Pursuing Desires Rather Than Duties? The Motivational Content of Gender Stereotypes
In the current research we provide initial documentation of the motivational content of gender stereotypes. Drawing from regulatory focus theory (Higgins, 1987, 1997), we distinguish between whether traits are perceived to be motivated by ideals, including hopes, dreams, and aspirations, and oughts, including responsibilities, duties, and obligations. In two studies of U.S. Midwestern undergraduates, participants rated the extent to which the traits of men or women are motivated by ideals or oughts. Study 1 included 137 introductory psychology students who rated gender stereotypic traits (e.g., competitiveness for men; sensitivity for women); Study 2 included 118 introductory psychology students who rated gender stereotypic or counterstereotypic traits (e.g., competitiveness for women; sensitivity for men). In both Studies 1 and 2, we demonstrate that people perceive women as especially motivated by ideals rather than oughts but men as equivalently motivated by ideals and oughts. These patterns emerge regardless of trait stereotypicality. In Study 3, we examined the relationship between perceptions of role flexibility and the perception of ideal motivation using a sample of 214 introductory psychology students from the Midwestern U.S. We found evidence that ascriptions of ideal motivation are associated with perceptions of role flexibility, which are greater for women. We discuss the implications of these beliefs for the legitimization of the existing gendered social system.
KeywordsGender stereotypes Gender roles Motivation Social roles Stereotype content
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of Interest
We have no conflicts of interest.
All participants were required to sign an informed consent prior to participation.
- Allport, G. W. (1954/1979). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
- Banchefsky, S., Diekman, A., Johnston, A. (2013). Achieving equality vs. avoiding discrimination: Using regulatory framing to affect attitudes. Poster presented at the 2013 meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
- Center for American Women and Politics. (2015). Women in elective office 2015: Fact Sheet. New Brunswick: Rutgers. Retrieved from http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/levels_of_office/documents/elective.pdf.
- Croft, A., Schmader, T., & Block, K. (2015). An underexamined inequality: Cultural and psychological barriers to men’s engagements with communal roles. Personality and Social Psychology Review. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1088868314564789.
- Eagly, A. H., & Diekman, A. B. (2003). The malleability of sex differences in response to changing social roles. In L. G. Aspinwall & U. M. Staudinger (Eds.), A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology (pp. 103–115). Washington, D.C.: APA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319.
- Johnston, A. M., & Diekman, A. B. (2013, January). Perceiving desires, not duties: Believing women are ideally motivated legitimizes the existing system. In M. Williams (Chair), When and why women step back from status: The enduring and self-reinforcing power of traditional gender roles. Symposium conducted at the 2013 meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
- Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837. doi: 10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1683.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1996). Pluralistic ignorance and the perpetuation of social norms by unwitting actors. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 161–209). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Labor. (2014). Women in the labor force: A databook (2014 ed., Report No. 1052). Washington, DC: U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.Google Scholar
- Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar