Sex Roles

, Volume 65, Issue 11–12, pp 761–773 | Cite as

Rape Myths: History, Individual and Institutional-Level Presence, and Implications for Change

  • Katie M. EdwardsEmail author
  • Jessica A. Turchik
  • Christina M. Dardis
  • Nicole Reynolds
  • Christine A. Gidycz
Feminist Forum


Rape myths, which are present at both the individual and institutional/societal levels, are one way in which sexual violence has been sustained and justified throughout history. In light of an increasing accumulation of rape myth research across a variety of disciplines, this paper proposes to use a feminist lens to provide an overview of the historical origins of rape myths, to document the current manifestations of these myths in American society, and to summarize the current body of research literature. We focus on the history of several specific rape myths (i.e., “husbands cannot rape their wives,” “women enjoy rape,” “women ask to be raped,” and “women lie about being raped”) and how these particular myths permeate current legal, religious, and media institutions (despite their falsehood). The paper concludes with suggestions for further research and describes how existing evidence could be used to aid in eradicating rape myths at both the individual and institutional levels.


Rape myths Rape Sexual assault Review History 



The authors would like to thank Joanne Archambault, Alan Berkowitz, Sharon Block, Renae Franiuk, Estelle Freedman, Katherine Jellison, Jessica Mindlin, Sarah Projanksy, Diane Sommerville, Kim Stevenson, and Tracy West for their expert consultation and editorial assistance. The authors would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their invaluable suggestions.


  1. All charges dropped in Duke case (2007, April 12). New York Times. Retrieved from
  2. Allen, M., D’Alessio, D., & Brezgel, K. (1995). A meta-analysis summarizing the effects of pornography II: Aggression after exposure. Human Communication Research, 22, 258–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1995.tb00368.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allison, J. A., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1993). Rape, the misunderstood crime. Thousand Oaks: Sage. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00310.Google Scholar
  4. Aromaki, A. S., Haebich, K., & Lindman, R. E. (2002). Age as a modifier of sexually aggressive attitudes in men. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 419–423.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ask, K. (2010). A survey of police officers’ and prosecutors’ beliefs about crime victim behaviors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 1132–1149. doi: 10.1177/0886260509340535.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barshis, V. G. (1983). The question of marital rape. Women’s Studies International Forum, 6, 383–393. doi: 10.1016/0277-5395(83)90031-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basile, K. C. (2002). Attitudes toward wife rape: Effects of social background and victim status. Violence and Victims, 17, 341–354. doi: 10.1891/vivi.17.3.341.33659.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennice, J. A., & Resick, A. (2003). Marital rape: History, research, and practice. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 4, 228–246. doi: 10.1177/1524838003004003003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blackstone, W. (1765). Commentaries on the law of England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Block, S. (2002). Rape without women: Print culture and the politicization of rape, 1765–1815. The Journal of American History, 89, 849–868. doi: 10.2307/3092343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Block, S. (2006). Rape and sexual power in early America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  12. Blyth, C. (2009). Terrible silence, eternal silence: A feminist re-reading of Dinah’s voicelessness in Genesis 34. Biblical Interpretation: A Journal of Contemporary Approaches, 17, 483–506. doi: 10.1163/156851508X401150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bourke, J. (2007). Rape: A history from 1860 to present. London: Virago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Brinson, S. L. (1992). The use and opposition of rape myths in prime-time television dramas. Sex Roles, 27, 359–375. doi: 10.1007/BF00289945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  16. Bryant, J., & Oliver, M. B. (2009). Media effects: Advances in theory and research. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  17. Bryden, D. P. (2000). Redefining rape. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 3(2), 317–479. doi: 10.1525/nclr.2000.3.2.317.Google Scholar
  18. Bryden, D. P., & Lengnick, S. (1997). Rape in the criminal justice system. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 87, 1194–1384. doi: 10.2307/1144018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Buddie, A. M., & Miller, G. (2001). Beyond rape myths: A more complex view of perceptions of rape victims. Sex Roles, 45, 139–160. doi: 10.1023/A:1013575209803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cahill, A. (2000). Foucault, rape, and the construction of the feminine body. Hypatia, 15, 43–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2000.tb01079.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Caringella-MacDonald, S. (1998). Parallels and pitfalls: The aftermath of legal reform for sexual assault, marital rape, and domestic violence victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 3, 174–189. doi: 10.1177/088626088003002004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carmody, D. C., & Washington, L. M. (2001). Rape myth acceptance among college women: The impact of race and prior victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 424–436. doi: 10.1177/088626001016005003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Centers for Disease Control (2004). Sexual violence facts. Retrieved from
  25. Chapleau, K. M., & Oswald, D. L. (2010). Power, sex and rape myth acceptance: Testing two models of rape proclivity. The Journal of Sex Research, 47, 66–78. doi: 10.1080/00224490902954323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cuklanz, L. M. (2000). Rape on prime time: Television, masculinity, and sexual violence. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  27. Davies, M. (2002). Male sexual assault victims: A selective review of the literature and implications for support services. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Davison, L. (2006). Preaching the women of the Bible. St. Louis: Chalice Press.Google Scholar
  29. Desai, A. D., Edwards, K. M., & Gidycz, C. A. (2008, November). Testing an integrative model of sexual aggression in college men. In A. C. Aosved (Chair), Sexual violence perpetration: Individual and contextual factors. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  30. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dworkin, A. (1981). Pornography: Men possessing women. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  32. Edward, K. E., & McLeod, M. D. (1999). The reality and myth of rape: Implications for the criminal justice system. Expert Evidence, 7, 37–58. doi: 10.1023/A:1008917714094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Edwards, R. W., Jumper-Thurman, P., Plested, B. A., Oetting, E. R., & Swanson, L. (2000). Community readiness: Research to practice. Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 291–307. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(200005)28:3<291::AID-JCOP5>3.0.CO;2-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Edwards, K. M., Gidyz, C. A., & Desai, A. D. (2010). [Rape myths]. Unpublished raw data.Google Scholar
  35. Emmers-Sommer, T. M., & Burns, R. J. (2005). The relationship between exposure to internet pornography and sexual attitudes toward women. Journal of Online Behavior, 1, Retrieved from:
  36. Ewoldt, C. A., Monson, C. M., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2000). Attributions about rape in a continuum of dissolving marital relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 1175–1182. doi: 10.1177/088626000015011004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ferguson, F. (1987). Rape and the rise of the novel. Representations, 20, 88–112. doi: 10.1525/rep.1987.20.1.99p0185u.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ferro, C., Cermele, J., & Saltzman, A. (2008). Current perceptions of marital rape: Some good and not-so-good news. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 764–779. doi: 10.1177/0886260507313947.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Feild, H. S. (1978). Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 156–179. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.36.2.156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Feild, H. S., & Bienen, L. B. (1980). Jurors and rape. Lexington: D.C. Health.Google Scholar
  41. Finch, E., & Munro, V. E. (2005). Juror stereotypes and blame attribution in rape cases involving intoxicants. British Journal of Criminology, 45, 25–38. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azh055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fisher, B. S., Cullen, F. T., & Turner M. G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women. Retrieved from
  43. Forcible and statutory rape: An exploration of the operation and objectives of the consent standard. (1952). The Yale Law Journal, 62, 55–83.Google Scholar
  44. Fortune, M. M. (2005). Sexual violence: The sin revised. Cleveland: Pilgrim Press.Google Scholar
  45. Fountain, A. (2007). It’s all in the words: Determining the relationship between newspaper portrayal of rape victims and reader responses. Bridgewater State College Undergraduate Review, 4, 33–40. Retrieved from
  46. Franiuk, R., Seefelt, J. L., Cepress, S. L., & Vandello, J. A. (2008a). Prevalence and effects of rape myths in print journalism: The Kobe Bryant case. Violence Against Women, 14, 287–309. doi: 10.1177/1077801207313971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Franiuk, R., Seefelt, J. L., & Vandello, J. A. (2008b). Prevalence of rape myths in headlines and their effects on attitudes toward rape. Sex Roles, 58, 790–801. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9372-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Freymeyer, R. H. (1997). Rape myths and religiosity. Sociological Spectrum, 17, 473–489. doi: 10.1080/02732173.1997.9982179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Garcia, L. T. (1998). Perceptions of resistance to unwanted sexual advances. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 10, 43–52. doi: 10.1300/J056v10n01_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gavey, N. (2005). Just sex? The cultural scaffolding of rape. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Gavey, N., & Gow, V. (2001). ‘Cry wolf’, cried the wolf: Constructing the issue of false rape allegations in New Zealand media texts. Feminism & Psychology, 11, 341–360. doi: 10.1177/0959353501011003006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Gidycz, C. A., Orchowski, L. M., & Edwards, K. M. (2011). Sexual violence: Primary prevention. In J. White, M. Koss, & A. Kazdin (Eds.), Violence against women and children (Vol 2): Navigating solutions (pp. 159–179). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Gladwell, M. (2002). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co.Google Scholar
  54. Gylys, J. A., & McNamara, R. (1996). Acceptance of rape myths among prosecuting attorneys. Psychological Reports, 79, 15–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hald, G. M., Malamuth, N. M., & Yuen, C. (2010). Pornography and attitudes supporting violence against women: Revisiting the relationship in nonexperimental studies. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 14–20. doi: 10.1002/ab.20328.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hale, M. (1736). Historia placitorum cornae: The history of the pleas of the crown. London: Gyles, Woodword, and Davis.Google Scholar
  57. Hinck, S. S., & Thomas, R. W. (1999). Rape myth acceptance in college students: How far have we come? Sex Roles, 40, 815–832. doi: 10.1023/A:1018816920168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Horos, C. V. (1974). Rape. New Canaan: Tobey.Google Scholar
  59. Howitt, D. (1998). Crime, the media, and the law. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  60. Hyman, I., Guruge, S., Stewart, D. E., & Ahmad, F. (2000). Primary prevention of violence against women. Women’s Health Issues, 10, 288–293. doi: 10.1016/S1049-3867(00)00066-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Johnson, B. E., Kuck, D. L., & Schander, P. R. (1997). Rape myth acceptance and sociodemographic characteristics: A multidimensional analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 693–707. doi: 10.1023/A:1025671021697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kahlor, L., & Morrison, D. (2007). Television viewing and rape myth acceptance among college women. Sex Roles, 56, 729–739. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9232-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Keener, C. (1996). Some biblical reflections on justice, rape and an insensitive society. In C. Kroeger & J. Beck (Eds.), Women, abuse, and the Bible: How scripture can be used to hurt or to heal (pp. 117–130). Grand Rapids: Baker Books.Google Scholar
  64. Kirkwood, M. K., & Cecil, D. K. (2001). Marital rape: A student assessment of rape laws and marital exemption. Violence Against Women, 7, 1234–1253. doi: 10.1177/1077801201007011003.Google Scholar
  65. Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. J. (1982). Sexual Experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455–457. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.50.3.455.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Koss, M. P., Abbey, A., Campbell, R., Cook, S., Norris, J., Testa, M., et al. (2007). Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 3, 357–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kovera, M. B. (2002). The effects of general pretrial publicity on juror decisions: An examination of moderators and mediating mechanisms. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 43–72. doi: 10.1023/A:1013829224920.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Krahe, B., Temkin, J., Bieneck, S., & Berger, A. (2008). Prospective lawyers’ rape stereotypes and schematic decision making about rape cases. Psychology, Crime and Law, 14, 461–479. doi: 10.1080/10683160801932380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. LaFree, G. D., Reskin, B. F., & Visher, C. A. (1985). Juror’s responses to victims’ behavior and legal issues in sexual assault trials. Social Problems, 32, 389–407. doi: 10.1525/sp.1985.32.4.03a00070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lees, S. (1996). Carnal knowledge: Rape on trial. London: Women’s Press.Google Scholar
  71. Loh, C., Gidycz, C. A., Lobo, T. R., & Luthra, R. (2005). A prospective analysis of sexual assault perpetration: Risk factors related to perpetrator characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1325–1348. doi: 10.1177/0886260505278528.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. R. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00448.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lonsway, K., Archambault, J., & Lisak, D. (2007). False reports: Moving beyond the issue to successfully investigate and prosecute non-stranger sexual assault. National Center for the Prosecution of Violence Against Women. Retrieved from
  74. Luddy, J. G., & Thompson, E. H. (1997). Masculinities and violence: A father-son comparison of gender traditionality and perceptions of heterosexual rape. Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 462–477. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.11.4.462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. MacKinnon, C. (1982). Feminism, Marxism, method, and the state: An agenda for theory. Signs, 7, 515–544. doi: 10.1086/493898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. MacKinnon, C. (1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Malamuth, N. M., & Check, J. V. P. (1985). The effects of aggressive pornography on beliefs in rape myths: Individual differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 299–320. doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(85)90021-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Malamuth, N. A., Addison, T., & Koss, M. (2000). Pornography and sexual aggression: Are there reliable effects and can we understand them? Annual review of sex research, 11, 26–91. Retrieved from
  79. Marshall, B. C., & Alison, L. J. (2006). Structural behavioural analysis as a basis for discriminating between genuine and simulated rape allegations. Journal of Investigating Psychology and Offender Profiling, 3, 21–34. doi: 10.1002/jip.42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Martin, E. K., Taft, C. T., & Resick, P. A. (2007). A review of marital rape. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 329–347. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2006.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Masser, B., Viki, G. T., & Power, C. (2006). Hostile sexism and rape proclivity amongst men. Sex Roles, 54, 565–574. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9022-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Matosian, G. M. (1993). Reproducing rape: Domination through talk in the courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  83. Mayerson, S. E., & Taylor, D. A. (1987). The effects of rape myth pornography on women’s attitudes and the mediating roles of sex role stereotyping. Sex Roles, 17, 321–338. doi: 10.1007/BF00288456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. McMahon, S. (2010). Rape myth beliefs and bystander attitudes among incoming college students. Journal of American College Health, 59, 3–11. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2010.483715.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. McMahon, S., & Farmer, G. (2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Journal of Social Work Research. (in press).Google Scholar
  86. Milburn, M. A., Mather, R., & Conrad, S. D. (2000). The effects of viewing R-rated movie scenes that objectify women on perceptions of date rape. Sex Roles, 43, 645–664. doi: 10.1023/A:1007152507914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Hollabaugh, C. (1988). Do women sometimes say no when they mean yes? The prevalence and correlates of women’s token resistance to sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 872–879. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.872.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Mullin, C., Imrich, D. J., & Linz, D. (1996). The impact of acquaintance rape stories and case-specific pretrial publicity on juror decision making. Communication Research, 23, 100–135. doi: 10.1177/009365096023001004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. National Center for the Prosecution of Violence Against Women. (2009). Summary of Spousal Rape Laws. Retrieved from
  90. Norton, R., & Grant, T. (2008). Rape myth in true and false rape allegations. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 275–285. doi: 10.1080/10683160701770286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Page, A. D. (2008). Judging women and defining crime: Police officers’ attitudes toward women and rape. Sociological Spectrum, 28, 389–411. doi: 10.1080/02732170802053621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Parry, R. (2002). Feminist hermeneutics and evangelical concerns: The rape of Dinah as a case study. Tyndale Bulletin, 53, 1–28. Retrieved from
  93. Patton, T. O., & Snyder-Yuly, J. (2007). Any four Black men will do: Rape, race, and the ultimate scapegoat. Journal of Black Studies, 37, 859–895. doi: 10.1177/0021934706296025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Payne, D., Lonsway, K., & Fitzgerald, F. (1994). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Awareness Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27–68. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  96. Russell, D. (1990). Rape in marriage. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Salmon, C., & Symons, D. (2003). Warrior lovers: Erotic fiction, evolution and female sexuality. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Schulhofer, S. J. (1998). Unwanted sex: The culture of intimidation and the failure of law. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Schwendinger, J. R., & Schwendinger, H. (1974). Rape myths: In legal, theoretical, and everyday practice. Crime and Social Justice, 1, 18–26.Google Scholar
  100. Senate Judiciary Committee (1993). The response to rape: Detours on the road to equal justice. Paper prepared by the majority staff of the Senate Judiciary Committee.Google Scholar
  101. Sheldon, J. P., & Parent, S. L. (2002). Clergy’s attitudes and attributions of blame toward female rape victims. Violence Against Women, 8, 233–256. doi: 10.1177/10778010222183026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Stevenson, K. (2000). Unequivocal victims: The historical roots of the mystification of the female complainant in rape cases. Feminist Legal Studies, 8, 343–366. doi: 10.1023/A:1009270302602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Suarez, E. B., & Gadalla, T. (2010, January). Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Social Work and Research, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
  104. Thurston, C. (1987). The romance revolution: Erotic novels for women and the quest for a new sexual identity. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  105. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 6, 142–161. doi: 10.1177/10778010022181769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Turell, S. C., & Thomas, C. (2001). Where was God? Utilizing spirituality with Christian survivors of sexual abuse. Women and Therapy, 24, 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Walklate, S. (2008). What is to be done about violence against women? Gender, violence, cosmopolitanism and the law. The British Journal of Criminology, 48, 39–54. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azm050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Ward, C. (1988). The attitudes toward rape victims scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 127–146. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00932.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Workman, J. E., & Orr, R. L. (1996). Clothing, sex of subject, and rape myth acceptance as factors affecting attributions about an incident of acquaintance rape. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 14, 276–284. doi: 10.1177/0887302X9601400407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Wyer, R. S., & Hartwick, J. (1980). The role of information retrieval and conditional inference processes in belief formation and change. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 241–283). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  112. Zurbriggen, E. L. (2000). Social motives and cognitive power-sex associations: Predictors of aggressive sexual behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 559–581. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.559.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katie M. Edwards
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jessica A. Turchik
    • 2
    • 3
  • Christina M. Dardis
    • 1
  • Nicole Reynolds
    • 4
    • 5
  • Christine A. Gidycz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyOhio UniversityAthensUSA
  2. 2.National Center for PTSD at VA Palo Alto Health Care SystemMenlo ParkUSA
  3. 3.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesStanford Univeristy of MedicineStanfordUSA
  4. 4.Department of EnglishOhio UniversityAthensUSA
  5. 5.Department of Women and Gender StudiesOhio UniversityAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations