Sex Roles

, Volume 63, Issue 1–2, pp 6–17 | Cite as

Here’s Looking at You: Self-Objectification, Body Image Disturbance, and Sorority Rush

  • Ashley Marie Rolnik
  • Renee Engeln-Maddox
  • Steven A. Miller
Original Article


This study investigated the impact of sorority rush on self-objectification and body image disturbance. First-year undergraduate women either participating (n = 68) or not participating (n = 59) in sorority rush at a U.S. Midwestern university completed online surveys at four time points. It was predicted that rush participation would lead to increases in self-objectification, which in turn would lead to increases in body shame and eating disordered behavior and attitudes. Results supported predictions based on objectification theory at a single time point, but not longitudinally. Rush participants evidenced higher levels of self-objectification and eating disordered behavior at all time points. Body mass index predicted dropping out of the rush process and was negatively correlated with satisfaction with the rush process.


Body shame Objectification theory Sexual objectification Sororities Eating disorders 


  1. Alexander, L. A. (1998). The prevalence of eating disorders and eating disordered behaviors in sororities. College Student Journal, 32, 66–75.Google Scholar
  2. Atlas, G., & Morier, D. (1994). The sorority rush process: Self-selection, acceptance criteria, and the effect of rejection. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 346–353.Google Scholar
  3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The mediator-moderator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Basow, S. A., Foran, K. A., & Bookwala, J. (2007). Body objectification, social pressure, and disordered eating behavior in college women: The role of sorority membership. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 394–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, C. B., Bull, S., Schaumberg, K., Cauble, A., & Franco, A. (2008). Effectiveness of peer-led eating disorders prevention: A replication trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 347–354.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, C. B., Smith, L. M., & Ciao, A. C. (2006). Peer-facilitated eating disorder prevention: A randomized effectiveness trial of cognitive dissonance and media advocacy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 550–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bessenoff, G. R., & Sherman, J. W. (2000). Automatic and controlled components of prejudice toward fat people: Evaluation versus stereotype activation. Social Cognition, 18, 329–353.Google Scholar
  8. Breines, J. G., Crocker, J., & Garcia, J. A. (2008). Self-objectification and well-being in women’s daily lives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 583–598.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Calogero, R. M., Davis, W. N., & Thompson, J. K. (2005). The role of self-objectification in the experience of women with eating disorders. Sex Roles, 52, 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohlan, M. (Director). (2006). Rushed [Online documentary]. Retrieved from
  11. Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing meditational models with longitudinal data: questions in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Conner, T. S., Feldman Barrett, L., Tugade, M. M., & Tennen, H. (2007). Idiographic personality: The theory and practice of experience sampling. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 79–96). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  13. Crandall, C. S. (1988). Social contagion of binge eating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 588–598.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dillon, S. (2007, February 25). Sorority evictions raise issues of looks and bias. The New York Times. Retrieved from
  15. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T.-A., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Garner, D. M., Olmstead, M. P., Bohr, Y., & Garkinel, P. E. (1982). The eating attitudes test: psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychological Medicine, 12, 871–878.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gollob, H. F., & Reichardt, C. S. (1991). Interpreting and estimating indirect effects assuming time lags really matter. In L. M. Collins & J. L. Horn (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions (pp. 243–259). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hebl, M. R., King, E. B., & Lin, J. (2004). The swimsuit becomes us all: Ethnicity, gender, and vulnerability to self-objectification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1322–1331.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2007). LISREL (Version 8.80) [Computer Software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  22. Keller, M. J., & Hart, D. (1982). The effects of sorority and fraternity rush on students’ self-images. Journal of College Student Personnel, 23, 257–261.Google Scholar
  23. Kozee, H. B., & Tylka, T. L. (2006). A test of objectification theory with lesbian women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 348–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kozee, H. B., Tylka, T. L., Augustus-Horvath, C. L., & Denchik, A. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Interpersonal Sexual Objectification Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 176–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lindberg, S. M., Grabe, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2007). Gender, pubertal development, and peer sexual harassment predict objectified body consciousness in early adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 723–742.Google Scholar
  26. MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analysis of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12, 23–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mazzeo, S. E. (1999). Modification of an existing measure of body image preoccupation and its relationship to disordered eating in female college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McKinley, N. M. (1998). Gender differences in undergraduates’ body esteem: The mediating effect of objectified body consciousness and actual/ideal weight discrepancy. Sex Roles, 39, 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McKinley, N. M. (1999). Women and objectified body consciousness: Mothers’ and daughters’ body experience in cultural, developmental, and familial context. Developmental Psychology, 35, 760–769.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. McKinley, N. M. (2006a). Longitudinal gender differences in objectified body consciousness and weight-related attitudes and behaviors: Cultural and developmental contexts in the transition from college. Sex Roles, 54, 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McKinley, N. M. (2006b). The developmental and cultural contexts of objectified body consciousness: A longitudinal analysis of two cohorts of women. Developmental Psychology, 42, 679–687.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mercurio, A. E., & Landry, L. J. (2008). Self-objectification and well-being: The impact of self-objectification on women’s overall sense of self-worth and life satisfaction. Sex Roles, 58, 458–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miner-Rubino, K., Twenge, J. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2002). Trait self-objectification in women: Affective and personality correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 147–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mongell, S., & Roth, A. E. (1991). Sorority rush as a two-sided matching mechanism. The American Economic Review, 81, 441–464.Google Scholar
  37. Moradi, B., Dirks, D., & Matteson, A. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of sociocultural standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomatology: An examination and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 420–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moradi, B., & Huang, Y. P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Muehlenkamp, J. J., & Saris-Baglama, R. N. (2002). Self-objectification and its psychological outcomes for college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 371–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nezlek, J. B. (2001). Multilevel random coefficient analyses of event- and interval-contingent data in social and personality psychology research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 771–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Preacher, K. J. (August, 2008). Anne Anastasi Distinguished Early Career Contributions Award: Approaches to hypothesis testing in mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  43. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Prouty, A. M., Protinsky, H. O., & Canady, D. (2002). College women: Eating behaviors and help-seeking preferences. Adolescence, 37, 353–363.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Quinn, D. M., Kallen, R. W., & Cathey, C. (2006). Body on my mind: The lingering effect of state self-objectification. Sex Roles, 55, 869–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schulken, E. D., & Pinciaro, P. J. (1997). Sorority women’s body size perceptions and their weight-related attitudes and behaviors. Journal of American College Health, 46, 69–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Slater, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2002). A test of objectification theory in adolescent girls. Sex Roles, 46, 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stice, E. (2002). Risk and maintenance factors for eating pathology: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 825–848.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Stice, E., Marti, C. N., Spoor, S., Presnell, K., & Shaw, H. (2008). Dissonance and healthy weight eating disorder prevention programs: Long-term effects from a randomized efficacy trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 329–340.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Stice, E., Rohde, P., Gau, J., & Shaw, H. (2009). An effectiveness trial of a dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program for high-risk adolescent girls. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 825–834.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Teachman, B. A., Gapinski, K. D., Brownell, K. D., Rawlins, M., & Jeyaram, S. (2003). Demonstrations of implicit anti-fat bias: The impact of providing causal information and evoking empathy. Health Psychology, 22, 68–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Tiggemann, M., & Boundy, M. (2008). Effect of environment and appearance compliment on college women’s self-objectification, mood, body shame, and cognitive performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tiggemann, M., Hargreaves, D., Polivy, J., & McFarlane, T. (2004). A word-stem completion task to assess implicit processing of appearance-related information. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57, 73–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2001). A test of objectification theory in former dancers and non-dancers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tylka, T. L., & Hill, M. S. (2004). Objectification theory as it relates to disordered eating among college women. Sex Roles, 51, 719–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tylka, T. L., & Subich, L. M. (2004). Examining a multidimensional model of eating disorder symptomatology among college women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 314–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashley Marie Rolnik
    • 1
    • 3
  • Renee Engeln-Maddox
    • 1
  • Steven A. Miller
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Clinical PsychologyArgosy UniversityChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyLoyola University ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations