Sex Roles

, Volume 69, Issue 9–10, pp 507–515 | Cite as

Shifts in Masculinity Preferences Across the Menstrual Cycle: Still Not There

Original Article

Abstract

Harris (2011) failed to find support for the popular hypothesis that women are attracted to masculine-faced men when conception is likely but attracted to feminine-faced men during other menstrual cycle phases. In response, DeBruine et al. (2010) wrote a commentary criticizing Harris theoretical analysis and data (e.g., sample age). The current paper addresses those criticisms with new data analysis, additional literature review, and logical arguments. Harris’ results are not attributable to her sample’s age; no preference shift was found for the subsample of women under 30 years old and no hint of an interaction existed between participant age group and menstrual cycle phase. This work also revisits the questionable assumptions inherent in the cycle shift hypothesis and reviews literature that suggests such assumptions are not tenable.

Keywords

Attractiveness Evolutionary theory Menstrual cycle shifts Masculinity preferences Ovulatory cycle Infidelity 

References

  1. Bellis, M. A., & Baker, R. R. (1990). Do females promote sperm competition? Data for humans. Animal Behaviour, 40, 997–999. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)81008-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braude, S., Tang-Martinez, Z., & Taylor, G. (1999). Stress, testosterone, and the immunoredistribution hypothesis. Behavioral Ecology, 10, 345–350. doi:10.1093/beheco/10.3.345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Frederick, D. A., Haselton, M. G., Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2010). Evidence for menstrual cycle shifts in women’s preferences for masculinity: A response to Harris (2011) “Menstrual Cycle and Facial Preferences Reconsidered”. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 768–775.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Durante, K. M., Li, N. P., & Haselton, M. G. (2008). Changes in women’s choice of dress across the ovulatory cycle: Naturalistic and laboratory task-based evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1451–1460. doi:10.1177/0146167208323103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., Hill, S. E., Perilloux, C., & Li, N. P. (2011). Ovulation, female competition, and product choice: Hormonal influences on consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 921–934. doi:10.1086/656575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fimmel, S., & Zouboulis, C. C. (2005). Influence of physiological androgen levels on wound healing and immune status in men. The Aging Male, 8, 166–174. doi:10.1080/13685530500233847.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Folstad, I., & Karter, A. J. (1992). Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. The American Naturalist, 139, 603–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver, C. E. (2002). Changes in women’s sexual interests and their partners’ mate-retention tactics across the menstrual cycle: Evidence for shifting conflicts of interest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 975–982. doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2005). Women’s sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle depend on primary partner development instability. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 272, 2023–2027. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Granger, D. A., Booth, A., & Johnson, D. R. (2000). Human aggression and enumerative measures of immunity. Psychosomatic Medicine, 62, 583–590.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gueguen, N. (2009a). Menstrual cycle phases and female receptivity to a courtship solicitation: An evaluation in a nightclub. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 351–355. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gueguen, N. (2009b). The receptivity of women to courtship solicitation across the menstrual cycle: A field experiment. Biological Psychology, 80, 321–324. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.11.004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris, C. (2011). Menstrual cycle and facial preferences reconsidered. Sex Roles, 64, 669–681. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9772-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haselton, M. G., & Gangestad, S. W. (2006). Conditional expression of women’s desires and men’s mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 509–518. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.10.006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hönekopp, J., Rudolph, U., Beier, L., Liebert, A., & Müller, C. (2007). Physical attractiveness of face and body as indicators of physical fitness in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 106–111. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L. G., DeBruine, L. M., Feinberg, D. R., Smith, M. J. L., … Perrett, D. I. (2005). Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the menstrual cycle when progesterone level is high. Hormones and Behavior, 48, 283-290. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.03.010
  17. Little, A. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2002). Evolution and individual differences in the perception of attractiveness: How cyclic hormonal changes and self-perceived attractiveness influence female preferences for male faces. In G. Rhodes & L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives (pp. 59–90). Westport: Ablex.Google Scholar
  18. Neave, N., Laing, S., Fink, B., & Manning, J. T. (2003). Second to fourth digit ratio, testosterone and perceived male dominance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 2167–2172. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Penton-Voak, I. S., & Chen, J. Y. (2004). High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 229–241. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2000). Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 39–48. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00033-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K., et al. (1999). Female preference for male faces changes cyclically. Nature, 399, 741–742. doi:10.1038/21557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., … Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884-886. doi:10.1038/29772
  23. Peters, M. C., Simmons, L. W., & Rhodes, G. I. (2008). Testosterone is associated with mating success but not attractiveness or masculinity in human males. Animal Behaviour, 76, 297–303. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.02.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peters, M., Simmons, L. W., & Rhodes, G. I. (2009). Preferences across the menstrual cycle for masculinity and symmetry in photographs of male faces and bodies. PLoS ONE, 4, 1–7. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pillsworth, E., & Haselton, M. (2006). Male sexual attractiveness predicts differential ovulatory shifts in female extra-pair attraction and male mate retention. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 247–258. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roberts, M. L., Buchanan, K. L., & Evans, M. R. (2004). Testing the immunocompetence handicap hypothesis: A review of the evidence. Animal Behaviour, 68, 227–239. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roney, J. R., Hanson, K. N., Durante, K. M., & Maestripieri, D. (2006). Reading men’s faces: Women’s mate attractiveness judgments track men’s testosterone and interest in infants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 273, 2169–2175. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366. doi:10.1177/0956797611417632.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van Bokhoven, I., van Goozen, S. H. M., van Engeland, H., Schaal,B., Arseneault, L., Seguin, J. R., … Tremblay, R. E. (2006). Salivary testosterone and aggression, delinquency, and social dominance in a population based longitudinal study of adolescent males. Hormones and Behavior, 50, 118-125. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.02.002
  30. Wood, W., Kressel, L., Joshi, P., & Louie, B. (2012). Women’s mate preferences: A meta-analysis of menstrual cycle effects. Manuscript Submitted for Publication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations