Advertisement

Sex Roles

, 65:83 | Cite as

Do Young Women Expect Gender Equality in Their Future Lives? An Answer From a Possible Selves Experiment

  • Janell C. Fetterolf
  • Alice H. Eagly
Original Article

Abstract

This study examined young women’s expectations about gender equality in their future careers and marriages. The study implemented a possible selves method in which 114 undergraduate women from a Midwestern university in the United States were randomly assigned to envision themselves as married mothers employed either full-time, part-time, or not at all and possessing either an advanced degree or a bachelor’s degree. Participants indicated their expectations for gender equality by estimating their own and their future husbands’ expected salaries and hours per week of housework and employment. They also evaluated their possible selves and estimated their emotional well-being and likely attainment of several important life goals. Greater employment produced greater expected gender equality, although in all conditions participants expected to have lesser salary and more domestic work than their husbands. With employment, compared with no employment, and with an advanced degree, compared with a bachelor’s degree, participants rated their possible selves more positively and estimated that they would have greater emotional well-being and attainment of life goals related to respect and finances. However, employment negatively affected participants’ anticipated relationships with their children. Thus, our participants’ reactions displayed a tradeoff between satisfying their employment goals and their goals for their relationship with their children.

Keywords

Gender equality Possible selves Domestic equality Undergraduate women 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research was supported in part by a grant from the Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, Northwestern University.

References

  1. Armor, D. A., Massey, C., & Sackett, A. M. (2008). Prescribed optimism: Is it right to be wrong about the future? Psychological Science, 19, 329–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02089.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Askari, S. F., Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., Staebell, S. E., & Axelson, S. J. (2010). Men want equality, but women don’t expect it: Young adults’ expectations for participation in household and child care chores. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 243–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01565.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertrand, M., Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2010). Dynamics of the gender gap for young professionals in the financial and corporate sectors. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2, 228–255. doi: 10.1257/app.2.3.228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228. doi: 10.2307/2675569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. A. (2006). Changing rhythms of American family life. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2007). The gender pay gap: Have women gone as far as they can? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blau, F. D., Brinton, M. C., & Grusky, D. B. (2006). (Eds.). The declining significance of gender? New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  8. Bradburn, E. M., Nevill, S., & Cataldi, E. F. (2006). Where are they now? A description of 1992–93 bachelor’s degree recipients 10 years later (NCES 2007–159). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  9. Brett, J. M., & Stroh, L. K. (2003). Working 61 plus hours a week: Why do managers do it? Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 67–78. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bridges, J. S., & Etaugh, C. (1995). College students’ perceptions of mothers: Effects of maternal employment-childrearing pattern and motive for employment. Sex Roles, 32, 735–751. doi: 10.1007/BF01560187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ciabattari, T. (2004). Cohabitation and housework: The effects of marital intentions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 118–125. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00008.x-i1.Google Scholar
  12. Claffey, S. T., & Mickelson, K. D. (2009). Division of household labor and distress: The role of perceived fairness for employed mothers. Sex Roles, 60, 819–831. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9578-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crosby, F. J., Williams, J. C., & Biernat, M. (2004). The maternal wall. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 675–682. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00379.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2004). Cross-national variations in the division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1260–1271. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00091.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Devos, T., Blanco, K., Rico, F., & Dunn, R. (2008). The role of parenthood and college education in the self-concept of college students: Explicit and implicit assessments of gendered aspirations. Sex Roles, 59, 214–228. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9430-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society, 24, 149–166. doi: 10.1177/0891243210361475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Erchull, M. J., Liss, M., Axelson, S. J., Staebell, S. E., & Askari, S. F. (2010). Well. .. she wants it more: Perceptions of social norms about desires for marriage and children and anticipated chore participation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 253–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01566.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frisco, M. L., & Williams, K. (2003). Perceived housework equity, marital happiness, and divorce in dual-earner households. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 51–73. doi: 10.1177/0192513X02238520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gorman, K. A., & Fritzsche, B. A. (2002). The good-mother stereotype: Stay at home (or wish that you did!). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2190–2201. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02069.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Green, C. A., & Ferber, M. A. (2005). The long-run effect of part-time work. Journal of Labor Research, 26, 323–333. doi: 10.1007/s12122-005-1028-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herr, J. L., & Wolfram, C. (2009). “Opt-out” rates at motherhood across high-education career paths: Selection versus work environment. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 14717. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w14717
  22. Hewlett, S. A. (2007). Off-ramps and on-ramps: Keeping talented women on the road to success. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Hill, E. J., Jacob, J. I., Shannon, L. L., Brennan, R. T., Blanchard, V. L., & Martinengo, G. (2008). Exploring the relationship of workplace flexibility, gender, and life stage to family-to-work conflict, and stress and burnout. Community, Work & Family, 11, 165–181. doi: 10.1080/13668800802027564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacobs, J. A., & Gerson, K. (2004). Understanding changes in American working time: A synthesis. In C. F. Epstein & A. L. Kalleberg (Eds.), Fighting for time: Shifting boundaries of work and social life (pp. 25–45). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Killeen, L. A., Lopez-Zafra, E., & Eagly, A. H. (2006). Envisioning oneself as a leader: Comparisons of women and men in Spain and the United States. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 312–322. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00299.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Knudsen, K., & Wærness, K. (2008). National context and spouses’ housework in 34 countries. European Sociological Review, 24, 97–113. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcm037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee, Y. S., & Waite, L. J. (2005). Husbands’ and wives’ time spent on housework: A comparison of measures. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 328–336. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2005.00119.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lips, H., & Lawson, K. (2009). Work values, gender, and expectations about work commitment and pay: Laying the groundwork for the “motherhood penalty”? Sex Roles, 61, 667–676. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9670-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Machung, A. (1989). Talking career, thinking job: Gender differences in career and family expectations of Berkeley seniors. Feminist Studies, 15, 35–58. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3177817
  30. Mannino, C. A., & Deutsch, F. M. (2007). Changing the division of household labor: A negotiated process between partners. Sex Roles, 56, 309–324. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9181-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Milkie, M. A., Raley, S. B., & Bianchi, S. M. (2009). Taking on the second shift: Time allocations and time pressures of U.S. parents with preschoolers. Social Forces, 88, 487–517. doi: 10.1353/sof.0.0268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 101–115. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Hansen, J. J., Devos, T., Linder, N. M., Ranganath, K. A., et al. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 36–88. doi: 10.1080/10463280701489053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Park, B., Smith, J. A., & Correll, J. (2010). The persistence of implicit behavioral associations for moms and dads. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 809–815. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pinto, K. M., & Coltrane, S. (2009). Divisions of labor in Mexican origin and Anglo families: Structure and culture. Sex Roles, 60, 482–495. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9549-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Raley, S. B., Mattingly, M. J., & Bianchi, S. M. (2006). How dual are dual-income couples? Documenting change from 1970 to 2001. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 11–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00230.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanchez, L., & Thomson, E. (1997). Becoming mothers and fathers: Parenthood, gender, and the division of labor. Gender & Society, 11, 747–772. doi: 10.1177/089124397011006003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spade, J. Z., & Reese, C. A. (1991). We’ve come a long way, maybe: College students’ plans for work and family. Sex Roles, 24, 309–321. doi: 10.1007/BF00288304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sweeny, K., Carroll, P. J., & Shepperd, J. A. (2006). Is optimism always best? Future outlooks and preparedness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 302–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00457.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  42. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2008). Married parents’ use of time, 2003–06. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/atus2.toc.htm
  43. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010a). Highlights of women’s earnings in 2009. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpswom2009.pdf
  44. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010b). Women in the labor force: A databook (2010 edition). Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook-2010.pdf
  45. U. S. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2010). Digest of education statistics: 2009. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010013.pdf
  46. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule—expanded form. Unpublished manuscript, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyRutgers UniversityPiscatawayUSA

Personalised recommendations