Sex Roles

, Volume 70, Issue 5–6, pp 183–194 | Cite as

When Civic Virtue isn’t Seen as Virtuous: The Effect of Gender Stereotyping on Civic Virtue Expectations for Women

  • Dan S. Chiaburu
  • Katina Sawyer
  • Troy A. Smith
  • Nicolas Brown
  • T. Brad Harris
Original Article


We examined the extent to which observers’ expectations of target employees’ civic virtue organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB) are a function of both observer- (gender stereotype activation, threat) and target-related (gender) influences. Consistent with a role congruity perspective, we proposed that civic virtue (constructive involvement in the political governance process of the organization) will be expected to a lesser extent of women, but only when gender stereotypes are activated. We confirm this hypothesis across two studies. In Study 1, based on a sample of 187 U.S. undergraduate students (101 women, 86 men), we show that less civic virtue is expected of women when observers’ gender stereotypes are experimentally activated (vs. the non-activated condition). Using an additional sample of 197 U.S. undergraduate students (Study 2; 118 women, 79 men), we extend our findings by demonstrating that less civic virtue was expected of women in a high (vs. low) threat (manipulated) condition. Findings for men are included for comparative and general informational purposes only. We observed no significant changes in civic virtue expectations for men due to our study manipulations. Our research extends prior studies by showing that expectations for civic virtue are diminished for women, but only when gender stereotypes and threat are activated.


Organizational citizenship behaviors OCBs Civic virtue Gender Gender stereotypes Threat 


  1. Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. (2001). The influences of ratee gender on ratings of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 2561–2587. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb00191.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1995). Implicit stereotyping and judgments of fame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 181–198. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In R. S. Wyer Jr. (Ed.), The automaticity of everyday life: Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10, pp. 1–61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Bauer, C. C., & Baltes, B. B. (2002). Reducing the effects of gender stereotypes on performance evaluations. Sex Roles, 47, 465–476. doi: 10.1023/A:1021652527696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brettell, C., & Sargent, C. (Eds.). (2001). Gender in cross-cultural perspective (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2012). Civilian labor force, by age, sex, race, and ethnicity, 1990, 2000, 2010, and projected 2020. Retrieved from htm.
  7. Cann, O. (2012). Slow Progress in Closing Global Economic Gender Gap, New Major Study Finds. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from
  8. Carter, J. D., Hall, J. A., Carney, D. R., & Rosip, J. C. (2006). Individual differences in the acceptance of stereotyping. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 1103–1118. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chiaburu, D., Sawyer, K. B., & Thoroughgood, C. N. (2010). Transferring more than learned in training: Employees’ and managers’ (over)estimation of training transfer. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 18, 380–393. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00520.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiaburu, D. S., Oh, I.-S., Berry, C. M., Li, N., & Gardner, R. G. (2011). The five-factor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1140–1166. doi: 10.1037/a0024004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiaburu, D. S., Kissack, H., & Schmid Mast, M. (2013). Keeping women in their place? The joint influence of target gender and interpersonal hierarchy expectations on contextual performance requirements. In D. Svyantek & K. Mahoney (Eds.), Received wisdom, kernels of truth, and boundary conditions in organizational studies (pp. 239–269). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  13. Deng, C.-P., Armstrong, P. I., & Rounds, J. (2007). The fit of Holland’s RIASEC model to US occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71, 1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2007.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ehrhart, M. G., & Godfrey, E. (2003). The role of schemas in gender and OCB research. Paper presented at the 18th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  17. Farrell, S. K., & Finkelstein, L. M. (2007). Organizational citizenship behavior and gender: Expectations and attributions for performance. North American Journal of Psychology, 9, 81–95.Google Scholar
  18. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. (1991). Social cognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Foldy, E. (2006). Dueling schemata: Dialectical sensemaking about gender. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42, 350–372. doi: 10.1177/0021886306290309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frese, M., Beimel, S., & Schoenborn, S. (2003). Action training for charismatic leadership: Two evaluations of studies of a commercial training module on inspirational communication of a vision. Personnel Psychology, 56, 671–697. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00754.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gatton, D. S., DuBois, L. Z., & Faley, R. H. (1999). The effects of organizational context on occupational gender stereotyping. Sex Roles, 40, 567–582. doi: 10.1023/A:1018888013808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Graham, J. W., & Van Dyne, L. (2006). Gathering information and exercising influence: Two forms of civic virtue organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 18, 89–109. doi: 10.1007/s10672-006-9007-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heilman, M. E., & Chen, J. J. (2005). Same behavior, different consequences: Reactions to men’s and women’s altruistic citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 431–441. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.431.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heilman, M. E., & Eagly, A. H. (2008). Gender stereotypes are alive, well, and busy producing workplace discrimination. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 393–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00072.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 81–92. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang, J., Curran, P., Keeney, J., Poposki, E., & DeShon, R. (2012). Detecting and deterring insufficient effort responding to surveys. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 99–114. doi: 10.1007/s10869-011-9231-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jost, J. T., & Kay, L. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., & Young, S. (2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240–246. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00810.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kidder, D. L. (2002). The influence of gender on the performance of organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 28, 629–648. doi: 10.1177/014920630202800504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kidder, D. L., & McLean Parks, J. M. (2001). The good soldier: Who is s(he)? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 939–959. doi: 10.1002/job.119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Konovsky, M. A., & Organ, D. W. (1996). Dispositional and contextual determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 253–266. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199605)17:3<253::AID-JOB747>3.0.CO;2-Q.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kunda, Z., & Oleson, K. C. (1995). Maintaining stereotypes in the face of disconfirmation: Constructing grounds for subtyping deviants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 565–579. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.565.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kushell, E., & Newton, R. (1986). Gender, leadership style, and subordinate satisfaction: An experiment. Sex Roles, 14, 203–209. doi: 10.1007/BF00288249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lovell, S. E., Kahn, A. S., Anton, J., Davidson, A., Dowling, E., Post, D., & Mason, C. (1999). Does gender affect the link between organizational citizenship behavior and performance evaluation? Sex Roles, 41, 469–478. doi: 10.1023/A:1018883018719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lyness, K. S., & Heilman, M. E. (2006). When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 777–785. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.777.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Madera, J. M., Hebl, M. R., & Martin, R. C. (2009). Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1591–1599. doi: 10.1037/a0016539.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McKillip, J., & Baldwin, K. (1990). Evaluation of an STD education media campaign: A control construct design. Evaluation Review, 14, 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  39. Oswald, D. L. (2008). Gender stereotypes and women’s reports of liking and ability in traditionally masculine and feminine occupations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 196–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00424.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107–142. doi: 10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 165–179. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schilt, K. (2011). Just one of the guys? Transgender men and the persistence of gender inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. Schilt, K., & Wiswall, M. (2008). Before and after: Gender transitions, human capital, and workplace experiences. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 8, 1–26. doi: 10.2202/1935-1682.1862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L. L., & McLean Parks, J. (1995). Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (A bridge over muddied waters.). In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research of organizational behavior (pp. 215–285). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  46. Vong, S., Ehrhart, M. G., Ehrhart, K. M., Devos, T. (2010). Gender and organizational citizenship behavior. Paper presented at the 24th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  47. Wheeler, S. C., & Petty, R. E. (2001). The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: A review of possible mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 797–826. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.797.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2009). Gender identity. In M. Leary & R. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 109–128). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan S. Chiaburu
    • 1
  • Katina Sawyer
    • 2
  • Troy A. Smith
    • 3
  • Nicolas Brown
    • 4
  • T. Brad Harris
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Management, Mays Business SchoolTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, Graduate Programs in Human Resource DevelopmentVillanova UniversityVillanovaUSA
  3. 3.Mays Business SchoolTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA
  5. 5.School of Labor and Employment RelationsUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations