Sex Roles

, Volume 66, Issue 7–8, pp 492–505 | Cite as

Observing Incivility toward Coworkers and Negative Emotions: Do Gender of the Target and Observer Matter?

Original Article


The purpose of the present study was to examine the relationship between observing incivility toward coworkers and negative emotions for observers. We also examined the roles target and observer gender play in this relationship. Participants included 453 restaurant employees (68% female, 76% White) mostly from the Midwest region of the U.S. who completed an online survey assessing observed incivility toward male and female coworkers. They also completed measures of anger, demoralization, fear, and anxiety at work. Results showed that participants reported more negative emotionality when they witnessed incivility toward same-gender coworkers compared to opposite-gender coworkers; this relationship was especially pronounced for male observers for anger, fear, and anxiety, and female observers for demoralization. These findings highlight the importance of secondary gender-based mistreatment and emotions in organizational contexts.


Gender differences Incivility Emotions Workplace Mistreatment 


  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452–471. doi:10.2307/259136.Google Scholar
  3. Barling, J. (1996). The prediction, experience, and consequences of workplace violence. In G. R. VandenBos & E. Q. Bulatao (Eds.), Violence on the job: Identifying risks and developing solutions (pp. 29–49). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10215-012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barling, J., Rogers, A. G., & Kelloway, E. K. (2001). Behind closed doors: In-home workers’ experience of sexual harassment and workplace violence. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 255–269. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.6.3.255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benavides-Espinoza, C., & Cunningham, G. B. (2010). Bystanders’ reactions to sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 63, 201–213. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9781-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berdahl, J. L. (2007). Harassment based on sex: Protecting social status in the context of gender hierarchy. Academy of Management Review, 32, 641–658.Google Scholar
  7. Berdahl, J. L., Magley, V., & Waldo, C. R. (1996). The sexual harassment of men? Exploring the concept with theory and data. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 527–547. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00320.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berenbaum, H., Fujita, F., & Pfennig, J. (1995). Consistency, specificity, and correlates of negative emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 342–352. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Hjelt-Back, M. (1994). Aggression among university employees. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 173–184. doi:10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brody, L. R. (1993). On understanding gender differences in the expression of emotion: Gender roles, socialization, and language. In S. L. Ablon, D. Brown, E. Khantzian, & J. Mack (Eds.), Human feelings: Explorations in affective development and meaning (pp. 89–121). Hillsdale, N. J.: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. (1993). Gender and emotion. In M. Lewis & J. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 447–460). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  12. Buchanan, N. T. (2005). The nexus of race and gender domination: The racialized sexual harassment of African American women. In P. Morgan & J. Gruber (Eds.), In the company of men: Re-discovering the links between sexual harassment and male domination (pp. 294–320). Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Buchanan, N. T., Settles, I. H., & Woods, K. C. (2008). Comparing sexual harassment subtypes among Black and White women by military rank: Double jeopardy, the Jezebel, and the cult of true womanhood. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 347–361. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00450.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  15. Carli, L. L. (1999). Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 81–99. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Caza, B. B., & Cortina, L. M. (2007). From insult to injury: Explaining the impact of incivility. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 335–350. doi:10.1080/01973530701665108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chow, R. M., Tiedens, L. Z., & Govan, C. L. (2008). Excluded emotions: The role of anger in antisocial responses to ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 896–903. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cortina, L. M. (2008). Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 33, 55–75. doi:10.2307/20159376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2009). Patterns and profiles of response to incivility in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 272–288. doi:10.1037/a0014934.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 64–80. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.6.1.64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cortina, L. M., Lonsway, K. L., Magley, V. J., Freeman, L. V., Collinsworth, L. L., Hunter, M., et al. (2002). What’s gender got to do with it? Incivility in the federal courts. Law and Social Inquiry, 27, 235–270. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.2002.tb00804.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ford, C. A., & Donis, F. J. (1996). The relationship between age and gender in workers’ attitudes toward sexual harassment. Journal of Psychology, 130, 627–633.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foulis, D., & McCabe, M. P. (1997). Sexual harassment: Factors affecting attitudes and perceptions. Sex Roles, 37, 773–798. doi:10.1007/BF02936339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. French, R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 159–167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  25. Glomb, S. M., & Espelage, D. L. (2005). The influence of restrictive emotionality in men’s emotional appraisal of sexual harassment: A gender role interpretation. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 6, 240–253. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.6.4.240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hitlan, R. T., Schneider, K. T., & Walsh, B. M. (2006). Upsetting behavior: Reactions to personal and bystander harassment experiences. Sex Roles, 55, 187–195. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9072-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hogh, A., & Viitasara, E. (2005). A systematic review of longitudinal studies of nonfatal workplace violence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14, 291–313. doi:10.1080/13594320500162059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Gender differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422–447. doi:10.2307/2393451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ibarra, H. (1997). Paving an alternative route: Gender differences in managerial networks. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 91–102. doi:10.2307/2787014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson, P. (1976). Women and power: Towards a theory of effectiveness. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 99–110. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1976.tb02599.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Judge, T. A., & Hulin, C. L. (1993). Job satisfaction as a reflection of disposition: A multiple source causal analysis. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 56, 388–421. doi:10.1006/obhd.1993.1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kemper, T. D. (1978). A social interactional theory of emotions. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Kemper, T. D. (1990). Social relations and emotions: A structural approach. In T. D. Kemper (Ed.), Research agendas in the sociology of emotions (pp. 207–237). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kemper, T. D. (1991). Predicting emotions from social relations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 330–342. doi:10.2307/2786845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kern, J., & Grandey, A. (2009). Customer incivility as a social stressor: The role of race and racial identity for service employees. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 46–57. doi:10.1037/a0012684.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Koss, M. O., Goodman, L. A., Browne, A., Fitzgerald, L. F., Keita, G. P., & Russo, N. F. (1994). No safe haven: Male violence against women at home, at work, and in the community. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Langhout, R. D., Bergman, M. E., Cortina, L. M., Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., & Hunter Williams, J. (2005). Sexual harassment severity: Assessing situational and personal determinants and outcomes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 975–1007. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02156.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaption. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Levin, I., & Stokes, J. P. (1989). Dispositional approach to job satisfaction: Role of negative affectivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 752–758. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.5.752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J. M., & Barrett, L. F. (Eds.). (2010). The handbook of emotion (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  42. Lim, S., Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2008). Personal and workgroup incivility: Impact on work and health outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 95–107. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lips, H. M. (1991). Women, men, and power. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. Lu, C., & Kleiner, B. H. (2001). Discrimination and harassment in the restaurant industry. The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 21, 192–203. doi:10.1108/01443330110789745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Magley, V. J., Waldo, C. R., & Drasgow, F. (1999). The impact of sexual harassment on military personnel: Is it the same for men and women? Military Psychology, 11, 283–302. doi:10.1207/s15327876mp1103_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McPherson, J. M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1987). Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. American Sociological Review, 52, 370–379. doi:10.2307/2095356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miller, C. T., & Kaiser, C. R. (2001). A theoretical perspective on coping with stigma. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 73–92. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Miner-Rubino, K., & Cortina, L. M. (2004). Working in a context of hostility toward women: Implications for employees well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9, 107–122. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.9.2.107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miner-Rubino, K., & Cortina, L. M. (2007). Beyond targets: Consequences of vicarious exposure to misogyny at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1254–1269. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1995). Sex differences in distress: Real or artifact? American Sociological Review, 60, 449–468. doi:10.2307/2096424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Montgomery, K., Kane, K., & Vance, C. (2004). Accounting for differences in norms of respect: A study of assessments of incivility through the lenses of race and gender. Group & Organization Management, 29, 248–268. doi:10.1177/1059601103252105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pearson, C. M., Andersson, L. M., & Porath, C. L. (2000). Assessing and attacking workplace incivility. Organizational Dynamics, 29, 123–137. doi:10.1016/S0090-2616(00)00019-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pearson, C. M., & Porath, C. L. (2009). The cost of bad behavior: How incivility is damaging your business and what to do about it. New York: Portfolio/Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  55. Peck, E. Y. (2000). Gender differences in film-induced fear as a function of type of emotion measure and stimulus content: A meta-analysis and laboratory study (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Wisconsin at Madison, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, 61, 0419–4209.Google Scholar
  56. Ridgeway, C. L. (1993). Gender, status, and the social psychology of expectations. In P. England (Ed.), Theory on gender: Feminism on theory (pp. 175–197). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  57. Ridgeway, C. L., & Johnson, C. (1990). What is the relationship between socioemotional behavior and status in task groups? American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1189–1212. doi:10.1086/229426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Roth, L. M. (2004). The social psychology of tokenism: Status and homophily processes on Wall Street. Sociological Perspectives, 47, 189–214. doi:10.1525/sop.2004.47.2.189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rupp, D. E., & Spencer, S. (2006). When customers lash out: The effect of customer interactional injustice on emotional labor and the mediating role of discrete emotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 971–978. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.971.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178. doi:10.1037/h0077714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Salvatore, J., & Shelton, J. N. (2007). Cognitive costs of exposure to racial prejudice. Psychological Science, 18, 810–815. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01984.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219–247. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.4.3.219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Settles, I. H., Harrell, Z. A. T., Buchanan, N. T., & Yap, S. C. Y. (2011). Frightened or bothered: Two types of sexual harassment appraisals. Social Psychological and Personality Science. doi:10.1177/1948550611402520.
  64. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Simon, R. W., & Nath, L. E. (2004). Gender and emotion in the United States: Do men and women differ in self-reports of feelings and expressive behavior? The American Journal of Sociology, 109, 1137–1176. doi:10.1086/382111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tangney, J. P. (1990). Assessing individual differences in proneness to shame and guilt: Development of the Self-Conscious Affect and Attribution Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 102–111. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Thau, S., Aquino, K., & Bommer, W. (2008). How employee race moderates the relationship between non-contingent punishment and organizational citizenship behaviors: A test of the negative adaptation hypothesis. Social Justice Research, 21, 297–312. doi:10.1007/s11211-008-0072-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Watson, D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1989). Health complaints, stress, and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychological Review, 96, 234–254. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wright, C. V., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2007). Angry and afraid: Women’s appraisal of gender harassment during litigation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 73–84. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00332.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wright, C. V., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2009). Correlates of joining a sexual harassment class action. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 265–282. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9156-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Young, A., Vance, C., & Ensher, E. (2003). Individual differences in sensitivity to disempowering acts: A comparison of gender and identity-based explanations for perceived offensiveness. Sex Roles, 49, 163–171. doi:10.1023/A:1024413014789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology and Women’s and Gender Studies ProgramTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyBuena Vista UniversityStorm LakeUSA

Personalised recommendations