Sex Roles

, Volume 65, Issue 1–2, pp 102–107 | Cite as

Gender Effects in Information Processing on a Nonverbal Decoding Task

  • Petra C. Schmid
  • Marianne Schmid Mast
  • Dario Bombari
  • Fred W. Mast
Original Article


Women typically outperform men on the ability to assess other people’s nonverbal behavior. This difference might occur because women are taught to be more sensitive to emotional and nonverbal cues at a very early age compared to men. As a consequence, women might use a more favorable cognitive processing style than men during nonverbal decoding. The present study investigated whether this gender difference is due to the use of different cognitive information processing styles (global or local). Participants (N = 137) were Swiss undergraduate students that were randomly assigned to either a global (focusing on the whole) or a local (focusing on details) priming of information processing style, or to a control group. They then performed a nonverbal decoding task. Results showed that compared to the control group, local priming had beneficial and global priming detrimental effects for nonverbal decoding accuracy. This was due to an improved performance in men after the local priming; women’s performance was not significantly affected by the local priming. Global priming increased nonverbal decoding accuracy in men and decreased performance in women. We conclude that women already use the more beneficial local processing style by default and that men’s performance can be boosted when providing them a processing strategy.


Nonverbal decoding Information processing Gender 


  1. Ambady, N., & Gray, H. M. (2002). On being sad and mistaken: Mood effects on the accuracy of thin-slice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 947–961. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.83.4.947.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (1993). Gender and emotion. In M. Lewis & J. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 447–460). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chepenik, L. G., Cornew, L. A., & Farah, M. J. (2007). The influence of sad mood on cognition. Emotion, 7, 802–811. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.802.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eyal, T., & Epley, N. (2010). How to seem telepathic: Enabling ming reading by matching construal. Psychological Science, 21, 700–705. doi:10.1177/0956797610367754.Google Scholar
  5. Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 231–254). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  6. Gasper, K., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 34–40. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–857. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.85.4.845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hall, J. A., & Bernieri, F. J. (Eds.). (2001). Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  11. Hall, G. B. C., Witelson, S. F., Szechtman, H., & Nahmias, C. (2003). Sex differences in functional activation patterns revealed by increased emotion processing demands. Brain Imaging, 15, 219–223. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000101310.64109.94.Google Scholar
  12. Hall, J. A., Blanch, D. C., Horgan, T. G., Murphy, N. A., Rosip, J. C., & Schmid Mast, M. (2009). Motivation and interpersonal sensitivity: Does it matter how hard you try? Motivation and Emotion, 33, 291–302. doi: 10.1007/s11031-009-9128-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee, T. M. C., Liu, H.-L., Hoosain, R., Liao, W.-T., Wu, C.-T., & Yuen, K. S. L. (2002). Gender differences in neural correlates of recognition of happy and sad faces in human assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroscience Letters, 333, 13–16. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(02)00965-5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Macrae, C. N., & Lewis, H. L. (2002). Do I know you? Processing orientation and face recognition. Psychological Science, 13, 194–196. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marsh, A. A., Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2003). Nonverbal “accents”: Cultural differences in facial expressions of emotions. Psychological Science, 14, 373–376. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.24461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McClure, E. B. (2000). A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 424–453. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.126.3.424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nisbett, R. E., & Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence of cultures: holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 467–473. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Peng, Y., Zebrowitz, L. A., & Lee, H. K. (1993). The impact of cultural background and cross-cultural experience on impressions of American and Korean male speakers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 203–220. doi: 10.1177/0022022193242005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Perren, S., Stadelmann, S., von Wyl, A., & von Klitzing, K. (2007). Pathways of behavioural and emotional symptoms in kindergarten children: What is the role of pro-social behaviour? European Child & Adolescence Psychiatry, 16, 209–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Phillips, L. H., Tunstall, M., & Channon, S. (2007). Exploring the role of memory in dynamic social cue decoding using dual task methodology. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 31, 137–152. doi: 10.1007/s10919-007-0026-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reber, R., & Flammer, A. (2002). The development of gender differences in affective expression and in the relationship between mood and achievement-related self-judgments. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 17, 377–392. doi: 10.1007/BF03173592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Rosenthal, R., Hall, J. A., DiMatteo, M. R., Rogers, P. L., & Archer, D. (1979). Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS test. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Rosip, J. C., & Hall, J. A. (2004). Knowledge of nonverbal cues, gender, and nonverbal decoding accuracy. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 267–286. doi: 10.1007/s10919-004-4159-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schmid, P. C., Schmid Mast, M., Bombari, D., Mast, F. W., & Lobmaier, J. S. (2011). Information processing and gender effects in facial emotion recognition: An eye tracking study. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  27. Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010–1028. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.1010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 527–561). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petra C. Schmid
    • 1
  • Marianne Schmid Mast
    • 1
  • Dario Bombari
    • 2
  • Fred W. Mast
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Work and Organizational PsychologyUniversity of NeuchatelNeuchatelSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Cognitive PsychologyUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations