Sex Roles

, Volume 64, Issue 1–2, pp 1–8 | Cite as

“I’ll Get That for You”: The Relationship Between Benevolent Sexism and Body Self-Perceptions

  • Melissa Shepherd
  • Mindy J. Erchull
  • Aryn Rosner
  • Leslie Taubenberger
  • Emily Forsyth Queen
  • Jenna McKee
Original Article

Abstract

Benevolent sexism has been shown to have negative consequences for women. In the present study, we investigated whether there were differences in reports of body self-perceptions between 93 college women in the southeastern United States who either witnessed or did not witness a staged act of benevolent sexism. Because we believed that benevolent sexism could make beauty norms more salient, we hypothesized that women who witnessed benevolent sexism would report higher levels of self-objectification, body surveillance, and body shame. Women who witnessed benevolent sexism did report higher levels of surveillance and shame, constructs associated with self-objectification, but not higher general levels of self-objectification. This research provides more evidence of the negative effects benevolent sexism has on women.

Keywords

Benevolent sexism Self-objectification Body surveillance Body shame 

References

  1. American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pi/wpo/sexualization.html
  2. Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 633–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Byrne, D., London, O., & Reeves, K. (2006). The effects of physical attractiveness, sex, and attitude similarity on interaction attraction. Journal of Personality, 36, 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calogero, R. (2004). A test of objectification theory: The effect of the male gaze on appearance concerns in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dardenne, B., Dumont, M., & Bollier, T. (2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 764–779.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Daubenmier, J. J. (2005). The relationship of yoga, body awareness, and body responsiveness to self-objectification and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. G. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forbes, G. B., Collinsworth, L. L., Jobe, R. L., Braun, K. D., & Wise, L. M. (2007). Sexism, hostility toward women, and endorsement of beauty ideals and practices: Are beauty ideals associated with oppressive beliefs? Sex Roles, 56, 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Franzoi, S. L. (2001). Is female body esteem shaped by benevolent sexism? Sex Roles, 44, 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T.-A., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complimentary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Sainz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hurt, M. M., Nelson, J. A., Turner, D. L., Haines, M. E., Ramsey, L. R., Erchull, M. J., et al. (2007). Feminism: What is it good for? Feminine norms and objectification as the link between feminist identity and clinically relevant outcomes. Sex Roles, 57, 355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnston-Robledo, I., & Fred, V. (2008). Self-objectification and lower income pregnant women’s breastfeeding attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnston-Robledo, I., Sheffield, K., Voight, J., & Wilcox-Constantine, J. (2007). Reproductive shame: Self-objectification and young women’s attitude towards their reproductive functioning. Women & Health, 46, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kelley, H. H. (1955). The two functions of reference groups. In G. E. Swanson, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 410–414). New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  19. Kilianski, S. E., & Rudman, L. A. (1998). Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism? Sex Roles, 39, 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mahalik, J. R., Morray, E. B., Coonerty-Femiano, A., Ludlow, L. H., Slattery, S. M., & Smiler, A. (2005). Development of the conformity to feminine norms inventory. Sex Roles, 52, 417–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disorder eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roberts, T.-A. (2004). Female trouble: The menstrual self-evaluation scale and women’s self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rose, E., & Felton, W. (1955). Experimental histories of culture. American Sociological Review, 20, 383–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Oxford: Harper.Google Scholar
  26. Sibley, C. G., & Wilson, M. S. (2004). Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes toward positive and negative sexual female subtypes. Sex Roles, 51, 687–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smolak, L., & Murnen, S. K. (2008). Drive for leanness: Assessment and relationship to gender, gender role and objectification. Body Image, 5, 251–260.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. World Health Organization (n.d.). BMI classification. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?introPage=intro_3.html

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melissa Shepherd
    • 1
  • Mindy J. Erchull
    • 1
  • Aryn Rosner
    • 1
  • Leslie Taubenberger
    • 1
  • Emily Forsyth Queen
    • 1
  • Jenna McKee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Mary WashingtonFredericksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations