Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 63, Issue 1–2, pp 18–31 | Cite as

Integrating Social Comparison Theory and Self-Esteem within Objectification Theory to Predict Women’s Disordered Eating

  • Tracy L. Tylka
  • Natalie J. Sabik
Original Article

Abstract

This study integrated social comparison theory and self-esteem into the objectification theory framework to broaden our understanding of sexual objectification as it relates to body shame and disordered eating. Women (N = 274) from a Midwestern U.S. college completed measures of sexual objectification via appearance feedback, body surveillance, body shame, body comparison, self-esteem, and disordered eating. Structural equation modeling indicated that this expanded model fit the data. Appearance feedback predicted body surveillance, body comparison, self-esteem and—unexpectedly—disordered eating. Body surveillance, body comparison, and self-esteem predicted body shame. Furthermore, hierarchical moderated regression revealed that body comparison moderated the body surveillance—disordered eating link; women who frequently monitored their body and compared it to others’ bodies reported the highest disordered eating.

Keywords

Objectification theory Appearance feedback Body surveillance Body shame Body comparison Self-esteem Eating disorder symptomatology 

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Augustus-Horvath, C. L., & Tylka, T. L. (2009). A test and extension of objectification theory as it predicts disordered eating: Does women’s age matter? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 253–265. doi: 10.1037/a0014637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenon of oppression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bessenoff, G. R. (2006). Can the media affect us? Social comparison, self-discrepancy, and the thin ideal. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 239–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00292.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brookings, J. B., & Wilson, J. F. (1994). Personality and family-environment predictors of self-reported eating attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 313–326. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6302_10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cahill, S., & Mussap, A. J. (2007). Emotional reactions following exposure to idealized bodies predict unhealthy body change attitudes and behaviors in women and men. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 62, 631–639. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.11.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Calogero, R. M., Herbozo, S., & Thompson, J. K. (2009). Complementary weightism: The potential costs of appearance-related commentary for women’s self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 120–132. doi: 0361-6843/09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cook-Cottone, C., & Phelps, L. A. (2003). Body dissatisfaction in college women: Identification of risk and protective factors to guide college counseling practices. Journal of College Counseling, 6, 80–89.Google Scholar
  10. Cronbach, L. J. (1987). Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 414–417. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.102.3.414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Downs, D. M., James, S., & Cowan, G. (2006). Body objectification, self-esteem, and relationship satisfaction: A comparison of exotic dancers and college women. Sex Roles, 54, 745–752. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9042-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Engeln-Maddox, R. (2005). Cognitive responses to idealized media images of women: The relationship of social comparison and critical processing to body image disturbance in college women. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 1114–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fingeret, M. C., & Gleaves, D. H. (2004). Sociocultural, feminist, and psychological influences on women’s body satisfaction: A structural modeling analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 370–380. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00154.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 115–134. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experience and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garner, D. M., Olmsted, M. P., Bohr, Y., & Garfinkel, P. E. (1982). The eating attitudes test: Psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychological Medicine, 12, 871–878.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Groesz, L. M., Levine, M. P., & Murnen, S. K. (2002). The effect of experimental presentation of thin media images on body satisfaction. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31, 1–16. doi: 10.1002/eat.10005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Heinberg, L. J., & Thompson, J. K. (1995). Body image and televised images of thinness and attractiveness: A controlled laboratory investigation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14, 325–338.Google Scholar
  20. Herbozo, S., & Thompson, J. K. (2006). Development and validation of the verbal commentary on physical appearance scale: Considering both positive and negative commentary. Body Image, 3, 335–344. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.10.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hesse-Biber, S., Leavy, P., Quinn, C. E., & Zoino, J. (2006). The mass marketing of disordered eating and eating disorders: The social psychology of women, thinness, and culture. Women’s Studies International Forum, 29, 208–224. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2006.03.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kilbourne, J. (2000). Can’t buy my love: How advertising changes the way we think and feel. New York: Simon and Shuster.Google Scholar
  24. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  25. Kozee, H. B., & Tylka, T. L. (2006). A test of objectification theory with lesbian women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 348–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00310.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kozee, H. B., Tylka, T. L., Augustus-Horvath, C. L., & Denchik, A. L. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Interpersonal Sexual Objectification Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 176–189. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00351.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levy, A. (2005). Feminist chauvinist pigs: Women and the rise of raunch culture. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  28. Lew, A., Mann, T., Myers, H., Taylor, S., & Bower, J. (2007). Thin-ideal media and women’s body dissatisfaction: Prevention using downward social comparisons on non-appearance dimensions. Sex Roles, 57, 543–556. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9274-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lin, L. F., & Kulik, J. A. (2002). Social comparison and women’s body satisfaction. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 115–123. doi: 10.1207/153248302753674622.Google Scholar
  30. Lindberg, S. M., Grabe, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2007). Gender, pubertal development, and peer sexual harassment predict objectified body consciousness in early adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 723–742.Google Scholar
  31. Mazzeo, S. E. (1999). Modification of an existing measure of body image preoccupation and its relationship to disordered eating in female college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 42–50. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.46.1.42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376–390. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mercurio, A. E., & Landry, L. J. (2008). Self-objectification and well-being: The impact of self-objectification on women’s overall sense of self-worth and life satisfaction. Sex Roles, 58, 458–466. doi: 10.1007/s11199-007-9357-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moradi, B., & Rottenstein, A. (2007). Objectification theory and deaf cultural identity attitudes: Roles in deaf women’s eating disorder symptomatology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 178–188. doi: 10.1037/0022-1067.54.2.178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moradi, B., & Huang, Y. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 373–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moradi, B., Dirks, D., & Matteson, A. V. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomatology: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 420–428. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morrison, T. G., Kalin, R., & Morrison, M. A. (2004). Body-image evaluation and body-image investment among adolescents: A test of sociocultural and social comparison theories. Adolescence, 39, 571–593.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Morry, M. M., & Staska, S. L. (2001). Magazine exposure: Internalization, self-objectification, eating attitudes, and body satisfaction in male and female university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33, 269–279. doi: 10.1037/h0087148.Google Scholar
  40. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2006). Mplus user’s guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  41. Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Paxton, S. J., Schutz, H. K., Wertheim, E. H., & Muir, S. L. (1999). Friendship clique and peer influences on body image concerns, dietary restraint, extreme weight-loss behaviors, and binge eating in adolescent girls. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 255–266. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.108.2.255.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pettijohn, T. F., & Jungeberg, B. J. (2004). Playboy playmate curves: Changes in facial and body feature preferences across social and economic conditions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1186–1197. doi: 10.1177/0146167204264078.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Phan, T., & Tylka, T. L. (2006). Exploring a model and moderators of disordered eating with Asian American college women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 36–47. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pipher, M. (1994). Reviving Ophelia: Saving the selves of adolescent girls. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  46. Robinson, J. P., & Shaver, P. R. (1973). Measures of social psychological attitudes (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  47. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Russell, W. D., & Cox, R. H. (2003). Social physique anxiety, body dissatisfaction, and self-esteem in college females of differing exercise frequency, perceived weight discrepancy, and race. Journal of Sport Behavior, 26, 297–318.Google Scholar
  49. Russell, D. W., Kahn, J. H., Spoth, R., & Altmaier, E. M. (1998). Analyzing data from experimental studies: A latent variable structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 18–29. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.45.1.18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shomaker, L. B., & Furman, W. (2007). Same-sex peers’ influence on young women’s body image: An experimental manipulation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 871–895. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2007.26.8.871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Steer, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2008). The role of self-objectification in women’s sexual functioning. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 27, 205–225. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2008.27.3.205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stice, E., Spangler, D., & Agras, S. W. (2001). Exposure to media-portrayed thin-ideal images adversely affects vulnerable girls: A longitudinal experiment. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 20, 270–288. doi: 10.1521/jscp.20.3.270.22309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stormer, S. M., & Thompson, J. K. (1996). Explanations of body image disturbance: A test of maturational status, negative verbal commentary, social comparison, and sociocultural hypotheses. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 19, 193–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Striegel-Moore, R. H., & Cachelin, F. M. (1999). Body image concerns and disordered eating in adolescent girls: Risk and protective factors. In N. G. Johnson, M. C. Roberts, & J. Worrel (Eds.), Beyond appearance: A new look at adolescent girls (pp. 85–108). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Szymanski, D. M., & Henning, S. L. (2007). The role of self-objectification in women’s depression: A test of objectification theory. Sex Roles, 56, 45–53. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9147-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tantleff-Dunn, S., Thompson, J. K., & Dunn, M. E. (1995). The Feedback on Physical Appearance Scale (FOPAS): Questionnaire development and psychometric evaluation. Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 3, 332–341.Google Scholar
  57. Thompson, J. K., Coovert, M. D., Richards, K. J., Johnson, S., & Cattarin, J. (1995). Development of body image, eating disturbance, and general psychological functioning in female adolescents: Covariance structural modeling and longitudinal investigations. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 18, 221–236. doi: 10.1002/1098-108X(199511)18:3<221::AID-EAT2260180304>3.0.CO;2-D.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Thompson, J. K., Coovert, M. D., & Stormer, S. M. (1999). Body image, social comparison, and eating disturbance: A covariance structure model investigation. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 26, 43–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Tiggemann, M., & Pickering, A. S. (1996). Role of television in adolescent women’s body dissatisfaction and drive for thinness. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 20, 199–203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2001). A test of objectification theory in former dancers and non-dancers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tiggemann, M., & McGill, B. (2004). The role of social comparison in the effect of magazine advertisements on women’s mood and body dissatisfaction. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 23, 23–44. doi: 10.1521/jscp.23.1.23.26991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tylka, T. L., & Hill, M. S. (2004). Objectification theory as it relates to disordered eating among college women. Sex Roles, 51, 719–730. doi: 10.1007/s11199-004-0721-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tylka, T. L., & Subich, L. M. (2004). Examining a multidimensional model of eating disorder symptomatology among college women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 314–328. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.51.3.314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tylka, T. L., & Augustus-Horvath, C. L. (in press). Fighting self-objectification in prevention and intervention contexts. In R. M. Calogero, S. Tantleff-Dunn, & J. K. Thompson (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  65. Tylka, T. L., Bergeron, D., & Schwartz, J. P. (2005). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Male Body Attitudes Scale (MBAS). Body Image, 2, 161–175. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.03.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. van den Berg, P., Paxton, S. J., Keery, H., Wall, M., Guo, J., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2007). Body dissatisfaction and body comparison with media images in males and females. Body Image, 4, 257–268. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.04.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. van den Berg, P., & Thompson, J. K. (2007). Self-schema and social comparison explanations of body dissatisfaction: A laboratory investigation. Body Image, 4, 29–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. van den Berg, P., Thompson, J. K., Obremski-Brandon, K., & Coovert, M. (2002). The tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbance: A covariance structure modeling investigation testing the meditational role of appearance comparison. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 53, 1007–1020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
  70. Yamamiya, Y., Shroff, H., & Thompson, J. K. (2008). The tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbance: A replication with a Japanese sample. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 41, 88–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyOhio State UniversityMarionUSA
  2. 2.Women’s StudiesUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations