Sex Roles

, Volume 67, Issue 9–10, pp 494–502 | Cite as

Gender Differences in Gossip and Friendship

  • David C. WatsonEmail author
Original Article


Gossip has been related to friendship as it can increase the bond between people and sense of belonging to a group. However, the role of gender in the relationship between gossip and friendship has not been examined in the literature. So, the present study examined gender differences in the relationship between friendship quality and gossip tendency with a sample of 167 female and 69 male Western Canadian undergraduate University students using the Friendship questionnaire and the Tendency to Gossip questionnaire. Given gender differences in friendship, with males being more agentic and females more communal, the relationship between gossip and friendship was predicted to be stronger in the males compared to the females. Friendship quality was positively correlated with gossip tendency in the males, but this effect was not present with the females. The information gossip scale was strongly associated with male friendship quality. This finding may be related to the greater emphasis on status with males, and that possession of knowledge and control of information is a method of attaining status. Physical appearance gossip was found to be more prevalent in females, but not related to friendship quality. This type of gossip may be a more of a competitive threat to the relationship in females. Achievement related gossip was also related to male friendship quality, which reflects the greater emphasis on individuation in male friendships.


Gossip Friendship Gender differences Social networks 


  1. Acheson, J. M. (1988). The lobster gangs of Maine. Hanover & London: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, G., & Plaut, V. C. (2003). The cultural grounding of personal relationship: Friendship in North America and West African Worlds. Personal Relationships, 10, 333–347. doi: 10.1111/1475-6811.00053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayim, M. (1994). Knowledge through the grapevine. In R. F. Goodman & A. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), Good gossip (pp. 85–99). Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bank, B. J., & Hansford, S. L. (2000). Gender and friendship: Why are men’s best same-sex friendships less intimate and supportive? Personal Relationships, 7, 63–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00004.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2003). The friendship questionnaire: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 509–517. doi: 10.1023/A:1025879411971.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumeister, R. F., & Sommer, K. L. (1997). What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness: Comment on Cross and Madson (1997). Psychological Bulletin, 122, 38–44. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergmann, J. R. (1993). Discreet indiscretions: The social organization of gossip. New York: Walter de Gruyter, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Besnier, N. (1989). Information withholding as a manipulative and collusive strategy in Nukulaelae gossip. Language in Society, 18, 315–341. doi: 0.1017/S0047404500013634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Besnier, N. (2009). Gossip and the everyday production of politics. Honolulu: University of Hawai’I Press.Google Scholar
  10. Blumberg, H. H. (1972). Communication of interpersonal evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 157–162. doi: 10.1037/h0033027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brison, K. J. (1992). Just talk: Gossip, meetings, and power in a Papua New Guinea Village (Studies in Melanesian Anthropology). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Backer, C. J. S., Nelissen, M., & Fisher, M. L. (2007). Let’s talk about sex: A study on the recall of gossip about potential mates and sexual rivals. Sex Roles, 56, 781–791. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9237-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Vries, B. (1996). Friendship: A life course perspective. In C. Magai & S. H. Mc Fadden (Eds.), Handbook of emotion, adult development and aging (pp. 249–268). New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunbar, R. (2010). How many friends does one person need? Dunbar’s number and other evolutionary quirks. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ellickson, R. C. (1991). Order without law: How neighbors settle disputes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Emler, N. (1994). Gossip, reputation, and social adaptation. In R. F. Goodman & A. Ben-Ze’ev (Eds.), Good gossip (pp. 119–140). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  17. Foster, E. K. (2004). Research on gossip: Taxonomy, methods, and future directions. Review of General Psychology, 8, 78–99. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foster, E. K., & Rosnow, R. L. (2006). Gossip and network relationships. In D. C. Kirkpatrick, S. Duck, & M. K. Foley (Eds.), Relating difficulty: The process of constructing and managing difficult interaction (pp. 161–180). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Ginsberg, D., Gottman, J. M., & Parker, G. P. (1987). The importance of friendship. In J. M. Gottman & G. P. Parker (Eds.), Conversations of friends: Speculations on affective development (pp. 3–48). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gonzalez, Y. S., Moreno, D. S., & Schneider, B. H. (2004). Friendship expectations of early adolescents in Cuba and Canada. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 35, 436–445. doi: 10.177/0022022104264127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grosser, T. J., Lopez-Kidwell, V., & Labianca, G. (2010). A social network analysis of positive and negative gossip in organizational life. Group & Organization Management, 35, 177–212. doi: 10.1177/105961109360391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hall, J. A. (2011). Sex differences in friendship expectations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 723–747. doi: 10.1177/0265407510386192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haviland, J. B. (1977). Gossip as competition in Zinacantan. Journal of Communication, 27, 186–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1977.tb01816.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hess, N. C., & Hagen, E. H. (2002). Informational warfare. Retrieved from
  25. Jaeger, M. E., Skleder, A. A., Rind, B., & Rosnow, R. L. (1994). Gossip, gossipers, gossipees. In R. F. Goodman & A. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), Good gossip (pp. 154–168). Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
  26. Koh, Y. J., Mendelson, M. J., & Rhee, U. (2003). Friendship satisfaction in Korean and Canadian university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 35, 239–253. doi: 10.1037/h0087205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lansford, J., Putallaz, M., Grimes, C. L., & Schiro-Osman, K. A. (2006). Perceptions of friendship quality and observed behaviors with friends: How do socimetrically rejected, average, and popular girls differ. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 694–720. doi: 10.1353/mpq.2006.0036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Levin, J., & Arluke, A. (1985). An exploratory analysis of sex differences in gossip. Sex Roles, 12, 281–286. doi: 10.1007/BF00287594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Macoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing apart, coming together. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Massar, K., Buunk, A. P., & Rempt, S. (2012). Age differences in women’s tendency to gossip are mediated by their mate value. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 106–109. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.09013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nevo, O., Nevo, B., & Derech-Zehavi, A. (1993). The development of the tendency to gossip questionnaire: Construct and concurrent validation for a sample of Israeli college students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 973–981. doi: 10.1177/001316449305004010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nevo, O., Nevo, B., & Derech-Zehavi, A. (1994). The tendency to gossip as a psychological disposition: Constructing a measure and validating it. In R. F. Goodman & A. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), Good gossip (pp. 180–189). Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
  33. Paine, R. (1970). Informal communication and information-management. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 7, 172–188. doi: 10.111/j.1755-618X.1970.tb01159.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosnow, R. L. (1977). Gossip and marketplace psychology. Journal of Communication, 27, 158–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1977.tb01811.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Salove, D. J. (2007). The future of reputation: Gossip, rumor, and privacy on the internet. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Suh, E., Diener, E., Oishi, O., & Triandis, H. C. (1998). The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 482–493. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Suls, J. M. (1977). Gossip as social comparison. Journal of Communication, 27, 164–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1977.tb01812.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Turner, M. M., Mazur, M. A., Wendel, N., & Winslow, R. (2003). Communication Monographs, 70, 129–141. doi: 10.1080/03633775032000133782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wright, P. H. (1988). Interpreting research on gender differences in friendship: A case for Moderation and a plea for caution. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 367–373. doi: 10.177/0265407588053006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wright, P. H. (2006). Towards an expanded orientation to the comparative study of women’s and men’s same-sex friendships. In K. Dindia & D. J. Canary (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (2nd ed., pp. 37–57). Mahwah: Lawrence Erbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  41. Zarbatany, L., Conley, R., & Pepper, S. (2004). Personality and gender differences in friendship needs and experiences in preadolescence and young adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 299–310. doi: 10.1080/1650250344000514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyGrant MacEwan UniversityEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations