Living in Metaphors, Trapped in a Matrix: The Ramifications of Neoliberal Ideology for Young Women’s Sexuality
- 820 Downloads
By proposing that gendered sexual norms dictating young women’s sexuality (i.e., the Virgin-Slut Continuum) are now joined by neoliberal scripts for sexual agency (i.e., the Agency Line), my hope was to prompt new conversations about the ideological context in which young women in the U.S. forge their sexualities. The responses to my original commentary indicate that there are many such conversations to be had. Before pursuing those, I wish to clarify some of the tenets of my proposal, most importantly that I do not advocate for the Agency Line and the matrix created by its intersection with the Virgin-Slut Continuum to be a fair or apt characterization of young women’s lived experiences. To the contrary, I see neoliberal sexual agency as a prescribed and prescriptive normative force that works in tandem with enduring gendered prohibitions to constrain young women’s sexual expression and to reinforce the sexual stigmatization of minority girls and women.
KeywordsYoung women Adolescent female sexuality Sexual agency Neoliberal ideology
Conflict of Interest
The author is unaware of any potential conflicts of interest.
- American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls (2007). Report of the APA task force on the sexualization of girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2015). The agency line: A neoliberal metric for appraising young women’s sexuality. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-015-0452-6.
- Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Livingston, J. A., & Fava, N. M. (2012). “Not always a clear path”: Making space for peers, adults, and complexity in adolescent girls’ sexual development. In E. L. Zurbriggen & T. Roberts (Eds.), The sexualization of girls and girlhood: Causes, consequences, & resistance (pp. 257–277). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bettie, J. (2003). Women without class: Girls, race, and identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- DuBois, W. E. B. (1998). Black reconstruction. New York: Free Press (Original work published 1935).Google Scholar
- Duggan, L. (2003). The twilight of equality?: Neoliberalism, cultural politics, and the attack on democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- Fasula, A. M., Carry, M., & Miller, K. S. (2014). A multidimensional framework for the meanings of the sexual double standard and its application for the sexual health of young black women in the U.S. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 170–183. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.716874.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gavey, N. (2005). Just sex?: The cultural scaffolding of rape. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hills, R. (2015). When your sex life doesn’t follow the script. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/08/31/when-your-sex-life-doesnt-follow-the-script.
- Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1998). The male in the head: Young people, heterosexuality and power. London: Tufnell Press.Google Scholar
- Katz, J., & Tirone, V. (2015). From the agency line to the picket line: Neoliberal ideals, sexual realities, and arguments about abortion in the U.S. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-015-0475-z.
- Lamb, S. (2015). Revisiting choice and victimization: A commentary on Bay-Cheng’s agency matrix. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-015-0508-7.
- Lerum, K., & Dworkin, S. L. (2015). Sexual agency is not a problem of neoliberalism: Feminism, sexual justice, & the carceral turn. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-015-0525-6.
- Taft, J. K. (2011). Rebel girls: Youth activism and social change across the Americas. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
- Tanenbaum, L. (2015). I am not a slut: Slut-shaming in the age of the internet. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
- Tanenbaum, L. (2000). Slut! Growing up female with a bad reputation. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
- Tolman, D. L. (2003). Improving women’s sexual assertiveness. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 35, 48. doi: 10.1111/j.1931-2393.2003.tb00087.x
- Tolman, D. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Tolman, D. L., Anderson, S. M., & Belmonte, K. (2015). Mobilizing metaphor: Considering complexities, contradictions, and contexts in adolescent girls’ and young women’s sexual agency. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-015-0510-0.