gender gap? Look up Wikipedia’s contributor list. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/31/business/media/31link.html?_r=0.
- Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Glott, R. & Ghosh, R. (2010). Analysis of Wikipedia survey data: Age and gender differences. 2010. Retrieved from http://www.wikipediasurvey.org.
- Harrington, E. (2014). Government-funded study: why is Wikipedia sexist? The Washington Free Beacon. Retrieved from http://freebeacon.com/issues/government-funded-study-why-is-wikipedia-sexist/.
- Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Newton, T., Cacioppo, J. T., MacCallum, R. C., Glaser, R., & Malarkey, W. B. (1996). Marital conflict and endocrine function: Are men really more physiologically affected than women? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 324–332. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.64.2.324.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kittur, A., Chi, E., Pendleton, B. A., Suh, B., & Mytkowicz, T. (2007). Power of the few vs. wisdom of the crowd: Wikipedia and the rise of the bourgeoisie. In Proceedings of Alt. CHI. San Jose, CA: ACM.Google Scholar
- Kittur, A., Suh, B., Pendleton, B. A., & Chi, E. H. (2007). He says, she says: Conflict and coordination in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of Alt. CHI. San Jose, CA: ACM.Google Scholar
- Kittur, A., Chi, E. H., & Suh, B. (2009). What’s in Wikipedia? Mapping topics and conflict using socially annotated category structure. In Proceedings of Alt. CHI. Boston, MA: ACM.Google Scholar
- Koh, A. (2013). How to organize your own Wikipedia edit-a-thon. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/how-to-organize-your-own-wikipedia-edit-a-thon/49757.
- Lam, S. T. K., Uduwage, A., Dong, Z., Sen, S., Musicant, D.R., Terveen, L., & Riedl, J. (2011, October). WP: Clubhouse?: An exploration of Wikipedia’s gender imbalance. In Proceedings of the 7 th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (pp, 1–10). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333–352). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Morgan, J.T., Bouterse, S., Walls, H., & Stierch, S. (2013, February). Tea and sympathy: Crafting positive new user experiences on Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 839–848). San Antonio, TX: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2441776.2441871.
- National Science Foundation. (2009). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Division of Science Resources Statistics, NSF 09-305. Arlington, VA: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd.
- Oped Project. (2015.). Retrieved from http://www.opedproject.org/.
- Paling, E. (2015). Wikipedia’s hostility to women. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/10/how-wikipedia-is-hostile-to-women/411619/.
- Priedhorsky, R., Chen, J., Lam, S. T. K., Panciera, K., Terveen, L., & Riedl, J. (2007, November). Creating, destroying, and restoring value in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2007 International ACM conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 259–268). Sanibel Island: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1316624.1316663.
- Reagle, J., & Rhue, L. (2011). Gender bias in Wikipedia and Britannica. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1138–1158.Google Scholar
- Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Suh, B., Convertino, G., Chi, E. H., & Pirolli, P. (2009, October). The singularity is not near: Slowing growth of Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 5 th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (p. 8). Orlando: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1641309.1641322.
- Viégas, F. B., Wattenberg, M., & Dave, K. (2004, April). Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 575–582). Vienna, Austria: ACM. doi: 10.1145/985692.985765.
- Voss, J. (2005). Measuring Wikipedia. Proceedings of 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
- Wikimedia. (2011). Wikipedia Editors Survey. Retrieved from https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Editor_Survey_2011.
- Wikipedia.org. (2012). Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About.
- Zickuhr, K. (2011). Wikipedia, past and present. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Wikipedia.aspx.