Are People Better at Recognizing Ambivalent Sexism on the Basis of the Non-standard Profiles than the Standard ASI Ones?
- 330 Downloads
Kilianski and Rudman (1998) developed “standard” profiles of a benevolent and a hostile sexist man from the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI) and tested if a U.S. sample of female students would perceive them as referring to the same person (i.e. an ambivalent sexist). Results showed that although they appraised the benevolent sexist profile favourably, and the hostile sexist one unfavourably, they considered it unlikely that they could refer to the same man. We developed “non-standard” profiles similar to those used by Kilianski and Rudman, with the major difference that they were not made directly from the ASI, but on the basis of attitudes and actions of a realistic soap-opera character, and tested if they would be considered as referring to the same individual by a sample of 238 undergraduate students (81 males and 157 females) at the University of Zimbabwe. Our results showed that both male and female participants found it as difficult to detect ambivalent sexism on the basis of non-standard ASI profiles as on the basis of standard ASI profiles.
KeywordsAmbivalent sexism Benevolent sexism Hostile sexism Standard ASI aprofiles Non-standard ASI profiles
- Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111–125. doi: 10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ashmore, R. D., Del Boca, F. K., & Wohlers, A. J. (1986). Sex stereotypes. In R. D. Ashmore & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.), The social psychology of male-male relations (pp. 69–120). Orlando: Academic.Google Scholar
- Domestic Violence Act of 2006, 24. (2007). Retrieved from http://www.kubatana.net/docs/legisl/dom_viol_act_ch5_16_act%2014_2006_070226.pdf .
- Dosekun, S. (2007). Defending feminism in Africa. Postamble, 3, 41–47.Google Scholar
- Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behaviour: A social-role interpretation. Hillside: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Good, J. G., & Woodzicka, J. A. (2010a). Reducing approval of benevolent sexism: An educational intervention. The New School Psychology Bulletin, 7, 16–30.Google Scholar
- Good, J. J., & Woodzicka, J. A. (2010b). Reducing approval of benevolent sexism: An educational intervention. The New School Psychology Bulletin, 7, 16–30.Google Scholar
- Kambarami, M. (2006). Femininity, sexuality and culture: Patriarchy and female subordination in Zimbabwe. South Africa: Africa Regional Sexuality Resource Centre.Google Scholar
- Pearce, C. (1990). Tsika, Hunhu and the moral education of primary school children. Zambezia, 17, 145–160.Google Scholar
- Samkange, S., & Samkange, T. M. (1980). Hunhuism or Ubuntuism: A Zimbabwe indigenous political philosophy. Harare: Graham.Google Scholar
- Soanes, C., & Hwaker, S. (Eds.). (2005). Compact Oxford English dictionary (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1972a). Who likes competent women? Competence, sex role congruence of interest, and subjects’ attitudes toward women as determinants of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2, 197–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1972.tb01272.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1972b). The Attitudes Towards Women Scale: An objective instrument to measure attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary society. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 66–67 (Ms. 153). doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00098.x
- Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism and collectivism: Past, present, and future. In D. Matsumoto (Ed.), Handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 35–50). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar