Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 62, Issue 3–4, pp 264–277 | Cite as

The Sexual Double Standard and Gender Differences in Predictors of Perceptions of Adult-Teen Sexual Relationships

  • Daniel SahlEmail author
  • Jennifer Reid Keene
Original Article

Abstract

We study gender differences and the effects of adult’s gender, an authority gap, and an age gap on university students’ perceptions of adult-teen sexual relationships. We specifically examine: the adult’s criminality, damage to the teen’s reputation, and emotional damage to the teen. We use a sample of 2,871 students from a Southwestern university in the U.S. who judged vignettes describing an adult-teen encounter. OLS regression demonstrated that women judged the scenarios more negatively than men. Further analyses found relationships between the experimental variables and each dependent variable and interactions by respondent’s gender and among the experimental variables. Results demonstrate a sexual double standard and highlight respondent’s gender, the age gap, and the authority context for perceptions of adult-teen relationships.

Keywords

Adult-teen sexual relationships Sexual double standard Statutory rape 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Anastasia Prokos, Kathryn Hausbeck, and Alexis Kennedy for helpful comments and suggestions on previous drafts of this manuscript. Also, Mary Ellen Fromuth deserves our gratitude for having provided copies of her research instrument.

References

  1. Aubrey, J. S. (2004). Sex and punishment: an examination of sexual consequences and the sexual double standard in teen programming. Sex Roles, 50, 505–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Back, S., & Lipps, H. M. (1998). Child sexual abuse: victim age, victim gender, and observer gender as factors contributing to attributions of responsibility. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22, 1239–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bay-Cheng, L. (2003). The trouble of teen sex: the construction of adolescent sexuality through school-based sexuality education. Sex Education, 3, 61–74.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, S. T., Kuriloff, P. J., & Lottes, I. (1994). Understanding attributions of blame in stranger rape and date rape situations: an examination of gender, race, identification, and students’ social perceptions of rape victims. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1719–1734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bornstein, B. H., Kaplan, D. L., & Perry, A. R. (2006). Child abuse in the eyes of the beholder: lay perceptions of child sexual and physical abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 31, 375–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bottoms, B., Nysse-Carris, K. L., Harris, T., & Tyda, K. (2003). Jurors perceptions of adolescent sexual assault victims who have intellectual disabilities. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 205–227.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bursik, K. (1992). Perceptions of sexual harassment in an academic context. Sex Roles, 27, 401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter, L. (1998). From girls into women: scripts for sexuality and romance in Seventeen Magazine, 1974–1994. The Journal of Sex Research, 35, 158–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cavanagh, S. L. (2004). Upsetting desires in the classroom: school sex scandals and the pedagogy of the femme fatale. Psychoanalysis, Culture, and Society, 9, 315–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cocca, C. E. (2004). Jailbait: The politics of statutory rape laws in the United States. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  11. Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: a review and methodological critique of two decades of research. The Journal of Sex Research, 40, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crawford, S. D., Couper, M. P., & Lamias, M. J. (2001). Web surveys: perceptions of burden. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 146–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Denov, M. (2003). The myth of innocence: sexual scripts and the recognition of child sexual abuse by female perpetrators. The Journal of Sex Research, 40, 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dollar, M., Perry, A., Fromuth, M. E., & Holt, A. (2004). Influence of gender roles on perceptions of teacher/adolescent student sexual relations. Sex Roles, 50, 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dougherty, T., Turban, D., England, D., Dwyer, P., & Lapreze, M. W. (1996). Factors affecting perceptions of workplace sexual harassment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 489–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duggan, L. M., Aubrey, M., Doherty, E., Isquith, P., Levine, M., & Scheiner, J. (1989). The credibility of children as witnesses in a simulated child sex abuse trial. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children’s testimony (pp. 71–99). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  17. Freel, M. (2003). Child sexual abuse and the male monopoly: an empirical exploration of gender and a sexual interest in children. The British Journal of Social Work, 33, 481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fromme, R. E., & Emihovich, C. (1998). Boys will be boys: young males’ perceptions of women, sexuality, and prevention. Education and Urban Society, 30, 172–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fromuth, M. E., & Holt, A. (2008). Perception of teacher sexual misconduct by age of student. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 17, 163–179.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fromuth, M. E., Holt, A., & Parker, A. L. (2001). Factors affecting college students’ perceptions of sexual relationships between high school students and teachers. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 10, 59–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust Web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about Internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hetherton, J., & Beardsall, L. (1998). Decisions and attitudes concerning child sexual abuse: does the gender of the perpetrator make a difference to child protection professionals? Child Abuse & Neglect, 22, 1265–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Horvath, M. A. H., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2007). Below the age of consent: influences on moral and legal judgments of adult-adolescent sexual relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 2980–3009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jonason, P. K., & Marks, M. J. (2008). Common vs. uncommon sexual acts: evidence for the sexual double standard. Sex Roles, 60, 357–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kimmel, M. (2008). Guyland: The perilous world where boys become men. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  26. Krahe, B., Bieneck, S., & Scheinberger-Olwig, R. (2007). Adolescents’ sexual scripts: schematic representations of consensual and nonconsensual heterosexual interactions. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 316–327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mark, M., & Miller, M. L. (1986). The effects of sexual permissiveness, target gender, subject gender, and attitude towards women on social perception: in search of the double standard. Sex Roles, 15, 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marks, M., & Fraley, C. M. (2005). The sexual double standard: fact or fiction? Sex Roles, 52, 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maynard, C., & Weiderman, M. (1998). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of child sexual abuse: effects of age, sex, and gender-role attitudes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 21, 833–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Measor, L. (2000). Young people’s views on sex education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Oliveri, R. (2000). Statutory rape law and enforcement in the wake of welfare reform. Stanford Law Review, 52, 463–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rogers, P., & Davies, M. (2007). Perceptions of victims and perpetrators in a depicted child sexual abuse case: gender and age factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 566–584.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1987). A sexual scripts approach. In J. Greer & W. T. O’Donohue (Eds.), Theories of human sexuality (pp. 363–383). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, H. D., Fromuth, M. E., & Morris, C. (1997). Effects of gender on perceptions of child sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 6, 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tanenbaum, L. (2000). Slut! Growing up female with a reputation. New York: Seven Stories.Google Scholar
  36. Tolman, D. L. (1994). Doing desire: adolescent girls’ struggle for/with sexuality. Gender& Society, 8, 324–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. University of Nevada, Las Vegas. (2007). Student statistics. Retrieved from: http://www.unlv.edu/about/facts.html.
  38. Wayne, J. L. (2000). Disentangling the power bases of sexual harassment: comparing gender, age, and position power. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 11, 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Winks, P. L. (1982). Legal implications of sexual contact between teachers and students. Journal of Law and Education, 11, 437–477.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of Nevada Las VegasLas VegasUSA

Personalised recommendations