Here’s Looking at You: Self-Objectification, Body Image Disturbance, and Sorority Rush
- 2.5k Downloads
This study investigated the impact of sorority rush on self-objectification and body image disturbance. First-year undergraduate women either participating (n = 68) or not participating (n = 59) in sorority rush at a U.S. Midwestern university completed online surveys at four time points. It was predicted that rush participation would lead to increases in self-objectification, which in turn would lead to increases in body shame and eating disordered behavior and attitudes. Results supported predictions based on objectification theory at a single time point, but not longitudinally. Rush participants evidenced higher levels of self-objectification and eating disordered behavior at all time points. Body mass index predicted dropping out of the rush process and was negatively correlated with satisfaction with the rush process.
KeywordsBody shame Objectification theory Sexual objectification Sororities Eating disorders
- Alexander, L. A. (1998). The prevalence of eating disorders and eating disordered behaviors in sororities. College Student Journal, 32, 66–75.Google Scholar
- Atlas, G., & Morier, D. (1994). The sorority rush process: Self-selection, acceptance criteria, and the effect of rejection. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 346–353.Google Scholar
- Bessenoff, G. R., & Sherman, J. W. (2000). Automatic and controlled components of prejudice toward fat people: Evaluation versus stereotype activation. Social Cognition, 18, 329–353.Google Scholar
- Cohlan, M. (Director). (2006). Rushed [Online documentary]. Retrieved from http://www.marcuscohlan.com/.
- Conner, T. S., Feldman Barrett, L., Tugade, M. M., & Tennen, H. (2007). Idiographic personality: The theory and practice of experience sampling. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 79–96). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Dillon, S. (2007, February 25). Sorority evictions raise issues of looks and bias. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com.
- Gollob, H. F., & Reichardt, C. S. (1991). Interpreting and estimating indirect effects assuming time lags really matter. In L. M. Collins & J. L. Horn (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions (pp. 243–259). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2007). LISREL (Version 8.80) [Computer Software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
- Keller, M. J., & Hart, D. (1982). The effects of sorority and fraternity rush on students’ self-images. Journal of College Student Personnel, 23, 257–261.Google Scholar
- Lindberg, S. M., Grabe, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2007). Gender, pubertal development, and peer sexual harassment predict objectified body consciousness in early adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 723–742.Google Scholar
- MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Mongell, S., & Roth, A. E. (1991). Sorority rush as a two-sided matching mechanism. The American Economic Review, 81, 441–464.Google Scholar
- Moradi, B., Dirks, D., & Matteson, A. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of sociocultural standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomatology: An examination and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 420–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Preacher, K. J. (August, 2008). Anne Anastasi Distinguished Early Career Contributions Award: Approaches to hypothesis testing in mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar