Sex Roles

, Volume 63, Issue 7–8, pp 568–579 | Cite as

What Will I Be? Exploring Gender Differences in Near and Distant Possible Selves

Original Article

Abstract

We investigated whether the possible selves of men and women align with the gender-differentiated social roles that are projected to vary across the lifespan. Across two studies (Study 1: N = 211 and Study 2: N = 314) of college students in the Midwestern U.S., we found that gender differences in possible selves were larger when projected into the distant future (e.g., 10–15 years) than the near future (1 year). In addition, the relationship between career and family possible selves varied depending on gender and temporal distance, with a tradeoff between career and family observed primarily among women and for distant possible selves (Study 1). Supporting role congruity theory, both genders hoped for role-congruent selves but feared role-incongruent selves (Study 2).

Keywords

Social roles Possible selves Gender differences 

References

  1. Anthis, K. S., Dunkel, C. S., & Anderson, B. (2004). Gender and identity status differences in late adolescents’ possible selves. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 147–152.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bianchi, S. M. (2000). Maternal employment and time with children: Dramatic change or surprising continuity? Demography, 37, 401–414.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. A. (2006). Changing rhythms of American family life. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Bielby, W. T., & Bielby, D. D. (1989). Family ties: Balancing commitments to work and family in dual earner households. American Sociological Review, 54, 776–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bosson, J. K., Prewitt-Freilino, J. L., & Taylor, J. N. (2005). Role rigidity: A problem of identity misclassification? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 552–565.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2008). Of men, women, and motivation: A role congruity account. In J. Y. Shah & W. L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 434–447). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  8. Diekman, A. B., Goodfriend, W., & Goodwin, S. (2004). Dynamic stereotypes of power: Perceived change and stability in gender hierarchies. Sex Roles, 50, 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diekman, A. B., Eagly, A. H., Mladinic, A., & Ferreira, M. C. (2005). Dynamic stereotypes about women and men in Latin America and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eagly, A. H., & Diekman, A. B. (2003). The malleability of sex differences in response to changing social roles. In L. G. Aspinwall & U. M. Staudinger (Eds.), A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology (pp. 103–115). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Eagly, A. H., Eastwick, P. W., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. (2009). Possible selves in marital roles: The impact of the anticipated division of labor on the mate preferences of women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 403–414.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 245–264.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Etaugh, C., & Folger, D. (1998). Perceptions of parents whose work and parenting behaviors deviate from role expectations. Sex Roles, 39, 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Friedman, S. R., & Weissbrod, C. S. (2005). Work and family commitment and decision-making status among emerging adults. Sex Roles, 53, 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fryberg, S. A., & Markus, H. R. (2003). On being American Indian: Current and possible selves. Self and Identity, 2, 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fryberg, S. A., Markus, H. R., Oyserman, D., & Stone, J. M. (2008). Of warrior chiefs and Indian princesses: The psychological consequences of American Indian mascots. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 208–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gadalla, T. M. (2008). Gender differences in poverty rates after marital dissolution: A longitudinal study. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 49, 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giles, M., & Rea, A. (1999). Career self-efficacy: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 393–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greene, B. A., & DeBacker, T. K. (2004). Gender orientations toward the future: Links to motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 91–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hayghe, H. V. (1986). Rise in mother’s labor force activity includes those with infants. Monthly Labor Review, 109, 43–45.Google Scholar
  22. Hayghe, H. V. (1990). Family members in the work force. Monthly Labor Review, 113, 14–19.Google Scholar
  23. Haygne, H. V. (1997). Developments in women’s labor force participation. Monthly Labor Review, 120, 41–46.Google Scholar
  24. Helwig, A. A. (1998). Gender-role stereotyping: Testing theory with a longitudinal sample. Sex Roles, 38, 403–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  26. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. The American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jackson, D. W., & Tein, J. (1998). Adolescents’ conceptualization of adult roles: Relationships with age, gender, work goal, and maternal employment. Sex Roles, 38, 987–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Killeen, L. A., López-Zafra, E., & Eagly, A. H. (2006). Envisioning oneself as a leader: Comparison of women and men in Spain and the United States. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 312–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Knox, M., Funk, J., Elliott, R., & Bush, E. G. (1998). Adolescents’ possible selves and their relationship to global self-esteem. Sex Roles, 39, 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuenzler, J., Walter, W., Reichart, E., & Pfister, G. (2001). Gender division of labour in unified Germany. Retrieved from http://www.politikwissenschaft.uni-wuerzburg.de/fileadmin/06060101/na_rep.pdf.
  31. Lenton, A. P., Sedikides, C., & Bruder, M. (2009). A latent semantic analysis of gender stereotype-consistency and narrowness in American English. Sex Roles, 60, 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lips, H. M. (2000). College students’ visions of power and possibility as moderate by gender. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lips, H. M. (2004). The gender gap in possible selves: Divergence in academic self-views among high school and university students. Sex Roles, 50, 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. The American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oyserman, D., & Markus, H. R. (1990). Possible selves and delinquency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 112–125.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Oyserman, D., Gant, L., & Ager, J. (1995). A socially contextualized model of African American identity: Possible selves and school persistence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1216–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reskin, B. F., & Roos, P. A. (1990). Job queues, gender queues: Explaining women’s inroads into male occupations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Riggs, J. M. (1997). Mandates for mothers and fathers: Perceptions of breadwinners and care givers. Sex Roles, 37, 565–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sanchez, L., & Thomson, E. (1997). Becoming mothers and fathers: Parenthood, gender, and the division of labor. Gender and Society, 11, 747–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. The state of the American woman (2009, October). Time Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/0,28757,1930277,00.html.
  41. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403–421.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Twenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Unemori, P., Omoregie, H., & Markus, H. R. (2004). Self-portraits: Possible selves in European-American, Chilean, Japanese, and Japanese-American cultural contexts. Self and Identity, 3, 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Waid, L. D., & Frazier, L. D. (2003). Cultural differences in possible selves during later life. Journal of Ageing Studies, 17, 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilde, A., & Diekman, A. B. (2005). Cross-cultural similarities and differences in dynamic stereotypes: A comparison between Germany and the United States. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 188–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Women in the labor force: A databook (2008). Bureau of Labor Statistics: United States Department of Labor. http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook2008.htm.
  47. Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2009). Gender identity. In M. Leary & R. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 109–128). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMiami UniversityOxfordUSA

Personalised recommendations