Boys Act and Girls Appear: A Content Analysis of Gender Stereotypes Associated with Characters in Children’s Popular Culture
- 6.9k Downloads
We conducted a content analysis of children’s products in U.S. popular culture that depict male and female characters to determine the extent to which gender stereotypes were portrayed. We examined popular Halloween costumes (90 female costumes and 90 male costumes) from popular retail websites, 79 popular dolls and 71 popular action figures from national store websites, and Valentines found at two national stores (portraying 54 female and 59 male characters). The coding system was adapted from several different studies. Female characters were far more likely than male characters to be depicted with traditional feminine stereotyped cues (e.g., decorative clothing) and sexually submissive, hyper-feminine cues (e.g., revealing clothing). Male characters were far more likely to be portrayed with traditional masculine characteristics like functional clothing and the body-in-motion, and they were often depicted with hyper-masculine accessories such as having a weapon. Implications for children’s gender-role development and the perpetuation of patriarchy are discussed.
KeywordsStereotyped attitudes Popular culture Socialization Human sex differences
Sarah K. Murnen, Department of Psychology, Kenyon College; Claire Greenfield, Department of Psychology, Kenyon College; Abigail Younger,, Department of Psychology, Kenyon College; Hope Boyd, Department of Psychology, Kenyon College. We would like to thank Sabina Hawks for her suggestions about the Valentines.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The validity study was reviewed and approved by the Kenyon College Institutional Review Board.
- American Psychological Association (2010). Report of the APA Task Force on the sexualization of girls. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/girls/report-full.pdf.
- Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (2004). Social cognitive theory of gender development and functioning. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 92–119). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Collins, R. L. (2011). Content analysis of gender roles in media: Where are we now and where should we go? Sex Roles, 64, 290–298. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9929-5.
- Coyne, S. M., Linder, J. R., Rasmussen, E. E., Nelson, D. A., & Collier, K. M. (2014). It’s a bird! It’s a plane! It’s a gender stereotype!: Longitudinal associations between superhero viewing and gender stereotyped play. Sex Roles, 70, 416–430. doi: 10.1007/s11199-014-0374-8.
- Douglas, S. J. (2010). Enlightened sexism: The seductive message that feminism’s work is done. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
- Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
- Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., Signorielli, N., & Shanahan, J. (2002). Growing up with television: Cultivation processes. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 43–67). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1979). Gender advertisements. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Jeffrys, S. (2005). Beauty and misogyny: Harmful cultural practices in the West. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Murnen, S. K. (1998). The hyper-femininity scale. In C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Scheer, & S. L. David (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 258–261). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2013). I’d rather be a famous fashion model than a famous scientist: The rewards and costs of internalizing sexualization. In E. Zurbriggen & T. A. Roberts (Eds.), The sexualization of girls and girlhood (pp. 235–253). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Murnen, S. K., Wright, C., & Kaluzny, G. (2002). If “boys will be boys”, then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 46, 359–375. doi: 10.1023/A:1020488928736.
- Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Smolak, L., & Murnen, S. K. (2011). The sexualization of women and girls as key antecedents to self-objectification. In R. Calogero & J. K. Thompson (Eds.), The objectification of women: Innovative directions in research and practice (pp. 53–75). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Tiggemann, M. (2011). Mental health risks of self-objectification: A review of the empirical evidence for disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual dysfunction. In R. M. Calogero, S. Tantleff-Dunn, & J. K. Thompson (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 139–159). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Twenge, J. M. (2009). Status and gender: The paradox of progress in an age of narcissism. Sex Roles, 61, 338–340. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9617-5.
- Valenti, J. (2010). The purity myth: How America’s obsession with virginity is hurting young women. Berkeley: Seal Press.Google Scholar