Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 73, Issue 11–12, pp 490–496 | Cite as

Gender in Context: Considering Variability in Wood and Eagly’s Traditions of Gender Identity

  • Clare M. Mehta
Feminist Forum Commentary

Abstract

This paper was written in response to Wood and Eagly’s (2015) feminist forum paper that proposes two traditions for gender identity research, a tradition based on gender-typed attributes and a tradition based on gender self-conceptualization. The present paper expands on Wood and Eagly’s (2015) framework by proposing, in line with social constructivist models, that both traditions of gender identity may be variable and context dependent. Specifically, the present paper reviews research conducted in the U.S.A. that suggests that gender-typed attributes and components of gender self-conceptualization may change based on contextual factors such as the gender of people in a person’s immediate context and the salience of gender in a given situation. The paper also reviews ways in which variation in gender-typed attributes and components of gender self-conceptualization has been measured previously, and suggests the use of experience sampling methodology for future research. Finally, the paper encourages researchers to consider Wood and Eagly’s (2015) suggestion of using the principle of compatibility when selecting trait or state measures of gender identity, and proposes that beliefs in gender essentialism (that gender differences are due to innate traits) may be reduced by understanding how contextual factors influence gender identity.

Keywords

Gender identity Social constructionism Context Gender-typed traits Femininity Masculinity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Yulia Dementieva for creating the figures presented in this manuscript.

Ethics Statement

IRB approval was granted for unpublished data presented in this paper. This unpublished data was collected in accordance with APA ethical guidelines.

References

  1. Anselmi, D. L., & Law, A. L. (1998). Questions of gender, perspectives and paradoxes. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  2. Berenbaum, S. A., & Beltz, A. M. (2011). Sexual differentiation of human behavior: Effects of prenatal and pubertal organizational hormones. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 32, 183–200. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2011.03.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brewer, G., & Hamilton, V. (2014). Female mate retention, sexual orientation, and gender identity. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 8, 12–19. doi: 10.1037/h0097245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cota, A. A., & Dion, K. L. (1986). Salience of gender and sex composition of ad hoc groups: An experimental test of distinctiveness theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 770–776. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1998). Gender behavior in a social context a social-psychological model of gender. In D. L. Anselmi & A. L. Law (Eds.), Questions of gender, perspectives and paradoxes (pp. 367–376). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  7. Dinella, L. M., Fulcher, M., & Weisgram, E. S. (2014). Sex-typed personality traits and gender identity as predictors of young adults' career interests. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 493–504. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0234-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Drury, K., Bukowski, W. M., Velásquez, A. M., & Stella-Lopez, L. (2013). Victimization and gender identity in single-sex and mixed-sex schools: Examining contextual variations in pressure to conform to gender norms. Sex Roles, 69, 442–454. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0118-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (2001). Gender identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for psychosocial adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 451–463. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.451.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fleeson, W. (2004). Moving personality beyond the person-situation debate: The challenge and the opportunity of within-person variability. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 83–87. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00280.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Funder, D. C. (2006). Towards a resolution of the personality triad: Persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 21–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hyde, J. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones, K. D., & Heesacker, M. (2012). Addressing the situation: Some evidence for the significance of microcontexts with the gender role conflict construct. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13, 294–307. doi: 10.1037/a0025797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Larson, R., & Richards, M. H. (1994). Divergent realities: The emotional lives of mothers, fathers, and adolescents. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Leaper, C. (2000). Gender, affiliation, assertion, and the interactive context of parent–child play. Developmental Psychology, 36, 381–393. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.36.3.381.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Leszczynski, J. P. (2009). A state conceptualization: Are individuals' masculine and feminine personality traits situationally influenced? Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 157–162. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leszczynski, J. P., & Strough, J. (2008). The contextual specificity of masculinity and femininity in early adolescence. Social Development, 17, 719–736. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00443.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lippa, R., & Connolly, S. (1990). Gender diagnosticity: A new Bayesian approach to gender-related individual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1051–1065. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45, 513–520. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.45.4.513.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mehta, C.M., & Dementieva, Y (2015a). The contextual specificity of gender: Femininity and masculinity in same- and other-sex contexts. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  21. Mehta, C.M., & Dementieva, Y. (2015b). Associations between location and reported femininity and masculinity. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, Emmanuel College, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  22. Mehta, C. M., & Strough, J. (2010). Gender segregation and gender-typing in adolescence. Sex Roles, 63, 251–263. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9780-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mehta, C. M., Walls, C., Blood, E. A., & Shrier, L. A. (2014). Associations between affect, context, and sexual desire in depressed young women. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 577–585. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.753026.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Musto, M. (2014). Athletes in the pool, girls and boys on deck: The contextual construction of gender in coed youth swimming. Gender and Society, 28, 359–380. doi: 10.1177/0891243213515945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oosterwegel, A. (2001) Commentary: The self-concept is dead, long live... which construct or process? Differentiation and organization of self-related theories. In H. A. Bosma, E. S. Kunnen, H. A. Bosma, & E. S. Kunnen (Eds.), Identity and emotion: Development through self-organization. (pp. 33–38). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Pickard, J., & Strough, J. (2003). The effects of same-sex and other-sex contexts on masculinity and femininity. Sex Roles, 48, 421–432. doi: 10.1037/t00748-000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rawlins, W. (2009). The compass of friendship: Narratives, identities, and dialogues. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  28. Reisner, S. L., Greytak, E. A., Parsons, J. T., & Ybarra, M. L. (2015). Gender minority social stress in adolescence: Disparities in adolescent bullying and substance use by gender identity. Journal of Sex Research, 52, 243–256. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2014.886321.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Shields, S. A. (1993). Speaking from the heart: Gender and the social meaning of emotion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Shields, S. A. (1998). Gender in the psychology of emotion: A selective research review. In D. L. Anselmi & A. L. Law (Eds.), Questions of gender, perspectives and paradoxes (pp. 376–390). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  31. Shields, S. A. (2013). Gender and emotion: What we think we know, what we need to know, and why it matters. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 423–435. doi: 10.1177/0361684313502312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shields, S. A., & Dicicco, E. C. (2011). The social psychology of sex and gender: From gender differences to doing gender. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 491–499. doi: 10.1177/0361684311414823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shrier, L. A., Shih, M. C., Hacker, L., & de Moor, C. (2007). A momentary sampling study of the affective experience following coital events in adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, e1–e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.10.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith, C. J., Noll, J. A., & Bryant, J. B. (1999). The effect of social context on gender self-concept. Sex Roles, 40, 499–512. doi: 10.1037/t00748-000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Van der Meulen, M. (2001). Developments in self-concept theory and research: Affect, context, and variability. In H. A. Bosma, E. S. Kunnen, H. A. Bosma, & E. S. Kunnen (Eds.), Identity and emotion: Development through self-organization (pp. 10–32). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vantieghem, W., Vermeersch, H., & Van Houtte, M. (2014). Why 'gender' disappeared from the gender gap: (Re-)introducing gender identity theory to educational gender gap research. Social Psychology of Education, 17, 357–381. doi: 10.1007/s11218-014-9248-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151. doi: 10.1177/0891243287001002002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. White, J. B., & Gardner, W. L. (2009). Think women, think warm: Stereotype content activation in women with a salient gender identity, using a modified stroop task. Sex Roles, 60, 247–260. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9526-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2015). Two traditions of research on gender identity. Sex Roles. doi: 10.1007/s11199-015-0480-2.
  40. Yoon, H. J., & Kim, Y. (2014). The moderating role of gender identity in responses to comedic violence advertising. Journal of Advertising, 43, 382–396. doi: 10.1080/00913367.2014.880390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Emmanuel College, Boston Children’s HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations