Sex Roles

, Volume 72, Issue 5–6, pp 173–182 | Cite as

Anything but Real: Body Idealization and Objectification of MTV Docusoap Characters

  • Mark A. Flynn
  • Sung-Yeon ParkEmail author
  • David T. Morin
  • Alexandru Stana
Original Article


Women and men featured in U.S. based MTV docusoaps were analyzed to explore body ideal and body exposure norms in a television genre highly popular among young people. Results from a quantitative content analysis of five popular docusoaps from 2004 to 2011 demonstrated that, although these shows were labeled as reality-based, the bodies displayed in them were highly idealized. Close to half of women’s bodies were coded as curvaceously thin and more than half of men’s bodies were coded as muscularly lean. Over two-thirds of women’s bodies and close to three-quarters of men’s bodies were coded as low fat, demonstrating that thinness was the most common body characteristic. In addition, cast members on the programs commonly exposed their bodies, including widespread partial nudity and some full nudity. Women, compared to men, exhibited a higher level of body exposure. However, men tended to expose their bodies to a higher degree than women. Close to half of all men were shown partially nude, compared to one-quarter of women. Characters with the idealized body types also exhibited a higher level of body exposure than others. These findings support previous research that investigated cultural expectations and media representations of women and men’s appearance in the U.S. The findings also demonstrate a growing focus on male body image and objectification. The potential psychological implications of self-objectification and modeling among adolescent audiences are discussed.


Reality TV MTV Docusoap Body image Body exposure Objectification Content analysis 


  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Andrejevic, M. (2004). Reality TV: The work of being watched. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous. (2011, Feb. 16). “The Hills” was fake: Star says MTV reality show all scripted. The New York Post. Retrieved from
  4. Aubrey, J. S. (2006). Effects of sexually objectifying media on self-objectification and body surveillance in undergraduates: Results of a 2-year panel study. Journal of Communication, 56, 366–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00024.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aubrey, J. S., & Taylor, L. D. (2009). The role of lad magazines in priming men’s chronic and temporary appearance-related schemata: An investigation of longitudinal and experimental findings. Human Communication Research, 35, 28–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.01337.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baruh, L. (2009). Publicized intimacies on reality television: An analysis of voyeuristic content and its contribution to the appeal of reality programming. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53, 190–210. doi: 10.1080/08838150902907678.
  7. Beck, D., Hellmueller, L. C., & Aeschbaher, N. (2012). Factual entertainment and reality TV. Communication Research Trends, 31, 4–27.Google Scholar
  8. Blond, A. (2008). Impacts of exposure to images of ideal bodies on male body dissatisfaction: A review. Body Image, 5, 244–250. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.02.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cafri, G., Blevins, N., & Thompson, J. K. (2006). The drive for muscle leanness: A complex case with features of muscle dysmorphia and eating disorder not otherwise specified. Eating and Weight Disorders, 11, 117–118. doi: 10.1007/BF03327575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calogero, R. M., & Thompson, J. K. (2010). Gender and body image. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 153–184). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carter, B. (2011, January 21). Another ratings record for ‘Jersey Shore’. The New York Times. Retrieved from
  12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014). Retrieved from
  13. Chozick, A. (2013, June 17). Longing to stay wanted, MTV turns its attention to younger viewers. The New York Times, Media & advertising. Retrieved from
  14. Conrad, K. D., Dixon, T. L., & Zhang, Y. (2009). Impact of music, music lyrics, and music videos on children and youth. Pediatrics, 124, 1488–1494. doi: 10.1542/peds. 2009-2145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dhoest, A. (2005). “The Pfaffs are not like the Osbournes”: National inflections of the celebrity docusoap. Television & New Media, 6, 224–245. doi: 10.1177/1527476404270608.
  16. Disanto, T. (Executive producer). (2004–2006). Laguna Beach: The real orange county [Television series]. Hollywood, Calif: Paramount Pictures.Google Scholar
  17. Disanto, T. (Executive producer). (2007–2008). Newport harbor: The real orange county [Television series]. Hollywood, Calif: Paramount Pictures.Google Scholar
  18. Egbert, N., & Belcher, J. D. (2012). Reality bites: An investigation of the genre of reality television and its relationship to viewers’ body image. Mass Communication and Society, 15, 407–431. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2011.583545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fallon, A. (1990). Culture in the mirror: Sociocultural determinants of body image. In T. Cash & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body images: Development, deviance, and change (pp. 80–109). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fouts, G., & Burggraf, K. (2000). Television situation comedies: Female body images and verbal reinforcements. Sex Roles, 40, 473–481. doi: 10.1023/A:1018875711082
  21. Fouts, G., & Vaughan, K. (2002). Television situation comedies: Male weight, negative references, and audience reactions. Sex Roles, 46, 439–442. doi: 10.1023/A:1020469715532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frederick, D. A., Fessler, D. M., & Haselton, M. G. (2005). Do representations of male muscularity differ in men’s and women’s magazines? Body Image, 2, 81–86. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2004.12.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward an understanding of women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T. A., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, retrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Freedman, R. (1986). Beauty bound. Lexington, MA: Heath.Google Scholar
  26. Freeman, M. J., Dolgen, L., Greenwood, K., Portnoy, A., Zalkind, J., Predescu, N., & Cohen, S. (Executive producers). (2009–2012). Teen Mom [Television series]. New York, NY: 11th Street Productions.Google Scholar
  27. Gardner, E. (January 15, 2013). What kind of person watches reality TV? Home/Entertainment. Cable Retrieved from
  28. Garner, D. M., Garfinkel, P. E., Schwartz, D., & Thompson, M. (1980). Cultural expectation of thinness in women. Psychological Reports, 47, 483–491. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1980.47.2.483.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gateley, L. (Executive producer). (2006–2010). The Hills [Television series]. Hollywood, Calif: Paramount Pictures.Google Scholar
  30. Goldschein, G., French, J., Johnston, J., & Murray, J. (Executive producers). (1992–2008). The Real World [Television series]. Hollywood, Calif: Paramount Pictures.Google Scholar
  31. Gorman, B. (2010, September 17). MTV’s ‘The Real World’ is turning 25 and returning to sin city as seven roommates take over Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in March 2011. TV By the Numbers. Retrieved from
  32. Grabe, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2009). Body objectification, MTV, and psychological outcomes among female adolescents. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 2840–2858. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00552.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grabe, S., Ward, L. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2008). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 460–476. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.460.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Harrison, K. (2001). Ourselves, our bodies: Thin-ideal media, self-discrepancies, and eating disorder symptomology in adolescents. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 20, 289–323. doi: 10.1521/jscp.
  35. Harrison, K. (2003). Television viewers’ ideal body proportions: The case of the curvaceously thin woman. Sex Roles, 48, 255–264. doi: 10.1023/A:1022825421647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hatton, E., & Trautner, M. N. (2011). Equal opportunity objectification? The sexualization of men and women on the cover of Rolling Stone. Sexuality and Culture, 15, 256–278. doi: 10.1007/s12119-011-9093-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hennink-Kaminski, H., & Reichert, T. (2011). Using sexual appeals in advertising to sell cosmetic surgery: A content analysis from 198 to 2007. Sexuality and Culture, 15, 41–55. doi: 10.1007/s12119-010-9081-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kilborn, R. (1994). How real can you get? Recent developments in reality television. European Journal of Communication, 9, 421–439. doi: 10.1177/0267323194009004003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. King, K., Laake, R. A., & Bernard, A. (2006). Do the depictions of sexual attire and sexual behavior in music videos differ based on the network and character gender? American Journal of Health Education, 37, 146–153. doi: 10.1080/19325037.2006.10598894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Labre, M. P. (2005). Burn fat, build muscle: A content analysis of Men’s Health and Men’s Fitness. International Journal of Men’s Health, 4, 187–200. doi: 10.3149/jmh.0402.187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Langley, J., & Langley, M. (Executive producers). (2007-present). Cops [Television series]. Los Angeles, CA: 20th Century Fox Television.Google Scholar
  42. Law, C., & Labre, M. P. (2002). Cultural standards of attractiveness: A thirty-year look at changes in male images in magazines. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 697–711. doi: 10.1177/107769900207900310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leit, R. A., Pope, H. G., & Gray, J. J. (2001). Cultural expectations of muscularity in men: The evolution of playgirl centerfolds. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 29, 90–93. doi: 10.1002/1098-108X(200101)29:1<90::AID-EAT15>3.0.CO;2-F.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Levine, S., & Weisman, J. (2010). MTV’s new reality. Variety, 306(21), 4.Google Scholar
  45. Luciano, L. (2007). Muscularity and masculinity in the United States: A historical overview. In J. K. Thompson & G. Cafri (Eds.), The muscular ideal (pp. 41–66). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  46. Marikar, S. (2009, January 19). The top 10 reality shows of the decade. ABC News. Retrieved from
  47. McCreary, D. R., Saucier, D. M., & Courtenay, W. H. (2005). The drive for muscularity and masculinity: Testing the associations among gender-role trait, behaviors, attitudes, and conflict. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 6, 83–94. doi: 10.1037/1524-9220.6.83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Michaels, M. S., Parent, M. C., & Moradi, B. (2013). Does exposure to muscularity-idealizing images have self-objectification consequences for heterosexual and sexual minority men? Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14, 175–183. doi: 10.1037/a0027259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mulgrew, K. E., Volcevski-Kostas, D., & Rendell, P. G. (2014). The effects of music video clips on adolescent boys’ body image, mood, and schema activation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 92–103. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9932-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Murnen, S. K., Smolak, L., Mills, J. A., & Good, L. (2003). Thin, sexy women and strong muscular men: Grade-school children’s responses objectified images of women and men. Sex Roles, 49, 427–437. doi: 10.1023/A:1025868320206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nabi, R. L., Biely, E. N., Morgan, S. J., & Stitt, C. (2003). Reality-based television programming and the psychology of its appeal. Media Psychology, 5, 303–330. doi: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0504_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Oldenburg, A. (2011, January 7). Jersey Shore’ Season 3 premiere sets ratings record for MTV. USA Today. Retrieved from
  53. Olivardia, R. (2001). Mirror, mirror on the wall, who’s the largest of them all? The features and phenomenology of muscle dysmorphia. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 9, 254–259. doi: 10.1037/1524–9220.5.2.112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Papacharissi, Z., & Mendelson, A. (2007). An exploratory study of reality appeal: Uses and gratifications of reality TV shows. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51, 355–370. doi: 10.1080/08838150701307152.
  55. Parent, M. C., & Moradi, B. (2011). His biceps become him: A test of objectification theory’s application to drive for muscularity and propensity for steroid use in college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58, 246–256. doi: 10.1037/a0021398.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Parsons, C., Burnett, M., Probst, J., & Burris, D. (Executive producers). (2000-present). Survivor [Television series]. Santa Monica, CA: Mark Burnett Productions.Google Scholar
  57. Pope, H. G., Olivardia, R., Gruber, A., & Borowiecki, J. (1999). Evolving ideals of male body image as seen through action toys. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 26, 65–72. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199907)26:1<65::AID-EAT8>3.3.CO;2-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Pope, C. G., Pope, H. G., Menard, W., Fay, C., Olivardia, R., & Phillips, K. A. (2005). Clinical features of muscle dysmorphia among males with body dysmorphic disorder. Body Image, 2, 395–400. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.09.001.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Potratz, R. M. (2007). When is reality real?: Youth perceptions of MTV reality programs (Master’s thesis, Ohio University). Retrieved from
  60. Rochlin, M. (2005, August 30). An MTV coming of age that went too far. The New York Times. Retrieved from
  61. Rohlinger, D. (2002). Eroticizing men: Cultural influences on advertising and male objectification. Sex Roles, 46, 61–74. doi: 10.1023/A:1016575909173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Salsano, S., Jeffress, S., & French, J. (Executive producers). (2009–2012). Jersey Shore [Television series]. Hollywood, Calif: Paramount Pictures.Google Scholar
  63. Silverstein, B., Perdue, L., Peterson, B., & Kelly, E. (1986). The role of the mass media in promoting a thin standard of bodily attractiveness for women. Sex Roles, 13, 519–532. doi: 10.1007/BF00287452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stefanone, M. A., Lackaff, D., & Rosen, D. (2010). The relationship between traditional mass media and “social media”: Reality television as a model for social network site behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54, 508–525. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2010.498851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stelter, B. (2008, March 27). ‘The Hills’ draws 4.8 million on TV, 1.8 million online. The New York Times. Retrieved from
  66. Sypeck, M. F., Gray, J. J., & Ahrens, A. H. (2004). No longer just a pretty face: Fashion magazines’ depictions of ideal female beauty from 1959 to 1999. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 36, 342–347. doi: 10.1002/eat.20039.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Thompson, M. J. (2002). Gender in magazine advertising: Skin sells best. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 18, 178–181. doi: 10.1177/0887302X0001800306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thompson, J. K., & Cafri, G. (Eds.). (2007). The muscular ideal: Psychological, social, and medical perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  69. Thompson, M. A., & Gray, J. J. (1995). Development and validation of a new body-image assessment scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 258–269. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6402_6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Thompson, J. K., Heinberg, L. J., Altabe, M. N., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (1999). Exacting beauty: Theory, assessment and treatment of body image disturbance. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tiggemann, M., & Kuring, J. (2004). The role of body objectification in disordered eating and depressed mood. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 299–311. doi: 10.1348/0144665031752925.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2012). Understanding sexual objectification: A comprehensive approach toward media exposure and girls’ internalization of beauty ideals, self-objectification, and body surveillance. Journal of Communication, 62, 869–887. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01667.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark A. Flynn
    • 1
  • Sung-Yeon Park
    • 2
    Email author
  • David T. Morin
    • 3
  • Alexandru Stana
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Communication, Languages, & CulturesCoastal Carolina UniversityMyrtle BeachUSA
  2. 2.Department of Telecommunications, School of Media & CommunicationBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA
  3. 3.Department of CommunicationUtah Valley UniversityOremUSA
  4. 4.Department of CommunicationFayetteville State UniversityFayettevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations