Sex Roles

, Volume 66, Issue 7–8, pp 518–529 | Cite as

Gender Rules: Same- and Cross-Gender Friendships Norms

  • Diane Felmlee
  • Elizabeth Sweet
  • H. Colleen Sinclair
Original Article

Abstract

We examined the relationships between gender and attitudes towards same- and cross-gender friendship norms for a sample of 269 West Coast, U.S., college students. Participants evaluated violations of friendship norms described in vignettes in which the friend’s gender was experimentally manipulated. Women differentiated more between types of violations in their evaluations than did men. There also were several significant gender differences in approval of norm violations. As expected, women tended to have relatively high expectations of their friendships in situations involving trust and intimacy, likely resulting from the high value they placed on affiliation and emotional closeness. Women were more disapproving than men of a friend who canceled plans or failed to come to their defense publicly. Men and women judged a woman who betrayed a secret more harshly than a man. Generally, expectations for cross-gender, versus same-gender, friends were more similar than different; there were no significant cross-gender interactions, with one exception. Men were particularly less approving of a male, as compared to a female, friend who kissed them in a greeting. Furthermore, an overwhelming majority of respondents (81.6%) reported that men and women can be friends. A minority of women were cautious in their responses, with women (18.5%) more apt to reply “maybe,” than men (9.9%). Overall, these findings provided evidence that gender, rather than cross-gender, norms primarily influenced friendship evaluations, and demonstrated that even a subtle manipulation of gender can trigger gender stereotypes. They suggested, too, that women may hold their friends to stricter “rules” than men.

Keywords

Friendship Gender differences Cross-gender friendship Norms Friendship expectations 

References

  1. Adams, R. G., & Blieszner, R. (1998). Structural predictors of problematic friendship in later life. Personal Relationships, 5, 439–447. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00181.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alves, W. M., & Rossi, P. H. (1978). Who should get what? Fairness judgments of the distribution of earnings. The American Journal of Sociology, 84, 541–564. doi: 10.1086/226826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argyle, M., & Henderson, M. (1984). The rules of friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 211–237. doi: 10.1177/0265407584012005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bank, B. J., & Hansford, S. L. (2000). Gender and friendship: Why are men’s best same-sex friendships less intimate and supportive? Personal Relationships, 7, 63–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00004.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumgarte, R. (2002). Cross-gender friendship: The troublesome relationship. In R. Goodwin & D. Cramer (Eds.), Inappropriate relationships (pp. 103–124). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Baumgarte, R., & Nelson, D. W. (2009). Preference for same-versus cross-sex friendships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 901–917. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00465.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell, R. R. (1981). Worlds of friendship. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Bleske, A. L., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Can men and women be just friends? Personal Relationships, 7, 131–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00008.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bleske-Rechek, A. L., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1310–1323. doi: 10.1177/01461672012710007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blieszner, R., & Adams, R. G. (1992). Adult friendship. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Bogle, K. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  12. Booth, A., & Hess, E. (1974). Cross-sex friendship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 36, 38–47. doi: 10.2307/350992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Clancey, S. M., & Dollinger, S. J. (1993). Photographic depictions of the self: Gender and age differences in social connectedness. Sex Roles, 29, 477–495. doi: 10.1007/BF00289322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.122.1.5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duck, S., & Wright, P. H. (1993). Reexamining gender differences in same-gender friendships: A close look at two kinds of data. Sex Roles, 28, 709–727. doi: 10.1007/BF00289989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Ecked & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Elkins, L. E., & Peterson, C. (1993). Gender differences in best friendships. Sex Roles, 29, 497–508. doi: 10.1007/BF00289323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fehr, B. (2004). Intimacy expectations in same-sex friendships: A prototype interaction-pattern model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 265–284. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Felmlee, D. H. (1999). Social norms in same-and cross-gender friendships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 53–67. doi: 10.2307/2695825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Felmlee, D., & Muraco, A. (2009). Gender and friendship norms among older adults. Research on Aging, 31, 318–344. doi: 10.1177/0164027508330719.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Finch, J. (1987). Research Note: The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology, 21, 105–114. doi: 10.1177/0038038587021001008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fiske, S. T. (2009). Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, 5th Ed. (pp. 941–982). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fox, M., Gibbs, M., & Auerbach, D. (1985). Age and gender dimensions of friendship. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 489–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1985.tb00898.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frieze, I. H., Sales, E., & Smith, C. (1991). Considering the social context in gender research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 371–392. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00414.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gabriel, S., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Are there “his” and “hers” types of interdependence? The Implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior, and cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 642–655. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.642.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Goffman, E. (1979). Gender advertisements. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  31. Guimond, S., Chatard, A., Martinot, D., Crisp, R. J., & Redersdorff, S. (2006). Social comparison, self-stereotyping, and gender differences in self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 221–242. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Halatsis, P., & Christakis, N. (2009). The challenge of sexual attraction within heterosexuals’ cross-sex friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 919–937. doi: 10.1177/0265407509345650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hall, J. A. (2011). Sex differences in friendship expectations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. doi: 10.1177/0265407510386192.
  34. Hays, R. B. (1985). A longitudinal study of friendship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 909–924. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.909.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Henningsen, D. D., Henningsen, M. L. M., & Valde, K. S. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions of women’s sexual interest during cross-sex interactions: An application and extension of cognitive valence theory. Sex Roles, 54, 821–829. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9050-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hughes, R. (1998). Considering the vignette technique and its application to a study of drug injecting and HIV risk and safer behaviour. Sociology of Health & Illness, 20, 381–400. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.00107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hughes, M., Morrison, K., & Asada, K. J. K. (2005). What’s love got to do with it? Exploring the impact of maintenance rules, love attitudes, and network support on friends with benefits relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 69, 49–66. doi: 10.1080/10570310500034154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kenler, K. S., Myers, J., & Prescott, C. A. (2005). Sex differences in the relationship between social support and risk for major depression: A Longitudinal study of opposite-sex pairs. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 250–256. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.2.250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kimmel, M. S. (1994). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame and silence in the construction of gender identity. In H. Broad & M. Kaufman (Eds.), Theorizing masculinities (pp. 119–141). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Kito, M. (2005). Self-disclosure in romantic relationships and friendships among American and Japanese college students. Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 127–140. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.145.2.127-140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Koenig, B. L., Kirkpatrick, L. E., & Ketelaar, T. (2007). Misperception of sexual and romantic interests in opposite-sex friendships: Four hypotheses. Personal Relationships, 14, 411–429. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00163.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lenton, A. P., & Webber, L. (2006). Cross-sex friendships: Who has more? Sex Roles, 54, 809–820. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9048-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lewis, R. A. (1978). Emotional intimacy among men. Journal of Social Issues, 34, 108–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1978.tb02543.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (2004). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  45. Messner, M. A. (2000). Barbie girls versus sea monsters: Children constructing gender. Gender and Society, 14, 765–784. doi: 10.1177/089124300014006004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Monsour, M. (1992). Meanings of intimacy in cross-and same-sex friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 277–295. doi: 10.1177/0265407592092007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Monsour, M. (2002). Women and men as friends: Relationships across the life span in the 21st century. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  48. Muraco, A. (2005). Heterosexual evaluations of hypothetical friendship behavior based on sex and sexual orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 587–605. doi: 10.1177/0265407505054525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. O’Meara, J. D. (1989). Cross-sex friendship: Four basic challenges of an ignored relationship. Sex Roles, 21, 525–543. doi: 10.1007/BF00289102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reeder, H. M. (2003). The Effect of gender role orientation on same- and cross-sex friendship formation. Sex Roles, 49, 2003. doi: 10.1023/A:1024408913880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reis, H. T. (1998). Gender differences in intimacy and related behaviors: Context and process. In D. L. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (pp. 203–231). Mahway: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  52. Ridgeway, C. L. (2009). Framed before we know it: How gender shapes social relations. Gender and Society, 23, 145. doi: 10.1177/0891243208330313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender and Society, 18, 510–531. doi: 10.1177/0891243204265269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rubin, L. B. (1985). Just friends: The role of friendship in our lives. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  55. Sheets, V. L., & Lugar, R. (2005). Friendship and gender in Russia and the United States. Sex Roles, 51, 131–140. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-1200-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 463–481. doi: 10.1177/0265407502019004048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thorne, B. (1986). Girls and boys together… but mostly apart: Gender arrangements in elementary schools. In W. Hartup & Z. Rubin (Eds.), Relationships and development (pp. 167–184). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  58. Walker, K. (1994). Men, women, and friendship: What they say, what they do. Gender and Society, 8, 246–265. doi: 10.1177/089124394008002007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Werking, K. (1997). We’re just good friends: Women and men in nonromantic relationships. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  60. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151. doi: 10.1177/0891243287001002002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. West, L., Anderson, J., & Duck, S. (1996). Crossing the barriers to friendships between men and women. In J. Wood (Ed.), Gendered relationships (pp. 111–127). Mountain View: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  62. Wright, P. H. (1982). Men’s friendships, women’s friendships and the alleged inferiority of the latter. Sex Roles, 8, 1–20. doi: 10.1007/BF00287670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diane Felmlee
    • 1
  • Elizabeth Sweet
    • 2
  • H. Colleen Sinclair
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SociologyThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.University of California, DavisDavisUSA
  3. 3.Mississippi State UniversityMississippi StateUSA

Personalised recommendations