Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 73, Issue 9–10, pp 371–383 | Cite as

How Women of Color Detect and Respond to Multiple Forms of Prejudice

  • Jessica D. Remedios
  • Samantha H. Snyder
Original Article

Abstract

The processes by which women of color and White women living in the United States detect and respond to prejudice may differ because women of color experience racism, sexism and intersectional bias. This review builds on past research by articulating how existing process models of stigmatization, when applied to the stigmatization of women of color, leave important research questions unanswered. Stigmatized individuals’ interpretations of and responses to others’ behaviors are continuously shaped by the possibility that they will be targeted by prejudice. In each interaction in which prejudice is plausible, targets first determine whether they have experienced prejudice and, if so, they cope with the psychological and emotional consequences of prejudiced treatment. Current theories of stigmatization best account for the experiences of people who face only one form of prejudice. In contrast, we consider how women of color, who possess multiple stigmatized identities, respond to the multiple forms of prejudice they face. First, we identify barriers to including women of color in stigma research. Second, we describe research examining how targets with one stigmatized identity detect, respond to and cope with prejudice. Third, we draw on related research on multiple identities in areas outside of the stigma literature (e.g., intergroup bias, cognition) to raise questions that are important to address in future stigma research. Our analysis is supported primarily by research conducted in the U. S. Addressing the research questions raised in this review will position the stigma literature to more readily capture the stigmatizing experiences of women of color.

Keywords

Stigma Intersectionality Prejudice Identity 

Notes

Author Note

We would like to thank Sam Sommers for his helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The authors are not aware of any affiliations, memberships, funding of financial holdings that might be perceived as presening a conflict of interest or as affecting the objectivity of this review.

References

  1. Apfelbaum, E. P., Phillips, K. W., & Richeson, J. A. (2014). Rethinking the baseline in diversity research: Should we be explaining the effects of homogeneity? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 235–244. doi: 10.1177/1745691614527466.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2004). The ups and downs of attributional ambiguity: Stereotype vulnerability and the academic self-knowledge of African American college students. Psychological Science, 15, 829–836. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00763.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Babbitt, L. G. (2011). An intersectional approach to Black/White interracial interactions: The roles of gender and sexual orientation. Sex Roles, 68, 791–802. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-0104-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berdahl, J. L., & Moore, C. (2006). Workplace harassment: Double jeopardy for minority women. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 426–436. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.426.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blascovich, J., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D., & Steele, C. (2001). African Americans and high blood pressure: The role of stereotype threat. Psychological Science, 12, 225–229. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00340.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowleg, L. (2008). When Black + lesbian + woman ≠ Black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59, 312–325. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9400-z.
  7. Brandt, M. J. (2011). Sexism and gender inequality across 57 societies. Psychological Science, 22, 1413–1418. doi: 10.1177/0956797611420445.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135–149. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carbado, D. W. (2000). Race and sex in antidiscrimination law. In L. W. Levy, K. L. Karst, D. J. Mahoney, & J. G. West (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the American Constitution (2nd ed., pp. 2089–2093). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Cheng, C.-Y., & Lee, F. (2009). Multiracial identity integration: Perceptions of conflict and distance among multiracial individuals. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 51–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.01587.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheng, C.-Y., Sanchez-Burks, J., & Lee, F. (2008). Connecting the dots within: Creative performance and identity integration. Psychological Science, 19, 1178–1184. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02220.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheryan, S., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). When positive stereotypes threaten intellectual performance: The psychological hazards of “model minority” status. Psychological Science, 11, 399–402. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00277.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. The American Psychologist, 64, 170–180. doi: 10.1037/a0014564.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Crisp, R. J., & Hewstone, M. (1999). Differential evaluation of crossed category groups: Patterns, processes, and reducing intergroup bias. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 307–333. doi: 10.1177/1368430299024001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crisp, R. J., Turner, R. N., & Hewstone, M. (2010). Common ingroups and complex identities: Routes to reducing bias in multiple category contexts. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14, 32–46. doi: 10.1037/a0017303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608–630. doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.96.4.608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crocker, J., Voelkl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 218–228. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.60.2.218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–74). New York, NY: Academic.Google Scholar
  20. Gaither, S. E. (2015). The multiracial demographic: A call for research. Current Directions in Psychological Science. (in press).Google Scholar
  21. Galinsky, A. D., Hall, E. V., & Cuddy, A. J. C. (2013). Gendered races: Implications for interracial marriage, leadership selection, and athletic participation. Psychological Science, 24, 498–506. doi: 10.1177/0956797612457783.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ghavami, N., & Peplau, L. A. (2012). An intersectional analysis of gender and ethnic stereotypes: Testing three hypotheses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 113–127. doi: 10.1177/0361684312464203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gonzales, P. M., Blanton, H., & Williams, K. J. (2002). The effects of stereotype threat and double-minority status on the test performance of latino women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 659–670. doi: 10.1177/0146167202288010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goodwin, S. A., Williams, K. D., & Carter-Sowell, A. R. (2010). The psychological sting of stigma: The costs of attributing ostracism to racism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 612–618. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoyt, C. L., Aguilar, L., Kaiser, C. R., Blascovich, J., & Lee, K. (2007). The self-protective and undermining effects of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 884–893. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Inman, M. L., & Baron, R. S. (1996). Influence of prototypes on perceptions of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 727–739. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.727.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Inzlicht, M., Kaiser, C. R., & Major, B. (2008). The face of chauvinism: How prejudice expectations shape perceptions of facial affect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 758–766. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jetten, J., Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Spears, R. (2001). Rebels with a cause: Group identification as a response to perceived discrimination from the mainstream. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1204–1213. doi: 10.1177/0146167201279012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaiser, C. R., Vick, S. B., & Major, B. (2006). Prejudice expectations moderate preconscious attention to cues that are threatening to social identity. Psychological Science, 17, 332–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01707.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107–128. doi: 10.1037/h0034225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. King, K. R. (2003a). Do you see what I see? Effects of group consciousness on African American women’s attributions to prejudice. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 17–30. doi: 10.1111/1471-6402.t01-2-00003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. King, K. R. (2003b). Racism or sexism? Attributional ambiguity and simultaneous membership in multiple oppressed groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 223–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01894.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kulik, C. T., Roberson, L., & Perry, E. L. (2007). The multiple category problem: Category activation and inhibition in the hiring process. The Academy of Management Review, 32, 529–548. doi: 10.2307/20159314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Livingston, R. W., Rosette, A. S., & Washington, E. F. (2012). Can an agentic black woman get ahead? The impact of race and interpersonal dominance on perceptions of female leaders. Psychological Science, 23, 354–358. doi: 10.1177/0956797611428079.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Logie, C. H., James, L., Tharao, W., & Loutfy, M. R. (2011). HIV, gender, race, sexual orientation, and sex work: A qualitative study of intersectional stigma experienced by HIV-positive women in Ontario, Canada. PLoS Medicine, 8, 1–12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302–318. doi: 10.1177/0146167292183006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Major, B., & O’Brien, L. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393–421. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Major, B., Quinton, W. J., & McCoy, S. K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 251–330). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  39. Major, B., Kaiser, C. R., & McCoy, S. K. (2003a). It’s not my fault: When and why attributions to prejudice protect self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 772–781. doi: 10.1177/0146167203029006009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Major, B., Quinton, W. J., & Schmader, T. (2003b). Attributions to discrimination and self-esteem: Impact of group identification and situational ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 220–231. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00547-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McCoy, S. K., & Major, B. (2003). Group identification moderates emotional responses to perceived prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1005–1017. doi: 10.1177/0146167203253466.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Mendes, W. B., Major, B., McCoy, S., & Blascovich, J. (2008). How attributional ambiguity shapes physiological and emotional responses to social rejection and acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 278–291. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.278.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mendoza-Denton, R., Downey, G., Purdie, V. J., Davis, A., & Pietrzak, J. (2002). Sensitivity to status-based rejection: Implications for African American students’ college experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 896–918. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.83.4.896.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (2013). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering (2013). Special Report NSF 13–304 (pp. 13–304). Arlington, VA. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/
  45. Oney, C. N., Cole, E. R., & Sellers, R. M. (2011). Racial identity and gender as moderators of the relationship between body image and self-esteem for African Americans. Sex Roles, 65, 619–631. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-9962-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pascoe, E. A., & Smart Richman, L. (2009). Perceived discrimination and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 531–554. doi: 10.1037/a0016059.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Pittinsky, T. L., Shih, M., & Ambady, N. (1999). Identity adaptiveness: Affect across multiple identities. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 503–518. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377–391. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Remedios, J. D., Chasteen, A. L., & Paek, J. D. (2012). Not all prejudices are experienced equally: Comparing experiences of racism and sexism in female minorities. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 273–287. doi: 10.1177/1368430211411594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 88–106. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rosenthal, L., & Lobel, M. (2011). Explaining racial disparities in adverse birth outcomes: Unique sources of stress for Black American women. Social Science & Medicine, 72, 977–983. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rosette, A. S., & Livingston, R. W. (2012). Failure is not an option for Black women: Effects of organizational performance on leaders with single versus dual-subordinate identities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1162–1167. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Salvatore, J., & Shelton, J. N. (2007). Cognitive costs of exposure to racial prejudice. Psychological Science, 18, 810–815. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01984.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Sanchez-Hucles, J. V., & Davis, D. D. (2010). Women and women of color in leadership: Complexity, identity, and intersectionality. The American Psychologist, 65, 171–181. doi: 10.1037/a0017459.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Sawyer, P. J., Major, B., Casad, B. J., Townsend, S. S. M., & Mendes, W. B. (2012). Discrimination and the stress response: Psychological and physiological consequences of anticipating prejudice in interethnic interactions. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 1020–1026. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300620.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2002). The internal and external causal loci of attributions to prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 620–628. doi: 10.1177/0146167202288006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., Kobrynowicz, D., & Owen, S. (2002). Perceiving discrimination against one’s gender group has different implications for well-being in women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 197–210. doi: 10.1177/0146167202282006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Settles, I. H. (2004). When multiple identities interfere: The role of identity centrality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 487–500. doi: 10.1177/0146167203261885.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Settles, I. H. (2006). Use of an intersectional framework to understand Black women’s racial and gender identities. Sex Roles, 54, 589–601. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9029-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shapiro, J. R., & Neuberg, S. L. (2007). From stereotype threat to stereotype threats: Implications of a multi-threat framework for causes, moderators, mediators, consequences, and interventions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 107–130. doi: 10.1177/1088868306294790.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Shelton, J. N. (2000). A reconceptualiztion of how we study issues of racial prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 374–390. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80–83. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sinclair, S., Hardin, C. D., & Lowery, B. S. (2006). Self-stereotyping in the context of multiple social identities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 529–542. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.529.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1998.1373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.68.2.199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tropp, L. R., & Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585–600. doi: 10.1177/0146167201275007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 1–60). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  69. Veenstra, G. (2013). Race, gender, class, sexuality (RGCS) and hypertension. Social Science & Medicine, 89, 16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Warner, L. R. (2008). A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research. Sex Roles, 59, 454–463. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9504-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Warner, L. R., & Shields, S. A. (2013). The intersections of sexuality, gender, and race: Identity research at the crossroads. Sex Roles, 68, 803–810. doi: 10.1007/s11199-013-0281-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Williams, D. R., Neighbors, H. W., & Jackson, J. S. (2003). Racial/ethnic discrimination and health: Findings from community studies. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 200–208. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.93.2.200.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Woods-Giscombé, C. L., & Lobel, M. (2008). Race and gender matter: A multidimensional approach to conceptualizing and measuring stress in African American women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14, 173–182. doi: 10.1037/1099-9809.14.3.173.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTufts UniversityMedfordUSA

Personalised recommendations