The status of women in the United States varied considerably during the 20th century, with increases 1900–1945, decreases 1946–1967, and considerable increases after 1968. We examined whether changes in written language, especially the ratio of male to female pronouns, reflected these trends in status in the full text of nearly 1.2 million U.S. books 1900–2008 from the Google Books database. Male pronouns included he, him, his, himself and female pronouns included she, her, hers, and herself. Between 1900 and 1945, 3.5 male pronouns appeared for every female pronoun, increasing to 4.5 male pronouns during the postwar era of the 1950s and early 1960s. After 1968, the ratio dropped precipitously, reaching 2 male pronouns per female pronoun by the 2000s. From 1968 to 2008, the use of male pronouns decreased as female pronouns increased. The gender pronoun ratio was significantly correlated with indicators of U.S. women’s status such as educational attainment, labor force participation, and age at first marriage as well as women’s assertiveness, a personality trait linked to status. Books used relatively more female pronouns when women’s status was high and fewer when it was low. The results suggest that cultural products such as books mirror U.S. women’s status and changing trends in gender equality over the generations.
Language use Status of women Feminism Cultural products Change over time Generations
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We thank Candice Davis, Van Ethan Levy, and Grace Rasmusson for their assistance.
Bretl, D. J., & Cantor, J. (1988). The portrayal of men and women in U.S. television commercials: A recent content analysis and trends over 15 years. Sex Roles, 18, 595–609. doi:10.1007/BF00287963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 253–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. H. (1972). The American woman: Her changing social, economic, and political roles, 1920–1970. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coontz, S. (2000). The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
DeWall, C. N., Pond, R. S., Campbell, W. K., & Twenge, J. M. (2011). Tuning in to psychological change: Linguistic markers of psychological traits and emotions over time in popular U.S. song lyrics. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 200–207. doi:10.1037/a0023195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188. doi:10.1177/0146167200262001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Evans, S. M. (1989). Born for liberty: A history of women in America. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 616–642. doi:10.1037/a0023557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamoreaux, M., & Morling, B. (2012). Outside the head and outside individualism-collectivism: Further meta-analyses of cultural products. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 299–327. doi:10.1177/0022022110385234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generation me: Why today’s young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled–and more miserable than ever before. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
U. S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States. (1925–2011). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Walker, T. (2007). Thou and you in early modern English dialogues: Trials, depositions, and drama come. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Zou, X., Tam, K., Morris, M., Lee, S., Lau, I., & Chiu, C. (2009). Culture as common sense: Perceived consensus versus personal beliefs and mechanisms of cultural influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 579–597. doi:10.1037/a0016399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar