Sex Roles

, 65:1 | Cite as

“Putting on” Sexiness: A Content Analysis of the Presence of Sexualizing Characteristics in Girls’ Clothing

  • Samantha M. Goodin
  • Alyssa Van Denburg
  • Sarah K. MurnenEmail author
  • Linda Smolak
Original Article


Objectification theory (Fredrickson and Roberts 1997) proposes that women from Western cultures are widely portrayed and treated as objects of the male gaze, leading to the development of self-objectification, in which girls and women internalize these societal messages and view their own bodies as objects to be evaluated according to narrow standards of (often sexualized) attractiveness. Prompted by findings from the American Psychological Association Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls (APA 2007), the present study considers girls’ clothing as a possible socializing influence that may contribute to the development of self-objectification in preteen girls. Accordingly, in this content analysis, we examined the frequency and nature of “sexualizing” clothing available for girl children (generally sizes 6–14) on the websites of 15 popular stores in the US. Sexualizing clothing was defined as clothing that revealed or emphasized a sexualized body part, had characteristics associated with sexiness, and/or had sexually suggestive writing. Clothing was also coded for childlike characteristics, such as child-like fabric (e.g., polka dot pattern) or a modest, non-revealing cut. Across all stores and all articles of clothing, 69% of the clothing items were coded as having only childlike characteristics, 4% as having only sexualizing characteristics, 25.4% as having both sexualizing and childlike characteristics, and 1% as having neither sexualizing nor childlike characteristics. “Tween” stores like Abercrombie Kids had the highest proportion of sexualizing clothing. The findings are discussed within the framework of the development of self-objectification.


Self-objectification Clothing Gender roles Femininity Sex object Sexy Content analysis 



Samantha M. Goodin is Kenyon College class of ’10, Alyssa Van Denburg is Kenyon College class of ’12, Sarah K. Murnen is a Professor of Psychology, and Linda Smolak is a Professor Emerita.

The authors would like to thank Genevieve Davison, Elaine Dicicco, James Dunckley, Nora Erickson, Kate Goldbaum, Jonela Kolasi, Kate Von Culin and James Weeks for their assistance in data collection.


  1. Abercrombie’s sexy undies “slip”. (2002, May 28). CNN Money. Retrieved from
  2. Afshar, H. (2008). Can I see your hair? Choice, agency, and attitudes: The dilemma of faith and feminism for Muslim women who cover. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31, 411–427. doi: 10.1080/01419870701710930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved from
  4. Barnes, R., & Eicher, J. B. (Eds.). (1992). Dress and gender: Making and meaning in cultural contexts. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, L., & Tiggeman, M. (2007). Sociocultural influences and body image in 9- to 12-year-old girls: The role of appearance schemas. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36, 76–86. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3601_8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook, D. T., & Kaiser, S. B. (2004). Betwixt and be tween: Age ambiguity and the sexualization of the female consuming subject. Journal of Consumer Culture, 4, 203–227. doi: 10:1177/1469540504043862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Disney child star’s clothing line deemed too racy by some. (2010, February 8). Fox News. Retrieved from
  8. Dohnt, H. K., & Tiggemann, M. (2005). Peer influences on body dissatisfaction and dieting awareness in young girls. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 103–116. doi: 10.1348/026151004X20658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dohnt, H., & Tiggemann, M. (2006). The contribution of peer and media influences to the development of body satisfaction and self-esteem in young girls: A prospective study. Developmental Psychology, 42, 929–936. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.5.929.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Downs, E., & Smith, S. L. (2010). Keeping abreast of hypersexuality: A video game character content analysis. Sex Roles, 62, 721–733. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9637-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunkel, T. M., Davidson, D., & Quarashi, S. (2010). Body satisfaction and pressure to be thin in younger and older Muslim and non-Muslim women: The role of Western and non-Western dress preferences. Body Image, 7, 56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.10.003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flannery-Schroeder, E. C., & Chrisler, J. C. (1996). Body esteem, eating attitudes, and gender-role orientation in three age groups of children. Current Psychology, 15, 235–248. doi: 10.1007/BF02686880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fredrickson, B. L., & Harrison, K. (2005). Throwing like a girl: Self-objectification predicts adolescent girls’ motor performance. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 29, 79–101.Google Scholar
  15. Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gapinski, K. D., Brownell, K. D., & LaFrance, M. (2003). Body objectification and “fat talk”: Effects on emotion, motivation, and cognitive performance. Sex Roles, 48, 377–388. doi: 10.1023/S:1023516209973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. George, L. (2007, January 1). Eight-year-olds in fishnets, padded “bralettes” and thong panties: Welcome to the junior miss version of raunch culture. Maclean’s, 119, 37–40.Google Scholar
  18. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1994). Growing up with television: The cultivation perspective. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 17–41). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Grabe, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2009). Body objectification, MTV, and psychological outcomes among female adolescents. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 2840–2858. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00552.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grabe, S., Ward, L. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2008). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 460–476. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.460.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gurung, R. A., & Chrouser, C. J. (2007). Predicting objectification: Do provocative clothing and observer characteristics matter? Sex Roles, 57, 91–99. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9219-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harrison, K., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2003). Women’s sports media, self-objectification, and mental health in Black and White adolescent females. The Journal of Communication, 53, 216–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02587.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harrison, K., & Hefner, V. (2006). Media exposure, current and future body ideals, and disordered eating among preadolescent girls: A longitudinal panel study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 155–163. doi: 10.1007/s10964-005-9008-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hebl, M. R., King, E. G., & Lin, J. (2004). The swimsuit becomes us all: Ethnicity, gender, and vulnerability to self-objectification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1322–1331. doi: 10.11777/0146167204264502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jeffreys, S. (2005). Beauty and misogyny: Harmful cultural practices in the West. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Kaiser, S., Chandler, J., & Hammidi, T. (2001). Minding appearances in female academic culture. In A. Guy, E. Green, & M. Bannin (Eds.), Through the wardrobe (pp. 117–136). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  27. Koukounas, E., & Letch, N. M. (2001). Psychological correlates of perception of sexual intent in women. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 443–456. doi: 10.1080/00224540109600564.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lamb, S., & Brown, L. M. (2006). Packaging girlhood: Rescuing our daughters from marketer’s schemes. New York: St Martin’s.Google Scholar
  29. Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., & McKinley, N. M. (2006). A measure of objectified body consciousness for preadolescent and adolescent youth. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 65–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00263.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCabe, M. P., Ricciardelli, L. A., Stanford, J., Holt, K., Keegan, S., & Miller, L. (2007). Where is all the pressure coming from? Messages from mothers and teachers about preschool children’s appearance, diet and exercise. European Eating Disorders Review, 15, 221–230.Google Scholar
  31. McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x.Google Scholar
  32. Merskin, D. (2004). Reviving Lolita? A media literacy examination of sexual portrayals of girls in fashion advertising. The American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 119–128. doi: 10.1177/0002764204267257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller, M. K., & Summers, A. (2007). Gender differences in video game characters’ roles, appearances, and attire as portrayed in video game magazines. Sex Roles, 57, 733–742. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9307-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Monro, F., & Huon, G. (2005). Media-portrayed idealized images, body shame, and appearance anxiety. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 38, 85–90. doi: 10.1002/eat.20153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moradi, B., & Huang, Y. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2011). I’d rather be a famous fashion model than a famous scientist: The rewards and costs of internalizing sexualization. In E. Zurbriggen and T.A. Roberts (Eds.). The sexualization of girls and girlhood. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Nelson, A. (2000). The pink dragon is female: Halloween costumes and gender markers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 137–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb00194.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ooh! La, La! Couture. (2010). Retrieved from
  39. Paul, P. (2005). Pornified: How pornography is transforming our lives, our relationships, and our families. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
  40. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2007). Adolescents’ exposure to a sexualized media environment and their notions of women as sex objects. Sex Roles, 56, 381–395. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9176-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pomerleau, A., Bolduc, D., Malcuit, C., & Cossette, C. (1990). Pink or blue: Gender stereotypes in the first two years of life. Sex Roles, 22, 359–367. doi: 10.1007/BF00288339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reichert, T., & Carpenter, C. (2004). An update on sex in magazine advertising: 1983 to 2003. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 823–837. doi: 10.1177/0887302X08327087.Google Scholar
  43. Rudy, R. M., Popova, L., & Linz, D. G. (2010). The context of current content analysis of gender roles: An introduction to a special issue. Sex Roles, 62, 705–720. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9807-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Simpson, L., Douglas, S., & Schimmel, J. (1998). Tween consumers: Catalog clothing purchase behavior. Adolescence, 33, 637–645.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Smolak, L., & Levine, M. P. (1994). Critical issues in the developmental psychopathology of eating disorders. In L. Alexander-Mott & D. B. Lumsden (Eds.), Understanding eating disorders: Anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and obesity (pp. 37–60). Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  46. Smolak, L., & Levine, M. P. (2001). Body image in children. In J. K. Thompson & L. Smolak (Eds.), Body image, eating disorders, and obesity in youth: Assessment, prevention and treatment (pp. 41–66). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smolak, L., & Murnen, S. K. (2011). The sexualization of girls and women as antecedents of objectification. In R. M. Calogero, S. Tantleff-Dunn, & J. K. Thompson (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 53–75). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stankiewicz, J. M., & Rosselli, F. (2008). Women as sex objects and victims in print advertisements. Sex Roles, 58, 579–589. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9359-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Strasburger, V. C., & Wilson, B. J. (2002). Children, adolescents, and the media. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Tanofsky-Kraff, M., Yanovski, S. Z., Wilfley, D. E., Marmarosh, C., Morgan, C. M., & Yanovski, J. A. (2004). Eating-disordered behaviors, body fat, and psychopathology in overweight and normal-weight children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 53–61. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.1.53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tiggemann, M. (2001). Mental health risks of self-objectification: A review of the empirical evidence for disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual dysfunction. In R. M. Calogero, S. Tantleff-Dunn, & J. K. Thompson (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 139–159). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  52. Tiggemann, M., & Lacey, C. (2009). Shopping for clothes: Body satisfaction, appearance investment, and functions of clothing among female shoppers. Body Image, 6, 285–291. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.07.002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Truby, H., & Paxton, S. J. (2002). Development of the children’s body image scale. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 185–203. doi: 10.1348/014466507X251261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walmart yanks pink “credit card” panties off racks. (2007, December 12)., Retrieved from,2933,316580,00.html.
  55. Ward, L. M. (2002). Does television exposure affect emerging adults’ attitudes and assumptions about sexual relationships? Correlational and experimental confirmation. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 31, 1–15. doi: 10.1023/A:1014068031532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ward, L. M. (2003). Understanding the role of entertainment media in the sexual socialization of American youth: A review of empirical research. Developmental Review, 23, 347–388. doi: 10.1016/S0273-2297(03)00013-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ward, L. M., & Friedman, K. (2006). Using TV as a guide: Associations between television viewing and adolescents’ sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 133–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. White, S. E. (1995). A content analytic technique for measuring the sexiness of women’s business attire in media presentations. Communication Research Reports, 12, 178–185.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samantha M. Goodin
    • 1
  • Alyssa Van Denburg
    • 1
  • Sarah K. Murnen
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Linda Smolak
    • 1
  1. 1.Kenyon CollegeGambierUSA
  2. 2.Psychology DepartmentKenyon CollegeGambierUSA

Personalised recommendations