Body Surveillance and Body Shame in College Men: Are Men Who Self-Objectify Less Hopeful?
- 799 Downloads
The current study examined self-objectification and hope in a sample of undergraduate men from a Midwestern university in the United States (N = 227). Specifically, an online survey utilizing self-report measures examined the associations between body surveillance, body shame, trait hope, social relationship hope, and romantic relationship hope were considered through the lenses of Objectification Theory and the Broaden and Build Theory of Positive Emotions. Consistent with Hypothesis 1, bivariate correlations showed that more body surveillance was associated with less trait agency, less trait pathways, less social relationship pathways, and less romantic relationship pathways. As well, more body shame was associated with less trait agency, less trait pathways, less social relationship pathways, less romantic relationship agency, and less romantic relationship pathways. Additionally, consistent with Hypothesis 2 and the model proposed by Objectification Theory, body shame explained relations between body surveillance and hope, specifically, trait agency, social relationship pathways, romantic relationship agency, and romantic relationship pathways in a path analysis. This work fills an important gap in the current literature, as it is the only study to date that examines relations between self-objectification and hope, and furthers objectification research among men. Results are discussed within the context of Objectification Theory and the Broaden and Build Theory of Positive Emotions. Implications and future directions are discussed.
KeywordsMen Objectification Hope Broaden and build Positive psychology
- American Psychological Association, Division 51 (2013). About us: who we are. Retrieved from http://www.division51.org/aboutus/whoweare.htm.
- Baird, A., & Grieve, F. (2006). Exposure to male models in advertisements leads to a decrease in men’s body satisfaction. North American Journal of Psychology, 8, 115–121.Google Scholar
- Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Berendes, D., Keefe, F. J., Somers, T. J., Kothadia, S. M., Porter, L. S., & Cheavens, J. S. (2010). Hope in the context of lung cancer: Relationships of hope to symptoms and psychological distress. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 40, 174–182. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.01.014.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Bernard, P., Gervais, S. J., Allen, J., Campomizzi, S. & Klein, O. (2012). Self-objectification and recognition of sexually objectified bodies: a vicious circle. Manuscript in press at British Journal of Social Psychology. Google Scholar
- Bordo, S. (1999). The male body: A new look at men in public and in private. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
- Chang, E. C. (1998). Hope, problem-solving ability, and coping in a college student population: Some implications for theory and practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 953–962. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199811)54:7<953::AID-JCLP9>3.0.CO;2-F.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- de Beauvoir, S. (1952). The second sex (trans: Parshley, H.M.). New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
- Frederick, D. A., Buchanan, G. M., Sadehgi-Azar, L., Peplau, L., Haselton, M. G., Berezovskaya, A., & Lipinski, R. E. (2007a). Desiring the muscular ideal: Men’s body satisfaction in the United States, Ukraine, and Ghana. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8, 103–117. doi:10.1037/1524-9188.8.131.52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Freund, R. J., Littell, R. C., & Creighton, L. (2003). Regression using JMP. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
- Hilleary, S. M., Shorey, H. S., Etchison, S., & Snyder, C. R. (2003, May). Hope and avoidant attachment: Is hope adaptive in a social vacuum? Poster presented at the Midwestern Psychological Association Convention, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
- Irving, L. M., Snyder, C. R., Cheavens, J., Gravel, L., Hanke, J., Hilberg, P., & Nelson, N. (2004). The relationships between hope and outcomes at the pretreatment, beginning, and later phases of psychotherapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 14, 419–443. doi:10.1037/1053-04184.108.40.2069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kilbourne, J., & Pipher, M. (1999). Deadly persuasion: Why women and girls must fight the addictive power of advertising. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Magyar-Moe, J. L. (2009). Therapist’s guide to positive psychological interventions. Burlington, MA: Academic.Google Scholar
- Menshealth.com. (2012, September 10). Retrieved from http://www.menshealth.com/.
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Author.Google Scholar
- Nussbaum, M. (1999). Sex and social justice. Oxford England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Otake, K., Waugh, C. E., Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions unlock other-focused thinking. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
- Rand, K. L., & Cheavens, J. S. (2009). Hope theory. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 323–333). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Shorey, H. S., & Snyder, C. R. (2004). Development and validation of the domain hope scale- revised. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
- Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holeran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S.T., … Harney, P. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 570–585. doi:10.1037//0022-35220.127.116.110
- Snyder, C. R., Rand, K. L., & Sigmon, D. R. (2005). Hope theory: A member of the positive psychology family. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 257–276). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sympson, S. C. (1999). Validation of the domain specific hope scale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
- Tennen, H., & Affleck, G. (1999). Finding benefits in adversity. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping: The psychology of what works (pp. 279–304). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar