Sex Roles

, Volume 70, Issue 1–2, pp 43–56 | Cite as

Gender Roles in Tween Television Programming: A Content Analysis of Two Genres

  • Ashton GerdingEmail author
  • Nancy Signorielli
Original Article


This content analysis of gender role portrayals in 49 episodes of 40 distinct United States tween television programs aired in 2011 examined two genres: teen scene (geared towards girls) and action-adventure (geared towards boys). This programming is of interest because tweens are a lucrative market, they watch more television than any other age group, and television programs are created specifically for them. Furthermore, members of this special group are in an important developmental stage in which social and intellectual schema are established and identity and gender are explored. The analysis focused on the numbers of male and female characters in both genres, and the gender role portrayals of characters in terms of appearance, behaviors, and personality characteristics in the two genres. Results show that females, compared to the U.S. population, were underrepresented in the action adventure genre, but that the gender distribution in the teen scene genre mirrored the male–female distribution in the U.S. population. Overall, compared to males, females were more attractive, more concerned about their appearance, received comments about their “looks.” Females were presented similarly in both genres. Overall, males were shown in varying levels of attractiveness, and were portrayed more stereotypically in the action adventure genre. Exploring these results through the lenses of cultivation theory and social cognitive theory shows that tween viewers could potentially develop narrow conceptions about their range of possibilities in the world.


Tweens Content analysis Television Gender roles 


  1. Aaron Stone. (2013). Retrieved from
  2. Aubrey, J., & Harrison, K. (2004). The gender-role content of children’s favorite television programs and its links to their gender-related perceptions. Media Psychology, 6, 111–146. doi: 10.1207/s1532785xmep0602_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, K., & Raney, A. (2007). Equally super?: Gender-role stereotyping of superheroes in children’s animated programs. Mass Communication & Society, 10, 25–41. doi: 10.1080/15205430709337003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (2009). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (Vol. 3, pp. 94–124). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Banet-Weiser, S. (2004). Girls rule!: Gender, feminism, and nickelodeon. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 21, 119–139. doi: 10.1080/07393180410001688038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barner, M. R. (1999). Sex-role stereotyping in FCC-mandated children’s educational television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 551–564. doi: 10.1080/08838159909364509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Behm-Morawitz, E., & Mastro, D. E. (2008). Mean girls? The influence of gender portrayals in teen movies on emerging adults’ gender-based attitudes and beliefs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 85, 131–146. doi: 10.1177/107769900808500109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Becker, A. (2004). Three-way war over tweens. Broadcasting & Cable, 134(38), 6.Google Scholar
  9. Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R. (2012). A narrative perspective on genre-specific cultivation. In M. Morgan, J. Shanahan, & N. Signorielli (Eds.), Living with television now: Advances in cultivation theory and research (pp. 261–285). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  10. Black, K. A., Merola, J. A., Littman, A. I., Chrisler, J. C., & Neace, W. P. (2009). Gender and form of cereal box characters: different medium, same disparity. Sex Roles, 60, 882–889. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9579-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brzeziski, M. (2004). Tweens: A billion-dollar market. Retrieved from http://
  12. Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 206, 676–713. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corder-Bolz, C. R. (1980). Mediation: the role of significant others. Journal of Communication, 30(3), 106–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1980.tb01997.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, S. N. (2003). Sex stereotypes in commercials targeted toward children: A content analysis. Sociological Spectrum: Mid-South Sociological Association, 23, 407–424. doi: 10.1080/02732170309220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dill, K. E., & Thill, K. P. (2007). Video game characters and the socialization of gender roles: Young people’s perceptions mirror sexist media depictions. Sex Roles, 57, 851–864. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9278-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fish Hooks. (2013). Retrieved from
  17. Frith, K. T., & Mueller, B. (2010). Advertising and societies: Global issues (2nd ed.). New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Gantz, W., Schwartz, N., Angelini, J. R., & Rideout, V. (2007). Food for thought: Television food advertising to children in the United States. Menlo Park: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  19. Gerbner, G. (1998). Cultivation analysis: An overview. Mass Communication & Society, 1, 175–194. doi: 10.1080/15205436.1998.9677855.Google Scholar
  20. Gram, M. (2005). “If we’re not going to Italy, I am not coming”: Children as co-decision-makers in the family. In K. M. Ekström & H. Brembeck (Eds.), European advances in consumer research. Gothenburg: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  21. Hannah Montana. (2013). Retrieved from
  22. iCarly. (2013). Retrieved from
  23. Kahlenberg, S. G., & Hein, M. M. (2010). Progression on Nickelodeon: Gender-role stereotypes in toy commercials. Sex Roles, 62, 830–847. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9653-.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krippendorf, K. (1980). Content analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Leaper, C., Breed, L., Hoffman, L., & Perlman, C. (2002). Variations in the gender-stereotyped content of children’s television cartoons across genres. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1653–1662. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02767.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lindstrom, M. (2004). Branding is no longer child’s play! Journal of Consumer Marketing, 21(3), 175–182. doi: 10.1108/07363760410534722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lindstrom, M., & Seybold, P. B. (2003). BRANDchild: Remarkable insights into the minds of today’s global kids and their relationships with brands. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  28. Lustyik, K. (2010). Transnational children’s television: The case of Nickelodeon in the South Pacific. International Communication Gazette, 72(2), 171–190. doi: 10.1177/1748048509353868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luther, C. A., & Legg, J. R., Jr. (2010). Gender differences in depictions of social and physical aggression in children’s cartoons in the US. Journal of Children and Media, 4, 191–205. doi: 10.1080/17482791003629651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martin, C., & Ruble, D. (2004). Children’s search for gender cues: Cognitive perspectives on gender development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(2), 67–70. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00276.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martins, N., Williams, D. C., Harrison, K., & Ratan, R. A. (2009). A content analysis of female body imagery in video games. Sex Roles, 61, 824–836. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9682-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mastro, D. E., & Behm-Morawitz, E. (2005). Latino representation on primetime television. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 82, 110–130. doi: 10.1177/107769900508200108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mastro, D. E., & Greenberg, B. S. (2000). The portrayal of racial minorities on prime time television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44, 690–703. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4404_10.Google Scholar
  34. Morgan, M. (1987). Television, sex-role attitudes, and sex-role behavior. Journal of Early Adolescence, 7, 269–282. doi: 10.1177/0272431687073004.Google Scholar
  35. Morgan, M., Shanahan, J., & Signorielli, N. (2009). Growing up with television: Cultivation processes. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 34–49). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Morgan, M., Shanahan, J., & Signorielli, N. (2012). Living with television now: Advances in cultivation theory & research. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  37. Nathanson, A. I. (1999). Identifying and explaining the relationship between parental mediation and children’s aggression. Communication Research, 26, 124–144. doi: 10.1177/009365099026002002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Northrup, T., & Liebler, C. (2010). The good, the bad, and the beautiful. Journal of Children and Media, 4, 265–282. doi: 10.1080/17482798.2010.496917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prince, D., & Martin, N. (2011). The tween market niche: An overview of past research, current practices, and a comprehensive research model. In J. Carland & J. Carland (Eds.), Proceedings of the Allied Academies’ Internet Conference, 13 (pp. 95–98). Arden: DreamCatchers Group.Google Scholar
  40. Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8–18 year olds. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J.Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved from
  41. Roberts, D. F., Foehr, U. G., & Rideout, V. R. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8–18 year olds. Menlo Park: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  42. Romano, A. (2004, April 19). Tween and mean: Nick and Disney slug it out to score with the lucrative 9–14 demographic. Broadcasting & Cable, p. 17.Google Scholar
  43. Siegel, D. L., Coffey, T. J., & Livingston, G. (2004). The great tweens buying machine: Capturing your share of the multi-billion-dollar tween market. Chicago: Dearborn Trade Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. Signorielli, N. (2009). Race and sex in prime time: A look at occupations and occupational prestige. Mass Communication and Society, 12, 332–352. doi: 10.1080/15205430802478693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Signorielli, N., & Bacue, A. (1999). Recognition and respect: A content analysis of prime-time television characters across three decades. Sex roles, 40, 527–544. doi: 10.1023/A:1018883912900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith, S. L., & Cook, C. A. (2008). Gender stereotypes: An analysis of popular films and TV. CA: The Geena Davis Institute on Gender and Media.Google Scholar
  47. Smith, S. L., Pieper, K. M., Granados, A., & Choueiti, M. (2010). Assessing gender-related portrayals in top grossing G-rated films. Sex Roles, 62, 774–786. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9736-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Star Wars: The Clone Wars. (2013). Retrieved from
  49. Sternglanz, S., & Serbin, L. (1974). Sex role stereotyping in children’s television programs. Developmental Psychology, 10, 710–715. doi: 10.1037/h0037044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Strasburger, V., Wilson, B. J., & Jordan, A. (2009). Children, adolescents, and the media (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  51. Straubhaar, J. D. (2007). World television: From global to local. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. The Suite Life on Deck. (2013). Retrieved from
  53. The Troop. (2013). Retrieved from
  54. Thompson, T., & Zerbinos, E. (1995). Gender roles in animated cartoons: Has the picture changed in 20 years? Sex Roles, 32, 651–673. doi: 10.1007/BF01544217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Umstead, T. (2009, February 9). Where the boys are: Rebranded action net Disney XD takes aim at tween males. Multichannel News, p. 6.Google Scholar
  56. Van Evra, J. (1998). Television and child development (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  57. Vandewater, E., Park, S., Huang, X., & Wartella, E. (2005). “No-you can’t watch that”: Parental rules and young children’s media use. American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 608–623. doi: 10.1177/0002764204271497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wizards of Waverly Place. (2013). Retrieved from
  59. Zooey 101. (2013). Retrieved from
  60. Zucker, K. J., & Bradley, S. J. (1995). Gender identity disorder and psychosexual problems in children and adolescents. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CommunicationUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.University of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations