Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 72, Issue 5–6, pp 221–236 | Cite as

Re-assessing the Role of Gender-Related Cognitions for Self-Esteem: The Importance of Gender Typicality for Cisgender Adults

  • Charlotte Chucky Tate
  • Jay N. Bettergarcia
  • Lindsay M. Brent
Original Article

Abstract

Gender-related cognitions have been central to accounts of well-being in children and adults in the United States. Yet, the child and adult literatures are currently not aligned in how they measure these experiences, creating an asymmetry in scientific understanding. The current investigation aligns these literatures by using the short-form of the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI; Bem 1981) (adult literature) and a modified version of Egan and Perry’s (2001) Gender Typicality Scale (child literature) with cisgender (i.e., those whose current gender identity is the same label as their birth-assigned category) adult participants. These measures were used to determine the relative contributions of each to self-esteem using nonprobability samples of heterosexual and queer (i.e., lesbian, gay, bisexual, pansexual, and asexual) women and men in the United States. The analyzed groups consisted of cisgender individuals: heterosexual women (N = 97), heterosexual men (N = 90), queer women (N = 83), and queer men (N = 51). All groups showed significant contributions of adult gender typicality to self-esteem, over and above the BSRI dimensions. Thus, both self-reported gender typicality and self-reported endorsement of certain BSRI dimensions are important indicators of well-being in cisgender adults in the United States.

Keywords

Gender Gender typicality Self-esteem Bem sex role inventory Cisgender Heterosexual Queer 

Notes

Acknowledgments

No funding source aided in the collection of these data. Portions of these data were presented at the 14th annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology (SPSP) on January 18, 2013, in New Orleans, LA, USA.

References

  1. Abrahams, B., Feldman, S. S., & Nash, S. C. (1978). Sex role self-concept and sex role attitudes: Enduring personality characteristics or adaptations to changing life situations? Developmental Psychology, 14, 393–400. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.14.4.393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLauglin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80–114. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  4. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162. doi: 10.1037/h0036215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bem, S. L. (1975). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634–643. doi: 10.1037/h0077098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Carlson, H. M., & Steuer, J. (1985). Age, sex-role categorization, and psychological health in American homosexual and heterosexual men and women. The Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 203–211. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1985.992287.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Carver, P., Yunger, J., & Perry, D. (2003). Gender identity and adjustment in middle childhood. Sex Roles, 49, 95–109. doi: 10.1023/A:1024423012063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carver, P. R., Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (2004). Children who question their heterosexuality. Developmental Psychology, 40, 43–53. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.1.43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Choi, N., Fuqua, D. R., & Newman, J. L. (2008). The Bem sex-role inventory: Continuing theoretical problems. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 881–900. doi: 10.1177/0013164408315267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cronin, A., & King, A. (2010). Power, inequality, and identification: Exploring diversity and intersectionality amongst older LGB adults. Sociology, 44, 876–892. doi: 10.1177/0038038510375738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diamond, M. (1993). Homosexuality and bisexuality in different populations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 291–310. doi: 10.1007/BF01542119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (2001). Gender identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for psychological adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 451–463. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.451.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Factor, R., & Rothblum, E. (2008). Exploring gender identity and community among three groups of transgender individuals in the United States: MTSs, FTMs, and genderqueers. Health Sociology Review, 17, 235–253. doi: 10.5172/hesr.451.17.3.235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). The ambivalence toward men inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 519–536. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00379.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gonzalez, C. A., Bockting, W. O., Beckman, L. J., & Duran, R. E. (2012). Agentic and communal personality traits: Their associations with depression and resilience among transgender women. Sex Roles, 67, 528–543. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0202-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hegarty, P. (2009). Toward an LGBT-informed paradigm for children who break gender norms: Comment on Drummond et al. (2008) and Reiger et al. (2008). Developmental Psychology, 45, 895–900. doi: 10.1037/a0016163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412–428. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoffman, R. M. (2001). The measurement of masculinity and femininity: Historical perspective and implications for counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 79, 472–485. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.2001.tb01995.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoffman, R. M., & Borders, L. D. (2001). Twenty-five years after the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A reassessment and new issues regarding classification variability. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 39–55.Google Scholar
  24. Kessler, S. J., & McKenna, W. (1978). Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Kuper, L. E., Nussbaum, R., & Mustanski, B. (2012). Exploring the diversity of gender and sexual orientation identities in an online sample of transgender individuals. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 244–254. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2011.596954.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Laurent, S. M., & Hodges, S. D. (2009). Gender and empathic accuracy: The role of communion in reading minds. Sex Roles, 60, 387–398. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9544-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674–697. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Meyer, I. H., & Wilson, P. A. (2009). Sampling lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 23–31. doi: 10.1037/a0014587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Myers, A. M., & Gonda, G. (1982). Empirical validation of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 304–318. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nezu, A. M., Nezu, C. M., & Peterson, M. A. (1986). Negative life stress, social support, and depressive symptoms: Sex roles as a moderator variable. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1, 599–609.Google Scholar
  31. Pedhazur, E. J., & Tetenbaum, T. J. (1979). Bem Sex Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 996–1016. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3–25. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, T. E., & Leaper, C. (2005). Self-perceived gender typicality and the peer context during adolescence. Journal of Research and Adolescence, 16, 91–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00123.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Spence, J. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity and gender related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13, pp. 1–97). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  36. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1979). Comparison of masculine and feminine personality attributes and sex-role attitudes across age groups. Developmental Psychology, 15, 583–584. doi: 10.1037/h0078091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1981). Androgyny versus gender schema: A comment on Bem’s gender schema theory. Psychological Review, 88, 365–368. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spence, J. T., Helmrich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39. doi: 10.1037/h0076857.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  40. Tate, C. (2011). The “problem of number” revisited: The relative contributions of psychosocial, experiential and evolutionary factors to the desired number of sexual partners. Sex Roles, 64, 644–657. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9774-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tate, C. C. (2012). Considering lesbian identity from a social-psychological perspective: Two different models of “being a lesbian.” Journal of Lesbian Studies, 16, 17–29. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2011.557639.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Tate, C. (2014). Gender identity as a personality process. In B. L. Miller (Ed.), Gender identity: Disorders, developmental perspectives and social implications (pp. 1–22). Hauppauge: Nova.Google Scholar
  43. Tate, C. C., Ledbetter, J. N., & Youssef, C. P. (2013). A two-question method for assessing gender categories in the social and medical sciences. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 767–776. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.690110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Tate, C. C., Youssef, C. P., & Bettergarcia, J. N. (2014). Integrating the study of transgender spectrum and cisgender experiences of self-categorization from a personality perspective. Review of General Psychology, 18, 302–312. doi: 10.1037/gpr0000019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tobin, D. D., Menon, M., Menon, M., Spatta, B. C., Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (2010). Intrapsychics of gender: A model of self-socialization. Psychological Review, 117, 601–622. doi: 10.1037/a0018936.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Tropp, L. R., & Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585–600. doi: 10.1177/0146167201275007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  48. Vandello, J.A., Bosson, J.K., Cohen, D., Burnaford, R.M., & Weaver, J.R. (2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1325–1339.Google Scholar
  49. Whitley, B. E. (1983). Sex role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 765–778. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.4.765.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Whitley, B. E. (1984). Sex-role orientation and psychological well-being: Two meta-analyses. Sex Roles, 12, 207–225. doi: 10.1007/BF00288048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Whitley, B. E. (1988). Masculinity, femininity, and self-esteem: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. Sex Roles, 18, 419–431. doi: 10.1007/BF00288393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Witt, M. G., & Wood, W. (2011). Self-regulation of gendered behavior in everyday life. Sex Roles, 62, 635–646. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9761-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2010). Gender. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 629–667). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  54. Yunger, J. L., Carver, P. R., & Perry, D. G. (2004). Does gender identity influence children’s psychological well-being? Developmental Psychology, 40, 572–582. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.4.572.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charlotte Chucky Tate
    • 1
  • Jay N. Bettergarcia
    • 2
  • Lindsay M. Brent
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologySan Francisco State UniversitySan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.School of Clinical, Counseling, and School PsychologyUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations