Associations Between Mixed-Gender Friendships, Gender Reference Group Identity and Substance Use in College Students
- 1.1k Downloads
We investigated the associations between same-gender friendship, gender reference group identity, and substance use in college students (54 % male, M age = 19.23, SD = 1.23) from the northeastern United States using an online survey. Male students reported greater weekly marijuana, but not alcohol use than female students. Regression analyses revealed that having a greater proportion of same-gender friendships was associated with greater weekly alcohol use for male students and lesser weekly alcohol and marijuana use for female students. Gender reference group identity was negatively associated with weekly marijuana use for male and female students. For female students, gender reference group identity mediated the association between proportion of same-gender friendships and weekly marijuana use. Our study highlights the importance of considering the social context (e.g., the gender of friends) and individual variables relating to gender (e.g. gender reference group identity) in substance use research. Our findings fit within social constructionist models of social development that suggest participation in gendered contexts (e.g., same-gender or other-gender-peer contexts) over time cue gender-typed behaviors such as using marijuana.
KeywordsGender segregation Same-sex friendships Cross-sex friendships marijuana use Alcohol use Gender identity College students
The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers who provided feedback on earlier versions of this manuscript. We would also like to thank Grant Kuehl, Kelly R. Smith, and Danielle Rose for their comments.
- Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston: Northeastern University.Google Scholar
- American Psychological Association (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx.
- Arndorfer, C. L., & Stormshak, E. A. (2008). Same-sex versus other-sex best friendship in early adolescence: Longitudinal predictors of antisocial behavior throughout adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 1059–1070. doi: 10.1007/s10964-008-9311-x.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Boyd, C. J., McCabe, S. E., Cranford, J. A., Morales, M., Lange, J. E., Reed, M. B., Ketchie, J. M., & Scott, M. S. (2008). Heavy episodic drinking and its consequences: The protective effects of same-sex, residential living-learning communities for undergraduate women. Addictive Behaviors, 33, 987–993. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.03.005.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carter, D. B. (1987). The roles of peers in sex role socialization. In D. B. Carter (Ed.), Current conceptions of sex roles and sex typing: Theory and research (pp. 101–121). New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
- Dick, D. M., Pagan, J. L., Holliday, C., Viken, R., Pulkkinen, L., Kaprio, J., & Rose, R. J. (2007). Gender differences in friends’ influences on adolescent drinking: A genetic epidemiological study. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 31, 2012–2019. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00523.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hibell, B., Guttormsson, U., Ahlström, S., Balakireva, O., Bjarnason, T., Kokkevi, A., & Kraus, L. (2012). The 2011 ESPAD report: Substance use among students in 36 European countries. Retrieved from: http://www.espad.org/Uploads/ESPAD_reports/2011/The_2011_ESPAD_Report_FULL_2012_06-08.pdf.
- Hummer, J. F., LaBrie, J. W., Lac, A., Sessoms, A., & Cail, J. (2012). Estimates and influences of reflective opposite-sex norms on alcohol use among a high-risk sample of college students: Exploring Greek-affiliation and gender effects. Addictive Behaviors, 37, 596–604. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.11.027.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Iwamoto, D. K., Cheng, A., Lee, C. S., Takamatsu, S., & Gordon, D. (2011). “Man-ing” up and getting drunk: The role of masculine norms, alcohol intoxication and alcohol-related problems among college men. Addictive Behaviors, 36, 906–911. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.04.005.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2012). Monitoring the future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2011. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge: Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Marshal, M. P., Friedman, M. S., Stall, R., King, K. M., Miles, J., Gold, M. A., Bukstein, O. G., & Morse, J. Q. (2008). Sexual orientation and adolescent substance use: A meta-analysis and methodological review. Addiction, 103, 546–556. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02149.x.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Monsour, M. (2002). Women and men as friends: Relationships across the life span in the 21st century. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
- Steele, J. L., Peralta, R. L., & Elman, C. (2011). The co-ingestion of nonmedical prescription drugs and alcohol: A partial test of social learning theory. Journal of Drug Issues, 41, 561–586.Google Scholar
- Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration. (2012). Results from the 2011 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of national findings, NSDUH series H-44, HHS publication no. (SMA) 12–4713. Rockville: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.Google Scholar
- Sutherland, E. H. (1939). Principles of criminology. Chicago: J.B. Lippincott Company.Google Scholar
- Whiting, B., & Edwards, C. P. (1988). A cross-cultural analysis of sex differences in the behavior of children aged 3 through 11. In G. Handel (Ed.), Childhood socialization (pp. 281–297). Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Wright, P. (1989). Gender differences in adults’ same- and cross-gender friendships. In R. G. Adams & R. Blieszner (Eds.), Older adult friendship: Structure and process (pp. 197–221). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar