Sex Roles

, Volume 74, Issue 5–6, pp 231–241 | Cite as

The Relationship between Mother-Daughter Self-Objectification: Identifying Direct, Indirect, and Conditional Direct Effects

  • Analisa ArroyoEmail author
  • Kristin K. Andersen
Original Article


Grounded in aspects of objectification theory, social learning theory, and attachment theory, we investigated the extent to which mothers’ and daughters’ self-objectification were related to one another’s and also identified three potential intervening factors. Specifically, we hypothesized a (statistical) direct effect of mothers’ self-objectification on that of their daughters’ (H1), as well as investigated a conditional direct effect (i.e., maternal care) (H2) and two indirect effects (i.e., co-rumination and mothers’ weight concerns) (H3) as intervening factors that may help explain the relationship between mothers’ and daughters’ self-objectification. A sample of 199 U.S. undergraduate women and their mothers completed an online survey; daughters and mothers mean ages were 19.42 and 50.15, respectively, with a majority of them reporting a normal body mass index (daughters: 23.05; mothers: 25.74) and being White/Caucasian (daughters: 79.4 %; mothers: 80.9 %). The results generally supported the hypotheses. First, H1 was confirmed: Mothers’ and daughters’ self-objectification were positively related to one another’s. Second, perceived maternal care was found to moderate this relationship, such that daughters reported higher levels of self-objectification when they perceived their mothers to be less caring; thus, H2 was confirmed. Third, H3 was partially confirmed: Perceived co-rumination about weight with mothers, but not perceived mothers’ weight-related concerns, was found to be a significant mediator. These results suggest that mothers can serve as protective or inhibitory factors in daughters’ experience of self-objectification depending on mothers’ level of care and their direct communication with their daughters’ about their bodies.


Mother-daughter Objectification Maternal care Co-rumination Weight concerns 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Because our study involved human subjects, we followed the guidelines for seeking approval from the Institutional Review Board. Upon approval of IRB, all participants read and agreed to the informed consent presented to them before completing this study.


  1. ‬‬‬‬‬‬‬Abraczinskas, M., Fisak, B., & Barnes, R. D. (2012). The relation between parental influence, ‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬body image, and eating behaviors in a nonclinical female sample. Body Image, 9, 93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.10.005
  2. Ackard, D. M., Neumark-Sztainer, D., Story, M., & Perry, C. (2006). Parent-child connectedness ‬‬‬‬and behavioral and emotional health among adolescents. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30, 59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Arroyo, A., Segrin, C., & Harwood, J. (2014). Appearance-related communication mediates the link between self-objectification and health and well-being outcomes. Human Communication Research, 40, 463–482. doi: 10.1111/hcre.12036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arroyo, A., Segrin, C., Harwood, J., & Bonito, J. A. (2015). Co-rumination of fat talk and weight control practices: An application of confirmation theory. Health Communication (in press).Google Scholar
  6. Aubrey, J. S., Henson, J. R., Hopper, K. M., & Smith, S. E. (2009). A picture is worth twenty words (about the self): Testing the priming influence of visual sexual objectification on women’s self-objectification. Communication Research Reports, 26, 271–284. doi: 10.1080/08824090903293551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bakhshi, S. (2011). Women’s body image and the role of culture: A review of the literature. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 7, 374–394. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v7i2.135.Google Scholar
  8. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  9. Benedikt, R., Wertheim, E., & Love, A. (1998). Eating attitudes and weight-loss attempts in female adolescents and their mothers. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 27, 43–57. doi: 10.1023/A:1022876715005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  11. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism; Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1 attachment. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
  13. Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676–713. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.676.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Calmes, C. A., & Roberts, J. E. (2008). Rumination in interpersonal relationships: Does co-rumination explain gender differences in emotional distress and relationship satisfaction among college students? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 577–590. doi: 10.1007/s10608-008-9200-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Calogero, R. M. (2009). Objectification processes and disordered eating in British women and men. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 394–402. doi: 10.1177/1359105309102192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2015). Retrieved from
  17. Clarke, L. H., & Griffin, M. (2007). Becoming and being gendered through the body: Older women, their mothers and body image. Ageing and Society, 27, 701–718. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X0700623X.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cooley, E., Toray, T., Wang, M. C., & Valdez, N. N. (2008). Maternal effects on daughters’ eating pathology and body image. Eating Behaviors, 9, 52–61. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2007.03.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Crawford, M., Lee, I., Portnoy, G., Gurung, A., Khati, D., Jha, P., & Regmi, A. C. (2009). Objectified body consciousness in a developing country: A comparison of mothers and daughters in the US and Nepal. Sex Roles, 60, 174–185. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9521-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davidson, C. L., Grant, D. M., Byrd-Craven, J., Mills, A. C., Judah, M. R., & Lechner, W. V. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Co-Rumination Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 171–175. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.002.
  22. Estlein, R., & Theiss, J. A. (2013, June). Responsiveness and control in marital and parental communication: Exploring consistencies across family subsystems and between perceived and observed behavior. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, London, England.Google Scholar
  23. Francis, L. A., & Birch, L. L. (2005). Maternal influences on daughters’ restrained eating behavior. Health Psychology, 24, 548–554. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.6.548.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grabe, S., Hyde, J. S., & Lindberg, S. M. (2007). Body objectification and depression in adolescents: The role of gender, shame, and rumination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 164–175. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00350.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grauerholz, E., & King, A. (1997). Primetime sexual harassment. Violence Against Women, 3, 129–148. doi: 10.1177/1077801297003002003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Grieve, R., & Helmick, A. (2008). The influence of men’s self-objectification on the drive for muscularity: Self-esteem, body satisfaction and muscle dysmorphia. International Journal of Men’s Health, 7, 288–298. doi: 10.3149/jmh.0703.288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kaschak, E. (1992). Engendered lives: A new psychology of women’s experience. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  30. Katz-Wise, S. L., Budge, S. L., Lindberg, S. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Individuation or identification? Self-objectification and the mother–adolescent relationship. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 366–380. doi: 10.1177/0361684312468425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Keery, H., van den Berg, P., & Thompson, J. K. (2004). An evaluation of the tripartite influence model of body dissatisfaction and eating disturbance with adolescent girls. Body Image, 1, 237–251. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2004.03.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Keery, H., Eisenberg, M. E., Boutelle, K., Neumark-Sztainer, D., & Story, M. (2006). Relationships between maternal and adolescent weight-related behaviors and concerns: The role of perception. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 61, 105–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.01.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Krassas, N. R., Blauwkamp, J. M., & Wesselink, P. (2003). “Master your Johnson”: Sexual rhetoric in Maxim and Stuff magazines. Sexuality and Culture, 7, 98–119. doi: 10.1007/s12119-003-1005-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. LaRossa, R., & Reitzes, D. C. (1993). Symbolic interactionism and family studies. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 135–163). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Levine, M. P., Smolak, L., & Hayden, H. (1994). The relation of sociocultural factors to eating attitudes and behaviors among middle school girls. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 471–490. doi: 10.1177/0272431694014004004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lin, C. (1997). Beefcake versus cheesecake in the 1990s: Sexist portrayals of both genders in television commercials. Howard Journal of Communications, 8, 237–249. doi: 10.1080/10646179709361757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lindberg, S. M., Grabe, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2007). Gender, pubertal development, and peer sexual harassment predict objectified body consciousness in early adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 723–742. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00544.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MacGeorge, E. L., Feng, B., & Burleson, B. R. (2011). Supportive communication. In M. L. Knapp, & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 317–354). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. McKinley, N. M. (1999). Women and objectified body consciousness: Mothers’ and daughters’ body experience in cultural, developmental, and familial context. Developmental Psychology, 35, 760–769. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.35.3.760.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. McKinley, N., & Hyde, J. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miga, E. M., Hare, A., Allen, J. P., & Manning, N. (2010). The relation of insecure attachment states of mind and romantic attachment styles to adolescent aggression in romantic relationships. Attachment & Human Development, 12, 463–481. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2010.501971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mikulincer, M., Florian, V., & Hirschberger, G. (2003). The existential function of close relationships: Introducing death into the science of love. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 20–40. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0701_2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Moradi, B. (2010). Addressing gender and cultural diversity in body image: Objectification theory as a framework for integrating theories and grounding research. Sex Roles, 63, 138–148. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9824-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moradi, B. (2011). Objectification theory: Areas of promise and refinement. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 153–163. doi: 10.1177/0011000010384279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moradi, B., & Huang, Y. P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Neumark-Sztainer, D., Bauer, K. W., Friend, S., Hannan, P. J., Story, M., & Berge, J. M. (2010). Family weight talk and dieting: How much do they matter for body dissatisfaction and disordered eating behaviors in adolescent girls? Journal of Adolescent Health, 47, 270–276. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.02.001.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Nichter, M. (2000). Fat talk. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. O’Dougherty, M., Schmitz, K. H., Hearst, M. O., Covelli, M., & Kurzer, M. S. (2011). Dual conversations: Body talk among young women and their social contacts. Qualitative Health Research, 21, 1191–1204. doi: 10.1177/1049732311405804.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Parker, G., Tupling, H., & Brown, L. B. (1979). A parental bonding instrument. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 52, 1–10. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1979.tb02487.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rodgers, R. F., Faure, K., & Chabrol, H. (2009). Gender differences in parental influences on adolescent body dissatisfaction and disordered eating. Sex Roles, 61, 837–849. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9690-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rodin, J., Silberstein, L., & Striegel-Moore, R. (1984). Women and weight: A normative discontent. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 267–307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  52. Rose, A. J. (2002). Co-rumination in the friendships of girls and boys. Child Development, 73, 1830–1843. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00509.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Rose, A. J., Carlson, W., & Waller, E. M. (2007). Prospective associations of co-rumination with friendship and emotional adjustment: Considering the socioemotional trade-offs of co-rumination. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1019–1031. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.1019.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Safford, S., Alloy, L., & Pieracci, A. (2007). A comparison of two measures of parental behavior. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16, 375–384. doi: 10.1007/s10826-006-9092-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Segrin, C., Woszidlo, A., Givertz, M., Bauer, A., & Taylor Murphy, M. (2012). The association between overparenting, parent-child communication, and entitlement and adaptive traits in adult children. Family Relations, 61, 237–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1741.3729.2011.00689.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Spitzack C. (1990). Confessing excess: Women and the politics of body reduction‬. New York: SUNY Press‬‬‬‬‬‬‬.‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬Google Scholar
  57. Starr, C. R., & Ferguson, G. M. (2012). Sexy dolls, sexy grade-schoolers? Media & maternal influences on young girls’ self-sexualization. Sex Roles, 67, 463–476. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0183-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thompson, J. K., Heinberg, L. J., Altabe, M., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (1999). Exacting beauty: Theory, assessment, and treatment of body image disturbance. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tiggemann, M., & McCourt, A. (2013). Body appreciation in adult women: Relationships with age and body satisfaction. Body Image, 10, 624–627. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.07.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. van den Berg, P., Neumark-Sztainer, D., Hannan, P. J., & Jess Haines, J. (2007). Is dieting advice from magazines helpful or harmful? Five-year associations with weight-control behaviors and psychological outcomes in adolescents. Pediatrics, 119, e30–e37. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0978.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Wilhelm, K., & Parker, G. (1990). Reliability of the parental bonding instrument and intimate bond measure scales. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 24, 199–202. doi: 10.3109/00048679009077683.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilhelm, K., Niven, H., Parker, G., & Hadzi-Pavlovic, D. (2005). The stability of the parental bonding instrument over a 20-year period. Psychological Medicine, 35, 387–393. doi: 10.1017/S0033291704003538.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Wiseman, M. C., & Moradi, B. (2010). Body image and eating disorder symptoms in sexual minority men: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 154–166. doi: 10.1037/t19098-000.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication StudiesUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations