Sex Roles

, Volume 68, Issue 7–8, pp 439–453 | Cite as

Patterns of Intimacy and Distancing as Young Women (and Men) Friends Exchange Stories of Romantic Relationships

  • Jerika C. Norona
  • Avril Thorne
  • Madeleine R. Kerrick
  • Halley B. Farwood
  • Neill Korobov
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

Heterosexual U.S. adolescents tend to show gender differences in how they describe romantic relationships, with males being positioned as cool and objectifying toward females, and females as warm and positively engaged (Simon et al. 1992; Tolman 2002). However, according to developmental theory (Arnett 2000, 2004), such gender scripts should be less operative in early adulthood, when romantic relationships become a prime concern for college-age youth regardless of gender. Partly confirming this premise, a recent study of male undergraduate friends in California found that during casual conversations, one of their most prevalent story telling patterns was shifting between positioning themselves as warm and engaged (intimate) and as cool and objectifying (distancing) toward romantic partners (Korobov and Thorne 2006). For purposes of a gender comparison, the present archival, mixed-methods study deployed the same methodology to examine the prevalence of these patterns for a companion college sample of 37 pairs of women friends. Gender differences were found for only one of four story patterns: Women friends told proportionately more stories than men that were mildly intimate. Otherwise the stories of both genders showed parallel patterns either of dense distancing, or of repeatedly shifting between intimacy and distancing. In addition, women and men friends showed a similar versatility in the array of patterns they produced. The findings suggest mild operability of a gendered intimacy script, but more generally support the premise that working out what one does and doesn’t want in a romantic relationship is a common concern for young adult friends regardless of gender.

Keywords

Gender Development Friends Romantic relationships Intimacy Young adulthood Stories Positioning 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bamberg, M. (2004a). “I know it may sound mean to say this, but we couldn’t really care less about her anyway”. Form and functions of “slut bashing” in male identity constructions in 15-year-olds. Human Development, 47, 331–353. doi: 10.1159/000081036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bamberg, M. (2004b). Talk, small stories, and adolescent identities. Human Development, 47, 366–369. doi: 10.1159/000081039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bamberg, M., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk, 28, 377–396. doi: 10.1515/TEXT.2008.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, B. B. (1999). “You’re going out with who?”: Peer group influences on adolescent romantic relationships. In W. Furman, B. B. Brown, & C. Feiring (Eds.), The development of romantic relationships in adolescence (pp. 291–329). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bryant, A. N. (2003). Changes in attitudes toward women’s roles: Predicting gender role traditionalism among college students. Sex Roles, 48, 131–142. doi: 10.1023/A:1022451205292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burns, A. (2000). Looking for love in intimate heterosexual relationships. Feminism & Psychology, 10, 481–485. doi: 10.1177/0959353500010004008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Connolly, J. A., & Goldberg, A. (1999). Romantic relationships in adolescence: The role of friends and peers in their emergence and development. In W. Furman, B. B. Brown, & C. Feiring (Eds.), The development of romantic relationships in adolescence (pp. 266–290). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Erikson, E. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. England: Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  13. Feiring, C. (1999). Gender identity and the development of romantic relationships in adolescence. In W. Furman, W. Furman, B. B. Brown, & C. Feiring (Eds.), The development of romantic relationships in adolescence (pp. 211–232). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fine, M. (1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 29–53.Google Scholar
  15. Furman, W. (2002). The emerging field of adolescent romantic relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 177–180. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giedd, J. N., Raznahan, A., Lee, N. R., Weddle, C., Liverpool, M., Stockman, M., et al. (2011). Structural brain magnetic resonance imaging of typically developing children and adolescents. In E. Amsel & J. Smetana (Eds.), Adolescent vulnerabilities and opportunities: Developmental and constructivist perspectives (pp. 23–40). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goffman, E. (1977). The arrangement between the sexes. Theory and Society, 4, 301–331. doi: 10.1007/BF00206983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gottman, J. M., Levenson, R. W., Swanson, C., Swanson, K., Tyson, R., & Yoshimoto, D. (2003). Observing gay, lesbian, and heterosexual couples’ relationships: Mathematical modeling of conflict interaction. Journal of Homosexuality, 45, 65–91. doi: 10.1300/J082v45n01_04.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Griffin, C. (2000). Absences that matter: Constructions of sexuality in studies of young women’s friendships. Feminism & Psychology, 10, 227–245. doi: 10.1177/0959353500010002003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Habermas, T., & de Silveira, C. (2008). The development of global coherence in life narratives across adolescence: Temporal, causal, and thematic aspects. Developmental Psychology, 44, 707–721. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.707.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hartup, W. W. (1993). Adolescents and their friends. In B. Laursen (Ed.), Close friendships in adolescence (pp. 3–22). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Henley, N. M. (1985). Psychology and gender. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 11, 101–119. doi: 10.1086/494202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hess, N. H., & Hagen, E. H. (2006). Sex differences in indirect aggression: Psychological evidence from young adults. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 231–245. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hey, V. (1997). The company she keeps. An ethnography of girls’ friendship. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Jackson, S. (2001). Happily never after: Young women’s stories of abuse in heterosexual love relationships. Feminism & Psychology, 11, 305–321. doi: 10.1177/0959353501011003004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jackson, S. (2005). ‘I’m 15 and desperate for sex”: ‘Doing’ and ‘undoing’ desire in letters to a teenage magazine. Feminism & Psychology, 15, 295–313. doi: 10.1177/0959-353505054717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jackson, S., & Cram, F. (2003). Disrupting the sexual double standard: Young women’s talk about heterosexuality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 113–127. doi: 10.1348/014466603763276153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kirkman, M., Rosenthal, D., & Smith, A. M. A. (1998). Adolescent sex and the romantic narrative: Why some young heterosexuals use condoms to prevent pregnancy but not disease. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 3, 355–370. doi: 10.1080/13548509808400610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Korobov, N., & Thorne, A. (2006). Intimacy and distancing: Young men’s conversations about romantic relationships. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 27–55. doi: 10.1177/0743558405284035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Korobov, N., & Thorne, A. (2009). The negotiation of compulsory romance in young women friends’ stories about romantic heterosexual experiences. Feminism & Psychology, 19, 49–70. doi: 10.1177/0959353508098619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Korobov, N., Thorne, A., Norona, J. C., & Farwood, H. B. (2011). Manual for coding intimate and distancing positions in narratives about romantic relationships. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
  32. Kurdek, L. A. (1998). Relationship outcomes and their predictors: Longitudinal evidence from heterosexual married, gay cohabitating, and lesbian cohabitating couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 553–568. doi: 10.2307/353528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  34. Leaper, C., & Ayres, M. M. (2007). A meta-analytic review of gender variations in adults’ language use: Talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 328–363. doi: 10.1177/1088868307302221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Montgomery, M., & Côté, J. E. (2003). College as a transition to adulthood. In G. R. Adams & M. D. Berzonsky (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence. Blackwell handbooks of developmental psychology (pp. 149–172). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (2001). Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Phillips, L. (2000). Flirting with danger: Young women’s reflections on sexuality and dominance. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rich, A. (1983). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. In A. Snitow, C. Stansell, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Powers of desire: The politics of sexuality (pp. 177–205). New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  39. Robinson, T., & Ward, J. (1991). A belief far greater than one’s disbelief: Cultivating resistance among African American female adolescents. In C. Gilligan, A. G. Rogers, & D. L. Tolman (Eds.), Women, girls, and psychotherapy: Reframing resistance (pp. 87–104). New York: Harrington Park Press.Google Scholar
  40. Rose, A. J. (2002). Co-rumination in the friendships of girls and boys. Child Development, 73, 1830–1843. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Simon, R. W. (2002). Revisiting the relationships among gender, marital status, and mental health. The American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1065–1096. doi: 10.1086/339225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Simon, R. W., Eder, D., & Evans, C. (1992). The development of feeling norms underlying romantic love among adolescent females. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 29–46. doi: 10.2307/2786684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Solomon, D. H., & Knobloch, L. K. (2004). A model of relational turbulence: The role of intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners in appraisals of irritations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 795–816. doi: 10.1177/0265407504047838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Taylor, J. M., Gilligan, C., & Sullivan, A. M. (1995). Between voice and silence: Women and girls, race and relationship. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Thompson, S. (1995). Going all the way: Teenage girls’ tales of sex, romance, and pregnancy. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  46. Thorne, A., Korobov, N., & Morgan, E. M. (2007). Channeling identity: A study of storytelling in conversations between introverted and extraverted friends. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1008–1031. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.12.001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thorne, A., Shapiro, L., Cardilla, K., Korobov, N., & Nelson, P. A. (2009). Caught in the act: How extraverted and introverted friends communally cope with being recorded. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 634–642. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.03.014.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tolman, D. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Tolman, D. L. (2006). In a different position: Conceptualizing female adolescent sexuality development within compulsory heterosexuality. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2006, 71–89. doi: 10.1002/cd.163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tolman, D. L., & Porche, M. V. (2000). The Adolescent Femininity Ideology Scale: Development and validation of a new measure for girls. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 365–376. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb00219.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tolman, D. L., Spencer, R., Rosen-Reynoso, M., & Porche, M. V. (2003). Sowing the seeds of violence in heterosexual relationships: Early adolescents narrate compulsory heterosexuality. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 159–178. doi: 10.1111/1540-4560.t01-1-00010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Umberson, D., Chen, M. D., House, J. S., Hopkins, K., & Slaten, E. (1996). The effect of social relationships on psychological well-being: Are men and women really so different? American Sociological Review, 61, 837–857. doi: 10.2307/2096456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Walkerdine, V. (1990). Schoolgirl fictions. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  54. Williams, K. (2003). Has the future of marriage arrived? A contemporary examination of gender, marriage, and psychological well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 470–487. doi: 10.2307/1519794.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerika C. Norona
    • 1
    • 3
  • Avril Thorne
    • 1
  • Madeleine R. Kerrick
    • 1
  • Halley B. Farwood
    • 1
    • 4
  • Neill Korobov
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of California, Santa CruzSanta CruzUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of West GeorgiaCarrolltonUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Tennessee, KnoxvilleKnoxvilleUSA
  4. 4.Health Professions CampusPacific UniversityHillsboroUSA

Personalised recommendations