The Collateral Damage of Ambient Sexism: Observing Sexism Impacts Bystander Self-Esteem and Career Aspirations
- 1.2k Downloads
Prior research demonstrates detrimental effects of sexism on female targets’ well-being and career outcomes. Extending research on those targeted by sexism, the current study explored the collateral damage of ambient sexism on bystanders observing sexism directed at others. An experiment with 218 U.S. undergraduates at a large West-coast public university assessed how ambient sexism directed at a female job applicant impacted male and female bystanders’ self-esteem and career aspirations. Results generally supported theoretical predictions regarding the moderating impact of bystander gender on the relationship between ambient sexism and bystander well-being. As hypothesized, ambient hostile sexism more negatively impacted female bystanders than male bystanders with regard to performance-based state self-esteem. Performance-based self-esteem in turn predicted career aspirations such that lower performance-based state self-esteem predicted lower career aspirations: gender moderated this mediated relationship such that the indirect effect was more negative for female bystanders than male bystanders. Gender also moderated the relationship between ambient benevolent sexism and appearance-based state self-esteem. Women observing benevolent sexism tended to report enhanced appearance-based esteem relative to women in the hostile sexism and control conditions, whereas men observing benevolent sexism reported significantly lower appearance esteem than men in the hostile sexism and control conditions. In sum, the current study suggests that women and men bystanders are impacted differently by ambient benevolent and hostile sexism.
KeywordsAmbivalent sexism Benevolent sexism Ambient sexism Gender discrimination Well-being Bystander effects
- Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111–125. doi:10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Book.Google Scholar
- Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. The Academy of Management Review, 24, 452–471. doi:10.5465/AMR.1999.2202131.
- Bradley-Geist, J.C., Skorinko, J., & Spring, E. (2015). Moral credentials from the observer’s perspective: Impact on perceived bias, likeability, and well-being. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
- Dion, K. L., Dion, K. K., & Keelan, P. (1990). Appearance anxiety as a dimension of social-evaluative anxiety: Exploring the ugly duckling syndrome. Contemporary Social Psychology, 14, 220–224.Google Scholar
- Dworkin, A. (1974). Woman hating. New York: E.P. Dutton.Google Scholar
- Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi:10.1037// 0022–3518.104.22.1688.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Forbes, G. B., Doroszewicz, K., Card, K., & Adams-Curtis, L. (2004). Associations of the thin body ideal, ambivalent sexism, and self-esteem with body acceptance and the preferred body size of college women in Poland and the United States. Sex Roles, 50, 331–345. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000018889.14714.20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heckert, T. M., Droste, H. E., Farmer, G. W., Adams, P. J., Bradley, J. C., & Bonness, B. M. (2002). Effect of gender and work experience on importance of job characteristics when considering job offers. College Student Journal, 36, 344–356.Google Scholar
- Hitlan, R. T., Schneider, K. T., & Estrada, A. X. (2002, April). Reactions to personal and bystander sexual harassment experiences. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
- Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509. doi:10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1248.
- Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 233–265). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x.
- National Center for Education Statistics (2011). Total fall enrollment in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by level of enrollment, sex, attendance status, and age of student: 2007, 2009, 2011. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_303.45.asp
- Preacher, K. J. (2001). Calculation for the chi-square test: An interactive calculation tool for chi-square tests of goodness of fit and independence [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org.
- Rosenberg, M. (1986). Self-concept from middle childhood through adolescence. In J. Suls & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 3, pp. 107–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Shepherd, M., Erchull, M. J., Rosner, A., Taubenberger, L., Forsyth Queen, E., & McKee, J. (2011). “I’ll get that for you”: The relationship between benevolent sexism and body self-perceptions. Sex Roles, 64, 1–8. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9859-2.