Sex Roles

, Volume 68, Issue 11–12, pp 803–810 | Cite as

The Intersections of Sexuality, Gender, and Race: Identity Research at the Crossroads

  • Leah R. WarnerEmail author
  • Stephanie A. Shields
Original Article


Psychology’s engagement with an intersectional perspective on social identities continues to grow. This special issue is significant in its use of intersectionality to complicate thinking about sexual orientation as a singular, homogenous category. Furthermore, it spotlights how intersectional positions within the range of sexual minority identities articulate with multiple other dimensions of identity, including gender, racial ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and age. In addition to recognizing the important contributions of this issue’s authors, in this commentary we relate their efforts to current trends in intersectionality research, including the contrasting ways intersectionality is applied in psychology. We observe that the authors portray intersectionality as either primarily concerned with multiple marginalized identities or as a more generalized theory of identity, and the authors use intersectionality as a framework, a theory, and an approach to social justice. We then address critiques of intersectionality theory that appear in the field of feminist/gender studies, showing how articles in this special issue both exemplify and challenge those critiques. Last, we focus on next steps in intersectionality research, focusing especially on the question of how intersectionality can best inform theory and methods in psychology.


Intersectionality Identity Women’s studies Sexuality Gender Race 


  1. Ackerly, C., & McDermott, R. (2012). Recent developments in intersectionality research: Expanding beyond race and gender. Politics & Gender, 8, 1–4. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X12000359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anthias, F., & Yuval-Davis, N. (1983). Contextualizing feminism: Gender, ethnic and class divisions. Feminist Review, 15, 62–75. doi: 10.1057/fr.1983.33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80–114. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azmitia, M., Syed, M., & Radmacher, K. (2008). On the intersection of personal and social identities: Introduction and evidence from a longitudinal study of emerging adults. In M. Azmitia, M. Syed, & K. Radmacher (Eds.), New directions for child and adolescent development: Intersections between personal and social identity (pp. 1–16). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Babbitt, L. G. (2011). An intersectional approach to Black/White interracial interactions: The Roles of gender and sexual orientation. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-0104-4
  6. Baca Zinn, M., & Thornton Dill, B. (1996). Theorizing difference from multiracial feminisms. Feminist Studies, 22, 321–331. doi: 10.2307/3178416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2006). Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 42, 228–235. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowleg, L. (2012). Once you’ve blended the cake, you can’t take the parts back to the main ingredients: Black gay and bisexual men’s descriptions and experiences of intersectionality. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0152-4
  9. Choo, H. Y., & Ferree, M. M. (2010). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28, 129–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01370.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cole, E. R. (2008). Coalitions as a model for intersectionality: From practice to theory. Sex Roles, 59, 443–53. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9419-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collier, K. L., Bos, H. M. W., Merry, M. S., & Standfort, T. G. M. (2012). Gender, ethnicity, religiosity, and same-sex sexual attraction and the acceptance of same-sex sexuality and gender non-conformity. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0135-5
  12. Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299. doi: 10.2307/1229039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as a buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9, 67–85. doi: 10.1177/1464700108086364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diamond, L. M. (2009). Sexual fluidity: Understanding women’s love and desire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dill, B. T., & Kohlman, M. H. (2012). Intersectionality: A transformative paradigm in feminist theory and social justice. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 154–174). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Duong, K. (2012). What does queer theory teach us about intersectionality? Politics and Gender, 8, 370–386. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X12000360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galupo, M. P., & Gonzalez, K. A. (2012). Friendship values and cross-category friendships: Understanding adult friendship patterns across gender, sexual orientation and race. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0211-x
  19. Helms, J. E., Jernigan, M., & Mascher, J. (2005). The meaning of race in psychology and how to change it: A methodological perspective. American Psychologist, 60, 27–36. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.1.27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Littleford, L. N., Wright, M. O. D., & Sayoc-Parial, M. (2005). White students’ intergroup anxiety during same-race and interracial interactions: A multimethod approach. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 85–94. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp2701_9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lott, B., & Bullock, H. E. (2007). Psychology and economic injustice: Personal, professional, and political intersections. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mahalingam, R., & Leu, J. (2005). Culture, essentialism, immigration and representations of gender. Theory & Psychology, 15, 839–860. doi: 10.1177/0959354305059335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771–1800. doi: 10.1086/426800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nakano Glenn, E. (1999). The social construction and institutionalization of gender and race: An integrative framework. In M. M. Feree, J. Lorber, & B. B. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 3–43). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Nash, J. C. (2008). Re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89, 1–15. doi: 10.1057/fr.2008.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. National Women’s Studies Association (2012). Women’s Studies Scholarship: A Statement by the National Women’s Studies Association Field Leadership Working Group (November 2012 draft).Google Scholar
  29. Norton, A. T., & Herek, G. M. (2012). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a national probability sample of US adults. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-0110-6
  30. Oswald, D. L., & Lindstedt, K. (2006). The content and function of gender self-stereotypes: An exploratory investigation. Sex Roles, 54, 447–458. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9026-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Phoenix, A., & Pattynama, P. (2006). Intersectionality. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13, 187–92. doi: 10.1177/1350506806065751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Prentice, D., & Miller, D. (2006). Essentializing differences between women and men. Psychological Science, 17, 129–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01675.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prins, B. (2006). Narrative accounts of origins: A blind spot in the intersectional approach? European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13, 277–290. doi: 10.1177/1350506806065757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Riggs, D. W. (2012). Anti-Asian sentiment amongst a sample of white Australian men on gaydar. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0119-5
  35. Robertson, M. A., & Sgoutas, A. (2012). Thinking beyond the category of sexual identity: At the intersection of sexuality and human-trafficking policy. Politics & Gender, 8, 421–429. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X12000414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sevelius, J. M. (2012). Gender affirmation: A framework for conceptualizing risk behavior among transgender women of color. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0216-5
  37. Shields, S. A. (2012). Waking up to privilege: Intersectionality and opportunity. In Y. Flores-Niemann, A. Harris, C. González, & G. Gutiérrez y Muhs (Eds.), Presumed incompetent: The intersections of race and class for women in academia (pp. 29–39). Logan: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Shields, S. A., & Steinke, P. (2003). Does self-report make sense as an investigative method in evolutionary psychology? In C. B. Travis (Ed.), Evolution, gender, and rape (pp. 87–104). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
  39. Singh, A. A. (2012). Transgender youth of color and resilience: Negotiating oppression and finding support. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0149-z
  40. Swank, E., & Fahs, B. (2012). An intersectional analysis of gender and race for sexual minorities who engage in gay and lesbian rights activism. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0168-9
  41. Syed, M. (2010). Disciplinarity and methodology in intersectionality theory and research. American Psychologist, 65, 61–62. doi: 10.1037/a0017495.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Symington, A. (2004). Intersectionality: A tool for gender and economic justice. Women’s Rights and Economic Change, 9. Retrieved from
  43. Veenstra, G. (2012). The gendered nature of discriminatory experiences by race, class, and sexuality: A comparison of intersectionality theory and the subordinate male target hypothesis. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0243-2
  44. Warner, L. R. (2008). A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research. Sex Roles, 59, 454–463. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9504-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Worthen, M. G. (2012). An argument for separate analyses of attitudes toward lesbian, gay, bisexual men, bisexual women, MtF and FtM transgender individuals. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0155-1
  46. Yoder, J. D., & Kahn, A. S. (2003). Making gender comparisons more meaningful: A call for more attention to social context. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 281–290. doi: 10.1111/1471-6402.00108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13, 193–210. doi: 10.1177/1350506806065752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social Science and Human ServicesRamapo College of New JerseyMahwahUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations