Sex Roles

, Volume 71, Issue 11–12, pp 414–418 | Cite as

Act 2: Extending Theory on Social Media and Body Image Concerns

Feminist Forum Review Article
First Online:

Abstract

In an article in this issue of Sex Roles, I proposed a transactional model of social media effects on body image concerns that emphasizes the role played by individual vulnerability characteristics, gratifications sought from social media, and a host of mediating psychological processes. Commentators offered thoughtful responses to the model, pointing to strengths, but also targeting a number of areas for additional emphasis and ameliorative attention. This article, with a focus on the U.S. context, reviews each of the papers. It summarizes their main suggestions, and pulls together the host of forward-looking ideas, including the role played by cultural forces, the interplay between social and conventional mass media, and an emphasis on the salutary effects of social media on body image processes.

Keywords

Social media Mass media Body image concerns Transactional model Self-construal Positive social media effects 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Andsager, J.L. (2014). Research directions in social media and body image. Sex Roles, this issue. doi:  10.1007/s11199-014-0430-4.
  2. Bazarova, N. N., & Choi, Y. H. (2014). Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. Journal of Communication, 64, 635–657. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Casetti, F., & Sampietro, S. (2012). With eyes, with hands: The relocation of cinema into the iphone. In P. Snickars & P. Vonderau (Eds.), Moving data: The iphone and the future of media (pp. 19–32). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R. K., Cooper, M. L., & Bouvrette, A. (2003). Contingencies of self-worth in college students: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 894–908. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.894.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  6. Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2014). Thinspiration: Self-improvement versus self-evaluation social comparisons with thin-ideal media portrayals. Health Communication. Advance online publication. doi:  10.1080/10410236.2014.921270.
  7. Morling, B., & Kitayama, S. (2008). Culture and motivation. In J. Y. Shah & W. L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 417–433). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Park, N., Kee, K. F., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 729–733. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2009.0003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Perloff, R. M. (2009). Mass media, social perception, and the third-person effect. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 252–268). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Perloff, R.M. (2014). Social media effects on young women’s body image concerns: Theoretical perspectives and an agenda for research. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-014-0384-6.
  11. Prieler, M., & Choi, J. (2014). Broadening the scope of social media effect research on body image concerns. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-014-0406-4.
  12. Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., & Ross, L. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 369–381. doi: 10.1177/0146167202286008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rodin, J., Silberstein, L., & Streigel-Moore, R. (1985). Women and weight: A normative discontent. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Psychology and gender (pp. 267–307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  14. Rubin, A. M. (2009). Uses-and-gratifications perspective on media effects. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 165–184). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Schatz, M. (1970). Ethics of the fathers in the light of Jewish history. New York: Bloch.Google Scholar
  16. Sundar, S. S., & Limperos, A. M. (2013). Uses and grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 504–525. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2013.845827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2013). NetGirls: The Internet, Facebook, and body image concern in adolescent girls. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 46, 630–633. doi: 10.1002/eat.22141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Turner, J.S. (2014). Negotiating a media effects model: Addendums and adjustments to Perloff’s framework for social media’s impact on body image concerns. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-014-0431-3.
  19. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63, 221–243. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vorderer, P., & Kohring, M. (2013). Permanently online: A challenge for media and communication research. International Journal of Communication, 7, 188–196.Google Scholar
  21. Williams, R.J., & Ricciardelli, L.A. (2014). Social media and body image concerns: Further considerations and broader perspectives. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-014-0429-x.
  22. Wolfsfeld, G., Segev, E., & Sheafer, T. (2013). Spring media and the Arab spring: Politics comes first. International Journal of Press/Politics, 18, 115–137. doi: 10.1177/1940161212471716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of CommunicationCleveland State UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations