Sex Roles

, Volume 67, Issue 9–10, pp 477–487 | Cite as

“Blessed Is He Who Has Not Made Me a Woman”: Ambivalent Sexism and Jewish Religiosity

Original Article

Abstract

This study explored the relationships between Jewish religiosity and ambivalent sexist attitudes toward men and women. Drawing on ambivalent sexism theory and Judaism’s views of gender relations, it was hypothesized that religiosity would be positively related to benevolent sexism and benevolent attitudes toward men. The hypotheses were tested in a convenience sample of 854 Israeli Jews (471 women, 355 men) who completed measures of ambivalent sexism, ambivalence toward men and religiosity. Controlling for the effects of age, education and marital status, religiosity predicted more benevolent sexist attitudes for both men and women. The findings also revealed negative associations between Jewish religiosity and hostile attitudes, mainly among men. That is, more religious men were less likely to express hostile attitudes toward men and women. These findings attest to the complex relationships between religiosity and sexist attitudes, and underscore the importance of investigating the impact of diverse religious traditions on gender attitudes.

Keywords

Jewish religiosity Benevolent sexism Hostile sexism Gender attitudes 

References

  1. Adler, R. (1999). Engendering Judaism: An inclusive theology and ethics. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  2. Alpert, R. (1992). Challenging male/female complementarity: Jewish lesbianism and Jewish tradition. In H. Eilberg-Schwartz (Ed.), People of the body: Jews and Judaism from an embodied perspective (pp. 361–377). New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baider, L., Holland, J. C., Russak, S. M., & Kaplan De-Nour, A. (2001). The System of Belief Inventory (SBI-15): A validation study in Israel. Psycho-Oncology, 10, 534–540. doi:10.1207/s15328023top3203_8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ben-Rafael, E., & Sharot, S. (1991). Ethnicity, religion, and class in Israeli society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burn, S. M., & Busso, J. (2005). Ambivalent sexism, scriptural literalism, and religiosity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 412–418. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00241.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, Z., Fiske, S. T., & Lee, T. L. (2009). Ambivalent sexism and power-related gender-role ideology in marriage. Sex Roles, 60, 765–778. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9770-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daly, M. (1968). The church and the second sex. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  8. Dashefsky, A., Lazerwitz, B., & Tabory, E. (2003). A Journey of the ‘straight way’ or the ‘roundabout path’: Jewish identity in the United States and Israel. In M. Dillon (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of religion (pp. 240–260). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deshen, S. A., Liebman, C. S., & Shokeid, M. (1995). Israeli Judaism: The sociology of religion in Israel. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  10. Eastwick, P. W., Eagly, A. H., Glick, P., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., Fiske, S. T., Blum, A. M. B., et al. (2006). Is traditional gender ideology associated with sex-typed mate preferences? A test in nine nations. Sex Roles, 54, 603–614. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9027-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fitzpatrick Bettencourt, K. E., Vacha-Haase, T., & Byrne, Z. S. (2011). Older and younger adults’ attitudes toward feminism: The influence of religiosity, political orientation, gender, education, and family. Sex Roles, 64, 863–874. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9946-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flor, D. L., & Knapp, N. F. (2001). Transmission and transaction: Predicting adolescents’ internalization of parental religious values. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 627–645. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.15.4.627.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forbes, G. B., Adams-Curtis, L. E., Hamm, N. R., & White, K. B. (2003). Perceptions of the woman who breastfeeds: The role of erotophobia, sexism, and attitudinal variables. Sex Roles, 49, 379–388. doi:0360-0025/03/1000-0379/0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Forbes, G. B., Collinsworth, L. L., Jobe, R. L., Braun, K. D., & Wise, L. M. (2007). Sexism, hostility toward women, and endorsement of beauty ideals and practices: Are beauty ideals associated with oppressive beliefs? Sex Roles, 56, 265–273. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9161-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gaunt, R. (2006a). Couple similarity and marital satisfaction: Are similar spouses happier? Journal of Personality, 74, 1–20. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00414.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gaunt, R. (2006b). Biological essentialism, gender ideologies, and role attitudes: What determines parents’ involvement in child care. Sex Roles, 55, 223–233. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9105-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaunt, R. (2008). Maternal gatekeeping: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 373–395. doi:10.1177/0192513X07307851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gavriel-Fried, B., & Ajzenstadt, M. (2011). Pathological women gamblers: Gender-related aspects of control. Sex Roles, 66, 128–142. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0071-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:0022-3514/96/S3.00.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119–135. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). The ambivalence toward men inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 519–536. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00379.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ambivalent sexism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 115–188. doi:0065-2601/01535.00.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 736–775. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glick, P., Lameiras, M., & Castro, Y. R. (2002). Education and Catholic religiosity as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexism toward women and men. Sex Roles, 47, 433–441. doi:10.1023/A:1021696209949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Glick, P., Sakalli-Ugurlu, N., Ferreira, M. C., & De Souza, M. A. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward wife abuse in Turkey and Brazil. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 292–297. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Glick, P., Lameiras, M., Fiske, S. T., Eckes, T., Masser, B., Volpato, C., et al. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713–728. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.713.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldstein, W. (2006). Defending the human spirit: Jewish law’s vision for a moral society. Jerusalem: Feldheim.Google Scholar
  28. Greenberg, B. (1998). On women and Judaism: A view from tradition. New York: Jewish Publication Society of America.Google Scholar
  29. Halperin-Kaddari, R. (2004). Women in Israel: A state of their own. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hasson-Ohayon, I., Braun, M., Galinsky, D., & Baider, L. (2009). Religiosity and hope: A path for women coping with a diagnosis of breast cancer. Psychosomatics, 50, 525–533. doi:10.1176/appi.psy.50.5.525.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hunsberger, B., & Jackson, L. M. (2005). Religion, meaning, and prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 807–826. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00433.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Israel Central Bureau of Statistics (2009). Social Survey No. 1344. Jerusalem: Israel Central Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  33. Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kapinus, C. A., & Pellerin, L. A. (2008). The influence of parents’ religious practices on young adults’ divorce attitudes. Social Science Research, 37, 801–814. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.02.006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Katz, R., & Lavee, Y. (2005). Families in Israel. In B. N. Adams & J. Trost (Eds.), Handbook of world families (pp. 486–506). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kulik, L. (2002). The impact of social background on gender-role ideology: Parents’ versus children’s attitudes. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 53–73. doi:10.1177/0192513X02023001003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kulik, L. (2004). Predicting gender-role attitudes among mothers and their adolescent daughters in Israel. Affilia, 19, 437–449. doi:10.1177/0886109904268930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee, T. L., Fiske, S. T., Glick, P., & Chen, Z. (2010). Ambivalent sexism in close relationships: (Hostile) power and (benevolent) romance shape relationship ideals. Sex Roles, 62, 583–601. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9770-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lemus, S., Moya, M., & Glick, P. (2010). When contact correlates with prejudice: Adolescents’ romantic relationship experience predicts greater benevolent sexism in boys and hostile sexism in girls. Sex Roles, 63, 214–225. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9786-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lewin-Epstein, N., Stier, H., Braun, M., & Langfeldt, B. (2000). Family policy and public attitudes in Germany and Israel. European Sociological Review, 16, 385–401. doi:10.1093/esr/16.4.385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maltby, E. L., Hall, M. E. L., Anderson, T. L., & Edwards, K. (2010). Religion and sexism: The moderating role of participant gender. Sex Roles, 62, 615–622. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9754-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moore, D. (2000). Gender identity, nationalism, and social action among Jewish and Arab women in Israel: Redefining the social order? Gender Issues, 18, 3–28. doi:10.1007/s12147-000-0008-z.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moore, D. (2006). Why don’t they demand more? Entitlement and work values of religious and secular women and men in Israel. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1924–1960. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00088.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Myers, S. M. (1996). An interactive model of religiosity inheritance: The importance of family context. American Sociological Review, 61, 858–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pearce, L. D., & Thornton, A. (2007). Religious identity and family ideologies in the transition to adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1227–1243. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00443.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rabin, C., & Lahav, T. (2001). Sepharadi women in Israel: Identity, family and change. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 13, 33–46. doi:10.1300/J086v13n01_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Remennick, L. (2000). Childless in the land of imperative motherhood: stigma and coping among infertile Israeli women. Sex Roles, 43, 821–841. doi:10.1023/A:1011084821700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ruether, R. R. (1974). Religion and sexism: Images of women in the Jewish and Christian tradition. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  49. Sacks, M. (1995). Active voices: Women in Jewish culture. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  50. Schwartz, S. H., & Huismans, S. (1995). Value priorities and religiosity in four western religions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 88–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Seguino, S. (2011). Help or hindrance?Religion’s impact on gender inequality in attitudes and outcomes. World Development. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.12.004.
  52. Stover, R. G., & Hope, C. A. (1984). Monotheism and gender status: a cross-societal study. Social Forces, 63, 335–348.Google Scholar
  53. Strassfeld, M. (2006). A book of life: Embracing Judaism as a spiritual practice. Woodstock: Jewish Lights Publishing.Google Scholar
  54. Strier, R., & Abdeen, Z. (2009). Women’s experiences of micro-enterprise: Contexts and meanings. Sex Roles, 61, 566–579. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9642-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tabory, E. (1991). The identity dilemma of non-orthodox religious movements: Reform and Conservative Judaism in Israel. In Z. Sobel & B. Beit-Hallahmi (Eds.), Tradition, innovation, conflict: Jewishness and Judaism in contemporary Israel (pp. 135–152). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  56. Tasdemir, N., & Sakalli-Ugurlu, N. (2010). The relationships between ambivalent sexism and religiosity among Turkish university students. Sex Roles, 62, 420–426. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9693-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Travaglia, L. K., Overall, N. C., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). Benevolent and hostile sexism and preferences for romantic partners. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 599–604. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.05.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Young-DeMarco, L., & Thornton, A. (2001). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 1009–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yuchtman-Yaar, E., & Peres, Y. (2000). Between consent and dissent: Democracy and peace in the Israeli mind. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  60. United Nations Human Development Report (2011). Human development statistical tables. Table 4. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2011_EN_Tables.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations