Sex Roles

, Volume 66, Issue 3–4, pp 175–183 | Cite as

The Role of Stereotype Threats in Undermining Girls’ and Women’s Performance and Interest in STEM Fields

Feminist Forum

Abstract

In the present manuscript we draw on the Multi-Threat Framework to explore gender-related math attitudes and how they put girls and women at risk for stereotype threats. Gunderson et al. (2011) detail how negative stereotypes about women’s math abilities are transmitted to girls by their parents and teachers, shaping girls’ math attitudes and ultimately undermining performance and interest in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields. The social psychological phenomenon of stereotype threat complements this approach and demonstrates the additional ways in which gender-related math attitudes undermine girls’ and women’s interest and performance in STEM domains. Considering the phenomenon of stereotype threat also identifies how stereotypes and other gender-related math attitudes can undermine women’s and girls’ interest and performance in STEM domains even when women and girls have positive math attitudes.

Keywords

Multi-Threat Framework Stereotype threat Gender stereotypes Math attitudes STEM 

References

  1. Aronson, J., Lustina, M. J., Good, C., Keough, K., Steele, C. M., & Brown, J. (1999). When white men can’t do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 29–46. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beilock, S. L. (2008). Math performance in stressful situations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 339–343. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00602.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beilock, S. L., Rydell, R. J., & McConnell, A. R. (2007). Stereotype threat and working memory: Mechanisms, alleviation, and spillover. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 136, 256–276. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beilock, S. L., Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., & Levine, S. C. (2010). Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science of the United States of America, 107, 1860–1863. doi:10.1073/pnas.0910967107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Rosabianca, A., & Kiesner, J. (2005). Why do women underperform under stereotype threat? Psychological Science, 16, 572–578. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01577.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045–1060. doi:10.1037/a0016239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheryan, S., Siy, J. O., Vichayapai, M., Drury, B. J., & Kim, S. (2011). Do female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM? Social Psychological and Personality Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1948550611405218.
  8. Danaher, K., & Crandall, C. S. (2008). Stereotype threat in applied settings re-examined. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1639–1655. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00362.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dasgupta, N., & Asgari, S. (2004). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 642–658. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D. M., & Gerhardstein, R. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615–1628. doi:10.1177/014616702237644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 276–287. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frantz, C. M., Cuddy, A. J. C., Burnett, M., Ray, H., & Hart, A. (2004). A threat in the computer: The race implicit association test as a stereotype threat experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1611–1624. doi:10.1177/0146167204266650.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goff, P. A., Steele, C. M., & Davies, P. G. (2008). The space between us: Stereotype threat and distance in interracial contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 91–107. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Good, C., & Aronson, J. (1998). Stereotypes in the calculus classroom: Men’s and women’s perceptions of sex-differences. Unpublished data. The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  15. Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women’s achievement in high-level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19, 17–28. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2007.10.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2011). The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes. Sex Roles, this issue. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9996-2.
  17. Huguet, P., & Régner, I. (2007). Stereotype threat among school girls in quasi-ordinary classroom circumstances. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 545–560. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huguet, P., & Régner, I. (2009). Counter-stereotypic beliefs in math do not protect school girls from stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1024–1027. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Inzlicht, M., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11, 365–371. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.029.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jamieson, J. P., & Harkins, S. G. (2007). Mere effort and stereotype threat performance effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 544–564. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.544.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jamieson, J. P., & Harkins, S. G. (2009). The effect of stereotype threat on the solving of quantitative GRE problems: A mere effort interpretation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1301–1314. doi:10.1177/0146167209335165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johns, M., Schmader, T., & Martens, A. (2005). Knowing is half the battle: Teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women’s math performance. Psychological Science, 16, 175–179. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00799.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johns, M., Inzlicht, M., & Schmader, T. (2008). Stereotype threat and executive resource depletion: Examining the influence of emotion regulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 137, 691–705. doi:10.1037/a0013834.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keller, J., & Dauenheimer, D. (2003). Stereotype threat in the classroom: Dejection mediates the disrupting threat effect on women’s performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 371–381. doi:10.1177/0146167202250218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kray, L. J., Thompson, L., & Galinsky, A. (2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 942–958. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.942.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Levy, B. (1996). Improving memory in old age through implicit self-stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1092–1107. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1092.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lippa, R. A., Collaer, M. L., & Peters, M. (2010). Sex differences in mental rotation and line angle judgments are positively associated with gender equality and economic development across 53 nations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 990–997. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9460-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Logel, C., Walton, G. M., Spencer, S. J., Iserman, E. C., von Hippel, W., & Bell, A. E. (2009). Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1089–1103. doi:10.1037/a0015703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maass, A., D’Ettole, C., & Cadinu, M. (2008). Checkmate? The role of gender stereotypes in the ultimate intellectual sport. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 231–245. doi:10.1002/ejsp.440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martens, A., Johns, M., Greenberg, J., & Schimel, J. (2006). Combating stereotype threat: The effect of self-affirmation on women’s intellectual performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 236–243. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.04.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marx, D. M., & Roman, J. S. (2002). Female role models: Protecting women’s math test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1183–1193. doi:10.1177/01461672022812004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marx, D. M., Stapel, D. A., & Muller, D. (2005). We can do it: The interplay of construal orientation and social comparisons under threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 432–446. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McGlone, M. S., & Aronson, J. (2006). Stereotype threat, identity salience, and spatial reasoning. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27, 486–493. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2006.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McGlone, M. S., Aronson, J., & Kobrynowicz, D. (2006). Stereotype threat and the gender gap in political knowledge. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 392–398. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00314.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McIntyre, R. B., Paulson, R. N., & Lord, C. G. (2003). Alleviating women’s mathematics stereotype threat through salience of group achievements. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 83–90. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00513-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miyake, A., Kost-Smith, L. E., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Cohen, G. L., & Ito, T. A. (2010). Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: A classroom study of values affirmation. Science, 330, 1234–1237. doi:10.1126/science.1195996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Muzzatti, B., & Agnoli, F. (2007). Gender and mathematics: Attitudes and stereotype threat susceptibility in Italian children. Developmental Psychology, 43, 747–759. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.747.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Neuville, E., & Croizet, J.-C. (2007). Can salience of gender identity impair math performance among 7–8 years old girls? The moderating role of task difficulty. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 307–316. doi:10.1007/BF03173428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Quinn, D. M., Kahng, S. K., & Crocker, J. (2004). Discreditable: Stigma effects of revealing a mental illness history on test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 803–815. doi:10.1177/0146167204264088.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosenthal, H. E. S., & Crisp, R. J. (2006). Reducing stereotype threat by blurring intergroup boundaries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 501–511. doi:10.1177/0146167205281009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., & Beilock, S. L. (2009). Multiple social identities and stereotype threat: Imbalance, accessibility, and working memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 949–966. doi:10.1037/a0014846.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schmader, T. (2002). Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 194–201. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440–452. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Barquissau, M. (2004). The costs of accepting gender differences: The role of stereotype endorsement in women’s experience in the math domain. Sex Roles, 50, 835–850. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000029101.74557.a0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Forbes, C. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115, 336–356. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sekaquaptewa, D., & Thompson, M. (2003). Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women’s performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 68–74. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00508-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shapiro, J. R. (2011). Different groups, different threats: A multi-threat approach to the experience of stereotype threats. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 464–480. doi:10.1177/0146167211398140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shapiro, J. R., & Neuberg, S. L. (2007). From stereotype threat to stereotype threats: Implications of a Multi-Threat Framework for causes, moderators, mediators, consequences, and interventions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 107–130. doi:10.1177/1088868306294790.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80–83. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stangor, C., Carr, C., & Kiang, L. (1998). Activating stereotypes undermines task performance expectations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1191–1197. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 21 (Vol. 21, pp. 261–302). New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Steele, J. R., & Ambady, N. (2006). “Math is hard!” The effect of gender priming on women’s attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 428–436. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 697–711. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 379–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255–270. doi:10.1037/a0021385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2003). Stereotype lift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 456–467. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00019-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 82–96. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Walton, G. M., & Spencer, S. J. (2009). Latent ability: Grades and test scores systematically underestimate the intellectual ability of negatively stereotyped students. Psychological Science, 20, 1132–1139. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02417.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wout, D. A., Shih, M. J., Jackson, J. S., & Sellers, R. M. (2009). Targets as perceivers: How people determine when they will be negatively stereotyped. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 349–362. doi:10.1037/a0012880.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Anderson School of ManagementUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations