Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Rape Myths and Beyond: A Commentary on Edwards and Colleagues (2011)

Abstract

This article comments on Edwards et al. (2011) who review the state of the current literature on rape myths, defined as “prejudicial, stereotyped or false beliefs about rape, rape victims, and rapists” (Burt 1980; p. 217). I argue that while studying rape myths is important to understanding the persistence of sexual assault against women in Western societies, other factors that contribute to this problem need to be considered. Specifically, I focus on the importance of examining societal messages regarding women’s sexuality, as well as examining how individuals conceptualize and define rape more broadly. I conclude by discussing directions for moving toward producing real changes in the prevalence of sexual violence as well as ways to intervene more effectively with victims of sexual violence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abbey, A., & McAuslan, P. (2004). A longitudinal examination of male college students’ perpetration of sexual assault. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 747–756. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.72.5.747.

  2. Botta, R. A., & Pingree, S. (1997). Interpersonal communication and rape: Women acknowledge their assaults. Journal of Health Communication, 2, 197–212. doi:10.1080/108107397127752.

  3. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217.

  4. Byers, E. S. (1996). How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Review of a program of research. In E. S. Byers & L. F. O’Sullivan (Eds.), Sexual coercion in dating relationships (pp. 7–25). New York: Haworth.

  5. Clements, C. M., & Ogle, R. L. (2009). Does acknowledgment as an assault victim impact postassault psychological symptoms and coping? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 1595–1614. doi:10.1177/0886260509331486.

  6. Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. The Journal of Sex Research, 40, 13–26. doi:10.1080/00224490309552163.

  7. Edwards, K. M., Turchik, J. A., Dardis, C., Reynolds, N., & Gidycz, C. A. (2011). Rape myths: History, individual and institutional-level presence, and implications for change. Sex Roles, this issue. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9943-2.

  8. Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. The Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–267. doi:10.1080/00224490609552324.

  9. Hamilton, L., & Armstrong, E. A. (2009). Gendered sexuality in young adulthood: Double binds and flawed options. Gender & Society, 23, 589–616. doi:10.1177/0891243209345829.

  10. Jonason, P. K., & Marks, M. J. (2009). Common vs. uncommon sexual acts: Evidence for the sexual double standard. Sex Roles, 60, 357–365. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9542-z.

  11. Kahn, A. S., Mathie, V. A., & Torgler, C. (1994). Rape scripts and rape acknowledgment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 53–66. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00296.x.

  12. Koss, M. P. (1989). Hidden rape: Sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of students in higher education. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: Emerging social issues (pp. 145–168). New York: Praeger.

  13. Krahé, B. (1991). Police officers’ definitions of rape: A prototype study. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 1, 223–244. doi:10.1002/casp.2450010305.

  14. Layman, M. J., Gidycz, C. A., & Lynn, S. J. (1996). Unacknowledged versus acknowledged rape victims: Situational factors and posttraumatic stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 124–131. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.105.1.124.

  15. Littleton, H. L., Radecki Breitkopf, C., & Berenson, A. B. (2007a). The rape scripts of low- income European American and Latina women. Sex Roles, 56, 509–516. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9189-1.

  16. Littleton, H. L., Rhatigan, D. L., & Axsom, D. (2007b). Unacknowledged rape: How much do we know about the hidden sexual assault victim? Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma, 14(4), 57–74. doi:10.1300/J146v14n04_04.

  17. Littleton, H. L., Axsom, D., & Grills-Taquechel, A. (2009a). Sexual assault victims’ acknowledgment status and re-victimization risk. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 34–42. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.01472.x.

  18. Littleton, H. L., Grills-Taquechel, A. E., & Axsom, D. (2009b). Impaired and incapacitated rape victims: Assault characteristics and post-assault experiences. Violence and Victims, 24, 439–457. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.24.4.439.

  19. Littleton, H. L., Tabernik, H., Canales, E. J., & Backstrom, T. (2009c). Risky situation or harmless fun? A qualitative examination of college women’s bad hook-up and rape scripts. Sex Roles, 60, 793–804. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9586-8.

  20. Marx, B. P., & Soler-Baillo, J. M. (2005). The relationships among risk recognition, autonomic and self-reported arousal, and posttraumatic stress symptomatology in acknowledged and unacknowledged victims of sexual assault. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67, 618–624. doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000171809.12117.79.

  21. Maxwell, C. D., Robinson, A. L., & Post, L. A. (2003). The nature and predictors of sexual victimization and offending among adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 465–477. doi:10.1023/A:1025942503285.

  22. McMullin, D., & White, J. W. (2006). Long-term effects of labeling a rape experience. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 96–105. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00266.x.

  23. Metts, S., & Spitzberg, B. M. (1996). Sexual communication in interpersonal contexts: A script-based approach. Communication Yearbook, 19, 49–91.

  24. Paul, E. L. (2006). Beer goggles, catching feelings, and the walk of shame: The myths and realities of the hookup experience. In D. C. Kirkpatrick, S. Duck, & M. K. Foley (Eds.), Relating difficulty: The process of constructing and managing difficult interaction (pp. 141–160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  25. Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of ‘casual’ sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenonology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 639–661. doi:10.1177/0265407502195006.

  26. Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. The Journal of Sex Research, 37, 76–88. doi:10.1080/00224490009552023.

  27. Ryan, K. M. (1988). Rape and seduction scripts. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 237–245. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00939.x.

  28. Seal, D. W., O’Sullivan, L. F., & Ehrhardt, A. A. (2007). Miscommunications and misinterpretations: Men’s scripts about sexual communication and unwanted sex in interactions with women. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The sexual self: The construction of sexual scripts (pp. 141–161). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

  29. Smith, G., Mysak, K., & Michael, S. (2008). Sexual double standards and sexually transmitted illnesses: Social rejection and stigmatization of women. Sex Roles, 58, 391–401. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9339-5.

  30. Zinzow, H. M., Resnick, H. S., McCauley, J. L., Amstadter, A. B., Ruggiero, K. J., & Kilpatrick, G. (2010). The role of rape tactics in risk for posttraumatic stress disorder and major depression: Results from a national sample of college women. Depression and Anxiety, 27, 708–715.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Heather Littleton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Littleton, H. Rape Myths and Beyond: A Commentary on Edwards and Colleagues (2011). Sex Roles 65, 792–797 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9982-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Sexual assault
  • Rape acknowledgment
  • Sexual scripts
  • Gender roles
  • Rape myths