Re-assessing the Role of Gender-Related Cognitions for Self-Esteem: The Importance of Gender Typicality for Cisgender Adults
Gender-related cognitions have been central to accounts of well-being in children and adults in the United States. Yet, the child and adult literatures are currently not aligned in how they measure these experiences, creating an asymmetry in scientific understanding. The current investigation aligns these literatures by using the short-form of the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI; Bem 1981) (adult literature) and a modified version of Egan and Perry’s (2001) Gender Typicality Scale (child literature) with cisgender (i.e., those whose current gender identity is the same label as their birth-assigned category) adult participants. These measures were used to determine the relative contributions of each to self-esteem using nonprobability samples of heterosexual and queer (i.e., lesbian, gay, bisexual, pansexual, and asexual) women and men in the United States. The analyzed groups consisted of cisgender individuals: heterosexual women (N = 97), heterosexual men (N = 90), queer women (N = 83), and queer men (N = 51). All groups showed significant contributions of adult gender typicality to self-esteem, over and above the BSRI dimensions. Thus, both self-reported gender typicality and self-reported endorsement of certain BSRI dimensions are important indicators of well-being in cisgender adults in the United States.
KeywordsGender Gender typicality Self-esteem Bem sex role inventory Cisgender Heterosexual Queer
No funding source aided in the collection of these data. Portions of these data were presented at the 14th annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology (SPSP) on January 18, 2013, in New Orleans, LA, USA.
- Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
- Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Hoffman, R. M., & Borders, L. D. (2001). Twenty-five years after the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A reassessment and new issues regarding classification variability. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 39–55.Google Scholar
- Kessler, S. J., & McKenna, W. (1978). Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Nezu, A. M., Nezu, C. M., & Peterson, M. A. (1986). Negative life stress, social support, and depressive symptoms: Sex roles as a moderator variable. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1, 599–609.Google Scholar
- Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Spence, J. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity and gender related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13, pp. 1–97). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Tate, C. (2014). Gender identity as a personality process. In B. L. Miller (Ed.), Gender identity: Disorders, developmental perspectives and social implications (pp. 1–22). Hauppauge: Nova.Google Scholar
- Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Vandello, J.A., Bosson, J.K., Cohen, D., Burnaford, R.M., & Weaver, J.R. (2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1325–1339.Google Scholar
- Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2010). Gender. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 629–667). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar