Sex Roles

, Volume 68, Issue 11–12, pp 738–753 | Cite as

Heterosexuals’ Attitudes Toward Transgender People: Findings from a National Probability Sample of U.S. Adults

  • Aaron T. NortonEmail author
  • Gregory M. Herek
Original Article


Using data from a national probability sample of heterosexual U.S. adults (N = 2,281), the present study describes the distribution and correlates of men’s and women’s attitudes toward transgender people. Feeling thermometer ratings of transgender people were strongly correlated with attitudes toward gay men, lesbians, and bisexuals, but were significantly less favorable. Attitudes toward transgender people were more negative among heterosexual men than women. Negative attitudes were associated with endorsement of a binary conception of gender; higher levels of psychological authoritarianism, political conservatism, and anti-egalitarianism, and (for women) religiosity; and lack of personal contact with sexual minorities. In regression analysis, sexual prejudice accounted for much of the variance in transgender attitudes, but respondent gender, educational level, authoritarianism, anti-egalitarianism, and (for women) religiosity remained significant predictors with sexual prejudice statistically controlled. Implications and directions for future research on attitudes toward transgender people are discussed.


Transgender Attitudes Sexual prejudice Public opinion 



Data collection was funded by a grant to Gregory Herek from the Gill Foundation. The authors thank Jonathan Mohr for his invaluable comments on an earlier draft of this paper.


  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Altemeyer, R. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2006). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys (4th ed.). Lenexa, KS: Author.Google Scholar
  4. American National Election Studies. (2011). Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Political Studies. Retrieved from American National Election Studies website:
  5. Auster, C. J., & Ohm, S. C. (2000). Masculinity and femininity in contemporary American society: A reevaluation using the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 43, 499–528. doi: 10.1023/A:1007119516728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162. doi: 10.1037/h0036215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brewer, P. R. (2003). Values, political knowledge, and public opinion about gay rights: A framing-based account. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 173–201. doi: 10.1086/374397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryant, K., & Schilt, K. (2008). Transgender people in the U.S. military: Summary and analysis of the 2008 transgender American Veterans Association survey. Retrieved from Palm Center website:
  9. Chang, L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2009). National surveys via RDD telephone interviewing versus the Internet: Comparing sample representativeness and response quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 641–678. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfp075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chauncey, G., Jr. (1982-1983). From sexual inversion to homosexuality: Medicine and the changing conceptualization of female deviance. Salmagundi, 58-59, 114-146Google Scholar
  11. Couper, M. P., Tourangeau, R., & Kenyon, K. (2004). Picture this! Exploring visual effects in web surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 255–266. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfh013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duckitt, J. H. (1992). The social psychology of prejudice. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  13. Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3–22. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Flynn, T. (2006). The ties that [don't] bind: Transgender family law and the unmaking of families. In P. Currah, R. M. Juang, & S. P. Minter (Eds.), Transgender rights (pp. 32–50). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  16. Franzini, L. R., & Casinelli, D. L. (1986). Health professionals’ factual knowledge and changing attitudes toward transsexuals. Social Science and Medicine, 22, 535–539. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90020-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freud, S. (1953). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 7, pp. 123-243). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published in 1905)Google Scholar
  18. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Grant, J. M., Mottet, L. A., & Tanis, J. (2011). Injustice at every turn: A report of the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. Retrieved from National Center for Transgender Equality & National Gay and Lesbian Task Force website:
  20. Green, R., Stoller, R. J., & MacAndrew, C. (1966). Attitudes toward sex transformation procedures. Archives of General Psychiatry, 15, 178–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haddock, G., Zanna, M. P., & Esses, V. M. (1993). Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1105–1118. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Henry, P. J. (2008). College sophomores in the laboratory redux: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of the nature of prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 19, 49–71. doi: 10.1080/10478400802049936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Herbenick, D., Reece, M., Schick, V., Sanders, S. A., Dodge, B., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2010). Sexual behavior in the United States: Results from a national probability sample of men and women ages 14-94. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7, 255–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02012.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Herek, G. M. (1986). On heterosexual masculinity. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 563–577. doi: 10.1177/000276486029005005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Herek, G. M. (1987). Can functions be measured? A new perspective on the functional approach to attitudes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 285–303. doi: 10.2307/2786814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Herek, G. M. (1994). Assessing heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A review of empirical research with the ATLG scale. In B. Greene & G. M. Herek (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 206–228). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Herek, G. M. (2000). The psychology of sexual prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 19–22. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Herek, G. M. (2002a). Gender gaps in public opinion about lesbians and gay men. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 40–66. doi: 10.1086/338409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Herek, G. M. (2002b). Heterosexuals' attitudes toward bisexual men and women in the United States. The Journal of Sex Research, 39, 264–275. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Herek, G. M. (2009a). Sexual prejudice. In T. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 439–465). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  31. Herek, G. M. (2009b). Sexual stigma and sexual prejudice in the United States: A conceptual framework. In D. A. Hope (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on lesbian, gay and bisexual identities: The 54th Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 65–111). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1999). Sex differences in how heterosexuals think about lesbians and gay men: Evidence from survey context effects. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 348–360. doi: 10.1080/00224499909552007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hill, D. B., & Willoughby, B. L. B. (2005). The development and validation of the genderism and transphobia scale. Sex Roles, 53, 531–544. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-7140-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holbrook, A. L., Krosnick, J. A., & Pfent, A. M. (2008). Response rates in surveys by the news media and government contractor survey research firms. In J. M. Lepkowski, C. Tucker, J. M. Brick, E. de Leeuw, L. Japec, P. J. Lavrakas, . . . R. L. Sangster (Eds.), Telephone survey methodology. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Jenness, V., Maxson, C., Matsuda, K., & Sumner, J. (2007). Violence in California correctional facilities: An empirical examination of sexual assault. Retrieved from Center for Evidence-Based Corrections website:
  36. Jordan-Young, R. M. (2010). Brain storm: The flaws in the science of sex differences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Juang, R. M. (2006). Transgendering the politics of recognition. In P. Currah, R. M. Juang, & S. P. Minter (Eds.), Transgender rights (pp. 706–719). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  39. Katz, J. N. (1995). The invention of heterosexuality. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  40. Kimmel, M. (1997). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame and silence in the construction of gender identity. In M. M. Gergen & S. N. Davis (Eds.), Toward a new psychology of gender (pp. 223–242). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. King, M. E., Winter, S., & Webster, B. (2009). Contact reduces transprejudice: A study on attitudes towards transgenderism and transgender civil rights in Hong Kong. International Journal of Sexual Health, 21, 17–34. doi: 10.1080/19317610802434609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kite, M. E., & Deaux, K. (1987). Gender belief systems: Homosexuality and the implicit inversion theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 83–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00776.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E. (1998). Do heterosexual women and men differ in their attitudes toward homosexuality? A conceptual and methodological analysis. In G. M. Herek (Ed.), Stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals (pp. 39–61). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Knowledge Networks. (2011). Knowledge Networks bibliography: Articles and presentations based on KN collected panel data, analysis, or methodology. Retrieved from Knowledge Networks website:
  45. Landén, M., & Innala, S. (2000). Attitudes toward transsexualism in a Swedish national survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 375–388. doi: 10.1023/A:1001970521182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lawless, J. L. (2004). Women, war, and winning elections: Gender stereotyping in the post-September 11th era. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 479–490. doi: 10.1177/106591290405700312.Google Scholar
  47. Lee, E. S., & Forthofer, R. N. (2006). Analyzing complex survey data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Leitenberg, H., & Slavin, L. (1983). Comparison of attitudes toward transsexuality and homosexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 12, 337–346. doi: 10.1007/BF01542194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lev, A. I. (2004). Transgender emergence: Therapeutic guidelines for working with gender-variant people and their families. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Lombardi, E. (2009). Varieties of transgender/transsexual lives and their relationship with transphobia. Journal of Homosexuality, 56, 977–992. doi: 10.1080/00918360903275393.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Madon, S. (1997). What do people believe about gay males? A study of stereotype content and strength. Sex Roles, 37, 663–685. doi: 10.1007/BF02936334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M. (Eds.). (2000). Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  53. Martin, C. L. (1990). Attitudes and expectations about children with nontraditional and traditional gender roles. Sex Roles, 22, 151–166. doi: 10.1007/BF00288188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Massey, J. T., & Botman, S. L. (1988). Weighting adjustments for random digit dialed surveys. In R. M. Groves, P. P. Biemer, J. T. Massey, W. L. I. Nichols, & J. Waksberg (Eds.), Telephone survey methodology (pp. 143–160). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  55. McCreary, D. R. (1994). The male role and avoiding femininity. Sex Roles, 31, 517–531. doi: 10.1007/BF01544277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Meyerowitz, J. (2002). How sex changed: A history of transsexuality in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Moradi, B., Mohr, J. J., Worthington, R. L., & Fassinger, R. E. (2009). Counseling psychology research on sexual (orientation) minority issues: Conceptual and methodological challenges and opportunities. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 5–22. doi: 10.1037/a0014572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nagoshi, J. L., Adams, K. A., Terrell, H. K., Hill, E. D., Brzuzy, S., & Nagoshi, C. T. (2008). Gender differences in correlates of homophobia and transphobia. Sex Roles, 59, 521–531. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9458-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Namaste, V. K. (2000). Invisible lives: The erasure of transsexual and transgendered people: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  60. Pettigrew, T. F. (2009). Secondary transfer effect of contact. Social Psychology, 40, 55–65. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335.40.2.55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. (2010). Religious groups' official positions on same-sex marriage. Retrieved from the Pew Research Center website:
  63. Raymond, J. (1979). The transsexual empire: The making of the she-male. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  64. Roen, K. (2002). “Either/or” and “both/neither”: Discursive tensions in transgender politics. Signs, 27, 501–522. doi: 10.1086/495695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157–176. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515–530. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sirin, S. R., McCreary, D. R., & Mahalik, J. R. (2004). Differential reactions to men and women's gender role transgressions: Perceptions of social status, sexual orientation, and value dissimilarity. The Journal of Men's Studies, 12, 119–132. doi: 10.3149/jms.1202.119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stenner, K. (2009). Three kinds of conservatism. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 142–159. doi: 10.1080/10478400903028615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stone, S. (1991). The empire strikes back: A posttranssexual manifesto. In J. Epstein & K. Straub (Eds.), Body guards: The cultural politics of gender ambiguity (pp. 280–304). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Stryker, S. (1994). My words to Victor Frankenstein above the village of Chamounix: Performing transgender rage. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 1, 237–254.Google Scholar
  71. Stryker, S. (2006). (De)subjugated knowledges: An introduction to transgender studies. In S. Stryker & S. Whittle (Eds.), The transgender studies reader (pp. 1–17). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  72. Tausch, N., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J. B., Psaltis, C., Schmid, K., Popan, J. R., . . . Hughes, J. (2010). Secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact: Alternative accounts and underlying processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 282-302. doi:10.1037/a0018553.Google Scholar
  73. Tee, N., & Hegarty, P. (2006). Predicting opposition to the civil rights of trans persons in the United Kingdom. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 70–80. doi: 10.1002/casp.851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Valentine, D. (2007). Imagining transgender: An ethnography of a category. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Weeks, J. (1977). Coming out: Homosexual politics in Britain from the nineteenth century to the present. London: Quartet Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  76. Whitley, B. E. (2002). Gender-role variables and attitudes toward homosexuality. Sex Roles, 45, 691–721. doi: 10.1023/A:1015640318045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Winter, S., Webster, B., & Cheung, P. K. E. (2008). Measuring Hong Kong undergraduate students attitudes towards transpeople. Sex Roles, 59, 670–683. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9462-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations