Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 63, Issue 5–6, pp 324–331 | Cite as

Size Does Matter: The Effects of Gender on Perceptions of Dating Violence

  • Sherry Hamby
  • Amy Jackson
Original Article

Abstract

Previous research has shown that people perceive intimate partner violence (IPV) as more serious in cases involving a male perpetrator and female victim versus other gender combinations. This study is the first to explore reasons for these differences. 181 undergraduates at a U.S. southeastern college rated one of four dating violence vignettes that varied by perpetrator and victim gender. Participants viewed male-on-female violence as more frightening primarily because males are stronger and bigger than female perpetrators. Physical differences were rated as significantly more important causes of fear than other personality/relationship dynamics. Because males are actually stronger and bigger than females, it appears that gendered perceptions of violence are based in real-world knowledge of gender differences, not merely gender stereotypes.

Keywords

Dating violence Intimate partner violence Asymmetry 

References

  1. Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006). Personal safety survey: Australia (Reissue). Sydney: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Browne, A., & Finkelhor, D. (1986). Impact of child sexual abuse: A review of the research. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 66–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cormier, N. S., & Woodworth, M. T. (2008). Do you see what I see? The influence of gender stereotypes on student and Royal Canadian Mounted Police perceptions of violent same-sex and opposite-sex relationships. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 17, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Durose, M., Harlow, C. W., Langan, P. A., Motivans, M., Rantala, R. R., & Smith, E. L. (2005). Family violence statistics including statistics on strangers and acquaintances. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  6. Dutton, D. G. (2010). The gender paradigm and the architecture of antiscience. Partner Abuse, 1, 5–25.Google Scholar
  7. Finkelhor, D., Turner, H., Ormrod, R., & Hamby, S. (2009). Violence, abuse and crime exposure in a national sample of children and youth. Pediatrics, 124, 1411–1423.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hall, K. (2009, June 23). Famous couples with taller women: Is height just a number? Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/14/famous-couples-with-talle_n_214948.html.
  9. Hamby, S. L. (2004). The spectrum of victimization and the implications for health. In K. Kendall-Tackett (Ed.), Health consequences of abuse in the family: A clinical guide for practice (pp. 7–27). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamby, S. L. (2009). The gender debate on intimate partner violence: Solutions and dead ends. Psychological Trauma, 1, 24–34.Google Scholar
  11. Hamel, J. (2007). Toward a gender-inclusive conception of intimate partner violence research and theory: Part 1, Traditional perspectives. International Journal of Men’s Health, 6, 36–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamel, J., Desmarais, S., & Nicholls, T. (2007). Perceptions of motives in intimate partner violence: Expressive versus coercive violence. Violence and Victims, 22, 563–576.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris, R. J., & Cook, C. A. (1994). Attributions about spouse abuse: It matters who the batterers and victims are. Sex Roles, 30, 553–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Smutzler, N., & Bates, L. (1997). A brief review of the research on husband violence, Part III: Sociodemographic factors, relationship factors, and differing consequences of husband and wife violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2, 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Houry, D., Rhodes, K. V., Kemball, R. S., Click, L., Cerulli, C., McNutt, L., et al. (2008). Differences in female and male victims and perpetrators of partner violence with respect to WEB scores. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 1041–1055.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. The American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Institute for Women’s Policy Research. (2009). The gender wage gap: 2008. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  18. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2010). Controversies involving gender and intimate partner violence in the United States. Sex Roles, 62, 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lindle, R., Metter, E., Lynch, N., Fleg, J., Fozard, J., Tobin, J., et al. (1997). Age and gender comparisons of muscle strength in 654 women and men aged 20–93 yr. Journal of Applied Physiology, 83, 1581–1587.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ogden, C. L., Fryar, C. D., Carroll, M. D., & Flegal, K. M. (2004). Mean body weight, height, and body mass index, United States 1960–2002. Atlanta: National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  21. Pierce, C. A. (1996). Body height and romantic attraction: A meta-analytic test of the male-taller norm. Social Behavior and Personality, 24, 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Poorman, P., Seelau, E. P., & Seelau, S. M. (2003). Perceptions of domestic abuse in same-sex relationships and implications for criminal justice and mental health responses. Violence and Victims, 18, 659–669.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Seelau, S. M., & Seelau, E. P. (2005). Gender-role stereotypes and perceptions of heterosexual, gay and lesbian domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sorenson, S. B., & Taylor, C. A. (2005). Female aggression towards male intimate partners: An examination of social norms in a community-based sample. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 78–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sorenson, S. B., & Thomas, K. A. (2009). Views of intimate partner violence in same-and-opposite-sex relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stark, E. (2010). Do violent acts equal abuse? Resolving the gender parity/asymmetry dilemma. Sex Roles, 62, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Straus, M. A. (1993). Physical assaults by wives: A major social problem. In R. Gelles & D. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 67–87). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Straus, M. A. (2005). Gender and partner violence in world perspective: Some results from the International Dating Violence Study. Paper presented at the 9th International Family Violence Research Conference, Portsmouth, NH.Google Scholar
  29. Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1990). Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8, 145 families. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  30. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the national violence against women survey. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Justice.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologySewanee, the University of the SouthSewaneeUSA

Personalised recommendations