New Directions for Research on the Role of Parents and Teachers in the Development of Gender-Related Math Attitudes: Response to Commentaries
We frame our response to the commentaries by Cheryan (2011), Lane (2011), and Shapiro and Williams (2011), in terms of two broad points made by Lane (2011). First, we agree that the various constructs that we termed “math attitudes”—including math-gender stereotypes, math anxiety, math self-concepts, and achievement motivation in math—are in fact distinct (Gunderson et al. 2011b). Nevertheless, we argue that investigating common mechanisms underlying the transmission of these constructs from adults to children is a productive approach because it can lead to general interventions to boost children’s performance and dispositions toward math. Second, we argue that research on the development of gender-related math attitudes exists at the intersection of multiple research areas, including research on attitudes (broadly defined), math, gender, social learning, and child development, and that drawing on well-developed theories in these areas can lead to novel research questions and predictions. The three excellent commentaries broaden the scope of our article on gender-related math attitudes to include the transmission of implicit attitudes from adults to children, stereotype threat, and gender roles in math-related careers (Cheryan 2011; Gunderson et al. 2011b; Lane 2011; Shapiro and Williams 2011).
KeywordsMath attitudes Gender stereotypes Math anxiety Parents Teachers Math
- Beilock, S. L. (2011, September 7). Why pretty girls can’t do math. Choke: What the secrets of the brain reveal about getting it right when you have to. Retrieved from http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/choke/201109/why-pretty-girls-can-t-do-math.
- Cheryan, S. (2011). Understanding the paradox in math-related fields: Why do some gender gaps remain while others do not? Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-0060-z
- Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
- Gunderson, E. A., Gripshover, S. J., Romero, C., Dweck, C. S., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Levine, S. C. (2011a). Naturalistic variation in parents’ praise and the formation of children’s theories about trait stability. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
- Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2011b). The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-9996-2
- Lane, K. A. (2011). Being narrow while being broad: The importance of construct specificity and theoretical generality. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-0077-3.
- Park, D., Ramirez, G., & Beilock, S. L. (2011, May). Put your math burden down: Expressive writing for the highly math anxious. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Shapiro, J. R. & Williams, A. M. (2011). The role of stereotype threats in undermining girls’ and women’s performance and interest in STEM fields. Sex Roles, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11199-011-0051-0
- Shreve, E. G., Harrigan, J. A., Kues, J. R., & Kagas, D. K. (1988). Nonverbal expressions of anxiety in physician–patient interactions. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 5, 378–384.Google Scholar
- Swetman, D., Munday, R., & Windham, R. (1993). Math-anxious teachers: Breaking the cycle. College Student Journal, 27, 421–427.Google Scholar