Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 72, Issue 3–4, pp 150–162 | Cite as

The Challenges of Israeli Adolescent Girls: Gender Differences in Observed Autonomy and Relatedness in Adolescent-Mother Interactions

  • Efrat Sher-CensorEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

This study examined gender differences in autonomy and relatedness in adolescent-mother interactions, to evaluate two competing notions. The first, based on social role theory, suggested that girls and their mothers would show lower autonomy and higher relatedness than boys and their mothers. The second, stemming from the psychodynamic perspective, suggested that girls would show higher autonomy than boys, and that girls and their mothers would show lower relatedness than boys and their mothers. Participants were 122 Jewish Israeli mothers and their 16.5 years old adolescents (58.19 % girls) from middle class families residing in northern and central cities in Israel. Dyads were observed during a family disagreement (i.e., a high-conflict condition) and while planning a vacation (i.e., a low-conflict condition). Autonomy and relatedness of each participant in each task were coded using the Individuality and Connectedness Q-sort (Bengston & Grotevant 1999). Our findings indicated that girls displayed higher autonomy than boys across the two conflict conditions. In addition, girls and their mothers showed lower relatedness than boys and their mothers, but only under the high-conflict condition. These results are in line with the notions offered by the psychodynamic perspective. They reveal the unique challenges which Jewish Israeli girls and their mothers may face with respect to autonomy and relatedness, and highlight the importance of assessing autonomy and relatedness under varied conflict conditions.

Keywords

Autonomy Relatedness Gender Parent-adolescent Individuality and connectedness q-sort, Israel 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank David Oppenheim for his support and advice throughout this research, and Ora Aviezer for her helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. I express my sincere gratitude to the adolescents and parents who participated in this research. Finally, I wish to thank the graduate students who conducted the observations and coded the interactions.

References

  1. Adams, S., Kuebli, J., Boyle, P. A., & Fivush, R. (1995). Gender differences in parent–child conversations about past emotions: A longitudinal investigation. Sex Roles, 33, 309–323. doi: 10.1007/BF01954572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2006). Sadness, anger, and frustration: Gendered patterns in early adolescents’ and their parents’ emotion talk. Sex Roles, 55, 775–785. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9131-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, J. P., Hauser, S. T., Bell, K. L., & O’Connor, T. G. (1994a). Longitudinal assessment of autonomy and relatedness in adolescent-family interactions as predictors of adolescent ego development and self-esteem. Child Development, 65, 179–194. doi: 10.2307/1131374.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, J. P., Hauser, S. T., Eickholt, C., Bell, K., & O’Connor, T. G. (1994b). Autonomy and Relatedness in family interactions as predictors of expressions of negative adolescent affect. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 4, 535–552. doi: 10.1207/s15327795jra0404_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen, J. P., Hauser, S. T., O’Connor, T. G., & Bell, K. L. (2002). Prediction of peer-rated adult hostility from autonomy struggles in adolescent-family interactions. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 123–137. doi: 10.1017/S0954579402001074.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Allen, J. P., Chango, J., Szwedo, D., Schad, M., & Marston, E. (2012). Predictors of susceptibility to peer influence regarding substance use in adolescence. Child Development, 83, 337–350. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01682.x.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Basow, S. A., & Rubin, L. R. (1999). Gender influences on adolescent development. In N. G. Johnson, M. C. Roberts, & J. Worell (Eds.), Beyond appearance: A new look at adolescent girls (pp. 25–52). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/10325-001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Becker-Stoll, F., Fremmer-Bombik, E., Wartner, U., Zimmermann, P., & Grossmann, K. E. (2008). Is attachment at ages 1, 6 and 16 related to autonomy and relatedness behavior of adolescents in interaction towards their mothers? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 372–380. doi: 10.1177/0165025408093654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bekker, M. H., & van Assen, M. A. (2008). Autonomy-connectedness and gender. Sex Roles, 59, 532–544. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9447-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ben-Arieh, A., Khoury-Kassabri, M., & Haj-Yahia, M. M. (2006). Generational, ethnic, and national differences in attitudes toward the rights of children in Israel and Palestine. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76, 381–388. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.76.3.381.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bengtson, P. L., & Grotevant, H. D. (1999). The individuality and connectedness Q-sort: a measure for assessing individuality and connectedness in dyadic relationships. Personal Relationships, 6, 213–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00188.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Best, K. M., Hauser, S. T., & Allen, J. P. (1997). Predicting young adult competencies: adolescent era parent and individual influences. Journal of Adolescence Research, 12, 90–112. doi: 10.1177/0743554897121006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buckner, J. P., & Fivush, R. (2000). Gendered themes in family reminiscing. Memory, 8, 401–412. doi: 10.1080/09658210050156859.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chodorow, N. J. (1999). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cinamon, R. G., & Rich, Y. (2002). Gender differences in the importance of work and family roles: Implications for work–family conflict. Sex Roles, 47, 531–541. doi: 10.1023/A:1022021804846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Condon, S. M., Cooper, C. R., & Grotevant, H. D. (1984). Manual for the analysis of family discourse. Psychological Documents, 14, (Ms. No. 2616).Google Scholar
  18. Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Edwards, G., Barkley, R. A., Laneri, M., Fletcher, K., & Metevia, L. (2001). Parent–adolescent conflict in teenagers with ADHD and ODD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 557–572. doi: 10.1023/A:1012285326937.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Eisenberg, N., Martin, C. L., & Fabes, R. A. (1996). Gender development and gender effects. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 358–396). New York: Prentice-Hall International.Google Scholar
  23. Eisenberg, N., Hofer, C., Spinrad, T. L., Gershoff, E. T., Valiente, C., Losoya, S.,…Maxon, E, (2008). Understanding mother–adolescent conflict discussions: Concurrent and across-time prediction from youths’ dispositions and parenting. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 73, vii-160. doi: 10.1002/9781444307252
  24. Eldridge, K. A., & Christensen, A. (2002). Demand–withdraw communication during couple conflict: A review and analysis. In P. Noller & J. A. Feeney (Eds.), Understanding marriage: Developments in the study of couple interaction (pp. 289–322). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eldridge, K. A., Sevier, M., Jones, J., & Christensen, A. (2007). Demand-withdraw communication in severely distressed, moderately distressed, and nondistressed couples: Rigidity and polarity during relationship and personal problem discussions. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 218–226. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.218.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Feldman, R., & Masalha, S. (2010). Parent–child and triadic antecedents of children’s social competence: Cultural specificity, shared process. Developmental Psychology, 46, 455–467. doi: 10.1037/a0017415.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Fivush, R., Brotman, M., Buckner, J. P., & Goodman, S. (2000). Gender differences in parent-child emotion narratives. Sex Roles, 42, 233–254. doi: 10.1023/A:1007091207068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Galambos, N. L. (2004). Gender and gender role development in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 233–262). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Galambos, N., Peterson, A., Richards, M., & Gitelson, I. B. (1985). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale for Adolescents (AWSA): A study of reliability and validity. Sex Roles, 13, 343–354. doi: 10.1007/BF00288090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Galambos, N. L., Berenbaum, S. A., & McHale, S. M. (2009). Gender development in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (Vol. I, pp. 305–357). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  32. Gorrese, A., & Ruggieri, R. (2012). Peer attachment: A meta-analytic review of gender and age differences and associations with parent attachment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 650–672. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9759-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Grotevant, H. D., & Cooper, C. R. (1985). Patterns of interaction in family relationships and the development of identity exploration in adolescence. Child Development, 56, 415–428. doi: 10.2307/1129730.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Grotevant, H. D., & Cooper, C. R. (1986). Individuation in family relationships. Human Development, 29, 82–100. doi: 10.1159/000273025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grotevant, H. D., & Cooper, C. R. (1998). Individuation and connectedness in adolescence: Review and prospects for research on identity, relationships and context. In E. E. A. Skoe & A. L. Von Der Lippe (Eds.), Personality development in adolescence: A cross national and life span perspective (pp. 3–37). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Hauser, S. T., Liebman, W., Houlihan, J., Powers, S. I., Jacobson, A. M., Noam, G. G., … & Follansbee, D. (1985). Family contexts of pubertal timing. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 14, 317–337.doi: 10.1007/BF02089237
  37. Hauser, S. T., Book, B. K., Houlihan, J., Powers, S., Weiss-Perry, B., Follansbee, D., Jacobson, A. M., & Noam, G. G. (1987). Sex differences within the family: Studies of adolescent and parent interactions. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 199–220. doi: 10.1007/BF02139091.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hill, J. P., & Lynch, M. E. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In J. Brooks-Gunn & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Girls at puberty: Biological and psychosocial perspectives (pp. 201–228). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huston, A. C. (1983). Sex-typing. In P. H. Mussen & E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 4, Socialization, personality, and social development (pp. 387–467). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  40. Huston, A. C., & Alvarez, M. M. (1990). The socialization context of gender role development in early adolescence. In R. Montemayor, G. R. Adams, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), From childhood to adolescence: A transitional period? (pp. 156–179). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Israel Central Bureau of Statistics (2008). Population census data. Retrieved from http://www.cbs.gov.il/census/census/pnimi_sub_page_e.html?id_topic=11&id_subtopic=1
  42. Izraeli, D. N. (1999). Hamigdur beolam ha’avoda [Genderizing in the work place]. In D. N. Izraeli, A. Friedman, H. Dahan-Kalev, S. Fogiel-Bijaourim, H. Herzog, & H. Nave (Eds.), Sex, gender, politics: Woman in Israel (pp. 167–216). Tel-Aviv, Israel: Hakibbutz Hameuchad.Google Scholar
  43. Josselson, R. L. (1973). Psychodynamic aspects of identity formation in college women. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2, 3–52. doi: 10.1007/BF02213921.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Katz, R. (2002). Expectations of family life in a multicultural context: An Israeli example. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 30, 1–19.Google Scholar
  45. Kulik, L. (2002a). Like-sex versus opposite-sex effects in transmission of gender role ideology from parents to adolescents in Israel. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 451–457. doi: 10.1023/A:1020263120774.
  46. Kulik, L. (2002b). The impact of social background on gender-role ideology parents’ versus children’s attitudes. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 53–73. doi: 10.1177/0192513X02023001003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kulik, L. (2004). Predicting gender role ideology among husbands and wives in Israel: A comparative analysis. Sex Roles, 51, 575–587. doi: 10.1007/s11199-004-5467-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kulik, L. (2006). Gender, gender identity, ethnicity and stereotyping of children’s chores: The Israeli case. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 408–420. doi: 10.1177/0022022106288477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kulik, L., & Rayyan, F. (2003). Wage-earning patterns, perceived division of domestic labor, and social support: A comparative analysis of educated Jewish and Arab-Muslim Israelis. Sex Roles, 48, 53–66. doi: 10.1023/A:1022344612560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lang-Takac, E., & Osterweil, Z. (1992). Separateness and connectedness: Differences between the genders. Sex Roles, 27, 277–289. doi: 10.1007/BF00289929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lavee, Y., & Katz, R. (2003). The family in Israel: Between tradition and modernity. Marriage & Family Review, 35, 193–217. doi: 10.1300/J002v35n01_11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Leaper, C., Hauser, S. T., Kremen, A., Powers, S. I., Jacobson, A. M., Noam, G., Weiss-Perry, B., & Follansbee, D. (1989). Adolescent–parent interactions in relation to adolescents’ gender and ego development pathway: A longitudinal study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 9, 335–361. doi: 10.1177/0272431689093009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Levenson, R. W., Carstensen, L. L., & Gottman, J. M. (1994). Influence of age and gender on affect, physiology, and their interrelations: A study of long-term marriages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 56–68. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.1.56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Lytton, H., & Romney, D. M. (1991). Parents’ differential socialization of boys and girls: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 267–296. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.109.2.267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Maslovaty, N., & Dor-Shav, Z. (1990). Gender and the structure and salience of values: An example from Israeli youth. Sex Roles, 22, 261–281. doi: 10.1007/BF00288333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mayseless, O. (1998). Growing up in Israel: Attitudes and values of Israeli youth in the last decade. Educational Couseling, 7, 87–102.Google Scholar
  57. Mayseless, O., & Salomon, G. (2003). Dialectic contradictions in the experiences of Israeli Jewish adolescents: Efficacy and stress, closeness and friction, and conformity and non-compliance. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education, International perspectives on adolescence (Vol. 3, pp. 149–171). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  58. Mayseless, O., & Scharf, M. (2003). What does it mean to be an adult? The Israeli Experience. In J. J. Arnett & N. L. Galambos (Eds.), New directions for child and adolescent development (#100): Exploring cultural conceptions of the transition to adulthood (pp. 5–20). San Francisco: Wiley Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  59. McElhaney, K. B., & Allen, J. P. (2001). Autonomy and adolescent social functioning: The moderating effect of risk. Child Development, 72, 220–231. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00275.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. McHale, S. M., Crouter, A. C., & Whiteman, S. D. (2003). The family contexts of gender development in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 12, 125–148. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Noller, P., Feeney, J. A., Sheehan, G., & Peterson, C. (2000). Marital conflict patterns: Links with family conflict and family members’ perceptions of one another. Personal Relationships, 7, 79–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00005.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Perry, D. G., & Pauletti, R. E. (2011). Gender and adolescent development. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 61–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00715.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pinquart, M., & Silbereisen, R. K. (2002). Changes in adolescents’ and mothers’ autonomy and connectedness in conflict discussions: An observation study. Journal of Adolescence, 25, 509–522. doi: 10.1006/jado.2002.0491.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Robin, A. L., & Foster, S. L. (1989). Negotiating parent-adolescent conflict: A behavioral-family system approach. NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  65. Roer‐Strier, D., & Rivlis, M. (1998). Timetable of psychological and behavioural autonomy expectations among parents from Israel and the former Soviet Union. International Journal of Psychology, 33, 123–135. doi: 10.1080/002075998400501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Roniger, L. (1994). Cultural prisms, western individualism, and the Israeli case. Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology, 59, 37–55. doi: 10.1080/00141844.1994.9981488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ruble, D. N., Martin, C. L., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2006). Gender development. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 858–932). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  68. Sagy, S., Orr, E., & Bar-On, D. (1999). Individualism and collectivism in Israeli society: Comparing religious and secular high-school students. Human Relations, 52, 327–348. doi: 10.1177/001872679905200303.Google Scholar
  69. Sagy, S., Orr, E., Bar-On, D., & Awwad, E. (2001). Individualism and collectivism in two conflicted societies comparing Israeli-Jewish and Palestinian-Arab high school students. Youth & Society, 33, 3–30. doi: 10.1177/0044118X01033001001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Scharf, M., & Mayseless, O. (2008). Late adolescent girls’ relationships with parents and romantic partner: The distinct role of mothers and fathers. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 837–855. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (Vol. 18, pp. 85–119). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  72. Seginer, R. (1988). Adolescents’ orientation toward the future: Sex role differentiation in a sociocultural context. Sex Roles, 18, 739–757. doi: 10.1007/BF00288058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Seginer, R. (2009). Future orientation: Developmental and ecological perspectives. NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Seginer, R., Shoyer, S., Hossessi, R., & Tannous, H. (2007). Adolescent family and peer relationships: Does culture matter? New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2007(116), 83–99. doi: 10.1002/cd.190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sher-Censor, E., & Oppenheim, D. (2010). Adjustment of female adolescents leaving home for the military: Links with earlier individuation. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 625–632. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.12.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Shulman, S., & Scharf, M. (2000). Adolescent romantic behaviors and perceptions: Age- and gender-related differences, and links with family and peer relationships. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10, 99–118. doi: 10.1207/SJRA1001_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859–884. doi: 10.1037/a0017364.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Von Der Lippe, A. L., & Amundsen, E. (1998). Individuation, ego development and the quality of conflict negotiation in the family of adolescent girls. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 39, 25–31. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00052.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Waters, E., & Deane, K. E. (1985). Defining and assessing individual differences in attachment relationships: Q-methodology and the organization of behavior in infancy and early childhood. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, 41–65. doi: 10.2307/3333826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Weichold, K., Büttig, S., & Silbereisen, R. K. (2008). Effects of pubertal timing on communication behaviors and stress reactivity in young women during conflict discussions with their mothers. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 1123–1133. doi: 10.1007/s10964-007-9260-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Center for the Study of Child DevelopmentUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations